• comment on a post South Carolina: bad news for every candidate over 6 years ago
    Now Obama surrogates and MSM bully and mock Bill Clinton and try to convince him and other common folk that his bringing out the distinctions with Obama is not effective for Hillarys campaign. I hope Bill Clinton listen to his instincts rather than these biased pundits. Based on history and through out his career he didnt have any respect for their skill and punditry. My respect for him gone up a notch since last month.
  • comment on a post Half a million + voted in South Carolina over 6 years ago
    May be NC going Blue if there happens a mega Democratic landslide but not SC
  • comment on a post Half a million + voted in South Carolina over 6 years ago
    Even in a landslide for Democrats in Nov 08, there is no way SC going blue. Be realistic. Both Republican and Democratic nominees are not going to spend single dollar combined SC.
  • comment on a post What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    Falcon do you really believe after having so much support from AA beating Obama in some polls, one fine day Hillary and Bill wanted to become racists. Suddenly started insulting MLK and doing all sorts of irrational things so they can lose their support in AA.
  • comment on a post What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    We are not talking about any major issue differences here between all dem. candidates atleast in Civil rights and other relevant issues. Not with any hidden Obama record in AA community that trumps Clintons.
  • comment on a post What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    AA community has to comeback to Obama. you have to read between the lines falcon.
  • comment on a post What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    Remember when this whole manufactured uproar in Media about race since New hampshire AA vote is about half and half going for Obama and Clinton. MSM doesnt want to see the elephant in the room. See the direct signs with Jesse Jackson Jr. comments about Hillary not shedding tears for Katrina, katrina, katrina. And there afterwards all the race baiting by Obama camp. But remember this was not the beginning point. This type of strategy is in the works pre Iowa for SC. Michelle Obama's comments about AA community has to comeback to them eventually.
  • comment on a post What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    Hillary camp might have to concede the AA vote but still got to play for. This is a tactical win for Obama camp because they didnt want AA getting sliced evenly for them and Clinton. But in the long run he did badly and cornered himself. Win the battle lose the war.
  • on a comment on What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    Hillary ended up about 56% of vote with Michigan more closely resembles national sample
  • on a comment on What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    yes. But even in Michigan obama sympathisers did a concerted and meaningful effort for 'uncommitted' on the ballot. Obama(I know its uncommited. But exit polls with the uncommited going for Obama) got more than 70% AA vote here
  • on a comment on What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    typo I mean not the official office voice of Obama
  • on a comment on What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    Obama might not win but he might want to play the spoiler. Jim Clyburn I know is the official voice for Obama camp, he sounds to go all the way to convention. calling the 2 or 3 tickets from SC. Everybody knows there are no tickets here onwards. Also he appear to be not happy having super tuesday coming fast with 22 states. You can read between the lines of his intentions, since he is officially neutral
  • on a comment on What does Obama's Rout Mean? over 6 years ago
    I think Georgia has more AA Dems. But your main point is right
  • comment on a post Hill Poised to Finish Reagobama over 6 years ago
    The most competitive one in Feb. 5 states for Obama appears to be Georgia(expecting Illinois going for native son Obama). Alabama trending more like the other super Tuesday contests.
  • comment on a post Don't Taunt the Tiger! over 6 years ago


    Did anybody notice all the cable news shows,most regular news channels,most of the newspapers
    running stories that a lot of Democrats privately
    telling them that Bill Clinton is damaging his reputation,his legacy etc. by 'attacking' Obama etc..

    Bill is hurting Hillary's campaign so and so. He is mad,uncontrollable etc. This kind of narration
    also coming from Republican radio shows, conservative leaning reportes.

    Here is the interesting point. Yesterday between
    his rants against Clintons, Chis Matthews unintendly opened his mind while talking to his
    guest speakers.( We all know his soft corner for
    Rudy Juliani and his suffering ever since Rudy's
    meltdown few weeks ago.). In a low tone filled with anxiety asking his guest, can Rudy be able to compete with Hillary if he becomes nominee .
    This question coming from Chris Mattews after his take or his usual dose of criticism against Hillary on Monday's debate.

    Folks that is grudging respect. Unfortunately we dont see that most of the time while these guys conducting their shows.

    Similar case with these guys criticism against
    Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton has done by himself  what a responsible Entire Media didnt do and ought to be doing. He has pointed that distinctions and Obama's limitations so persuasively to undecided and uninformed voter.
    He has done it so effectively.

    In all these incidents he communicated the distinctions without one single personal attack
    on Obama, contrary to what media says, twists.
    I have not a single remark that is derogatory to
    Mr. Obama personally. Everthing targeted to the
    capabilities,polices,experience  or lack of them.

    Now they(some unnamed? Democrats and a few others) are trying to Bully,discourage,planting
    doubts to Clinton campaig to make Bill Clinton not do what is very effectively doing(he wouldnt
    have done it, if we have a responsible media).

    The thing with Clintons is that they dont listen to these pundits and weak boned Democrats. Especially Bill Clinton has this unique ability to listen to his instinct which is very superior and right on target for so many of his victories against Republicans. Thats is the difference and margin he has achieved and rest of the Democrats lacked in their pusuit against Republicans.

    Remind you so far Obama has not substantively refuted any of the things Bill Clinton said(not counting the rhetoric).

    My respect for Bill Clinton increased a bit while seeing this entire fiasco for the last few weeks.

    I can understand why he is the only Democrat who elected twice since FDR.

Diaries

Advertise Blogads