CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

If Katie Merrill had the goal of preventing a primary campaign against Ellen Tauscher, it might not have been the best strategy to provoke the publisher of the most widely read political blog in the world into declaring, "So in CA-10, we will have a candidate, and there will be a primary."

But as Jane Hamsher noted, Tauscher has greater problems than netroots. Sure, California bloggers are going to cover this race closely (Calitics is averaging more than a post a day on Ellen Tauscher in December of all months and Markos lives in the east bay). And sure, if things get interesting the national blogs will have the ability to get the race nationwide attention. But all of that will be focused towards understanding and supporting what is actually going on in California's 10th congressional district.

Rototilling the Grassroots

From a grassroots perspective, the DLC fad of the 1990s destroyed the Democratic Party. The reliance on corporate big money all but cut rank and file supporters out of the process.

The new people-powered grassroots wave was a direct reaction to people like Gray Davis who triangulated against the base to be funded by big corporations.

Ellen Tauscher was part of this fad, but her continued contempt for the grassroots is so out of style that it makes it clear she is out of touch.

Since Tauscher bought her seat by spending $1.7 million, she has grown increasingly dependent upon PAC contributions while failing to develop support infrastructure in district. In her first re-election, almost 60% of her funding came from individuals, but her most recent report shows the ration flipping to where she now relies upon (mostly business) PACs for more than 60% of her warchest.

Now here is where the blogs come in and why Katie Merrill's move was such a political disaster for Congresswoman Tauscher. What the blog infrastructure allows is not just volunteers and tons of money, but the ability for local resentment of Tauscher's arrogance to have a nationwide voice.

After reading the front page post on Daily Kos, an 18 year old spoke up in the comments. He then learned how easy it was for him to refine his point, set up an account here, and post his thoughts as a diary. This morning, that diary was picked up by Fire Dog Lake and broadcast nationwide.

There is a structure to promote and reward ideas about the race, which is compounded in Tauscher's case by the unique geography where bay area writers have six different BART stops they can choose from in the 10th district.

In the successful primary campaign against Joe Lieberman in Connecticut, the blogosphere amplified the reporting of Paul Bass and Colin McEnroe turning them into nationwide stars. Do you think this dynamic has escaped Tim Redmond? If a bay area race becomes ground zero in the battle for the future of the Democratic Party, CA-10 could be more thoroughly covered than most people can imagine.

The tools are readily available for grassroots activists to share stories of personal experiences involving Ellen Tauscher. I've heard lots of stories that I'm sure others would appreciate hearing and I know there are far more out there. So start an account at Calitics and tell your stories -- people are waiting to listen.

--------

Some of the comments thanks to Counterproductive Katie's whine:

Kos, "It's not surprising that this writer, Ellen Tauscher campaign manager Katie Merrill, would try to head off what will be a vicious fight for this seat in a primary. Unlike her apparent hero Joe Lieberman, Tauscher won't get a "do-over" if she loses."

Blue in Colorado, "How stupid can this woman be? A campaign manager-political operative needlessly and untruthfully insulting a several million strong group in her own party."

zot23, " I don't even know who Tauscher was 5 mins ago, but now I support a primary challenge against her.  This whiney-ass boo-hoo letter makes me think she's afraid of a populist net-roots primary challenge for a reason."

Emetbloom, "I can tell you that there is significant antipathy towards Tauscher in both the El Cerrito and the Lamorinda Democratic Clubs.  I can also tell you that a lot of folks in CoCo County are upset because Tauscher belittles people who have challenged her vote on the war, has actively supported a Republican over active Dems for Community College Board, and in general is scornful towards people who don't agree with her.  Also, her support of Filson didn't exactly win her any supporters among Dems in her district."

deaniac83, "Ellen Tauscher did her darnest to push Jerry McNerney - now the victorious Congressman from California's 11th CD (defeating Richard Pombo) out in the Democratic primary.  You know why?  Because her longtime donor Steve Filson was running.  Tauscher put her nose in where it didn't belong (I know this because but I can't reveal the exact happenings or the source) to try to force Jerry out, and she was not nice about it.  We had to trounce DLC and Tauscher favorite Filson in the primaries 52-25% and then go on to beat Pombo."

