Redefining "Supervisor" Under Labor Law

There's an important new bill in Congress that hasn't gotten much attention as of yet. Senators Dodd, Durbin, and Kennedy, and Reps. Rob Andrews and Don Young have just introduced the Re-empowerment of Skilled and Professional Employees and Construction Tradeworkers (RESPECT) Act, S. 969 in the Senate and H.R. 1644 in the House. Here's the short summary. The 1947 Taft-Hartley Act -- legislation meant to emasculate the 1935 National Labor Relations Act -- excluded employees classified as "supervisors" from the protections of the NLRA. Back in October of 2006, a National Labor Relations Board's decision in what's known as the Kentucky River cases opened the gates on employees exempt from labor protections by deciding that charge nurses are indeed "supervisors." These are RNs, you see, who have the responsibility to assign other nurses, LPNs (licensed practical nurses), and other medical staff to take care of certain patients, and who may generally oversee patient care in their units during their shifts. The Kentucky River decision hinged on the definition of "supervisor" under the law in 29 U.S.C. § 152 (11):

Any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.

The gist of the statute, of course, is someone who operates as management, with the clear capacity to dramatically shape the work lives of employees. As the dissent in Kentucky River said, charge nurses aren't "vested with such genuine management prerogatives." They cannot hire and they cannot fire. In its decision, the NLRB, however, went strict constructionist -- saying that it could only rely upon an on-their-face reading of words like "assign" and "direct." So in comes the RESPECT Act. The RESPECT Act is a five-line bill crafted to combat Kentucky River. All it does is this:

Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152(11)) is amended -- (1) by inserting "and for a majority of the individual's worktime" after "interest of the employer'; (2) by striking assign," and (3) by striking "or responsibility to direct them,".

Why would the NLRB make the Kentucky River call in the first place? An NLRB cynic would say that expanding the definition of "supervisor" expands the opportunity for employers to give some employees minimal supervisory roles in order to keep them from unionizing. As it stands, a common tactic among employers trying to subvert a union certification process is to claim that some number of employees are actually supervisors -- creating confusion and slowing the process while who is and isn't one gets sorted out. There's been a constant battle in the Bush years between pro-labor forces and a National Labor Relations Board that sees its role as limiting the ability of workers to organize a majority, certify a union, and get to initial contract.

Time for Congress to Deliver for Workers

From Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa; cross posted from TheHill.com:

As the new 110th Congress begins its work, the Teamsters Union is making sure that workers are the focus. In November, working families demonstrated our strength. Our votes and voices changed the nation's priorities. Americans decidedly rejected six years of failed policies from the Bush administration.

This is an important year for working Americans. The challenges we face include the lack of affordable health care, growing retirement insecurity, dwindling workplace rights, job-killing trade agreements, unsafe highways and concerns about our national security.

There's more...

Labor Built this Country - It's Time to Take it Back

Well this seems like something we could get done next cycle. Jeff Farmer is the director of organizing for the Teamsters. I'm going to thank them preemptively for our new servers, since that's what's going to keep this site running on election day. -Matt

Organized Labor was dealt another damaging blow last week by President Bush's cronies on the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB ruled 3-2, along party lines, that millions of nurses and other workers are "supervisors," and therefore excluded from collective bargaining rights.

The so-called "Kentucky River decision" was pretty much expected from the Big Business shills who sit on the NLRB. Not only will 8 million workers lose their labor law protections, including their right to form unions, but companies will be even more emboldened under the new expansive definition of "supervisor" to reclassify workers in their effort to dismantle organizing drives.

There's more...

American Workers' Freedom to Form Unions Threatened Under Bush NLRB

This is a crosspost from Daily Kos.

A few nights ago, a group of New Jersey nurses in contract negotiations with Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital held a candlelight vigil. The nurses are seeking contract language that will protect them from an expected anti-worker decision by the Bush-packed National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB is set to rule on three cases collectively known as "Kentucky River"--and the ruling literally could take away bargaining rights from hundreds of thousands of employees.

And not just nurses. If the NLRB agrees to alter the definition of "supervisor," building trades workers, newspaper and television employees, port workers and many others could be prohibited from forming unions.

There's more...

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------