Remember the bailout: who got the money?
by Jerome Armstrong, Thu Jul 16, 2009 at 06:48:03 PM EDT
Remember the bailout? Matt Taibbi remembers it about the same way I do:
It turned out not to happen that way. We constructed this massive bailout infrastructure, and instead of pumping that free money back into the economy, the banks instead simply hoarded it and ate it on the spot, converting it into bonuses. So what does this Goldman profit number mean? This is the final evidence that the bailouts were a political decision to use the power of the state to redirect society's resources upward, on a grand scale. It was a selective rescue of a small group of chortling jerks who must be laughing all the way to the Hamptons every weekend about how they fleeced all of us at the very moment the game should have been up for all of them.
There are going to be some people who say that some of this stuff isn't government subsidy so much as ordinary government contracting. After all, do we criticize Boeing for making airplanes or Electric Boat for making submarines during a war? If we don't do that, then why should we be pissed about Goldman making a profit underwriting TARP repayment stock issuances, or Treasuries?
The difference is that Boeing and Electric Boat didn't start the war. But these guys on Wall Street causesd this crisis, and now they're raking in money on the infrastructure their buddies in government have devised to bail them out. It's a self-fulfilling cycle -- beautiful, in a way, but at the same time sort of uniquely disgusting. That they're going to get away with it is bad enough -- that they're getting praised for it, for being such smart guys, is damn near intolerable.
As far as I'm concerned, opposing the bailouts that began in Sept 2008 is on par with opposing the invasion of Iraq. Grayson is one:
Who got the money?
The New York Times' Joe Nocera:
There's a bad after-taste for sure. A lot of apathy. There is a lull happening right now before a storm, John Carney:
Not everyone understands why they are pissed off. For instance, the Congressmen grilling Hank Paulson today are thoroughly confused. Some want to know why Paulson didn't fire Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis. Others want to know where Paulson got the temerity to threaten Lewis's job. Still others just seem to want a chance to vent.
But Matt Taibbi, whose famous Rolling Stone article proposed a somewhat absurd conspiracy theory that described Goldman as a bubble machine, has finally figured it out. What's wrong with Goldman isn't that is evil or even uniquely evil. What's wrong is that it is pocketing money that it is making, in part, because it isn't subject to market discipline. It is close to a pure play government arbitrage firm these days.
Taibbi's follow-up from his first articleis a much better on the mark shot that's not in the dark.
More from Ian Welsh, Glynnis MacNicol, Digby & dday.
An audit of the Federal Reserve is a good spot to start. We've got 100 Democrats in the House backing it.
And then there's AIG...