DavidW, "She was dragged kicking and screaming to drop her support for the Iraq War, and to start standng up against Bush. I'm in her district and I attended the district "town hall" meetings when she spoke about the war. Though she wasn't an active proponent of the war, she didn't represent her district when she voted for it, and it took her forever before she backed away from her support (via votes) for the war"

hartford for lamont, "by invoking Lieberman, a guy who lost the Connecticut Dem vote, all that Katie Merrill is doing here is showing how ignorant she is about what being a good Democrat is all about."

machopicasso, "According to Tauscher's campaign manager, it was a "misguided effort" to challenge an incumbent who was willing to leave the Democratic party in order to retain his Senate seat, campain with Republicans, and draw substantial support from the White House. That's a totally different ballgame. Quite frankly, I'm surprised Merrill wants to place Tauscher and Lieberman in the same category. The latter already lost his primary; maybe Tauscher isn't all that committed to the party, herself."

electricgrendel, "She picked this fight.  It was her insufferable and useless "business friendly" Democratic model that helped greatly in getting the Democratic message diluted to the point of uselessness.  Not only that, but if I am not mistaken it was Ellen Tauscher who went out boasting about how much power she'd gotten because so many of the newly elected Dems were "conservative". As for the press flak's whine that we should be doing X, Y and Z so long as none of that involves rooting out conservative/business-friendly Democrats who make it impossible for us to deliver on a populist message, the only thing I have to say is that there are a whole lot of us.  There are a lot of fingers on a whole lot of keyboards and there are a whole lot of small wallets out there ready to open.  Don't worry about us trying make sure that the freshman get elected and that we secure the White House in 08."

tmo, "Lots of Dems in the district don't like her and don't consider her to be on their side. The general wisdom in the district is that she's out of touch with her constituents and is not interested in being in touch; she knows what's best and the voters should really just stay quiet."

Giodude, "As I recall, she got really upset when the legislature unveiled the new maps. She was upset her moderate voting record would be a liability in her safe democratic seat."

Neutron, "The chickens are coming home to roost for Lobbyistloving Tauscher."

brittain33, "And here we have "business-friendly" Ellen Tauscher, representing a district substantially more liberal than her. No wonder she didn't want this outcome. It reduces her ability to be a power player in the middle, who also happens to be exceptionally valuable to lobbyists. If she plays her moderation as a point of principle and not a way to get money from lobbyists and nicknames from George W. Bush, she'll do well. If she sells out, by all means, primary her ass."

RevJoe, "And Tauscher should be very, very afraid. She has been out of touch with her constituents for quite some time. She is definitely out of touch with her party."

Faber, "This county is home to a large number of technical professionals;  I'm one of them.  Times aren't as bad as they were in that business, but they're not what they were in 2000. Ellen Tauscher has been in bed with ITAA since the get-go, and has sold out this constituency every chance she got. It isn't a matter of ideological litmus tests or "values" issues.  Tauscher has simply done a rotten job of representing the issues of her constituents.  I will be working actively on a primary challenge for 2008."

Big Tent Democrat, "The Netroots does not demand ideological purity. The Netroots demands the Democrats fight for Democrats, and that ideological disputes be resolved within our Big Tent. Tauscher's meeting with Bush undercut our Dem leadership. That was Bush's goal and Tauscher played along, just as Joe Lieberman always did. But it is more fun to believe there is an ideological test in the Netroots. Pure malarkey in the best tradition of Lieberman."

AustinSF, "Congresswoman Tauscher serves as National Vice-Chair of the Democratic Leadership Council, an organization that is widely regarded as the intellectual center of the Democratic Party. DLC > them's fightin words around these Dkos parts."

mackellanpatrick, "I live in Ellen Tauscher's district, and I agree that a primary challenge would be good for the district, good for the Democrats, good for democracy, and, frankly, good for Ellen Tauscher.  She seems to live in a gilded bubble and has gone unchallenged for too long, which isn't good for anyone in leadership. The district has truly changed underneath her and become much more liberal.  And her campaign manager is just frankly an ass.  If you're going to create enemies, at least be smart enough to be on the right side of history and don't ramble on with "dying entrenched dinosaur overlord" kinds of things when new tools and communities arise with fresh voices.  A real choice for Democrats in the 10 would be a good thing, and maybe this time ALL democrats would rally around and support whoever the actual winner was, and not start their own party if they didn't like the results."

michael1104, "I seriously cannot wait to see her go! It is going to be soooo much fun challenging her and making her defend her right-wing corporatist stances against a progressive Democrat who would better represent the district."

