Obama Up in MI and NH, McCain Up in VA and MO

Here are the latest swing state numbers from CNN and Time:

Michigan (September 7-9, 966 RVs, MoE 3.0%)

John McCain (R): 45 percent
Barack Obama (D): 49 percent

Missouri (September 7-9, 940 RVs, MoE 3.0%)

John McCain (R): 50 percent
Barack Obama (D): 45 percent

New Hampshire (September 7-9, 899 RVs, MoE 3.5%)

John McCain (R): 45 percent
Barack Obama (D): 51 percent

Virginia (September 7-9, 920 RVs, MoE 3.0%)

John McCain (R): 50 percent
Barack Obama (D): 46 percent

Looking through the write up of the polling linked to above, one piece of data jumped out at me from the Virginia survey:

Obama is leading in southeast Virginia, where he spent Wednesday campaigning, 54% to 41%, despite the Arizona senator's strong military background; the area is home to the Naval Mecca of Norfolk as well as several Army and Coast Guard bases.

The full internals of this poll have not been released, but doing some triangulation it's likely that the margin of error for the subsample of Southeast Virginia is in the neighborhood of plus or minus 7 percentage points, meaning that these numbers are likely right on the edge of statistical significance. That said, if it is indeed the case that Obama is leading by about 13 points in the region, it's hard to see him losing the state. Note that back in 2006 Jim Webb carried the Southwest portion of the commonwealth by a 53 percent to 47 percent margin. So it's definitely worth keeping an eye on polling from Virginia to see if these numbers showing Obama particularly strong in the Southeast portion of the commonwealth are borne out in other surveys.

Anyway, overall this remains a close race.

There's more...

Missouri Looks a Lot Like a Swing State

Missouri is one of those states -- kind of like Florida -- I have generally tried not to get my hopes up about to too great a degree. Missouri seems to be the type of state that would provide electoral votes 300 through 311 for Barack Obama if he carried it rather than 259 to 270 (i.e. it would be gravy to carry rather than the one to put him over the top). But inasmuch as this election is not just about putting together the states to get to 270 but also a broader chess game to force the opposing candidate to go on defense in states he should be able to feel safe in, thus decreasing the opponent's ability to reach 270, Missouri is an important state for the Obama campaign. You can see as much in the latest polling from the state. Here's Rasmussen Reports:

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in Missouri shows John McCain attracting 47% of the vote while Barack Obama earns 42%. A month ago, the candidates were essentially even. That survey was conducted the night that Obama clinched the Democratic Presidential nomination. McCain had the advantage in earlier surveys.

When leaners are included in the current survey, McCain leads Obama 50% to 45%. Leaners are survey participants who initially indicate no preference for either major candidate but indicate that they are leaning towards either McCain or Obama.

And here's Public Policy Polling:

John McCain 47
Barack Obama 44

Both surveys show John McCain holding his party base better than Obama -- though that's largely a function of the fact that disgruntled Republicans have left the party to become independents, making those still self-identifying with the party a more loyal bunch by comparison.

But the more exciting development out of the state, which now only leans about 2 points towards McCain according to the Pollster.com trend estimate, is this: Obama may have 10 times more organizers on the ground in the state than McCain, according to The Kansas City Star.

The Democrat's campaign said Tuesday it is tripling its paid staff -- to an unprecedented 150 workers, who will fan out from 30 field offices across the state, from West Plains to Maryville.

"It's unheard of," veteran Democratic worker Woody Overton of Kansas City said of the effort and expenditure.

"It's unbelievable."

"Desperate" is the adjective John McCain's camp uses.

"When you feel like you have to put that many people in the state to cover it, means you think you're in trouble and you have to have a surge," said Jack Jackson, McCain's Missouri co-chairman.

Recent polls indicate the race in Missouri is close.

McCain's operation expects to have 12 to 14 full-time workers and 10 offices. The Arizona Republican now has four people on the ground.

You have got to respect the chutzpah of the McCain campaign in trying to spin away their remarkable organizing disadvantage as a sign of strength by saying that the Obama campaign is only putting staff in Missouri because they think their candidate is weak there. I guess that means that McCain trailing in the polls nationally must be a good thing for his campaign, too...

Regardless of the McCain spin, this is a really exciting development. Do I think that Missouri will necessarily be in the Obama column come November 4? No. But that's not what's truly important. With a field organization like this, on top of polling showing this to be about a 2-point race, there's a strong likelihood that Obama won't be pulling up the stakes in Missouri in September -- a move that has occurred in the past, allowing the Republicans to divert money they would spend to defend the state to other states. And in the three-dimensional chess game that is the race to the White House, keeping one's opponent on his heels is a definite key to victory.

There's more...

MO-Pres: Democrats Lead in Every Potential Matchup

Only once during the 20th century -- 1956 -- did a Republican win the White House without carrying the state of Missouri. So is it problematic, then, that the three leading Democratic presidential candidates lead in every potential matchup against the four leading Republican presidential candidates in the Show Me state? Take a look at the latest numbers from Research 2000:

R/DClintonObamaEdwardsGiuliani39/4742/4640/47Romney38/4738/4638/47Thompson38/4638/4737/47McCain41/4640/4641/46

On average, the Democratic candidates lead the Republican candidates 46.5 percent to 39.2 percent in Missouri. On the basis of these numbers I wouldn't mark the state down in the Democrats' column just yet. Note for instance that John Kerry got about 46 percent of Missouri's vote in 2004 and that Al Gore got about 47 percent in the state in 2000 -- and neither of them carried the state.

That said, George W. Bush got 51 percent of Missouri's vote in 2000 and 53 percent in 2004, a significantly higher share than the Republicans' current showing in the low 40s, indicating that the Republicans have a lot of ground to recover before they are able to carry this state. And though I wouldn't use history to suggest that the GOP needs Missouri's support in order to win the White House, the electoral vote math gets really difficult for the party if it can't win Missouri -- particularly if states like Virginia, Arkansas and Ohio start going Democratic, as polling indicates they might.

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------