oh lord im dreading november. like u said before- how in the hell did the wh decide to put itself in a straightjacket. we are paralyzed- unable tp pass needed stimulus funds. and americans are willing to vote for crazy they are so mad. these right winger this go round i swear have to be the most conservative since when? pre teddy roosevelt? Buck is for the gold standard. Angle is for Chile's pension system. Paul questions the Civil Rts Act. Feingold's oppnent questions global warming and has a plan to drill the Great Lakes. yet he right now has a narrow polling lead. a nightmare.
very true. eleanor was the one who prodded fdr to do more. have u seen franklin and eleanor- the acclaimed tv miniseries on the roosevelts. mand that is one hell of a pic- very accurate.
on charlie rose last night they talked about reforming the senate. yall should watch it. charlierose.com. it made me sad. a point was brought up about fdr: in 34- the midterms- millions were without work. millions. fdr was getting slammed by left and right that he hadnt done enough or too much. yet the voters- perhaps more trusting of govt then than now- trusted the dems to keep on trying. today it seems perhaps too many want a magic pill. u know- a quick joystick war or a pill to melt those pounds. in 2 yrs americans appear to have decided they wont give dems more time to keep trying to fix the economy. post watergate syndrome perhaps?
obama should have done a bigger stim bill etc.. but he didnt yet recognizes the need for more. he needs to come out with a plan- u know if dems are elected to hold congress for another 2 yrs who is the plan for jobs. maybe then people just might give dems another chance to keep on trying. hell the gop wont.
some say graham is playing the game here to protect pal mccain from a verry damaging immigration vote. if immigration is next mccain will surely oppose giving hayworth lots of ads with mccain pushing immigration reform time and again. so graham throws both climate and immi ref into chaos.
lemos is right- the senate cannot do 2 issues at once- this is something we must remedy asap. we have a jobs bill pending, billions the sen must approve to back up school districts so 300,000 teachers are fired, citizens united "fix," a hundred noms still not approved and the budget. la times says even after the climate bill was unveiled it wouldnt be on the floor for debate for another month! why- they got to send it to cbo and other agencies for analysis and to win the votes. good grief.
fdl asks the question im wodnering- why did reid put the opt out in the bill if he didnt have the votes of conservadems to begin with? now we have another compromise about to be compromised again. what votes did the opt out get? none it appears.
great poll on po-but like wyden says if u told people the reality-the po would be open to only 10pct of folks the poll results would not be as great. time for rhetoirc to meet policy. dems say u will have a choice. so lets get a bill with that choice for all.
hah. if obama is with trigger he is in for the headache from hell. check the hill for ltr sent to rahm from naacp and moveon asking wh to heed people's will.
truman is the great maverick. a real one. note- he ran on civil rights for aas in 48. everyone told him dont but he did and ran on universal healthcare. there wont be another truman.
lincoln deserves mention. he was couragoues enough to issue the emancipation . he had the ability to grow on aas having equal rights and was courageous enough to push for what was realy needed in 1865.
fdr a great in courage on the use of govt to improve lives of americans. it doesnt sound so radical now but what he did by creatin g ss etc was highy courageous. he welcomed the hate of special interests and used govt.
if joe kennedy ran id back him. ive looked at his house record-if only we had more dems like he. his focus is on poverty. but he isnt a talker on it-when he left the house he set up a co op for giving heating oil to the poor. i like oreily much also. i want a fighter from ma. lord knows we need a fighter.
a great idea here-
kennedy's medicare for all bill should be reintroduced in t he congress. that would be a fitting tribute to the man. heck we could reset this debacle of a healthcare debate and do what is needed-have not for profit healthcare for all americans.i wonder if any prog on the hill will do it? rep weiner? woolsey? someone?!
if america doesnt get a decent healthcare bill through our economy wont ever be ablle to be what it ever was. millions with no care and millions going bankrupt bc of our failing system impacts the global economy. our lack of healthcare drains our nation and thus does harm the world economic balance. obama said that a million times. so perhaps it is the business of sos to make sure our eocnomy is sound and our businesses dont have to risk collapse bc of healthcare payments,no?
i say all hands on deck. i saw hillary on mtp and she talked healthcare for 2 minutes. gave a mroe impassioned potent 2 min arguement for passing reform than ive heard in sucha bite. id like ot hear mroe onw hat exactly she would do and how to do it given she is sos. id be thrilled to see her make those anti right wing arguements bc right now it all seems to be comming apart
depressed too. politico has a story to give mroe pause-forclosures are soaring-will hti 9 mil by 2012. homelessness rising fast bc of it. and its too late for another plan on this. yikes
jeromearmstrong Our Polarized and Money-Driven Congress: Created Over 25 Years By Republicans (and Quickly Imitated by Democrats http://bit.ly/ewXlXI #bblue
oh lord im dreading november. like u said before- how in the hell did the wh decide to put itself in a straightjacket. we are paralyzed- unable tp pass needed stimulus funds. and americans are willing to vote for crazy they are so mad. these right winger this go round i swear have to be the most conservative since when? pre teddy roosevelt? Buck is for the gold standard. Angle is for Chile's pension system. Paul questions the Civil Rts Act. Feingold's oppnent questions global warming and has a plan to drill the Great Lakes. yet he right now has a narrow polling lead. a nightmare.
