by neutron, Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 01:33:34 PM EST
Why is no candidate talking about Verified Voting?
It's sad really, that a topic that everybody pretty much agrees on, that everybody should have the ability to vote and know their vote accounted, has turned into something divisive and fracturing.
I used to have high hopes that Rep. Holt's bill in the house would pass in the Republican congress, after all it had plenty of Republican co-sponsors, and there had been multiple companion bills in the Senate. That didn't happen, the Republican leadership would never let it come to a vote.
Now we have a Democratic congress, and while we hold only a bare majority in the Senate, still the legislation never ends up coming to a vote.
Moreover, anytime "irregularities" show up, people are immediately divided up into "deniers" and "fraudsters".
While it is true that you can't blame every electoral loss or mishap on "Diebold", it is also foolish to pretend that the problem doesn't exist or that "the states have it under control."
In some cases this is true, but why fight 50 battles when we don't have to?

There's more...
Loading

by DerekLarsson, Sat Aug 11, 2007 at 07:09:56 PM EDT
A starling statistic from the Iowa Straw Poll won't leave my mind and may foreshadow many more Elections to come.
There were 26,000 total Tickets sold for this event, yet there were only just 14,302 votes tabulated.
Now think about that for a minute.
26,000 people purchase tickets to go to a Straw Poll event, and yet we are to believe that 12,000 of those people couldn't even care less about the voting part? Just what were they there for?
This is not believable.
12,000 people went through all that trouble to get a ticket, drive a long distance, wrestle around with parking, or public transportation, and spent their whole Saturday away at a crowded and noisy event, and then did not even vote for anybody?
What were they there for again?
There's more...
Loading

by neutron, Tue Dec 12, 2006 at 10:27:37 AM EST
I am thrilled at our upcoming Democratic majority in both houses of congress. The fact that we are going to see some real Democratic legislation passed is exciting and it makes all of the many, many hours of work and toil totally worth it.
There is something that needs to be addressed immediately, it is a problem that eats away at the very core of our Democracy and American Values. We need some to be able to address the problem of voting machines and unverified voting.
There's more...
Loading

by ProgressiveChristian, Thu Nov 16, 2006 at 09:55:57 AM EST
As required by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)(or the Help Republicans Get Elected Act), New York City is in the
process of finding electronic replacements for the venerable old lever machines that
have nobly served for over half a century. This week, the NYC Board of Elections is
providing two demonstrations of the proposed new equipment in advance of a public
hearing on November 21 (strategically timed two days before Thanksgiving) and a
series of public vendor interviews that will precede the final order in March.
I attended the session on November 15 in Queens with a group from Democracy for NYC and, far from alleviating my
concerns about the new machines, it raised even more issues that aren't always
fully discussed when the contentious topic of voting machines arises. For anyone
in New York City concerned about voting machine issues, I highly recommend that
you find a way to attend the final demo session at 5PM on Friday, November 17 at
Hostos Community College in The Bronx.
An overview of the proposed machines and some observations from
the November 15 session follow the fold.
There's more...
Loading

by Alice Marshall, Wed Sep 27, 2006 at 04:37:46 AM EDT
Tomorrow at 9 AM the Committee on House Administration will be holding a hearing on electronic voting machines: verification, security and paper trails. Move On is asking supporters of paper trails to attend:
There's more...
Loading