Pthy Cherub, "Nevertheless, she deserves a primary challenger that speaks to the values of the district and not her Liebermanesque view of how the world ought to be.  Maybe just maybe, she failed to notice her neighbor district brough done Pombo with a candidate that beat the establisment candidate in the district.  Some people have to learn lessons by actually getting in trouble rather than showing leadership and evolving when evidence says their political worldview is undergoing a dynamic shift.  She wants to "learn" the hardway - didn't Joementum start out by poo pooing the netroots too."

Nemesis22, "If Tauscher wants to avoid a primary from the emboldened left of the party, having her campaign manager whine about the indignity of being challenged by the great unwashed & comparing her favorably to Joe Lieberman isn't a good start."

And finally, a letter:

Dear Congresswoman Tauscher:

Today I read your campaign manager disrespecting the netroots Democrats, whining about attacks on pseudo-centrists Lieberman, Harman, and now apparently you.  "D-Alamo?"  Please.

You want to pick a fight with the netroots?  Fine.  It's on.

You've just turned another netroot constituent into a political enemy. 

See you in two years

Way to go Counterproductive Katie!

Tags: blogs, CA-10, CT-Sen, DLC, Ellen Tauscher, grassroots, Joe Lieberman, Katie Merrill, netroots (all tags)

Comments

16 Comments

Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill
Check out the growing Ellen Tauscher page at Calitics.
by Bob Brigham 2006-12-13 05:09PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

I am very much amused by Merrill's response on her own post.

On the contrary, my post far from backfired. In fact, the critical responses to my post on CMR and on different blogs prove my point.

Rather than unifying behind a common purpose to move the country forward under the Democratic leadership of Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader Harry Reid, which the moderates are doing, those who responded critically reaffirmed their desire to target (e.g "primary") moderates they don't like - no matter how strong the moderate's record is on key Democratic issues and no matter how well they serve their districts.

A full quarter of the Democratic caucus of the 110th Congress identify themselves as moderate Democrats - many of them newly elected last month. If we eschew the Big Tent and cannot unite as a party to support a quarter of our House Democrats, then our party is in big trouble.

Despite the fact that the internet has become a powerful small-donor fundraising tool, the resources that we Democrats (I say "we" because, despite our disagreements, we are ultimately on the same side) can devote in any cycle is finite. So every volunteer hour spent targeting an incumbent Democrat for defeat is a volunteer hour not spent helping a challenger Democrat beat a Republican. Every contribution made to a candidate that is trying to knockoff a moderate incumbent Democrat is a contribution not going to a Democrat trying to beat a Republican in a competitive open seat. Not to mention the resources that are being diverted from protecting our vulnerable freshman for 08. As more than one commenter pointed out on Kos, it took resources from all over the Bay Area to get Jerry McNerney in CD-11 elected, and we will need all of those and more to get him re-elected. Let's focus on our common goals and win.

Gosh, there is so much there to deconstruct, where to start?

by juls 2006-12-13 05:22PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

The first paragraph is a joke, I'll take the second paragraph:

Rather than unifying behind a common purpose to move the country forward under the Democratic leadership of Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader Harry Reid, which the moderates are doing, those who responded critically reaffirmed their desire to target (e.g "primary") moderates they don't like - no matter how strong the moderate's record is on key Democratic issues and no matter how well they serve their districts.

The irony is that Pelosi had her buddy John Burton redistrict Tauscher to give her a carrot and try to get her in line. That didn't work, but Pelosi's move was designed for a Plan B, which Merrill ensured will occur. Helping Speaker Pelosi move the country forward begins in California's 10th congressional district.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-13 05:27PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

P.S. I'll have a full post on Pelosi and Tauscher at calitics tomorrow.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-13 05:31PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

I took it all on here.

