An Economy of the Brink

Despite claims to the contrary from the rightwing pundits, the US economy is in poor shape.  Bush's policies have only exacerbated underlying weaknesses and created new problems instead of dealing with fundamental problems.  Economic predictions are notoriously fickle and imprecise.  However, Katrina's long-term structural and psychological effects may prove to be the final straw for the US economy.
The US consumer

Consumer spending represents 2/3 of the US economy.  Therefore, the consumer's financial health and confidence in the future are paramount to national economic health.  For the last 4 years, the consumer's financial health has grown more precarious.  According to the Bureau of Labor Services, wages for non-supervisory employees have grown 13.24% from January 2001 to July 2005.  Over the same time, inflation increased 11.59%, making inflation adjusted wage growth a paltry 1.6% over a five and a half year period. To maintain their standard of living, consumers have engaged in two risky behaviors.  First, they have tapped their savings.  However, the US savings rate is now at zero 0%, effectively ending that behavior.  Secondly, consumers have increased their debt load to record levels.  According to the Federal Reserves most recent flow of funds report, total mortgage borrowing increased from 4.64 trillion in 2001 to 9.04 trillion in 2004.  In addition, according to the Federal Reserve, household debt service payments now comprise 18.45% of disposable income.  In short, the US consumer is nearly tapped out.  

Add to this the shock of Katrina.  Regardless of who or what governmental agency eventually receives the blame, Katrina delivered a clear psychological blow to the US consciousness, as it exposed extreme ineptitude. Each picture of stranded residents lowered the national faith in its central institutions.  Although it is difficult to gauge overall psychology, it is not a stretch to state people's confidence was shaken.  And confidence and faith in the future is required to take out debt.

Housing

The FDIC, Fed Chairman Greenspan and National City Corporation have all publicly discussed or written reports on the existence of the housing bubble.  Although the rightwing pundits claim otherwise, the bubble exists.  According to the National Association of Realtors, the national median price of a home increased 31.87% from 2002 -2004, from 158,100 to 208,500.  Here is a simple rule of markets: prices don't go up forever. The desire to buy a house is directly tied to confidence in the economy.  As mentioned above in the consumer discussion, Katrina's long-term effect on consumer psychology will probably be negative.

Housing is the main engine of growth for the US economy.  According to the Bureau of Labor Services, the nation created 1,545,000 jobs from January 2001 to July 2005.  Of those 448,000 or 28% were construction related.  In addition, the economy created 487,000 financial service jobs over the same time.  Assuming 20% of these are mortgage related, we get an addition 97,400 jobs or an addition 6%, bringing the total number of housing related jobs to 34%.  That's a large percentage for the economy.  In short, when housing starts to slow, so will the engine responsible for the largest percentage of job-growth.

Energy

Rising energy prices are another piece in the puzzle.  As prices rise they take a larger percentage of a consumer budget that has barely grown in 5 years.  In addition, prices are now above the psychologically important $3/level.  There are talks of gas lines and shortages in various regions.  Compounding transportation costs are winters heating prices. Numerous articles from various states have warned of winter heating price spikes.  The US consumer is about to receive a very rude and abrupt slap in the face from energy costs.  The length of time of price hikes compounds the effects.  Gasoline will take some time to drop at the pump and winter is just around the corner.  It is likely that in some markets there will be a solid 6 months of high prices from transportation and heating.

Federal Finances

Finally, there is the hampered federal government.  The Federal government is in fact the de facto insurer of last resort.  To perform this function, it should be in sound fiscal shape.  The Republicans, however, are poor stewards of public funds.

First, actual revenue coming into the government is in fact decreasing, despite the recent claims of rightwing economic mouthpieces (I would call them economists, but their reputation is already low enough).  According to the COngressional Budget Office receipts from individual income taxes have decreased 18% since 2001, from 994.3 billion in 2001 to 809 billion at the end of 2004. Corporate receipts have increased 25%, but that increase is misleading because total corporate receipts in 2004 were only 24% of the individual total receipts.  Much smaller in total than individual and corporate receipts, estate and gift taxes decreased 14% over the same time, falling from 29 to 24.8 billion.  

Over the same time period (2001-2004), the Republican controlled Congress increased discretionary spending 33%.  The Defense Depart was the largest recipient, receiving a 48% increase in spending.  Other domestic also increased 27% over the same period.

In other words, the Republicans have not only clearly violated their "fiscal conservatism" principles, they have once again increased total US debt. In 2001, the total amount of debt held by the public and governmental agencies was 5,807,463,412,200.06 on September 28, 2001.  On September 1, 2005 the total amount of debt increased 27% to 7,929,658,283,890.28.  The policy of tax cuts and a voluntary war - the classic guns and butter economic problem - have placed the country is dire financial straits from which payments for a foreseeable natural disaster will only increase the Republican created fiscal disaster.

And that is where the problem comes in.  Because the government is the de facto insurer of last resort, it's finances must be in good shape in order to be the insurer of last resort. If the US had a clean bill of fiscal health right now, the Treasury could go to the bond markets over the next few months and sell the needed debt to pay for Katrina's damage.  As it stands, the federal government's position as insurer of last resort will simply increase its total debt to over 8 trillion dollars - roughly 70% of US GDP. Interest payments on the national debt are already one of the largest spending categories of the national budget.  And they stand to increase.  

