Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Since Obama has put out his plan it is time to line the two plans up and see what the proposals are. So here we go!! Once again I am pulling the info from their websites so I am not going to link.

Please do not comment if you are going to do the following:

1. Rehash the AUMF vote and/or Obama's record on voting for the supplementals.

  1. State that Edwards is not sincere, honest or dedicated to his fight on poverty. If you want to take that approach PROVE IT! The bankruptcy bill he voted on had a min. wage increase in it. I think he made a trade off on that.
  2. MENTION HAIRCUTS or HOUSE SIZE in any fashion.
  3. Bring in any insinuations, right wing smear (aka the debate comments) or any other unsubstantiated attacks on EITHER candidate.

If because of these rules this diary only gets 10 comments I do not care. I am tired of my fact based diaries getting hijacked by the above subjects. Have I made myself clear?

If you want to discuss the pros and cons of their plans please do.

I DO NOT WORSHIP EDWARDS, THINK HE WALKS ON WATER OR HATE OBAMA. I base my decisions on plans, past actions and who I think is the best prepared to fix the deep problems in this country.

I am going to list them side by side by the breakdowns they have on their sites which are pretty similar.

EDWARDS

First his mission statement:

 

End Poverty by 2036: John Edwards believes that ending poverty should be a goal our nation actively pursues. A national goal will rally support for the cause and help us measure our progress. In 1999, Tony Blair announced a 20-year goal to end child poverty in Great Britain and he has already reduced child poverty by 17 percent [Washington Post, 4/3/2006]. Edwards calls for a national effort to:

Cut poverty by one third within a decade, lifting 12 million Americans out of poverty by 2016.
End poverty within 30 years, lifting 37 million Americans out of poverty by 2036

Jobs:

Rewarding Work
Create 1 Million Stepping Stone Jobs for Workers Who Take Responsibility

As much as 18 percent of former welfare recipients do not have a job. Edwards suggested creating 1 million temporary jobs over five years. However, some willing workers cannot find jobs because of the place they live, a lack of skills, experience, and references, or other obstacles like a criminal record The jobs would be reserved for individuals who cannot find other work after six months of looking, pay the minimum wage, and last up to 12 months. In return, workers must show up and work hard, stay off drugs, not commit any crimes, and pay child support. Studies have shown that these programs are successful moving people into permanent jobs. Jobs would be chosen carefully with local business and labor leaders to meet local needs without displacing existing workers. [Turner, Danziger and Seefeldt, 2006; Mathematica, 2002; CBPP, 1997; Ellwood and Welty, 1999]

Raise the Wage to $9.50 by 2012: Edwards will set a national goal of a minimum wage that equals half the average wage. To accomplish this goal, he will raise the minimum wage by 75 cents a year until it reaches $9.50 in 2012. Edwards will also restore the minimum wage for tipped workers to half the full minimum wage; the minimum wage for these workers has stood at $2.13 since 1997. [EPI, 2007]

Ensure Continued Rising Wages: Working families cannot rely on Washington to stand up for them. Instead, recent decades saw Congress tolerating a stagnant minimum wage while millions of families lost ground. Once the minimum wage reaches $9.50 an hour, Edwards will index it so that it automatically rises each year along with average wages, ensuring that all workers share in America's growth. [CBPP, 2006]

Take Care of the Caretakers: The Supreme Court recently ruled that home health care workers are not eligible for federal minimum wage protections. Millions of these care providers work long hours without overtime and at hourly rates below the minimum wage, and the occupation is projected to grow faster than any other job in America. Edwards will amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to include home health care workers. [Washington Post, 6/12/2007; BLS, 2004

Create Opportunity in Rural America. Nearly 90 percent of America's poorest counties are rural, and many have been hit hard by the struggles of the U.S. manufacturing and textile industries. Edwards believes in investing more in rural community colleges to strengthen "mid-skilled" industries and linking training to actual business needs. He also supports rural small business centers to build rural economies around homegrown businesses. [Rural Poverty Research Center, 2006; Center for the Study of Rural America, 2005]

Strengthen Labor Laws. Union workers earn 28 percent more than non-union workers, on average. Federal law promises workers the right to choose a union, but the law is poorly enforced, full of loopholes, and routinely violated by employers. Edwards supports the Employee Free Choice Act to give workers an effective, democratic choice over whether to form a union.

Obama

Jobs
Expand Transitional Jobs and Bridge Programs

Transitional jobs are a promising way to help chronically unemployed people break into the workplace. This approach places participants into temporary, subsidized wage-paying jobs. It also offers mentoring and social services designed to address the work-blocking problems like personal and family conflicts. Obama supports providing funding for both transitional jobs programs as well as bridge programs that partner the federal government with employers and community-based organizations to identify job opportunities, develop customized training programs, and place low-income employees in better jobs.

Create Career Pathways for Workers to Move up the Ladder

Barack Obama believes that all workers who want a job should not only be able to gain meaningful employment, but also be able to move up the career ladder to further support their families and serve as role models for their children. Obama has introduced legislation to help strengthen career ladders by first identifying regions and industries where career pathways are not fully developed and then establish public-private partnerships to lift up low-wage workers. Obama supports using the successful organized labor model of providing workers with additional skills and opportunities, and looks forward to working with organized labor to build more opportunities for low-income workers to reach economic security.

Ensure Freedom to Unionize

Barack Obama believes that workers should have the freedom to join a union without harassment or intimidation from their employers. Although an estimated 60 million Americans would join a union if given the opportunity, companies too often evade employment laws and deny workers the opportunity to organize and advocate for their rights. Obama is a cosponsor and strong advocate for the Employee Free Choice Act, a bipartisan effort to make the unionization process more transparent and increase penalties on companies that violate employee rights. He voted in favor of the legislation this year and will continue to fight for its passage. Obama also will fight to make the card check process more common and less difficult.

Help Youth Connect with Growing Job Sectors

Barack Obama will create the 5-E (Energy Efficiency, Environmental Education and Employment) Disconnected Youth Service Corps. This program would directly engage disconnected and disadvantaged youth in energy efficiency and environmental service opportunities to strengthen their communities while also providing them with practical skills and experience in important career fields of expected high-growth employment. The program would engage private sector employers and unions to provide apprenticeship opportunities. The program also encourages summer high school students to stay in school, and provides GED help and other wrap-around social services for drop-outs.

Improve Transportation Access to Jobs

Three quarters of welfare recipients live in areas that are poorly served by public transportation and low-income workers spend up to 36% of their incomes on transportation. As president, Obama will work to eliminate transportation disparities so that all Americans can lead meaningful and productive lives. Obama will strengthen the federal Jobs Access and Reverse Commute program to ensure that additional federal public transportation dollars flow to the highest-need communities and that urban planning initiatives take this aspect of transportation policy into account.

Increasing Minority Access to Capital

Access to capital is critically important to the development of minority-owned businesses. Yet there has been a growing gap between the amounts of venture capital and access to business loans available to minority-owned small businesses compared to other small businesses. Less than 1 percent of the $250 billion in venture capital dollars invested annually nationwide has been directed to the country's 4.4 million minority business owners. A recent study found that minority business owners, even if they have the same characteristics as other business owners, are significantly denied credit more frequently and required to pay higher interest rates than white applicants. To compound this problem, in recent years there has been a significant decline in the share of the Small Business Investment Company financings that have gone to minority-owned and women-owned businesses. In order to increase their size, capacity, and ability to do business with the Federal government and to compete in the open market, minority firms need greater access to venture capital investment, as well as greater access to business loans. Barack Obama will strengthen Small Business Administration programs that provide capital to minority-owned businesses, support outreach programs that help minority business owners apply for loans, and work to encourage the growth and capacity of minority firms.