The notion that the money raised on ActBlue would have gone into other accounts if it didn't exist is ridiculous.

by juls 2006-12-13 06:06PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

Great response. BTW, I've really been enjoying Ruck Pad.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-13 06:09PM | 0 recs
I like the quotes

and, for the record, I cannot conceive why Katie Merrill would write that post.

When Jerry McNerney walked into the room to give his speech at the staff/volunteer thank you party celebrating his historic win in CA-11, the first person he singled out for thanks was Matt Lockshin of the blog Say No to Pombo.

Jerry understood that in a room crowded with labor and Democratic donors and activists, Matt represented something fresh and envigorating inside the Democratic Party: a grassroots/netroots activist, a blogger and, in many ways, the single essential force that propelled his candidacy from its earliest days into its ultimate victory.

Why would, in December of 2006, Katie thumb her nose and talk down to the most exciting and efficacious trend in Democratic politics since Paul Wellstone took a bus tour of Minnesota? (Presaging the Clinton/Gore bus tours by two years.)

I simply don't know.  It's mind-boggling.

She writes as if bloggers are some "angry mob."  She doesn't understand.  As a 38-year old long-time veteran of Democratic activism I can tell Katie something she apparently doesn't realize:  "bloggers" are simply the typing wing of the most exciting reform movement in the Democratic party in our lifetimes.

"Bloggers" are fresh activists who happen to have been activated in the era of online communication.

One of our principles here on the blogs, something we learned from the Dean campaign, is that our candidates, our electeds should reflect the values of the people who bust their ass to send them to Washington.

Jerry gets this.  Ellen doesn't.  Mocking and putting down the blogs will get Tauscher and friends nowhere.

There are many more Matt Lockshins out there.  They care.  They are committed.  And they are not what Ms. Merrill thinks they are. These are positive people motivated by deepseated values.

Ellen Tauscher may think that she "owns" the seat in CA-10 like she "owned" the seat in CA-11.

It's simply not true.  

With no malice, and with a ton of positive energy, Ellen Tauscher may just learn that the netroots are more a force to be reckoned with than belittled.

Too bad for her that it's a lesson she seems hellbent on ignoring.

by kid oakland 2006-12-13 10:26PM | 0 recs
Gotta Love Her!

Ordinarily, it's so much work to get a primary challenge off the ground.

Not this time, though.  That 18-year old's Caltics diary is really killer.  If you haven't read it already, do yourself a favor.  Click the link, and go.

by Paul Rosenberg 2006-12-13 10:26PM | 0 recs
IT'S ON!

The SFist:

Now Tauscher is in trouble with the netroots for showing up and not pulling a Jim Webb (Webb, by the way, rules) They're even throwing the "L" word to describe her, you know, Lieberman.   The site Calitics has been all over her lately and even has a post from one of her constituents saying that she's really not that nice of a lady.  And needless to say, the Kossacks are in full bile spewing mode.  There's even talk of running someone against her in the next primary and when her campaign spokesman pooh-poohed the whole thing, the netroots brought the pain.  Oh, it's on.

The criticism is that she's basically undercutting the new Democratic majority before the Democratic majority can even begin (although that might already be happening).  And then there's the making nice with somebody who has spent the past six years kicking the Democrats brains in.  It doesn't help that it's well known that Tauscher and Pelosi don't get along.

I love the line, "the netroots brought the pain.  Oh, it's on."

CA-10 is going to be a tag to watch.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-14 04:31PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

So who's going to run? We need to open an Act Blue account ASAP, in the 2006 race, Dear Ellen raised $928,426 to run against Republican Darcy Linn woh spent $3,963(Lynn "raised" $1,854)
http://www.opensecrets.org/races/summary .asp?ID=CA10&Cycle=2006

During a contested primary, Dear Ellen will be able to raise (my best guess) $1.4M and she won't have to worry about saving any to run against a real Republican candidate in the general, she'll be able to spend it all in the primary. The R's were only willing to run a token candidate in 2006, because having Dear Ellen in place was just as good.
And to hold power, Katie Merrill will run a full Karl Rove smear, and to counter that will take big $$$. We have to start now, find a candidate, open a primary fund, and start collecting the bucke, including convincing Dear Ellen's Labor backers that our new candidate will have their best interests at heart.

