by RDemocrat, Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 04:47:08 PM EDT
If you are like me, one of the main things you have struggled with lately is the price of gasoline, which in the last several years has been higher than ever. Many regions in this country have faced stifling prices of over $3.00 a gallon. At the same time we get to hear the reports of insultingly huge profits for the fat-cats of Big Oil. No surprise as our pinch hits a record, so do their profits.
I believe that two of the main reasons we are paying so much is the lack of competition among these companies to create a lower price, and of course the serious de-regulation of the oil industry in the last few years. If these problems aren't adressed, then more and more of the American families' dollar will be swallowed up whole by inflated prices from Big Oil.
There's more...
Loading

by RDemocrat, Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 10:57:37 AM EDT
In 2004, John Edwards stormed onto the American political scene with his talk that strongly resonated with voters, including myself, about the two Americas that exist today. Now, Edwards is revisiting this theme, and will give a speech tonight outlining his plans to create one America once again. Lets take some time to look at this brilliant plan in advance.
There's more...
Loading

by maddogg, Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 06:48:37 AM EST
This is the second part of a series. You can find the first part here.
There are probably as many different definitions of progressive as there are Senators who'd like to be president. In spite of the fact that bloggers, intellectuals, and politicians all declaring themselves to be progressive, there doesn't seem to be a common definition of what it means to be a progressive. This leaves progressives open for the criticism that "progressive" is just another word for "liberal". If a progressive movement is to last, we must define ourselves to voters before Conservatives do.
There's more...
Loading

by maddogg, Wed Dec 06, 2006 at 12:50:28 PM EST
There are probably as many different definitions of progressive as there are Senators who'd like to be president. In spite of the fact that bloggers, intellectuals, and politicians all declaring themselves to be progressive, there doesn't seem to be a common definition of what it means to be a progressive. This leaves progressives open for the criticism that "progressive" is just another word for "liberal". If a progressive movement is to last, we must define ourselves to voters before Conservatives do.
Importance:
Why is it important to define ourselves? There are several reasons. One, I just mentioned. If Americans don't learn from us what a progressive is, they'll learn it from a conservative. If that happens Democrats will start dodging the work "progressive" like they do "liberal". If people think of progressives mostly in a positive light, then Politians will embrace it. The goal of which is so that politicians start arguing who is more "progressive" in democratic primaries. The way Republicans argue who is more will argue who is more "progressive" in Democratic primaries the way Republicans argure who is more "conservative" in theirs. This would be an infinite improvement over the "liberal" label where politicians don't even put the word anywhere on their campaign's website.
Another reason is that we can help make Democratic politicians lives easier. When someone asks why they're a Democrat or what they believe in they can parrot the same talking point. I'm a Democrat because 'X'. Right now Conservatives have us beat on this aspect. Ask a Conservative why he's a Conservative and he'll say either "I'm a Conservative because I believe in free markets with limited government" or "I believe in family values" or some variation on those 2 themes. Ask a Democrat why they're a Democrat(or progressive or liberal) and see how many wildly different answers. If you don't believe me, Google the following "Why I'm a Democrat" and compare that with "Why I'm a Republican". Switch out the words with Conservative and Liberal and Progressive and you'll see that RepublicanConservatism is well defined in the minds of it's supporters.
One thing to understand when defining progressivism is not to define it by issues. It needs to be defined as a philosophy. If you define progressivism as a group of issues it does not convey conviction. For instance if you say progressives believe in raising the minimum wage, fair trade, and Universal Healthcare and somebody asks, "why" your only answer would be "um... because". You have to have a reason that you support different issues. Even if your underlying philosophy is the "Vulcan philosophy" that The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few at least you can answer, "I support Universal Healthcare because the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few".
There's more...
Loading

by toncuz, Mon Nov 13, 2006 at 01:30:51 PM EST
I believe the "Land Value Tax" ECONOMIC SYSTEM... eventually, will become the best idea progressives have to bring us closest to the social democracy progressives strive for...and...it's the perfect "economic justice mantra" we need (as opposed to the progressive's "social justice" message that turns off so many voters and hasn't worked in twenty years) to help us stay in government.
We simply can't depend on the Republicans to implode year after year if we want to maintain a majority. I'll try to be concise....
There's more...
Loading