Reduce Crime Recidivism by Providing Ex-Offender Supports

America is facing an incarceration and post-incarceration crisis in urban communities. Today, nearly 2 million children have a parent in a correctional facility. Barack Obama recognizes that it is simply unacceptable to keep ignoring this crisis in American families and communities. In the U.S. Senate, Obama has worked to provide job training, substance abuse and mental health counseling, and employment opportunities to ex-offenders. In addition to signing these important programs into law, Obama will create a prison-to-work incentive program, modeled on the successful Welfare-to-Work Partnership to create ties with employers, third-party agencies that provide training and support services to ex-offenders, and to improve ex-offender employment and job retention rates. Obama will also work on initiatives to reduce barriers in state correctional systems that prevent finding and maintaining employment

HOUSING

Edwards

Expanding Affordable Housing
Establish a New Era at HUD. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) needs an overhaul to make housing policy a force for economic opportunity. Too many low-income families are segregated in high-poverty neighborhoods, cutting them off from jobs and good schools and creating areas of concentrated poverty that undermine other antipoverty programs. Edwards suggested creating one million new housing vouchers over five years to let low-income families choose to live in better neighborhoods. He believes that we should also expand the supply of affordable housing that is economically integrated with other communities. He also proposed coordinating housing policies across metropolitan areas, cutting HUD bureaucracy, and requiring recipients of new housing vouchers to work if they can.

Fight Predatory Lending. Home ownership promotes economic security and, for most families, is the top generator of wealth. However, predatory lenders use deceptive terms and abusive interest rates and fees to strip away families' equity, reducing the amount of wealth they have saved in their homes and sometimes depriving them of their homes entirely. Edwards called for fair rules to protect homeowners

Create a Million New Housing Vouchers: Our current housing policies concentrate low-income families together, isolating willing workers from entry-level jobs and children from good schools. Edwards will create a million vouchers over five years to help low-income families move to better neighborhoods. At the same time, he will phase out housing projects that tie families to certain locations and are often lower quality and more expensive than private sector alternatives.

Revitalize Devastated Neighborhoods: Edwards believes that it is better to invest in struggling neighborhoods than abandon them. He will reform and expand the HOPE VI program to replace dilapidated housing in areas of concentrated poverty.

OBAMA

Housing
Create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund

In too many communities, low-income families are priced out of the housing market. Between 1993 and 2003, the number of units of affordable to low-income households fell by 1.2 million. Barack Obama believes we should create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund to develop affordable housing in mixed-income neighborhoods. The Affordable Housing Trust Fund would use a small percentage of the profits of two government-sponsored housing agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to create up to 14,000 new units of affordable housing every year.

Combat Mortgage Fraud and Subprime Loans

There is a growing epidemic of mortgage fraud crimes in which sophisticated scam artists cheat homeowners out of their mortgages. Some have estimated that more than 2 million homeowners with subprime mortgages are at risk of losing their homes. Barack Obama believes we must establish stiff penalties to deter fraud and protect consumers against abusive lending practices. Obama introduced the STOP FRAUD Act that would increase funding for federal law enforcement programs, create new criminal penalties for mortgage professionals found guilty of fraud, and require industry insiders to report suspicious activity. This bill also provides counseling to homeowners and tenants to avoid foreclosures. In the Illinois State Legislature, Obama cosponsored a bill creating the High Risk Home Loan Act to protect borrowers who enter into high-risk home loans. As president, Obama will continue to fight to ensure more Americans can achieve and protect the dream of home ownership.

Fully Fund the Community Development Block Grant

The Bush Administration has consistently attempted to cut funding for CDBG, by $1.2 billion next year and $6.9 billion over the next five years. Obama has fought against these cuts, and will restore funding for the CDBG program, which supports economic development and affordable housing opportunities in communities throughout the country.

HELPING FAMILIES SAVE

EDWARDS


Help Low-Income Workers Save with "Work Bonds."Edwards proposed a new tax credit to help low-income, working Americans save for the future. The credit would match wages to $500 per year and be directly deposited into a savings account. Edwards has also proposed expanding the Savers Credit to match the savings of low-income families.

Expand Access to Bank Accounts and Fight Abusive Payday Lending. An estimated 56 million Americans don't have bank accounts, and they pay check cashers $8 billion for services most banks provide for free. Short-term payday loans regularly charge interest rates above 300 percent. Edwards suggested subsidizing bank accounts for working families and national rules to prevent abusive payday lending. [Center for Economic Progress, 2004]

Obama has nothing under a similar heading so on to the next one.

EDUCATION

EDWARDS


Expand College Opportunity: In Greene County, North Carolina, Edwards helped launch a College for Everyone program that is helping students attend college this fall. He has proposed a similar national program where students who agree to work part-time during their first year at a public college would get their tuition paid. Research has shown that the first year of college is the most difficult one, where additional student aid can make the greatest difference. [Dynarski, 1999; Census, 2005]

Create Second-Chance Schools for High School Dropouts: As many as one-third of all students drop out of school, and the rates are even worse for poor and minority students. Almost a third of dropouts between the ages of 25 and 34 live in poverty. Large majorities of recent dropouts regret their decision and now believe that a high school degree is the key to good jobs. Edwards believes that we should create second-chance schools, including some in evenings and at community colleges, to help former dropouts get back on track. [Civic Enterprises, 2006; Manhattan Institute, 2006; Urban Institute, 2001]

Strengthen Public Schools: Edwards suggested expanding access to preschool programs such as Head Start and North Carolina's Smart Start, investing more in teacher pay and training to attract good teachers where we need them most, and strengthening high schools with smaller schools and a more challenging curriculum.

Investing in Family Literacy: Thirty million American adults have very limited literacy skills and the children of functionally illiterate parents are twice as likely to be illiterate themselves. Family literacy programs address the educational needs of both parents and children by enhancing the language skills of adults and providing age appropriate instruction to accelerate the cognitive development of children. President Bush has drastically cut funding for family literacy. John Edwards will restore funding and give family literacy programs the support they deserve

Give Bonuses to Middle-Class Schools Enrolling Low-Income Students: Edwards will provide $100 million for school districts implementing economic integration programs, helping finance transportation and additional resources for schools enrolling low-income children. Similar programs have successfully attracted suburban participation in places like St. Louis. [Century Foundation, 2002]

Create Magnet Schools Dedicated to Economic Integration: To attract more students to low-income areas, Edwards will double current federal magnet schools funding to $200 million a year and dedicate the increase to schools that draw students from across district lines and pledge to maintain economically diverse schools. The right magnet schools can attract middle-class suburban students to high-poverty urban neighborhoods, as does a Montessori school in Harford, if the school at the end of the bus ride is excellent. Nationally, an estimated 150,000 students are on waiting lists for magnet schools

OBAMA

Increase Funding for Head Start

Research shows that many poor and minority children do not enter kindergarten ready to learn. Black children start school substantially behind white children in reading and math, and these early achievement gaps expand throughout elementary school. Barack Obama supports increasing funding for the Head Start program to provide low-income preschool children with critically important learning skills, and supports the necessary role of parental involvement in the success of Head Start.

Place High-Quality Teachers in Low-Income Classrooms

Some studies have indicated that the most important factor in a child's education is the quality of their teacher. Barack Obama introduced a plan to support school districts that try new methods to improve student achievement and reward high-quality teachers and school leaders. Under his initiative, 20 districts across the country will get grants to develop innovative plans in consultation with their teacher unions. High-performing teachers, and those who take on new responsibilities, such as working at struggling schools and mentoring new teachers, will be eligible for pay increases beyond their base salary. These innovation districts will show results that can be replicated in other school districts.

Extend Summer School Opportunities to Low-Income Students

Students lose an average of two months or more worth of math facts and skills during the summer, with the largest learning loss affecting children who live in poverty, suffer from learning disabilities, or do not speak English at home. Barack Obama's "STEP UP" plan addresses the achievement gaps among grade-school children by supporting summer learning opportunities for disadvantaged children through partnerships between local schools and community organizations.

Make College More Affordable

College tuition rates are rising almost 10 percent a year. These surging tuitions priced over 200,000 students out of college altogether in 2004. Two decades ago, the Pell maximum grant covered 55 percent of costs at a public four-year college, compared with only 32 percent today. The very first bill Barack Obama introduced in the U.S. Senate was a bill to help make college more affordable by increasing the maximum Pell Grant amount to $5,100. Barack Obama will also eliminate wasteful subsidies to private banks under the federal student loan program. Reforming this program will save taxpayers billions of dollars each year -- money that Obama will direct to fund need-based grants, such as the Pell Grant.

EXTRAS: Promoting responsible families and a few other tidbits

EDWARDS


Encourage and Reward Responsibility from Fathers. Welfare reform required mothers to work and helps them find jobs, but it failed to touch poor fathers. It did not help fathers support their children and become valuable members of their family and their community. Edwards will require more fathers to help support their children and, in return, help them find work. He will reserve budget cuts in child support enforcement to increase collections by more than $8 billion over the next decade and ensure that payments benefit children.

