by Restore Fairness, Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 05:07:06 PM EDT
From Restore Fairness blog. Yesterday, a federal judge issued a temporary injunction on some of the toughest portions of Arizona’s anti-immigration law SB1070 including the power for police to detain anyone “suspected” of being in the country illegally. While the ruling is a victory, immigration law enforcement still needs reform
There's more...
Loading

by Restore Fairness, Fri Jul 16, 2010 at 03:41:05 PM EDT
From Restore Fairness blog
When the NAACP called on the Tea Party to reject the racism that exists within its ranks, Tea Party activists were outraged and denied that racism is a part of their movement — despite a clear pattern of bigotry and hate. Instead, Mark Williams, the public face of the Tea Party Express, attacked the NAACP as being a “racist” organization, saying “they make more money off of race than any slave trader, ever.”
There's more...
Loading

by The Opportunity Agenda, Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 03:33:42 PM EDT
Prior to the Supreme Court's recent decision
in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, many legal U.S. residents who had committed minor misdemeanors were unfairly classified as
having committed "aggravated felonies" under immigration law, which subjected them to automatic deportation. The
Supreme Court took note of the unfair deprivation of due process and took a strong stance in support of human rights when it
corrected the deportation requirement for minor drug offenses.
The controversy over Mr. Carachuri-Rosendo's case stems from the government's increasingly broad application of "aggravated felony" charges that lead to mandatory deportation
for noncitizens without the opportunity to contest the order. Because there was no official limit to the government's
application of the "aggravated felony" charge, and due to disparities in how courts interpreted its definition, legal
residents were often deprived a chance to defend themselves against automatic deportation because their offenses were, often
incorrectly, labeled "aggravated felonies."
There's more...
Loading

by John Terzano The Justice Project, Wed May 19, 2010 at 02:42:12 PM EDT
Last month, Frank Sterling was exonerated by DNA evidence after being incarcerated 18 years for a crime he did not commit. Sterling was wrongfully convicted of murdering an elderly woman in Rochester, New York in 1988. His conviction was based entirely on a false confession. In the meantime the actual killer remained free, and six years later he murdered four-year-old Kali Poulton. This tragedy leaves no question that addressing the flaws in our criminal justice system that lead to wrongful convictions is a public safety imperative.
There's more...
Loading

by John Terzano The Justice Project, Wed May 19, 2010 at 02:42:12 PM EDT
Last month, Frank Sterling was exonerated by DNA evidence after being incarcerated 18 years for a crime he did not commit. Sterling was wrongfully convicted of murdering an elderly woman in Rochester, New York in 1988. His conviction was based entirely on a false confession. In the meantime the actual killer remained free, and six years later he murdered four-year-old Kali Poulton. This tragedy leaves no question that addressing the flaws in our criminal justice system that lead to wrongful convictions is a public safety imperative.
There's more...
Loading
