by Sam Wise Gingy, Tue May 27, 2008 at 02:21:30 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton maintains that she is the rightful nominee of the Democratic Party.
She bases this claim on the premise that she is the popular vote leader.
Is she the popular vote leader and if she is should we use the popular vote as the measure of the party's will?
Let's look at the numbers; according to Real Clear Politics Obama has 17,596,239 popular votes, while Hillary Clinton has 17,650,671 popular votes. Therefore Clinton has 54,432 vote margin and a claim on the nomination basis on winning the popular vote.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/
2008/president/democratic_vote_count.htm
l
How can Obama supporters deny Hillary the nomination if she has won more votes without being anti-democratic?
There are two basic reasons for rejecting the popular vote as the measure of party will. If either if these arguments for rejecting Hillary's claim is true then Hillary's claim to "more popular votes" as the reason she is the rightful winner of the nomination is false.
If you care to hear my argument join me after the fold.
There's more...
Loading

by Jerome Armstrong, Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 06:56:02 AM EDT
The first poll out of WV for the nomination,
Rasmussen shows Clinton with a 55-27 percent lead over Obama. The primary is not until May 13th. This is the second poll I've seen recently that shows the "Economy/Jobs" issue going over 50 percent as the number one problem to solve. Here's some more:
Clinton is viewed favorably by 72% of West Virginia's Primary Voters, Obama by 53%.
By a 48% to 31% margin, the West Virginia voters believe Clinton will be the stronger general election candidate against John McCain. However, by a 47% to 35% margin, they believe Obama will win the nomination. Even 32% of Clinton voters expect Obama to be the Democratic nominee in 2008.
If Obama is nominated, just 42% of Clinton supporters say they are even somewhat likely to vote for him against McCain. Eighteen percent (18%) of Clinton voters say that they are Not Very Likely to vote for Obama and 35% say they are Not at All Likely to vote for Obama. On the other hand, if Clinton is nominated, 57% of Obama voters are at least somewhat likely to vote for the former First Lady.
Rasmussen has more on
the state of the contest today.
There's more...
Loading

by Jerome Armstrong, Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 11:03:40 PM EDT
Bowers
posted the cash on hand from 2Q ending:
Obama: $34M
Clinton: $33M
Edwards: $12M
Richardson: $7.1M
Dodd: $6.4M
Biden: $2.8M
Kucinich: $221K
In Gallup polling, Obama moved into a 30-29 lead at the beginning of June (with Gore), but since then, Gallup has shown the trend reversing and moving away from Obama. There was a lot of hope by Obama supporters that Obama would get a bounce of his fundraising totals, but the latest Gallup national poll (without Gore) shows Clinton's lead increasing from last month, and that Clinton leads Obama by 16% regardless of if Gore is in the race.

With Gore, it's a race for second place:
Clinton 37
Obama 21
Gore 16
Edwards 13
And the reason why pollsters include Gore in the race, is because at somepoint this fall Gore is going to make a decision and until then it's a possibility. But still, the story as far as the national polling goes is that the status quo is still firmly holding, and given that Gallup shows 42% of "extremely likely" primary voters saying they will support Clinton it is still Clinton's race to lose.
There's more...
Loading

by Jerome Armstrong, Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 10:00:16 AM EDT
Research 2000 did a poll released on the Concord Monitor in NH, with these results:
Clinton 33
Obama 25
Edwards 15
Richardson 7
Dodd 3
Biden 2
Kucinich 1
Gravel 1
If Gore were also in the mix, here are the results:
Dec '06 July '07
Clinton 22 27
Obama 21 23
Gore 10 14
Edwards 16 10
Richardson 2 8
On the Republican side, Romney still has the lead:
Romney 27
Giuliani 20
McCain 16
Thompson 15
Paul 1
From the last Research 2000 poll, Clinton has opened up a bit of a lead, but Obama has also increased his percentage, and Edwards falls 1% without Gore in the race 6% with Gore. The quotes in the article are amazingly anti-Edwards while pro-Clinton, hoping for Richardson, and pretty much ignoring of Obama. They also know that Romney is a loser. Dodd has moved up to 3% and Paul still is just a blip outside the internet.
There's more...
Loading

by Jerome Armstrong, Thu Jul 12, 2007 at 08:58:23 AM EDT
Moveon held what was billed as their "Largest MoveOn Event Since 2004; Over 100,000 People Joined at 1,300 House Parties and Online to Watch Virtual Town Hall" and released the results from their straw poll on climate change:
MoveOn member vote results:
Edwards 33.10%
Kucinich 15.73%
Clinton 15.71%
Obama 15.03%
Richardson 12.60%
Biden 3.06%
Dodd 3.01%
Gravel 1.78%
You'll recall, in their last straw poll done, that
Obama placed 1st, which makes his fall to a tie with Kucinich and Clinton, in 4th, surprising to some. And once again, Richardson shows he's much stronger with the members that are attending the meetings.
Votes by MoveOn members who attended house parties:
Edwards 25.53%
Richardson 20.19%
Kucinich 17.55%
Clinton 13.80%
Obama 10.18%
Biden 6.15%
Dodd 3.63%
Gravel 2.96%
A third and final Town Hall will take place in the fall and will focus on affordable health care for all Americans.
There's more...
Loading