Cut Taxes for Low-Income Workers. The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) matches the first earnings of low-income workers. The credit is often used for household necessities and work expenses. It is also an effective tool for increasing labor force participation. The EITC already lifts more than 4 million people out of poverty, and expanding it could draw hundreds of thousands more Americans into the workforce and lift more than a million out of poverty. [CBPP, 2006; Sawhill and Thomas, 2001]

Triple the EITC for Adults without Children. Working adults without children are the only Americans living in poverty who pay income and payroll taxes. A single worker at the poverty line pays more than $800 in federal income and payroll taxes. Moreover, the EITC largely overlooks single men, who receive less than 2 percent of EITC benefits. Edwards supported tripling the maximum EITC for single adults to $1,236. This proposal will give 4 million low income workers a tax cut averaging $750, lifting workers out of poverty and drawing more men into the workforce. [CBPP, 2000 and 2006]

Reduce the Marriage Penalty for Struggling Families. Marriage is the foundation for strong, economically secure families, but the EITC penalizes married couples by up to $3,000. Edwards believes that we must cut the EITC marriage penalty. His proposal would reduce penalties on low-income families who choose to get married and cut taxes for 3 million couples by about $400 a year. [CBPP, 2006]

Fight Teen Pregnancy. Edwards believes we can build on recent partial success in reducing teen pregnancy. The U.S. still has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the industrialized world. Edwards called for more support for struggling young people and investments in programs that help them beat the odds

Home Visits for New Parents: Home visits improve prenatal health and the quality of caregiving after birth. John Edwards will invest in home visits by registered nurses to low-income new parents, providing matching grants to states to serve 50,000 families. Multiple visits from nurses, with manageable caseloads, to families living at up to twice the poverty line will start during pregnancy and continue through each child's second year. Children receiving nurse visits are cognitively more advanced than their non-visited peers, have fewer behavioral problems, and are less likely to be abused or neglected

Enforcing Labor Protections: In many industries, violations of our most basic labor laws have become the new way of doing business. The Department of Labor has found that the countless businesses do not adhere to minimum wage and overtime laws. In fact, in the United States today, there is only one wage and hour inspector for every 150,000 employees, half of inspections are conducted by fax and telephone, and up to 30 percent of employers misclassify their employees to avoid paying taxes, benefits and worker's compensation. [DOL, 2007, 1998, 2001, 2001; NELP, 2007]

To help protect workers Edwards will revive the Department of Labor, creating a new taskforce to target the industries with the worst abuses of minimum wage and overtime laws. To stop the misclassifying of employees as independent contractors, he will require companies to document their payments to subcontractors, increase penalties for employers who routinely pay "off the books," and give workers more rights to question their status. He will also make workplaces safer by boosting funding for OSHA inspectors, updating OSHA practices for the new service economy, restoring ergonomic standards, strengthening whistleblower protections and extending OSHA protections to all workers.

Paid Sick Days for All: Nearly half of all private-sector workers, and nearly 80 percent of low-wage workers, must forgo pay to miss even a single day due to illness or caregiving. John Edwards believes that protecting the health of workers is not only important for families, but also best for the health of the community. Edwards' new initiative will help ensure that all employees have at least seven paid sick days a year, with pro-rated leave for part-time workers.

OBAMA

Promote Responsible Fatherhood

Since 1960, the number of American children without fathers in their lives has quadrupled, from 6 million to more than 24 million. Children without fathers in their lives are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime, nine times more likely to drop out of school, and 20 times more likely to end up in prison. Barack Obama has re-introduced the Responsible Fatherhood and Healthy Families Act to remove some of the government penalties on married families, crack down on men avoiding child support payments, and ensure that payments go to families instead of state bureaucracies. The legislation would also fund support services for fathers and their families, including domestic violence prevention efforts. As President, he will sign this bill into law and continue to implement innovative measures to strengthen families.

Support Parents with Young Children

Barack Obama would expand the highly-successful Nurse-Family Partnership to all low-income, first-time mothers. The Nurse-Family Partnership provides home visits by trained registered nurses to low-income expectant mothers and their families. The trained nurses use proven methods to help improve the mental and physical health of the family by providing counseling on substance abuse, creating and achieving personal goals, and effective methods of nurturing children. Proven benefits of these types of programs include improved women's prenatal health, a reduction in childhood injuries, fewer unintended subsequent pregnancies, increased father involvement and women's employment, reduced use of welfare and food stamps, and increased children's school readiness. Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis concluded that these programs produced an average of five dollars in savings for every dollar invested and produced more than $28,000 in net savings for every high-risk family enrolled in the program. The Obama plan would assist approximately 570,000 first-time mothers each year.

Expand Paid Medical Leave

Today, three-out-of-four low-wage workers have no paid sick leave. It is fundamentally unfair that a parent playing by the rules can get fired or lose wages because their child gets sick. Barack Obama supports efforts to guarantee workers seven days of paid sick leave per year, a proposal that will not impose an onerous burden on employers

Well there you all have it. I did not put in Edwards' Rural Plan because Obama hasn't put his out and this diary would be WAY too long at that point.

I know it is a wall of text but I hope you find it useful.

With respect,

Chaoslillith

Tags: 2009 presidential elections, Barack Obama, John Edward (all tags)

Comments

84 Comments

Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Very thorough work here that I appreciate and I am sure others will as well.  I think this represents the perfect type of candidate comparison diary in terms of a tight theme and specific information about different candidates.  I do think all the ground rules are a bit much, though I share your pain, and maybe could just be stated as sentence expressing your intentions in creating this diary.

As a fellow Edwards supporter, if I may be so bold, I would suggest you consider two types of changes.  Appreciating all the hard work you put into this diary I feel a little cold asking for more work, but I am liking what you do and want to see the most informative possible diaries comparing the candidates.

The first would be to supplement the "wall of text" with some analysis of your own to help me and others understand what all this means.  Where are most important differences?  Where are the particular strengths and weaknesses?  What would you change?  I am personally as interested in what you think about the details of their respective plans as I am in the content of those plans.

The second would be to include Senator Clinton's plans (or lack thereof) on any given topic.  Maybe others, but at least the three that 90%+ of the folks on this and similar sites are considering.

Thanks for the hard work. I look forward to your future diaries.

by Trond Jacobsen 2007-07-20 03:36AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty
well- as Hillary supporters say on DK - Hillary is ahead and doesn't need to present proposals. You know - like actually letting people know specifically where she stands.
LOL
by annefrank 2007-07-20 11:54AM | 0 recs
This is all very interesting

and utterly meaningless without some idea of the cost of these programs and how the candidates will pay for them.

by fladem 2007-07-21 06:10AM | 0 recs
Yes very detailed.

The comparison is good, because there are many differences.

Much Edwards works on suddenly becomes the issue for the moment with some of the other candidates.

Thanks for putting this all together.

by dk2 2007-07-20 03:58AM | 0 recs
A lot of work.

