William Rehnquist Is Dead

:-( Now Bush can appoint another Court Justice, oh joy...

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

8 Comments

by Bill Felmlee 2005-09-03 07:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Just posted on NYT.com
Text, in case link is blocked if not a subscriber:

September 3, 2005
Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist Dies
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist died Saturday evening at his home in suburban Virginia, said Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg.

A statement from the spokeswoman said he was surrounded by his three children when he died in Arlington.

"The Chief Justice battled thyroid cancer since being diagnosed last October and continued to perform his dues on the court until a precipitous decline in his health the last couple of days," she said.

Rehnquist was appointed to the Supreme Court as an associate justice in 1971 by President Nixon and took his seat on Jan. 7, 1982. He was elevated to chief justice by President Reagan in 1986.

His death ends a remarkable 33-year Supreme Court career during which Rehnquist oversaw the court's conservative shift, presided over an impeachment trial and helped decide a presidential election.

The death President Bush his second court opening within pour months and sets up what's expected to be an even more bruising Senate confirmation battle than that of John Roberts.

Rehnquist, 80 and ill with cancer, presided over President Clinton's impeachment trial in 1999, helped settle the 2000 presidential election in Bush's favor, and fashioned decisions over the years that diluted the powers of the federal government while strengthening those of the states.


by Bill Felmlee 2005-09-03 07:26PM | 0 recs
The court may actually move left
Bush would have a hard time finding someone more conservative than Rehnquist.

Considering that he has little to no "political capital" left, he'll be probably be looking for Anthony Kennedys, not Antonin Scalias.

The court may actually become more liberal.

by wayward 2005-09-03 07:39PM | 0 recs
Re: The court may actually move left
I wouldn't count on that.  Bush has met every previous challenge to his credibility by charging forward harder.  And anyone in the mold of Scalia or Thomas would indeed make the court more conservative.
by arenwin 2005-09-03 08:56PM | 0 recs
Does anyone know
if the O'Connor for Chief Justice thing has weight?

That would be something that folks could come together on.  Strictly pragmatically:

Keep two women.
First woman Chief Justice.
Consensus Choice for Chief, versus any alternative that Bush would consider.
Country comes together in time of crisis to keep the focus on post-Katrina work.
Both Roberts and O'Connor hearings become formalities...

something that one or two Senators might not mind happening.

I still oppose Roberts.  I still think my senators should vote no. But...I'm realistic enough to know that Roberts + O'Connor = a win / the best we could expect.

by kid oakland 2005-09-03 07:40PM | 0 recs
No Weight
O'Connor left the Court, at least partially, because her husband has Alzheimer's. That hasn't changed, and the CJ job is more time consuming than just being a Justice. It's not realistic that she'd be interested.

However, I think Bush is likely to tap a woman or Hispanic, but probably someone more conservative than O'Connor.

by SLinVA 2005-09-03 07:53PM | 0 recs
Re: No Weight
The same names pushed forward the last time show up again.  My first thought id that it will be Alberto (Abu) Gonzales.  He was being talked up as a likely SC judge once Bush killed off McCain.
by David Kowalski 2005-09-03 08:18PM | 0 recs
Re: No Weight
I'm expecting the kookiest minority female that Bush can find.
by EvanstonDem 2005-09-03 08:54PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------