No Secret Ballot Caucuses R B S
by fairleft, Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 08:36:06 AM EST
I talked about this for Iowa -- in the The 4% Iowa Party Hack Lie -- and it's just as bad or even worse in Nevada. How about a little right to make your voting choice in private, away from bosses' (including union bosses') ears and eyes?! It's damn obvious caucuses, which violate the principle of a secret ballot, should be illegal, but they aren't in this devolving to pre-democracy. Here's Las Vegas Sun columnist John Ralston (emphasis added throughout diary):
New York: We have heard a lot about unions pressuring their members (or not pressuring their members) to caucus for Obama. Do you think this is going to play a significant part in tomorrow's caucus? And as a follow up, if union members are largely Latino and minority, do think these demographics trump the union expectations?Jon Ralston: The answer to your last question may be the key to the election. That is, will women and Hispanics in the Culinary -- Hispanics make up about 40 percent of the union members -- who might lean toward Hillary Clinton stick with her, or out of union solidarity, go with Obama? If it were a secret ballot, I think the Culinary's impact would be diminished. But these folks will be standing with other union members and openly stating their preference. How many will go against the union's wishes?