Interesting.

by lovingj 2007-07-20 04:04AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Well, I have more of a question than a criticism.  Does Obama plan to have any focus on rural as well as urban poverty?

by bruh21 2007-07-20 04:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty
Obama said in his urban poverty address on Thursday that he was focusing on urban poverty but also said he would be laying out an agenda for rural poverty "in the coming weeks."
by psericks 2007-07-20 05:23AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

okay that's fine- just making sure he will have that component and i am not sure why he wouldn't announce both.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 05:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

The issues facing each group are different. Also, announcing his rural plan in D.C. would have seemed inappropriate... part of politics is theater, after all. It's important to set the right stage (as Edwards did with the poverty tour and the New Orleans campaign announcement and Obama did at the community development campus where he announced his plan and the Springfield State Capitol building where he announced his entry into the campaign)

by Max Fletcher 2007-07-20 07:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Are they?

by clarkent 2007-07-20 07:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast:

Excellent and fair depiction of both candidates' proposals.  This is exactly the kind of diary that is needed.

by littafi 2007-07-20 05:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

I recognize the Edwards laundry-list, but no matter how long he makes it and how specific to urban/rural, I just do not trust a candidate who took up poverty as a cause in his last election and did nothing concretely to end poverty anywhere before then. I don't believe he's running to win, or if he is he should be doing better his second time around. If he can't run a strong campaign how can he run the only world superpower, or end poverty? If Edwards plans to be Hillary's VP, as it appears from his collaboration with her at the NAACP forum, he won't have to deliver on a single item on the long list. Obama's plans are specific, do-able, and he has an almost 25-year record of working WITH and not just FOR the poor on the issues, beginning at $12k/year when he could've successfully pursued a lucrative career with Columbia U credentials. Obama addresses education and jobs for ex-felons, a huge problem that keeps poor urban and rural neighborhoods poor and deadly - Edwards ignores it. If you'd read Obama's speech instead of relied on a website list, you'd have heard of a program he'll expand, proven in NY's Harlem, that lifts the entire neighborhood, rather than patches symptoms. Edwards promotes dispersal of the poor - that's already happening with urban gentrification, and the results are catastrophic. Lack of local jobs and costly transportation undermines dispersed poor workers, as Obama addresses. On education, lots of similarities, and Obama immediately worked to increase Pell Grants when he reached the US Senate. Obama does dare tell the national teachers' union that teachers must be made accountable, rewarded with bonuses for performing according to their own standards not the federal governments, or replaced when not - Edwards patronizes the union at the expense of children and their communities. Obama returned to community service and taught constitutional law and civil rights after getting a Harvard Law degree. Obama's only made his first million recently, with booksales not lawsuits - he was just a middle-class teacher then state senator paying off student loans before that booksales windfall. He's been focused on civil rights, most relevant to the poor, disabled and elderly who have the least resources to defend themselves from discrimination that takes down entire towns and cities. Finally, Edwards' voting record is so far right he's a lonely blue Dem spot in a sea of red Republicans in the spectrum of voting records. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/spectrum .xpd  I don't trust anyone with that record, including Edwards' vote to reduce HUD funding in the midst of a homelessness epidemic, instead of fixing it. It's about history and actions, not just laundry lists.

by VCubed 2007-07-20 06:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty
There's a whole lot here that should be parsed, but the first question I have is what does Obama just recently becoming a millionaire have anything to do with fighting poverty?
by cesar 2007-07-20 09:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Perhaps since the original poster decided not to stick around to answer questions about their post, one of the 7 people that rated their comment a 3 would like to jump in and answer the question I asked.  You apparently either agree with the post (which below we discuss to be a questionable use of the rating system) or more hopefully, you feel that this comment is well formulated.  So to any of the 3 raters, please explain to me how bringing up the timeliness of Obama's wealth has anything to do with his ability to advocate for the poor.  And if you don't, why you feel this then still warrants a "best in class" rating of the comment given the asssertion of a frame that how you make your money and how much money you make has a bearing on how you would eradicate poverty.  

by cesar 2007-07-20 02:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Obama isn't a millionaire.  

by Adam B 2007-07-20 05:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

That's simply not true:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2007/05/16/AR2007051600811. html

Or see the raw numbers here:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005 /N00009638_2005.pdf

He got a $1.9 million advance in 2005 for Audacity of Hope and two yet to be released books.  

It's factually correct that he's a recent member of the millionaire's club.  However, I'm still waiting for someone...anyone, to explain to me why that's relevant to putting forth policy to eradicate poverty.  

by cesar 2007-07-20 06:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

In publishing, advances are divided up over time, so that $1.9M gets split between the three books, over the years, as they're written and published.  You don't just get it all at once.

by Adam B 2007-07-20 07:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

So Obama overstated his wealth on his financial disclosure forms? I don't get it.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 07:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Obama didn't claim he received it all in one year; he claimed 847K of it in 2006.   While his combined income for 2006 is slightly over $1M, given royalties for his first book, being a "millionaire" is typically defined by having >$1M in assets, and he's probably not there yet, based on that disclosure.

by Adam B 2007-07-20 08:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

This is really silly to spend anymore time on, but I'm a sucker for clarification.  His book deal is "advance against royalties" meaning he got paid the 847K up front in 2005 for Audacity of Hope, which then gets counted against his royalties of which he gets 15% of the hardcover sales.  In 2006, Audacity came out, and it's fair to estimate , considering it was #1 on the NYT best seller list during the holiday season AND has been #8 on Neilsen's Bookscan for sales from Jan 1 to July 1, 2007, that at a 15% royalty rate and over a million books sold (I keep seeing 1.3M tossed around) at mostly at $25 a pop, that he's made above and beyond the advance already.  He also continues to pull in large chunks of change for Dreams from my Father and not to mention his salary with the cushiest of employers the US Govt which pays him 165K a year.  And this is all income coming within the last 3 years.  That says nothing of his assets before he entered Congress.  

Meanwhile as we ruminate on his financial numbers, no one has demonstrated why any of this money stuff matters with respect to ending poverty.

by cesar 2007-07-21 05:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

The publishing world is one that I know a lot about, so let me walk people through it: the book first has to earn back to the publisher that 847K before Obama starts getting that 15%.  He's done it by now.  Royalty checks usually only come out once a year.

He had almost no assets before entering Congress.

by Adam B 2007-07-21 06:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

So after a day and a half, neither VCubed nor the people that rated his post a 3, had anything to say about the question I asked.

Interesting.  Very interesting.

This is where I think the blogosphere fails on it's promise.  The promise of informed discourse, of hashing out positions based on debate.  In reality, people drop a comment, leave, others endorse it not because of the quality of the argument but because it fits their cognition, they don't bother to back it up, and that's that.  How is this any different than the soundbite culture of the mainstream media exactly?

by cesar 2007-07-21 04:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

All I want to say about this is that I, for one, have no problem with a lawyer making money holding corporations and the powerful to account for the harm they do to regular folks.

It's not like Edwards made the bulk of his money from liquidating pensions funds.

In fact, given that all candidates need big money to run and that, in part, requires tapping wealthy folks, the trial lawyers are the single best loaded constituency to tap.  I do not mind their quid pro quo, I guess is what I am saying.  I think tort reform is a corporate sham and class action suits are vital to our justice in our country.

by Trond Jacobsen 2007-07-20 10:15AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Has anyone found out the value of the Clinton homes and assets and made a judgment on whether this makes Bill Clinton's international relief effort somehow fake or Hilary Clinton's proposals insincere?

All this you can't be for good things if you have money, or you can't have good motivations if you are running for office starts from a very anti-politician anti-government frame that has its roots in the conservative movement.  

I am sure there are right wing trolls on this site who propagate this stuff, but it is sad to see progressives get caught up in it just because they have a personal preference of one candidate over another.

by Orlando 2007-07-20 11:12AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Whoever gave this a Zero rating (I'm talking to you whoever you are wherever you are hiding) has no business on this site.

I hope all Edwards supporters will disavow that.. its PATHETIC.

by lafinur 2007-07-20 11:23AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Actually if you look at his/her ratings history (many 0's to ObamaEdwards for some reason), you can pretty much determine that s/he doesn't understand what a 0 rating implies.  S/He probably just totally disagrees with the post and isn't aware that a 0 implies a troll rating.  The magnitude of your disagreement with a comment is not what ratings are about.  But I might add, the flipside is true as well and positive rating abuse goes too often ignored.  People use 3's to say they agree with a post.  Which is not what they should be used for.  A 3 means it's a high-quality comment, regardless of whether you agree with it or not.  Really there should be two ratings.  One for identifying trolls and post quality.  And another for agreeing or disagreeing.  

Of course, this is my interpretation of how it's supposed to work, and I am by no means a mydd veteran.  If I've got that wrong, please let me know.

by cesar 2007-07-20 12:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

the person you are replying to is no stranger to ratings abuse, taking part it quite a bit of it themselves.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 12:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

If you are referring to me:

If Litaffi is going to give a bunch of 0's for no justifiable reason I am going to give him a bunch of 1's. I'm not going to accept being censored for no reason lying down.

Frankly I don't even understand how people give 0's. I don't even know how they do it. I think its lame though.

Anyways I'm out for the day. I'm getting bored with the level of violence on this site. At least I post nice things about most candidates. I have had good things to say about Hillary, Obama and Dodd. The only candidate I dislike is Edwards but its supporters of him such as Littafi who I particularly cant stand. Who died and made him king to decide to censor stuff he didn't like? He hardly has a nice thing to say about anything! There is a bitterness to 90% of his posts! Unless its a "Thanks for great diary (on Edwards of course)" its all tearing down. ANd then he acuses me of being a troll? Hey jackie I am no troll! I happen to like politics and while supporting Obama keep an open mind.

