GOP Planning "Minority Rally" starring, "George Allen" in Virginia
by Edna Howard, Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 12:15:53 PM EDT
reposted with diarist permission

All, I can say is, "Get the F*CK outta here!!!"
George Allen, THE RACIST, George Allen?
by Edna Howard, Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 12:15:53 PM EDT
reposted with diarist permission

All, I can say is, "Get the F*CK outta here!!!"
George Allen, THE RACIST, George Allen?
by Jonathan Singer, Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 09:52:56 AM EST
Marc Ambinder does some speculating as to who John McCain might chose as his running mate. One of the names, in particular, jumped out at me (well, two, if you count the misspelling of Bobby Jindal's name):
1. Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN)
2. Gov. John Huntsman (R-UT)
3. Sen. John Thune (R-SD)
4. Ex-Sen. Fred Thompson
5. Ex-Sen. George Allen
6. Gov. Bobby Jindall (R-LA)
7. Mike Huckabee
8. Gov. Charlie Crist (R-FL)
9. Mitt Romney
Is George Allen really in the running to be McCain's Vice Presidential nominee? One might think that such a possibility is a bit absurd -- after all, Allen's name has been thoroughly tarnished, not only in his home state of Virginia (which seems like it will be a key swing state in November's presidential election) but also across the country as a result of his utterance of the term "Macaca" and subsequent reporting on allegations of racism on Allen's part. However, McCain did chose Allen to introduce him at the CPAC conference, and Allen did just endorse McCain. And presumably Allen would be able to help McCain shore up support among conservatives, who still seem to like the tainted Virginian.
Maybe Allen's name being floated is just that -- or even less than that, speculation on the part of Ambinder. But given that more Americans viewed Allen unfavorably than favorably even before the Macaca incident, and after the incident 62 percent of Americans indicated that they did not want to see Allen run for President (compared with the paltry 13 percent saying they would like to see him make a White House bid), it sure seems that Allen would be a large net negative on a Republican ticket. So notwithstanding the fear of the possibility that Allen would become the Vice President of the United States, I certainly would not be too unhappy about seeing him on the GOP ticket this fall.
by Paul Hogarth, Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 08:25:59 AM EDT
I published this today for Beyond Chron, San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily.
About a month ago, I was on a radio talk show (KALW-91.7 FM) to discuss the 2008 Presidential primary - when a caller predicted that this would be the "YouTube election." Now that any web-savvy citizen can post a video online (or even create a mash-up video that satirizes a presidential candidate), elections will be decided less through conventional media buys - and more through the grassroots actions of political activists who may have no affiliation with a campaign. With this week's release of the anonymous YouTube video lampooning Hillary Clinton as "Big Brother," we know that the caller's prediction was right. It's a brave new world, and campaigns must learn to adapt.
by Joseph Hughes, Fri Mar 16, 2007 at 09:07:04 AM EDT
by areucrazy, Mon Feb 19, 2007 at 11:23:47 AM EST
(crossposted at dailykos)
The 2006-midterm elections presented Democrats with a historic opportunity to strengthen the party brand and retake control of both houses of congress. Party members of all stripes helped secure an election day capped with record setting victories through the nation.
Although Howard Dean's 50-state strategy emphasizes long run party building over the short term electoral gains, its immediate success was vitally important not only to Americans hoping to derail the Bush agenda, but also to Democratic people powered movements in general. Would grassroots level party building strengthen the brand or would it be wasted on people picking their noses in "red America"?