In summation, there are numerous problems lurking on the horizon.  The initial shock of Katrina will probably lower consumer confidence.  Spiking energy prices through the winter will further hurt sentiment.  This will lead to lower housing starts and purchases overall consumer spending, as will the lack of national savings and mammoth debt level.  The economy is at a point where there are too many negatives to overcome by wishful thinking or political spin.  Either we will deal with these lurking issues, or they will deal with us.

Tags: (all tags)

Comments

13 Comments

small but imp. correction
-->the total amount of debt held by the public and governmental agencies was 5,807,463,412,200.06 on September 28, 2001.  On September 1, 2005 the total amount of debt increased 27% to 7,929,658,283,890.28.

bonddad: my calculation shows a 36.5% increase in debt and not 27%:

-->(7929-5807)/5807
 ans  =

    0.3654210  

thanks
Neo

by NeoLiberal 2005-09-05 09:36AM | 0 recs
Re: small but imp. correction
Good catch.

Thanks.

by Bonddad 2005-09-05 09:55AM | 0 recs
Our Debt under Bush vs. before...
Doesn't this graphic say it all?

National Debt Under Bush vs. before

they are looting America..

by ultraworld 2005-09-05 05:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Our Debt under Bush vs. before...
this is a beuatifully done piece! :)

Do you know its original creators?

by NeoLiberal 2005-09-05 09:36PM | 0 recs
Bonddad, You Are a Voice That Needs to Be Heard
I've already linked to this post as my (tiny) little blog.
by Yosef 52 2005-09-05 09:43AM | 0 recs
Bonddad,
keep up the good work!

For followup analyses as well as citation purposes, it would be great if you are able to post links to the data sources though.

Thanks for your efforts.

by Xman 2005-09-05 12:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
I cite the main pages -- for example -- the Bureau of Labor Statistics -- to get people there.  I don't know why, but whenever I paste a spcific page from the BEA or BLS into a diary, the link comes up "file not found."

The government pages are really easy to navigate once you're there.  

by Bonddad 2005-09-05 12:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
-->I cite the main pages -- for example -- the Bureau of Labor Statistics -- to get people there. You mean in plain text and not as a link? -->I don't know why, but whenever I paste a spcific page from the BEA or BLS into a diary, the link comes up "file not found." Perhaps some html coding error. Let me give an example here: Population Estimates Are you following this syntax for posting links? -->The government pages are really easy to navigate once you're there. Yes, and No. They also tend to have a plethora of information, which is quite hard to wade through. In fact, I strongly recommend completely rigorous sourcing for the data quoted. That way, the work will be much more convincing for dissemination and debate purposes (for example, if someone links to your writings and argues therefrom, they'd need to be able to trace/recalculate every figure with precision).
by Xman 2005-09-05 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
oops, please ignore the comment above. I accidentally clicked the "Post" button, instead of the "Preview" button. updated comment coming soon.
by Xman 2005-09-05 01:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
-->"I cite the main pages -- for example -- the Bureau of Labor Statistics -- to get people there."

You mean in plain text and not as a link?

-->"I don't know why, but whenever I paste a spcific page from the BEA or BLS into a diary, the link comes up "file not found.""

Perhaps some html coding error. Let me give a code example here:

----------
<a href="http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php&quot;&gt; Population Estimates</a>
-----------

This code will "linkify" the phrase "Population Estimates" with the link "http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php&quot;

Are you following this syntax for posting links?

-->"The government pages are really easy to navigate once you're there."

Yes, and No. They also tend to have a plethora of information, which is quite hard to wade through.

In fact, I strongly recommend completely rigorous sourcing for the data quoted. That way, the work will be much more convincing for dissemination and debate purposes. For example, if someone links to your writings and argues therefrom, they'd need to be able to authenticate every claim that someone else may challenge. Don't you agree?

by Xman 2005-09-05 01:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
The problem with the government economic pages is I can link to the main page fine.  When I start requesting individual statisitcal series -- such as the inflation rate from BLS or GDP numbers from BEA -- the pages don't link.  I think the only way to get to those pages (the specific series of statistics) is to go to the government pages and specifically ask for the numbers.

For example, here is the link for total jobs created  It is properly formatted, yet comes up data not available.

by Bonddad 2005-09-05 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
Bdad, that is because, the parent page contains a form, which when filled and submitted, generates the value specific html-page, which is then displayed at the URL you have linked above. I doubt that there is an easy way to fill these forms using your own html code.

I have experimented and found the following to work:

  1. once you get to the generated cgi page, save the file as a plain html file, on your computer.

  2. then upload the file somewhere from where it is web accessible. myDD has some file space that you can use and which you can get to when you visit your user page, e.g., your file listing is here. Presumably, there is a quota limit on the disk space usage by individual users, but you could probably request Jerome/Chris to increase your quota if necessary.

  3. post the link to the saved web-location in your diary.

As en example, I have saved a BLS file here, which should display a table (slightly off-format, but functional) with data.

Hope that helps. Now, Prof. Xman says, it's time for "praciticals" :) Let me know how it goes if you try this out.

thanks.

by Xman 2005-09-05 03:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Bonddad,
Thanks.  
by Bonddad 2005-09-05 03:19PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------