There's plenty of things I don't like but you leave them up. Censoring stuff and threatening as he has done with a I paraphrase "one more peep and I will take them down"... That ain't right jackie.

by lafinur 2007-07-20 12:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Well, retaliatory troll rating is itself ratings abuse. Besides, why did you rate the following comment a '1'?

Re: John Edwards walks the talk (2.50 / 4)

I would say "much like the one he grew up in," except I think that one was much more rural. Probably a lot more like the one he's been helping to rebuild in NOLA or the ones he's been helping to organize workers in, I guess.

by sirius on Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 08:06:05 PM EST
[ Parent | Reply to This |   ]

by clarkent 2007-07-20 01:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

I'm an Edwards supporter.

Explain to me please why I am responsible for policing every word to leave the lips of every other Edwards supporters.  I don't get it.

Next time I don't like something a Clinton or Obama supporter says (I do not know who you support) I should come running to you to complain?

Ridiculous.

by Trond Jacobsen 2007-07-20 12:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

VCubed, you'll be pleased to know that John Edwards has a long history of working on poverty issues. For many years before entering the Senate,  Edwards worked with (and was on the board of) Urban Ministries of Wake County -- a faith-based organization that helps the homeless and poor, helping alleviate the effects of poverty and promoting self-sufficiency. That organization is in its 25th year now.

Re HUD vote you mention: Can't find a cite for it. JRE has often stated that HUD needs a radical overhaul, noting its bloated bureaucracy and long track record of mismanaging money. Perhaps the vote had something to do with that.

Glad Barack included the felon re-entry issue, it's an important one. Does he work with the Fortune Society?

by Swamp Cat 2007-07-20 02:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

ridiculous.

Edwards worked with Urban Ministries for years before he ever ran for office.

There's also the little matter of 200+ kids from Down East going to college with his money.

by DrFrankLives 2007-07-20 02:16PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

If Edwards plans to be Hillary's VP, as it appears from his collaboration with her at the NAACP forum, he won't have to deliver on a single item on the long list.

This is just so off the mark as to not be taken seriously.

by DoIT 2007-07-20 02:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Obama does dare tell the national teachers' union that teachers must be made accountable, rewarded with bonuses for performing according to their own standards not the federal governments, or replaced when not - Edwards patronizes the union at the expense of children and their communities.

This comment is total and complete BS. Can I borrow it to spread upon my garden. Edwards has a very detailed policy proposal on Education in this country. You need to look at it:

http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/povert y/creating-opportunity/

In fact, Obama's take is that it is the fault of the overworked and underpaid teachers, and not the fault of a faulty seriously underfunded system. I strongly disagree with him. There was a lot more in your post that was hard to swallow, but I had to refute that!!

by RDemocrat 2007-07-20 08:29PM | 0 recs
Thank You

This is the kind of diary that helps legitimately undecided people like me. Thanks for all your hard work.

I'm not very familiar with a lot of these issues, but the Edwards plan struck me as more comprehensive. However, I did appreciate Obama including one key item that Edwards missed: public transportation.

Michigan and Detroit in particular has suffered from a lack of real public transit (the "people mover" doesn't really count), and improving that would help tremendously. Not only would it have the direct benefit of helping low-income residents, but it would make the city a more attractive place for business, helping bring in jobs. Despite what the Republicans want us to believe, businesses look for cities with strong public services.

by Fitzy 2007-07-20 06:59AM | 0 recs
More details on the Obama plan
There's a seven page pdf with more details on the Obama plan if anyone wants to take a look.
by psericks 2007-07-20 07:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast:

Thanks for this diary. Although Obama has some good plans, I think you successfully show that Edwards remains a step ahead on most issues. Another diary that lets me know I have made the right choice in this primary!! Thanks for the hard work on it!!

by RDemocrat 2007-07-20 07:22AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty
Hi Chaoslillith,

This is a very worthwhile diary. I'm grateful someone like you is there to put in the work on this kind of thing. I have 2 suggestions if you continue work on this:

1) Specifically identify your source documents so that people can readily see what you have included from the 2 campaigns.

2) You may have missed some things. I noticed after a quick scan you did not include the EITC for Obama. The best source for his proposals is probably here.

When it comes to these issues, I love both these guys. If either one becomes president I have every confidence they will work well together on these issues.
by Satya 2007-07-20 07:30AM | 0 recs
I got the info from

the issues page on each of their websites and I stated that at the beginning of the diary.

I did not know about the seven page pdf from Obama because I did not see a link from his issues page.

by Chaoslillith 2007-07-20 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: I got the info from
The link to the pdf is actually on the issues page. In the upper right corner there's a link called "Plan Details."
by psericks 2007-07-20 12:22PM | 0 recs
Oh whoops

ok..wasn't trying to be disengenous with Obama.

Thanks for clarifying.

by Chaoslillith 2007-07-21 12:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

The major differince that I see are that Obama has proposed legislatively reachable goals - while many of Edwards proposals have been batted around for years and find little support.  Although, I would like to see Obama take up some of Edwards unatainable goals.

I have it on good word that Obama will be taking up the full policy goals of the ONE Campaign later in the race, but is waiting because he wants to make it one of his big policy issues.  Obama seems much more concerned with thirs-world poverty than US poverty, and Edwards visa-versa - excepts with minorities.

by CardBoard 2007-07-20 07:33AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

Some of the proposals Edwards has are new and innovative, others have been bouncing around for awhile. The main problem is that nobody has actually pushed for them. A lot of FDR's reforms were much the same way.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 07:44AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

The good thing about both the Edwards and Obama plans is that there is no way for idiots from the right to paint them as "radical" or "socialist." These are fairly measured and non-controversial proposals, though they are both quite aggressive and ambitious in the way that they take on poverty.

by Max Fletcher 2007-07-20 07:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

exactly how do you determine that Edwards goals aren't reachable but Obama's are? what's your process for reaching this conclusion because otherwise it seems unsubstantiated to make this claim.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 01:51PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

I thought the same thing. Billion dollar programs aimed at poor neighborhoods in select urban centers aren't exactly easy to pass.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 01:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast

My guess is this is one of those supporters who now come on to blogs like this who post just to cheerlead rather than provide any substantive differences. From what i can tell the main component missing right now from Obama's plan is rural, and the main one from Edwards is transportation (which is a bit surprising considering his focus on rural areas). Rather than discussing these things- we have multiple responses along this thread which can be summed up with a) I don't like Edwards b) Obama is wonderful because ... (normally nothing to explain it like the above poster to whom I replied).

There are some attempts at substantive analysis by  a few Obama supporters and Edwards supporters that I do appreciate because if not for them- I wouldn't have known Obama plans to role out a rural plan later.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 02:04PM | 0 recs
"Read my lips..."

Thanks for this list.  

I have been following Obama's work for a while now and I firmly believe that he will deliver on his promises based on his past record.  Remember "Read my lips, no new taxes" by Bush I and the promise not to be "nation builders" and to be "compassionate conservatives" by Bush II...The fact is, candidates are known for saying what they think will get them elected.  I think it would be (perhaps more) useful to detail the records of the candidates on poverty.  I know Obama has a stellar record.  I don't know much about Edwards' record, but I will say that based on what I have read (about the boards he has been on, etc.), I would expect Edwards to throw money towards a few programs with great sounding names (not sure how much, especially since one of the previous posts said he voted to reduce money to HUD which helps to house the poor).  The great thing about Obama is that he appreciates the complexity of an issue and tries to focus on finding (possibly new) solutions instead of rehashing a variant of the Democratic party line on an issue.  Education is one of his strong points on this.  He wants to find what works in poor neighborhoods and duplicate it - instead of just throwing money and rhetoric at the problem (i.e. money without thought).  He once proposed "innovation zones" to identify replicable holistic solutions.  Since the Harlem Children's Zone is working quite well, he is now seeking to implement some of their successes in other communities.