very true. eleanor was the one who prodded fdr to do more. have u seen franklin and eleanor- the acclaimed tv miniseries on the roosevelts. mand that is one hell of a pic- very accurate.
on charlie rose last night they talked about reforming the senate. yall should watch it. charlierose.com. it made me sad. a point was brought up about fdr: in 34- the midterms- millions were without work. millions. fdr was getting slammed by left and right that he hadnt done enough or too much. yet the voters- perhaps more trusting of govt then than now- trusted the dems to keep on trying. today it seems perhaps too many want a magic pill. u know- a quick joystick war or a pill to melt those pounds. in 2 yrs americans appear to have decided they wont give dems more time to keep trying to fix the economy. post watergate syndrome perhaps?
obama should have done a bigger stim bill etc.. but he didnt yet recognizes the need for more. he needs to come out with a plan- u know if dems are elected to hold congress for another 2 yrs who is the plan for jobs. maybe then people just might give dems another chance to keep on trying. hell the gop wont.
some say graham is playing the game here to protect pal mccain from a verry damaging immigration vote. if immigration is next mccain will surely oppose giving hayworth lots of ads with mccain pushing immigration reform time and again. so graham throws both climate and immi ref into chaos.
lemos is right- the senate cannot do 2 issues at once- this is something we must remedy asap. we have a jobs bill pending, billions the sen must approve to back up school districts so 300,000 teachers are fired, citizens united "fix," a hundred noms still not approved and the budget. la times says even after the climate bill was unveiled it wouldnt be on the floor for debate for another month! why- they got to send it to cbo and other agencies for analysis and to win the votes. good grief.
fdl asks the question im wodnering- why did reid put the opt out in the bill if he didnt have the votes of conservadems to begin with? now we have another compromise about to be compromised again. what votes did the opt out get? none it appears.
http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/11/21/w ith-conservative-resistance-to-public-op tion-what-was-the-point-of-the-opt-out/
great poll on po-but like wyden says if u told people the reality-the po would be open to only 10pct of folks the poll results would not be as great. time for rhetoirc to meet policy. dems say u will have a choice. so lets get a bill with that choice for all.
hah. if obama is with trigger he is in for the headache from hell. check the hill for ltr sent to rahm from naacp and moveon asking wh to heed people's will.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/22 796099-Action-Alert:-Help-House-Progre ssives-Get-218-on-Robust-Public-Option
truman is the great maverick. a real one. note- he ran on civil rights for aas in 48. everyone told him dont but he did and ran on universal healthcare. there wont be another truman.
lincoln deserves mention. he was couragoues enough to issue the emancipation . he had the ability to grow on aas having equal rights and was courageous enough to push for what was realy needed in 1865.
fdr a great in courage on the use of govt to improve lives of americans. it doesnt sound so radical now but what he did by creatin g ss etc was highy courageous. he welcomed the hate of special interests and used govt.
if joe kennedy ran id back him. ive looked at his house record-if only we had more dems like he. his focus is on poverty. but he isnt a talker on it-when he left the house he set up a co op for giving heating oil to the poor. i like oreily much also. i want a fighter from ma. lord knows we need a fighter.
kennedy's medicare for all bill should be reintroduced in t he congress. that would be a fitting tribute to the man. heck we could reset this debacle of a healthcare debate and do what is needed-have not for profit healthcare for all americans.i wonder if any prog on the hill will do it? rep weiner? woolsey? someone?!
if america doesnt get a decent healthcare bill through our economy wont ever be ablle to be what it ever was. millions with no care and millions going bankrupt bc of our failing system impacts the global economy. our lack of healthcare drains our nation and thus does harm the world economic balance. obama said that a million times. so perhaps it is the business of sos to make sure our eocnomy is sound and our businesses dont have to risk collapse bc of healthcare payments,no?
i say all hands on deck. i saw hillary on mtp and she talked healthcare for 2 minutes. gave a mroe impassioned potent 2 min arguement for passing reform than ive heard in sucha bite. id like ot hear mroe onw hat exactly she would do and how to do it given she is sos. id be thrilled to see her make those anti right wing arguements bc right now it all seems to be comming apart
disgusting. im contacting wapo on this. why is this permissable?
depressed too. politico has a story to give mroe pause-forclosures are soaring-will hti 9 mil by 2012. homelessness rising fast bc of it. and its too late for another plan on this. yikes
exactly. i wish gillibrand's pub opt was used-medicare on a sliging scale.