Duh, Clinton will be nominated

Oh, what do you know, the Obama campaign agrees with placing Clinton's name in nomination alongside Obama's. Too bad for all the naysaysers that claimed this would ruin the unity of the world for all of mankind. Oh well, by this point, they are too used to changing their positions on a dime to placate their nonsense much:

In negotiations this summer with Obama's campaign, Clinton's team did not ask for Clinton's name to be submitted.

But within the past week, Clinton advisers informed the Obama team that many of Clinton's staunchest supporters felt strongly that something had to be done, and that Clinton had concluded that, in part for the sake of unity, their wishes ought to be respected.  They heard back immediately: the Obama campaign had always been open to having her name placed in nomination alongside his.

If Clinton's name is formally offered up, she could be afforded the normal complement of nominating and seconding speeches, and the official role call of votes will include participation from her delegates.  (In theory, if enough Obama delegates change their minds, then Clinton could win the nomination. In practice, there's no chance that will happen.)

On August 6, Clinton told donors at a private fundraiser that she thinks "that people want to feel like, O.K., it's a catharsis, we're here, we did it, and then everybody get behind Senator Obama. That is what most people believe is the best way to go."

That sentiment is shared by Obama advisers, even as reports of tension between her aides and Obama's campaign have proliferated in the press.

The claims against having the vote were one of the most asinine and historically ignorant arguments ever I'd heard, a byproduct of continued Clinton hatred. Glad its over. The nomination of also-rans is a traditional formality.

There's more...

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------