He also has a long history of being in the "heat of the battle" so to speak.  The defining feature of most of his career has been to help those that need it most, to fight for those who cannot fight for themselves, to bring empowerment to the un-empowered.  He has done this by their side as their partner.  I wish I could say more about Edwards on this.  I know he has been the wealthy donor.  I'm not sure if he can really relate to the issues that the poor face which probably means that he may be unable to get to real solutions (beyond nice sounding rhetoric).

by hithere 2007-07-20 07:44AM | 0 recs
Re: "Read my lips..."

I am a HUGE Obama fan and think he will do a terrific job on this issue and many others as president.  

That said, it saddens me to see Edwards' sincerity on the issue questioned by those who support other candidates.  Your comment is fair and positive, not one of the bad offenders, but the reference to an earlier vote of Edwards just reminded me of this feeling.

Regardless of the priority Edwards might or might not have placed on this issue when he represented North Carolina, I do think his focus in recent years is genuine.  (Of course, Obama has a stronger record overall and is the better candidate.)

by CeeCee34 2007-07-20 01:06PM | 0 recs
Re: "Read my lips..."

Thank you. People - both Obama supporters and Edwards supporters act like the must demonize or turn candidates into saints in order to choose on over the other. I am an Edwards supporter, but I think Obama's heart and values are in the right place even if I disagree vehemently with his strategic approach. I just don't see the value of pretending any of these people aren't progressives/liberals. They both are.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 01:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Progressive liberals have failed over and over again to solve issues in urban communities.  Schools are still failing, communities are still drug ridden, black men are still going to jail or dying at very young ages.  Just because someone's heart is in the right place (although I'm not making that claim) doesn't imply in any way that that person will solve a problem.  What is more important is results.  Someone whose heart is in the 'wrong' place but who wants to boost their resume, for example a results-driven investment banker, can have a far greater impact than the most liberal person on the planet.  

Let's focus on results, not on where we think someone's heart is.  People thought Bush I was a "compassionate conservative."  In any case, we cannot question Obama's heart.  His life's work won't allow us to.

by hithere 2007-07-21 07:04AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Buse II that is...

by hithere 2007-07-21 07:08AM | 0 recs
More From Obama

Obama's plan doesn't quite fit into the format provided above. The full urban poverty plan (pdf) is up on the campaign website.

White House Office of Urban Policy

Barack Obama will create a White House office of Urban Policy to develop a strategy for metropolitan America to ensure that all federal dollars targeted to urban areas are effectively spent on the highest-impact programs. The Director of Urban Policy will report directly to the President and coordinate the urban programs across the federal government. The Director of Urban Policy will also serve as a liaison to Congress and mayors on urban affairs.

Such an office is fitting to an Obama poverty plan. As has been widely noted (often times with dismay, as in the case of David Sirota), Obama is extremely pragmatic and results-oriented. This likely goes back to his days as an organizer, when he was on the ground working directly with people in the types of neighborhoods he is trying to turn around. He fully understands the extreme complexities of the problem in a way many other candidates just cannot. One of the criticisms of the Obama and Edwards poverty plans being raised by the media is the fact that the plans are expensive, and success is uncertain. The office of Urban Policy will ensure that the programs he is putting out are working, and change course if need be.

By now you may have heard of the "promise neighborhood" program Obama has proposed. It is based off of a highly successful program in Harlem, and is to be immediately replicated in 20 cities nationwide during an Obama Presidency. Here are the services to be provided through such a program:

Promise Neighborhoods will work with community organizations to provide:

--Extended day and extended year school programs
--Safe and educational after-school programs for all resident children; programs will place a strong emphasis on cultivating meaningful parent involvement
--Crime prevention support programs that engage both young people and community residents to implement proven anti-crime activities
--Technology training to area youth and adults
--Job training and internship placement to resident youth by developing and maintaining strong ties to the region's private sector
--Community health facilities that provide basic and preventative health care services and train residents on healthy living techniques, including proper nutrition, exercise, and development of healthy living spaces
--Resources that strengthen families including family counselors and social workers and anti-domestic violence programs
--Financial counseling for entire families that includes emphasizing stable employment, personal savings, and home ownership
--Effective leadership and development training to ensure that Promise Neighborhood programs are sustainable and staffed by local residents

Again, we see Obama's days a community organizer woven throughout the plan. One of the basics of community development is that it has to be done in full partnership with the people of the community in question. This isn't something that can be done to them, it has to be something that is done with them. The final point of the goals expressed above embodies this beautifully, though almost all of the points are careful to be inclusive of local residents. He also stresses working with existing community organizations and local businesses. This has all the marks of a staff of community workers having had a hand in drafting the policy (remember, famed organizer and Caesar Chavez partner Marshall Ganz is a member of Obama's staff--I believe this is the first political campaign he's worked on since Bobby Kennedy's).

Also, you mentioned in your diary that Obama doesn't have a savings program: it appears to have been rolled in with the Promise Neighborhood effort. This is definitely an important part of ending poverty, so it is good to see it included.

You should also check out Obama's programs for broadband internet access to the urban poor and his Nurse-Family partnership to 570,000 first-time moms each year.  

If you want to see the full plan, again, it is available in pdf format on the website.

by Max Fletcher 2007-07-20 07:53AM | 0 recs
Re: More From Obama

I think that Office of Urban Policy idea is an excellent one.  Having the various programs buried deep into other department without overall coordination and evaluation could lead to more failed programs.

My bet is that Edwards has something like this in mind as well even if he hasn't presented it yet.  Obama is just more process oriented so includes it in his policy now.

by Satya 2007-07-20 09:07AM | 0 recs
Thanks for the link

I thought that his issues page included this as I clicked on the poverty link.

My bad...

by Chaoslillith 2007-07-20 09:19AM | 0 recs
Isn't this quite ridiculous?

Don't mention AUMF or the bankruptcy vote? Isn't it quite clear that you are an Edwards supporter? The whole premise of this diary is ridiculous! Don't compare Edwards with Obama using VOTES THAT WERE ACTUALLY CAST, but compare them based on what they say they will do on their websites? Sheesh! So much for actions speak louder than words.

Having great ideas is easier than accomplishing great things. My question to many of you Edwards and Obama supporters out there is this - What makes you believe that your candidate can actually pass all the legislation that he has proposed? I would appreciate it if you could take off your respective candidate blinders and reasonably assess their strengths and weaknesses in terms of building popular momentum behind their ideas. I would especially appreciate Edwards supporters voicing their own personal doubts about Edwards' efficacy. Likewise for Obama supporters. It would at least let people know that your respective support is based in some reality, because both these guys have HUGE question marks on their candidacies.

I'd take the candidate who can pass meaningful reform over the candidate who can come up with utopian proposals that have no hope of passage. Any talk of what these guys say they stand for has to be balanced by their ability to build popular momentum behind their agenda.

by crazymoloch 2007-07-20 10:02AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous?

First off, the diarist put those admonitions at the top because they have been rehashed a zillion times in other places. She wanted to keep the focus on the topic at hand.

You also miss the point of actually running on proposals. If you win, by definition you've built popular momentum for your agenda. See Johnson, Lyndon Baines for his Great Society proposals.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous?

Every candidate has thousands of proposals. Each campaign focuses on only a few.

"If you win, by definition you've built popular momentum for your agenda. See Johnson, Lyndon Baines for his Great Society proposals."

Winning by definition doesn't mean you've built popular momentum for every proposal! The 2006 election is a great example. Democrats focused on Iraq and made 6 for '06 their signature issues. Within the first 100 days they acted on them. They didn't run on a campaign that focused on healthcare and there is absolutely no activity on any significant healthcare reform in Congress right now.

To build momentum for grand accomplishments, your campaign has to leave no doubts that the election was won because of said issue.

by crazymoloch 2007-07-20 11:49AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous?

Senator Edwards has a to do list prominently displayed on his website. Poverty is on that list. He stopped campaigning in early primary states to focus on the issue. If he continues to make it a focus, and he wins, you bet that he can claim a mandate for action on his proposals.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 11:59AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous?

Having a to do list is quite different from staking your campaign on something. I think JE has talked about poverty enough to make me believe that he is genuinely trying to build momentum on the issue.

