is what I see.  Later.

the politics of hope proponents start with the namecalling and putdowns?

Not very unifying or likely to garner support.

In fact, the person I was communicating with said:

"Alegre 'must' disown."

Spare me the hope and unity, will you?

does not make me dumb.

I assure you I am not playing.

I don't particularly like talking about people behind their backs.

And I don't like when people categorize others based on their own bias, as if they are the ones who know better.

was that I found there was a disconnect when people seek support, but require those giving it to atone for their sins.

The fact is that you have labeled and made silly demands as a precondition.

that one seeking support is the one that woos, then what can I say?

Keep asking people to crawl, and let's see how much success you have.

I see that Obama is taking a different tact toward Clinton supporters.

makes me wonder who put you in charge?

As if you are the decider?

in my view.

because rhetoric is just that.

as well.  Virtual reality.

I made my point.

You don't win supporters by calling them names or expecting them to crawl.

make it absolute reality.

Sorry, but I get to discuss what I like, and my point was much more broad.

hypocrites and psychos.

Lovely way to earn their support.

and there is plenty of hate speech at both venues.

What that has to do with the means to obtaining support from others is beyond me.

but suggest that people look at their own conduct, irrespective of what others do.

Is that too much to ask for?