by desmoinesdem, Sun Sep 14, 2008 at 11:18:29 AM EDT
Maybe someone out there who knows the inner workings of EMILY's List can explain to me why this group has not put money behind Becky Greenwald, the Democrat challenging loyal Republican foot-soldier Tom Latham in Iowa's fourth Congressional district.
I have been going over the list of Democratic women running for Congress whom EMILY's List is supporting, with a particular focus on the six challengers most recently added to this group in early August. I do not mean to denigrate any of those candidates, and I recognize that every race has its own dynamic.
However, after comparing Greenwald's race to those of other candidates, I remain puzzled that EMILY's list is not more involved in IA-04.
Follow me after the jump for more.
There's more...
Loading

by BruinKid, Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 05:14:41 AM EDT
In the last couple days, there have been several posts across the blogosphere citing what various candidates running for Congress have said on FISA and retroactive immunity for the telecoms. But so far, it's been all over the map. I'll try to corral all their statements into this diary, so you can see who the "good guys" are.
First, let's start off with the current House and Senate members who voted against this bill. They do deserve credit, as it's their jobs on the line.
Follow me below the fold to see the dozens of Democratic challengers who are standing up for the Constitution, and are against this FISA bill and retroactive immunity.
There's more...
Loading

by Chris Kelly, Fri May 02, 2008 at 06:22:51 AM EDT
Opportunity is clearly knocking in southwest Ohio, thanks to Jane Mitakides in OH-3, Steve Driehaus in OH-1, and Victoria Wulsin in OH-2 . But as you consider these races, take a look at the actual, hard numbers comparing the three districts:

Democratic challenger performance in OH-3 is trending through the roof, besting 60% in the 2008 primary. Governor Ted Strickland carried OH-3 in 2006, making it the only district in the region that he won with more than 50%. This is a highly winnable race.
There's more...
Loading

by Rep Earl Blumenauer, Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 03:19:03 PM EST
If somebody had told me six months ago that I would be campaigning in Boise, Idaho during the final two weeks before the election, I would have suggested rest and medication. But here I am, Monday morning, on my way to Boise, not just for our candidate for Congress, Larry Grant, but the entire Democratic ticket--Jerry Brady for Governor and former Congressman Larry LaRocco for Lt Governor. They are all managing amazing races and have upset the National Republican Party. Recent campaign stops from Dennis Hastert, Dick Cheney, and Ken Melman, the RNC Chair are evidence, as is the hundreds of thousands of dollar that the national party never expected to invest. Cheney is even coming again this week.
There's more...
Loading

by Victoria Wulsin, Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 10:38:01 AM EDT
As you well know, Congress will debate Net Neutrality on the floor of the House tomorrow. There's a good chance that the bi-partisan coalition lead by Congressmen Ed Markey, James Sensennbrenner, and John Conyers will prevail. But before Congress votes, I wanted to weigh in with one more reason why we should protect Net Neutrality: It saves lives .
I'm running for Congress in Ohio's 2nd district in large part because our health care system is broken and I have some good ideas about how to fix it. As a public health doctor, I've dedicated my life to defeating disease and workplace injuries in Cincinnati, across Ohio, and in Kenya.
What does Net Neutrality have to do with saving lives? Our health care system requires major changes, and an open and neutral internet is absolutely necessary in order to develop the innovative technologies and systems that will improve health outcomes and reduce costs.
There's more...
Loading
