by pollbuster, Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 08:53:27 AM EDT
A new Survey USA poll has Obama and McCain tied in Massahusetts 47-47. If Obama can't beat McCain in Mass, where can he beat him. It's time for the super delegates to step in, and stop what is now beginning to look like a democratic defeat of historic proportions in November. We can't afford another 8 years of GOP rule. By the way Hillary leads in Mass, according to Survey USA, by 13 points. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/
2008/latestpolls/index.html
There's more...
Loading

by Aimeymays4536, Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 02:30:24 AM EST
I wish Clinton has some people checking over these sites. I have been saying for a long while that it is not that Obama's borrowing Patrick's words that is important. It is the similarity between their background, their inexperience, and their way of fooling people with rhetoric that should matter. Deval Patrick should have been used as an example that words without action are meaningless. Deval Patrick should serve as a primary example that why voting for rhetoric is a dangerous business.
If using Deval patrick is too much a gample given his racial background, Hillary should have hit with Matt Blunt's inexperience, especially when she was campaigning in MO. You can take a chance in inexperience but at this time of peril, do you really want to do that?
It is laughable that a surrogate of Obama could not cite a single legislative achievement of Obama's. You have to ask yourself how many people are getting into the fashionable worship of Obama without knowing anything about him rather than he is susposedly a good speaker and he inspires? People, do you really need to be inspired to do things? Do you really need a savior?
There's more...
Loading

by Aimeymays4536, Mon Feb 18, 2008 at 03:21:35 PM EST
It is really not a big deal for Obama to use Patrick's line. But Obama's avoidling use of Patrick's name may well be more intentional than you and I think. The reason is that Patrick is an all talker and not a doer. That's the exact reason why Obama lost MA so much even with two K's behind him. Because the good people of MA have seen the movie before. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you!
When Patrick was challenged with this all talker no doer line, he used his lines that he eventually lent to Obama. People in MA clearly bought his lines and look what they have bought with a governor that talks really good! Do you think Obama wants this comparison? Gimme a break! At least Patrick could think of his own lines and he was trying to fool one state. This man, Obama, who could not have his own line, is now trying to fool the whole nation?
Be careful, be very careful!!!
There's more...
Loading