Although I haven't chosen a horse, I have ruled out a few. Sadly, I don't see myself supporting Edwards in the primaries. I actually think the spirit of his campaign and content of his rhetoric is what the country needs. Its still a trust issue for me. I have trouble reconciling the John Edwards I remember being infuriated by from '98 through '02 and the John Edwards that has emerged now. I'm not saying he's not genuine, just that he hasn't made a believer out of me yet.

by crazymoloch 2007-07-20 12:38PM | 0 recs
Ditto clarkent's statement

and everyone knows I am an Edwards supporter.

I have also stated repeatedly that I am under no illusions that any of the candidates can get everything they want passed. I post the compare and contrast diaries so people can easily see what is being proposed and the direction, details and ideas the candidates have. That to me is what decides who I should vote for. Their ideas on how to fix the country's problems, their motives for running and the depth of their proposals. Are they merely fluff to make them sound good or did real work go into making these plans.

by Chaoslillith 2007-07-20 11:26AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous? No.

I will speak only for Obama, and only as a supporter.  I would say his enormous success thus far in bringing people into his campaign as well as the positive impact he had in the 2006 elections nationwide is evidence that if he is successful at winning both elections he will have a popular momentum behind his agenda.  Of course a point could be made that anyone who wins both elections would have that momentum - but this is especially true with Obama because his detractors like to call his supporters "worshipers" and his appeal to be somehow not about the Party but about himself, so I guess a good case could be made that his mandate would be more specific to his agenda than perhaps it would be for others.  I don't personally buy into the worshipper non-Dem argument but since some others do it seems to fit here.

As for accomplishing things, just look at his record.  He had an extremely successful State Senate career, and for a junior Senator just 2 years in the most ingrained old-boy network of our government, his track record so far in the US Senate is quite noteworthy.

by Doug Tuesday 2007-07-20 11:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Isn't this quite ridiculous? No.

And no one can use the bully pulpit more effectively than Obama to inspire and rally the country around important causes.  He appeals to our higher instincts.  This will make a difference.

by CeeCee34 2007-07-20 01:10PM | 0 recs
The Agenda of Hope, Inc.

Another Hope,Inc.er who has drank the Kool Aid.
Obama has shown his cautious streak and it is ugly.  What is his agenda?

Hope?

A new kind of politics?

You need a reality check.  Absolutely nothing will change in DC if Obama is elected.

And he has already paralyzed any chances he had to get an agenda (one with teeth) passed because he constantly speaks condescedingly to everyone else about "Playing politics" or for engaging in "Small politics".  The first time he tried to pass his non-universal health care plan the GOP will say no (Of course) and there will be no room to negotiate because if Obama doesn't make the legislation toothless they will blame him of "small politics".

Barack Obama's only agenda is Barack Obama.

He's an illusion.  And you have bought into the hype hook line and sinker.

Talking about Obama's "agenda" is an insult to my intelligence.  He lacks substance and he's alredy shown that he lacks political courage.  That means that if he did propose something it would be half ass and he obviously doesn't have the political courage to get anything done.

Obama is obsessed with "consensus".  The probelem is that he is too afraid to try to build consensus so he would just accept the "consensus" that will be pushed by the elite in DC.

When will you Hope,Inc.ers wake up?

by Michael 4 Edwards 2007-07-20 08:37PM | 0 recs
Re: The Agenda of Hope, Inc.

We're waiting for a condescending asshole like you to show us the way.

" The first time he tried to pass his non-universal health care plan the GOP will say no (Of course) and there will be no room to negotiate because if Obama doesn't make the legislation toothless they will blame him of "small politics"."

For some reason they will say 'yes' when Edwards comes knocking?

The fact that you have to tear down a DECENT FELLOW DEMOCRAT (if anything, we can at least agree that he is a decent human being)to tout your candidate speaks volumes about the quality of your belief in Edwards. You seem to possess the cognitive dissonance necessary to be easily converted into a Republican in a few years time. I hope you resist.

by crazymoloch 2007-07-20 09:22PM | 0 recs
Re: The Agenda of Hope, Inc.

What a stupid response.

So anyone who bashes Lord Barack is a Republican in waiting?

That is proof that your argument is weak and that you are the pathetic Kool-Aid drinker I thought you were.

No they aren't going to say "Yes" to Edwards but you have to come from a position of strength.  Obama wants to start the negotiation from a weaker place.  And he is so uber-cautious that he had to beg his worshipers to help him with his plan.

Kind of like during the Tavis Smiley forum when he just kept saying "What John Said" or during the AFSCME forum when he had to stay glued to his little not cards.

Why do you think he gives one-tenth the interviews Edwards does and he no showed for Meet the Candidate even though Edwards was the first to do it.

Your guys a hack.
He's not ready for prime time.
His whole campaign is based on himself.
Edwards' is based on the American people.

You can't get around that no matter how hard you try.

You're just another in a long line of Obama apologsists who has nothing to say but, "If you're mean to Baracky you must be a Republican."

How childish.

On Universal Health Care Edwards comes from a place of strength.

Obama does not.

Obama's "new kind of politics" is an excuse for his spinessness.

An Obama supporter accuses me of cognitive disonacne?

Is this opposite day?

Why do you support Hope,Inc.

If I'm consescending to you it's because you back a pathetic candidate for pathetic reasons.

You are so caught up in "The Audacity of Hype" that you can't even see straight.

You thought you've found an oasis but you're really just guzzling sand.

Accusing me of being a Republican?

How patheic can you get.

I back John Edwards because he is the best communicator and representative of progressive values and because he is the most electable.

He has detailed policy proposals and he is actually willing to confront the Republicans.  Obama just wants to play patty-cake.  You actually think that if Lord Barack wins DC will change?

You are so out of touch with reality it's not even funny.

Get off your personal mission to castrate the Democratic Party and for once demand something from your candidate other than platitudes.

The hack you back is scared to even say the word "Democrat".

And don't insult my intelligence with another stupid ass reply.

Show some substance, do it because your candidate doesn't, and list an actual reason to vote for him besides his smile.

He's running a "peronsality-based" campaign and gullible hype-mongers like yourself are buying into it hook, line, and sinker.

And at least put on your "Got Hope" shirt before responding. Your first response was so fucking pathetic that you are going to need to pray to "Lord Barack" to stand a chance.

Pick an issue.

Pick any one of the major 3 issues.

Ending the war
Health care
or the
environment

Pick your poison.  I'll represnet Edwards, you represent Obama.  I am so ready to tear another one of your pathetic arguments to pieces.

If you aren't a spineless hack like Lord Barack then accept.

Please, accept, I would love to kick your ass again.

You Obama worshipers are not cute anymore.
I used to think that down the line we would be working together in the progressive movement.
But you have shown that your allegiance is not to progressive values, or a progressive agenda.

You are so wrapped up in the hype that even when your guy clearly sells out you blame everyone who calls him on at as being a Republican.

Get your damn priorities straight.

And pick the isssue.  I have a nice response waiting for you.

by Michael 4 Edwards 2007-07-21 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: The Agenda of Hope, Inc.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Barack guy. I'm just retarded enough to think that he's a bad guy or someone who doesn't care about the issues he champions. I don't think ill of Edwards either. I think they are both tolerable, although not good, candidates. I'm not going to defend Barack's candidacy because I don't much good to say about his presidential prospects. However, I have little negative to add. Even if I did, I wouldn't rip him using Republican stereotypes.

The reason I think that you have the potential to turn into a Republican is because you feel the unconscionable need to tear down good people simply because you disagree with them in degree, not principle.

I don't doubt that Edwards has good proposals. I actually like what his campaign stands for the most. For me, it comes down to credibility. John Edwards' political philosophies seem to be EXACTLY where they need to be for each election he has run in. He has never been out on a limb on any political issue. Upon joining the Senate he joined the Senate Centrist Coalition and the Senate New Democrat Coalition (DLC). It obviously made sense given that he was elected in NC. His Senate voting record was only marginal, except on issues of education and abortion where he was exemplary. Again, I'm sure being from North Carolina played a role no doubt. Of course the AUMF and Bankruptcy Bill weren't shining moments either. Again, 70% of the public backed the Iraq war in 2002 and everyone was in the pockets of the banking industry. Edwards is need of too many excuses to explain the choices he made when he actually held public office last time around.

When he had a chance to showcase his visionary bent while in office he chose not to. I'm not willing to give him credit for 'seeing the light' now that he is free of elected office. Frankly, his recent about turn on Iraq isn't impressive given that it came when popular opinion was also against the war.

