O, showing it in jeans for the photo-op, saying "no flash".

Do we really have to have to nominate our version of Bush?

I really miss that good old site, "Media Whores Online."

Update [2008-5-13 19:15:46 by Jerome Armstrong]: Heh, Obama supporters are offended by the comparison of Obama's preening for the media with Bush's preening for the media. Certainly Obama's agenda will be different that Bush's, thank goodness, but in this regard, it is what it is I'm afraid.

There's more...

Obama has lead from day one of the Primary and leads today: Obama 112+ days , Hillary 0 days.

Obama's stable and uninterrupted lead:

1) Obama has lead in delegates for all 112 or more days of the primary, Clinton has lead for  0 days.

2) Voters have ratified Obama's as the Nominee of the Democratic Party by increasing his lead on more than 80% of the voting days of the 2008 primary. On the 16 days there were contests Obama has won more delegates on 14 days, Hillary has won on 2 days, the second was Pennsylvania.

3) Obama has held a consistent and modest 3-9 point lead in polls through out the primary. Gallup, Rasmussen, averages  and the voting results all agree.

4) Obama is closing the deal as planned in his campaign's 50 state strategy. The voters have not been indecisive but are continuing the support they provided Obama on day one of the primary season. The Democratic Primary Race does not reflect an electorate with "buyers remorse": Obama has a consistent modest majority but lacks that majority with less educated and older voters, these demographic variations manifest as wins for the trailing candidate in states like Pennsylvania. Demographic difference in a given state do not indicate a shift in voter sentiment. This consistent modest lead is born out by the national tracking polls.

Obama's lead is modest but has exhibited  no evidence of the polar swings that are reported.

There's more...