(cross-posted at kickin it with cg and motley moose)

The gunman that murdered Stephen Tyrone Johns at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC was a right-wing extremist and Freeper.  As ThinkProgress notes:

A white supremacist born in 1920. Brunn has been approvingly cited on Stormfront, a national white supremacist website. He is apparently the author of a tract called, "Kill the Best Gentiles," which his website describes as "a new, hard-hitting exposé of the JEW CONSPIRACY to destroy the White gene-pool." Brunn, a WWII veteran, also wrote a screed on President Obama's citizenship that was re-posted to popular right-wing message board Free Republic:

Obama is missing!
DN.no (Nowegian Forum) ^ | December 2, 2008 | James W. von Brunn
Posted on December 2, 2008 3:40:03 PM GMT-05:00 by wannabegeek

Obama is missing!

The American People Demand to Know:

WHO SENT YOU???

Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no records -- no paper trail -- none -- this is no accident. It is being done on purpose with Media help - but to serve whom & why???

MISSING-HIDDEN DOCUMENTS:

Original, vault copy of Certificate of Live Birth in the USA -- Not Released (1 version hidden in Hawaii, Original found in Kenya)

Certificate of Live Birth -- Released - Proven Counterfeit (www.ObamaFiles.com)

Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released

Soetoro adoption records -- Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Not Released

Punahou School records -- Not released

Selective Service Registration -- Released - Proven Counterfeit

Occidental College records -- Not released

Passport (Pakistan) -- Not released

Columbia College records -- Not released

Columbia thesis -- Not released

Harvard College records -- Not released

Harvard Law Review articles -- None (maybe 1, Not Signed)

Baptism certificate -- None

Medical records -- Not released

Illinois State Senate records -- None (Locked up to prohibit public view

Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost (All other Illinois state senators' records are intact)

Law practice client list -- Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None

WHY DON'T WE SEE ONE WORD OF THIS IN ANY OF THE MEDIA?

Love him or hate him, we all remember how the press went to great lengths to find out every move that President Bush made ... finally unable to come up with anything factual, so they created it! When their accusations were proven empty, they refused to retract one word of the fraud they perpetrated on the American people.

Dan Rather lost his job over fraudulent documents, because common people like you & me reached out and ripped CBS to pieces. They couldn't stand the loss of sponsors OR viewers!

The same Media went to great lengths to scandalize & destroy Sarah Palin. She maintains a 91% approval rating among voters from all parties, thanks to the Internet and investigative journalists who don't work for the mainstream media.

NOW ------- The Supreme Court has scheduled a Conference for Dec 5th about Obama's

U. S. Citizenship. STILL, not a word about any of this from the Media. If it were not for the Internet and talk radio, American citizens would become the servants of a dishonest & conspiratorial Media.

THINK ABOUT IT. IT DIDN'T USED TO BE THIS WAY! How much longer are we going to sit on our hands & say not a word?

AND DON'T THINK THE MEDIA SIMPLY DOESN'T KNOW - THEY ARE GETTING POUNDED WITH EMAILS ABOUT IT!!!

Obama could not get a simple security clearance with the information the government has on him ---- NOBODY COULD!

NOW he is privy to every top secret America has!

What is going on??? WHERE ARE THE GOOD PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY - ARE YOU OUT THERE???

Submitted by: James W. von Brunn

The above post was scrubbed from the Free Republic site and then mysteriously reappeared shortly ago.

There's more...

The "Freepers" have been skewing the poll numbers in a county commission race in MO.  Lets 'correct' the imbalance. Go to http://stjoechannel.com/content/poll/?po ll_id=561

to vote for Mr.Hook, the democrat in the race.  Public perceptions via polling can adversely affect election results.

There's more...

Now that Barry Obama has secured the nomination -- despite the protests from some quarters -- we turn our attention to his choice of vice presidential nominee. On this issue, things couldn't be any clearer.

