He is a Surrendercrat who advocates selling out to Republicans in the name of bi-partisanship.  He wants his face on coins and he'll roll over for John Boehner and Mitch Connell to get there if he has too.

His "Democrat for a day" nonsense infuriates me.  I want people who want to be Democrats for life.  Not Republicans who want to cross over one day to stick it to Bill Clinton one last time.

You're just making it worse by elaborating on it.

Obama has been making a series of statements recently, and all of them are disparaging of "pre-Obama" Democrats.  He's been attacking regular Democrats for months now.

This is not just one statement that someone is over-interpreting or reading into.  This is a whole pattern of anti-Democratic rants by Obama that has become particularly apparent to us in the past few days, as he amps it up, apparently to try to win over some rednecks in SC and NV and FL.

Where did that quote come from that CBS had?

Reagan didn't take running government seriously either.  He napped during meetings.   Maybe Obama is thinking he can take some cat naps too.  After all Obama doesn't think the nuts and bolts day to day stuff is important.  

"I would never use Ronald Reagan as an example of change...

"He was openly -- openly -- intolerant of unions and the right to organize. He openly fought against the union and the organized labor movement in this country. He openly did extraordinary damage to the middle class and working people, created a tax structure that favored the very wealthiest Americans and caused the middle class and working people to struggle every single day. The destruction of the environment, you know, eliminating regulation of companies that were polluting and doing extraordinary damage to the environment...

"I can promise you this: This president will never use Ronald Reagan as an example for change."

Well, whaddya know? A REAL Democrat. John Edwards.

Barack Obama is just a pseudo-Democrat, and in fact, he ought to be running as a Republican.

Lambert at Correntewire has Obama's number:

Bush Latte: Obama keeps moving right, cites Reagan's "optimism" and "clarity"
Submitted by lambert on Thu, 2008-01-17 00:36.

http://www.correntewire.com/bush_latte_o bama_keeps_moving_right_cites_reagans_op timism_and_clarity
Well.

Wouldn't it be simpler for Obama just to run on the Republican ticket? They really need a decent candidate over there, and I think Obama is just as adept and far more eloquent than Romney, has better hair, a better baritone--and he doesn't have the funny underwear thing the Mittster has, either. I'd call it a win-win situation.

I think, at this point, we can forget about the biography, and the position papers, and the oratory, stop listening to the music, and start listening to the lyrics.

First came Obama's infamous dogwhistle to the Village that put Social Security in play, a right wing talking point. Then there was calling unions "special interests", a right wing talking point. Then there was tax cuts as a panacea, a right wing talking point. Meanwhile, the Oborg consistently leverage right wing talking points like "trial lawyers" to trash Edwards, not to mention Hillary hatred, all the while explaining what Obama "really means," and airily denying it all. Then there was the trashing of Gore.

And finally we've got the infamous Florida brochure, where Obama encourages Republicans to become "Obamacrats" just for one day to vote for him, and then re-up as Republicans again. (Way to party build, there, guy.) Obama is a highly skilled politician and a Harvard-schooled lawyer. None of this can be accidental.

Read the rest of it, so you know exactly what Lambert said. It might wake you up a little.