Anyone in the CA-10, who do you know, no felons, ex-porn stars, and PROGRESSIVE?
http://dumptauscher.blogspot.com/

by Kurlan Naiskos 2006-12-14 06:55PM | 0 recs
NO, there is no hurry

We don't need to rush for a candidate, we need to make the case against Tauscher.

In an ideal world, a candidate announces the first week of a fundraising quarter. We don't want to go too early, so April is out. Only a fool would announce in the summer, so July is out. That means the earliest it makes sense for a candidate to surface is October. That is when a candidate who is smart will announce.

Until then, forget about the candidate and make the case against Tauscher.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-14 07:01PM | 0 recs
Re: NO, there is no hurry
Hmmm...I'm not a politician, but timing is everything. Am I doing this wrong? Is this too soon? Let me know, not just blogswarm, but everyone weigh in. thanks-K
http://dumptauscher.blogspot.com/
by Kurlan Naiskos 2006-12-14 07:24PM | 0 recs
Re: NO, there is no hurry

Fellow MyDD'er ttagaris beat Lieberman with Lamont, but wrote 11 months before the election that the campaign was doomed because John Ormand pulled out of the race. We don't want an early candidate, it would be a disaster. The only focus for 2007 should be on Tauscher.

Any primary is like a recall, there are two questions. We want to focus on the first one for as long as possible while building the infrastructure to allow the second question to have the potential to catapult.

If Jesus Christ were to announce tomorrow, Tauscher would win as she will with any marathon.

We need to go hard against Tauscher, but we want to keep our candidate as an ace in the hole for a good time. Hackett raised as much money in two weeks as we need for the entire race, let's not blow our wad early because we will lose.

by Bob Brigham 2006-12-14 07:46PM | 0 recs
Re: NO, there is no hurry

I'm not sure whether I agree with this or not, but I can tell you that we need to make damn sure people are on notice this is leading somewhere so that the politicians don't just endorse Tauscher as a matter of course.  There'll be a lot of contested primaries in CA-10 in 2008 and some of the established politicos will be involved in them.  We don't want them to align with Tauscher just because they think she's the only Democrat.  Otherwise there will be some elements of the grassroots who will feel reluctant to buck the electeds that they like/respect.    

But then again, should we make sure that people know there's a possibility of there being a primary, we run the risk of someone announcing who isn't good but who would steal some of the thunder of the "candidate on ice."  I am especially concerned about one person in particular who could through his own egotism cripple this effort.  

by Matt Lockshin 2006-12-14 09:03PM | 0 recs
Need to set the stage

Good discussion - another important element that will be required to be in place before the issue of which candidate comes up, is to build and demonstrate support for challenging Tauscher.  Congressional primary challengers hardly ever win, and established people who could jump in as really credible candidates are likely giving up something to take this risk.  They won't unless they know they've got support to build a real campaign on.  This will take time.  

by PeterB 2006-12-14 10:33PM | 0 recs
Re: CA-10: Counterproductive Katie Merrill

If, and it is a huge if, Tauscher is right about the Blue Dog lean of the next Congress, the complicity of Rahm and his minions in allocating money needs to be addressed.  McNerney got active DCCC funded opposition from Steve Filson and in the general election received a mere $200 K from the DCCC.  Pombo got a lot more help.  Hey, Filson got a lot more help.  Environmental groups contributed $1 million in independent expenditures in the CA-11 race and pulled Mcnerney over the top despite Tauscher and Rahm.

Meanwhile, not a dime of DCCC money went to CA-4 and Charlie Brown's campaign.  DiFi was sitting on a small fortune because Richard Mountjoy needed to be opposed.  Right.

California has easily the largest contingent of right wing democrats of any non-southern state.  What is going on, here?  

by David Kowalski 2006-12-15 12:46AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------