First, let's dispatch with the wannabes who have NO chance! We'll take them one at a time:

1)RODHAM-CLINTON.......hahahahahahahahah ahahahahah, sorry I'll try to control myself.  Rodham-Clinton represents the old Washington politics that Barry O spent the ENTIRE campaign denouncing.  If she was on top of the ticket, he'd be offered the second spot and he'd definitely take it.  Democrats would have their "dream ticket." However, she's not, he is.  There is no advantage to Barry O to offer the job to her (and her husband) unless he wants to have a nightmare ticket.  He doesn't, he wants to win.

2)JOHN EDWARDS.......despite his protests that he's been there, done that, if Obama offered the job, the Breck Girl would accept.  But he does nothing to shore up Obama's foreign policy and military credentials.  Therefore, it's not gonna happen.

3)CHRIS DODD......the only possible reason to offer the spot to this woman/man is, um, is, a, yea, well, actually there are no reasons. (Would it surprise anyone if it turned out Chris Dodd is a transvestite?)  He adds nothing to the ticket and would put voters to sleep.  No sale.

4)GOVERNOR RICHARDSON......the stumbling-bumbling, rolly- polly Richardson has already endorsed Obama, and would probably excite some hispanics.  Problem is he doesn't engender real confidence in any measurable degree across the political spectrum.  His appeal is extremely limited to ethnic pride; therefore, he's a definite no.

5)JOE BIDEN.....a.k.a. Senator foot-in-the-mouth.  I think Barry already answered this question when Biden described him as an "articulate and clean" black man....that's "just Joe" said Obama with a detectable air of disgust.  The general election is gonna be a rough and tumble affair; Obama can't afford to turn that crazy man loose.  No deal.

6)Dennis Kissinich and all the remaining wannabe candidates... the fact that they're grouped with Dennis Kissinich tells you all you need to know.

So who IS his choice gonna be?  I can tell you EXACTLY what, although not yet who it will be.

It will be a man with impeccable military credentials.  America is at war.  Senator Obama has NO military or foreign policy credentials whatsoever.  His standard refrain, "I have the judgment" will grow old quickly in the general election.

He will have to choose someone his base will find mostly unpalatable and then reassure them that the guy will only be second in command, so just suck it up and bear it.

And there is a 100% guarantee that I'm right, so just remember where you read this first.

There's more...

I didn't think it would be possible, but Hillary Clinton actually gave me a reason to vote for McCain if she somehow manages to become the Democratic nominee.
I hate racists and racially polarizing figures, and Hillary has become one. The fact that she is a sitting US senator is a disgrace. I will not tolerate her in any capacity, and I will remind everyone of her "working, hard-working Americans, white Americans" comment, and I may actually work to unseat her in NY.
Could you imagine what would have happened had McCain said what Clinton said? The entire Democratic Party, and a large proportion of the Republican Party, would be up in arms against McCain if he had said such a thing.
Hillary Clinton is dead politically.

There's more...

Bill Clinton and other Clinton surrogates and supporters are insisting, incredibly, that Barack Obama is the one color-arousing the presidential race, even though it was the head of Clinton's New Hampshire campaign who suggested, based on no evidence whatever, that Barack Obama might have been a drug dealer.  One syndicated columnist observed at the time,

But could it be that this story is even worse than many in the national press will say? Isn't it interesting that Shaheen, or whoever is behind this, opted to invoke the image of a drug dealer in referencing the first top-tier black candidate for president? That's quite a coincidence. This wouldn't be an ugly Willie Horton-type tactic intended to harvest fear and play on stereotypes about who is a criminal and who isn't, or -- in this case -- who uses drugs and who sells them?

Nah. Liberal Democrats would never sink that low. Why if they did, how could they continue to package themselves as a kinder and gentler -- and more enlightened -- alternative to Republicans? Certainly not with a straight face.  Drug rumors about Obama playing on stereotypes?

There's more...