I recognize that it is easier for blue state politicians to hold liberal position while in public office because of the nature of their constituency. This is why I'm not willing to give Obama much credit for his position on Iraq. A state senator from Illinois came out against the war in 2002? Maybe it was a position of principle, but it didn't come at much cost. HRC has the opposite problem. Taking an anti-war position in 2002 would have been easier for her because she came from NY, but she chose to vote for it anyway. To date, only Gore and Dean were politicians who stood to lose greatly by coming out against the war in 2002. Unfortunately, neither is running.

Anyway, your Obama bile is wasted on me. I find it annoying and offensive, but big whoop. I just don't understand you can jump on the Edwards express soon after his lackluster Senate career where he took zero political risks. I'd vote for Edwards if he was the nominee, but am not crazy about him just yet.

by crazymoloch 2007-07-21 12:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

I work in ex-offender reentry and you would not believe what it means for 40,000+ ex-offenders  per year to be sent back into poor communities in Chicago with no housing, jobs, or job skills. The communities can not help them nor absorb them so they commit additional crimes and jeapordize everyone's safety. Obama understands that at a far more personal level, and that is why it is an important piece of his plan and his speeches. In Illinois we have watched Obama take on racial profiling, and other bread and butter issues and as a US senator take on the Vet issues and make a difference. Yes it is easier to make poverty your issue than it is to accumulate a record of making things better.

by jazzyjay 2007-07-20 11:30AM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

This post is what i call utter bullshit. Recount in the same time what Edwards has done in a fair way or admit you are unable to be honest.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 01:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

By the way- as I say above- you don't need to knock down the other guys commitment just because you have choosen a candidate. It's fundamentally a sign of your own weaken position that you feel the need to do so.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 01:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

Are you in a position to describe the Obama plan to deal with this felon re-entry/recidivism issue?

I can't imagine his plan is to leave everyone locked up in jail - and if it is that is mark against him, in my eyes.

Is it his job training, housing, and all that from above?  Is that tailored to meet the particular needs of the population you work with?  Is it to stop racial profiling and reduce the pipeline into prison, the issue you reference from his state legislator days?  Is that Obama's main prison reform/criminal justice reform plan?  Because if it is, I support that wholeheartedly but I do think the problem is bigger than that.

On that topic, what do you think should be done to re-integrate ex-offenders into the community?  If you have good ideas, I'd be interested in hearing them because I think this is a big problem: Too many people in prison.  Being in prison makes all but the strongest people even worse able to deal with life than when they went in.  Thanks.

by Trond Jacobsen 2007-07-20 03:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

I have heard Obama discuss job training, and skill development and describe his intentions on his web site and I trust from watching him take on issues that he will follow though. We are trying to teach vocational skills that transfer into job readiness, or even small business development. There just isn't enough focus on it or monies available to sustain the few programs that exist. It is not enough to do have job placement facilities when most people won't hire ex offenders if they admit they have a record and will fire them for falsifying if they don't admit to it. Most ex-offenders desparately go for expungement, and our state reps have consistently fought to make expungement more readily available to more people. The prison industry is like the military industrial complex, in that their is profit to be made in building and maintaining prisons especially in small downstate towns that use the prison as a way to employ townspeople. Clinton did awful things to prove he was tough on crime, such as 3 strikes, mandatory sentencing, and it is a devasting problem. So if one president can create a disaster it would seem another president with empathy for this issue could turn things around considerably.

I don't know all the specifics that Obama has in his mind for this issue, but I have a passion for this work and so I am glad that he is willing to address it in a serious way. There is so much disparity in the criminal justice system, and so much despair associated with people who are caught up in it, that it is a central issue for community development. So I'm not saying Edwards is not sincere, but if this level of pain and dysfunction is out here, and other candidates don't even consider it in their list of important things to do, well I just end up feeling less confident that they will ever spend their political capital on these issues.

by jazzyjay 2007-07-20 07:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

Appreciate your insights.

by Trond Jacobsen 2007-07-20 08:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Easier said than done

Edwards' proposals on job training and stepping stone jobs programs are aimed precisely at making sure ex-convicts and others don't get locked out of society if they're honestly trying to make their way back in.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 08:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Good diary with a substantive comparison.

In thinking about Obama's speech the other day about combatting urban poverty, I had to wonder, once again, about why Obama didn't bother to show up for the presidential forum hosted by ACORN a few weeks ago.

ACORN is well known for their work on urban poverty and seems to be an effective organization. They recently ran a campaign to raise the minimum wage in several states, which was successful. John Edwards helped them with that campaign.

Their presidential forum was held in Philadelphia on a day when Obama was in Philadelphia to speak at the NEA convention, along with the other candidates. Since he was in Philadephia already, it was pretty weird that he avoided ACORN.

Contrast that with John Edwards, who not only showed up at he ACORN forum (where they loved him), but also just took 3 days off of fundraising and campaigning in key early states to do things like visit homeless shelters, neighborhoods with rampant home foreclosures, and the ninth ward of New Orleans, among other places, to bring media attention to those problems and their solutions.

by sirius 2007-07-20 11:26AM | 0 recs
Yeah I wondered that too

about Obama's planning choices.

I applaud Edwards' efforts to use the focus of the media on the Presidential election to draw attention to poverty. He means what he says and will fight to the last to help those who are suffering.

by Chaoslillith 2007-07-20 11:28AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

I don't think it gets us anywhere to assume non-participation means anything about a candidate unless expressly stated.  You could say the same thing about why did Edwards scheduling his poverty tour when he had a prior commitment but that would be very wrong.  

by Doug Tuesday 2007-07-20 11:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

yet you regularly here make such inuendo based on Edwards. I actually again agree with you as to your point about Obama, but the double standards of some of you here is striking.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 01:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

I will take a man who (barely) made a living fighting poverty over one who was never employed doing such any day when it comes to the issue of poverty.

Obama spent years fighting poverty as a community organizer.  He was on the front lines, meeting the people, working with the people, fighting for the people.  No other candidate can say that.  There is no candidate as sincere about poverty as Obama.

But he realised that work on the ground was not enough.  Good, meaningful laws would need to be passed.  Laws for all people.  Not just for a million here or a million there, as in several of Edwards proposals.  

Establishing a number of people as a goal tells me that he just does not "get it."  What do we do when we reach the goal?  Celebrate?  Announce victory?  "Mission accomplished"?  There will be millions more that will also need help.  No.  The American people deserve better.

Obama has the heart, the mind, and the will.  He has the history to back it up.  And he knows.  He understands.  He "gets it."  And he will have my vote.

by Jacor 2007-07-20 11:43AM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Jacor, the Edwards proposals are much broader than Obama's. They do not just apply to a million here and there. And the goal aspect is the most laudable. The end goal is to have zero Americans living below the poverty line in thirty years.

by clarkent 2007-07-20 12:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

I will take a guy who actually pulled himself out of poverty, worked on the issues depsite what people claim here and has placed this as his central theme of his campaign.

by bruh21 2007-07-20 02:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Thanks for this excellent substantive diary. I learned a lot.  Am leaning toward Edwards.

The poverty issue is inextricably intertwined with the healthcare issue so I wonder why you do not include Edwards' and Obama's HC policy plans among the items in your post.

The book "Uninsured in America: Life and death in the land of plenty" does a powerful job in explaning, thru interviews with over 100 people from all walks of life, the direct link between lack of real universal healthcare in the U.S. (ie Medicare For All) and poverty. The book identifies this as "the death spiral", which includes the downward spiral into poverty and being trapped there by ill health and limited healthcare.

Thanks again for your hard work on this post and I hope to see more from you.

- Ann, a community health nurse and health and social justice activist
Alliance to Defend Healthcare (in Massachusetts) http://www.defendhealth.org

by Ann E Malone RN 2007-07-20 04:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

Look...i am happy with all our candidates but I will take the candidate with the track record of helping those who are less fortunate. Obama still lives on the Southside. He hasn't forgot what (or who) got him to this point. I'll take an active civil right attorney over the King of Torts...

by chicagogene 2007-07-20 09:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Compare and Contrast: Edwards V Obama Poverty

my problem with your post i that it bares no relationship to edwards background. if you want to support whoever you want to support start from honesty

by bruh21 2007-07-21 06:10AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------