Your post is full of insinuation, suppositions and assumptions. Running with the jist of the post, Obama is as dirty as your candidate. Ok, let's play. 1 candidate who is dirty and the other is dirty as well. So your argument is what? Evaluate who has less dirt? HRC still looses. We've seen this play before. It was called the 1990s and the actors were Newt, Bill, Rush, Dick Army, Hillary. The play was ok then but there's a new play now and the American ppl are choosing it over the old one. Don't be sore about it :)
there is nothing to this. You are comparing one person, who is a former VP candidate, leader in the Democratic party, fundraiser for the Clinton's v. an unelected citizen that has no part in the campaign.
Completely out the window. While everything is essentially up in the air with "ideas" being floated, Jerome has become a cheerleader for the Clintons. Is this the same Jerome who helped in writing CTG?#!@$@ How is it that' you've become an advocate in both obvious and subtle ways for the King and Queen of the DLC.
Michigan and Florida....your state party let you down. Knowing the rules full well you decided not to follow them and you have been penalized. Disenfranchised? Oh for god sakes, it's an insult to people who really have that happen to them.