Were they even Democrats?

So I was at work all day and missed everything and as I float different blogs to get a sense of what happened comments stand out

I can no more vote for McCain than I can vote for Obama.

Oh, well, maybe I can vote for McCain, after all.

or

Yeah, I used to be on that bus, but I've recently transferred to the Straight Talk Express. I'd rather see McCain as I no longer have respect for the party I once loved.

or

Returned to the John McCain website. Searching for groups in my area as far a recruitment/activities. The site is really slow. I think that maybe MANY are trying to log on. Wasn't that way a few hours ago. Interesting.

or my fav.

I just created an account on McCain's website and its CRAZY up there.

There are so many Hillary supporters, I will fit right in it seems.

I get they are mad, but to me this goes that at 8 am this morning they were ready to fight tooth and nail for Hillary and her platform,

the fact they can so easily and quickly move to McCain I was just shocked was it ever about ANY issues for them, maybe that diary about "supporters" was right indeed.

I was just amazed, they might as well write Hillary letters, it was fun while it lasted but hey all that stuff you said the country need or how bad you said McCain was, yeah well I don't think you were right about that.

this doesn't go for all supporters, but these people who are already sending McCain money, why were they even voting for Hillary in the first place again because to me they just said that it had NOTHING to do with her platform.



Display:


Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Operation Chaos


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:33:39 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

It's all sound and fury, signifying nothing. Let them be angry. Some may stay with McCain, but the majority will not.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:33:48 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

I can get being angry but my god, do they not even think thats a slap in her face?

they are instantly at McCain's site, I mean not even a third party, or anything nope its ok if I can't have Hillary well I will go COMPLETELY in the opposite direction and take McCain, I mean when Hillary said he was soooo bad, well pffft its Hillary not like she knows what she was talkin about.


Obama said, as Bill beamed. "Thank you, President Clinton."
by TruthMatters on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:35:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

It all goes back to first grade and petty revenge. It shows the level their maturity continues to exist at. We don't want them on our side if that's how they act- hell, it shows us, indeed, how committed they really are about the issues important to us. I mean, they want to tell us that OBAMA supporters are a personality cult with actions like this?

Like I said, this is only a minority of the Clinton supporters, however. These assholes don't deserve to even be labeled as such.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:38:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (2.00 / 1)

These are Republicans they were never Clinton supporters.


by Politicalslave on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:59:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Bingo!


by futbol dad on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 12:10:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The answer = no. (none / 0)

Their allegiances to the party began and ended with one candidate. Once that candidate could no longer win the nomination, their allegiances shifted to the candidate they deemed most capable of enacting revenge upon the party.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:34:11 PM EST

Re: The answer = no. (1.00 / 1)

Wrong,  My allegiance to the Democratic Party is not determined by one candidate.

I have been a member of the Democratic Party since 1972.  This is my 10th presidential election.  I have voted for the Democrat in the first 9, without fail.

I do not consider Obama a Democrat.  Not when he praises Republicans and Reagan and bashes Bill Clinton.

It is MY party.  I am not leaving.  You newcomers think you own this?  Your one candidate?  There is a long road ahead and it won't be long till Obama is no more remembered or revered than Michael Dukakis.


by wblynch on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:08:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

Ah, so you're simply a "democrat" who won't vote for the nominee of the Democratic party.

Got it.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:10:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

I will never vote for Obama.  I don't care what slot he fills in which party.  I will never vote for him.

Guess what?  There are millions more, just like me.


by wblynch on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:17:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Guess what (none / 0)

there are millions who won't vote for Clinton.

too bad, your intimidation fails again.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:22:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (2.00 / 1)

You are a Republican I can accept that and come November you and your party will pay big time.


by Politicalslave on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 12:01:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

I am a Democrat and I have been all my life.  You are not qualified to determine my party registration and loyalty.

I bet I have been voting Democratic longer than you have even been alive.


by wblynch on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 03:10:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

well when Obama goes down, so will Hillary Clinton.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:12:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

This is the problem with people of your ilk. It is not YOUR party. It is OUR party. That is, the collective group of all of us, Clinton and Obama supporter alike who will turn out on Election Day to vote for our candidate, regardless of who it is.

Newcomers? Surely you don't think that the millions who voted for Senator Obama have never before voted or even been in the Democratic party?

You want to take your ball and go home? You don't want to vote for Obama? That's fine, but don't you dare talk about YOUR party and then insult half the people in it as well as its presumptive nominee for the highest office in the land.


by JENKINS on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 03:24:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

I am not insulting half the Democratic party.

MORE than half of Democrats have voted for and supported Clinton.  Obama reached this point depending on cross over Republicans, Independents and "Democrats-For-A-Day".

Interlopers and carpetbaggers that have come here this year because they are disgusted with the Republicans but believe they should have a role in selecting the Democratic party candidate because their own party sucks.


by wblynch on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 03:14:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The answer = no. (none / 0)

Wasnt it Hillary who said McCain passed the commander in chief test but not Obama?


by Pravin on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 04:06:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

It's hard to say.  I suspect that there might have been some infiltration.


by rfahey22 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:34:15 PM EST

Nice try (none / 0)

Yeah, we're all for Grumpy McSame now. Right.

No way those could be Rethug trolls - no way. I mean, Rethugs playing ugly??? Lying on the Internet???

No could never happen.

Good you took the time to write this intelligent diary.


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:35:09 PM EST

Re: Nice try (2.00 / 1)

You've got a right-wing blog in your sig that actively spreads lies about the Democratic nominee.

It doesn't matter what you call yourself; you're no Democrat.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:36:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Find one single lie at the Democratic, admittedly hard-hitting, blog RezkoWatch if you can!

One. Single. Lie.

I dare you to it!


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:40:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Are you a Democrat? If so, now that Obama has a 99.9% chance of being the nominee will you remove your attack site?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:49:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Yes. Are you a Democrat?

First of all: it's not my site to remove. I merely link to it.

Secondly: as long as there is a nomination battle going on and RezkoWatch continues to vet that incredibly weak and wanting candidate Barack Obama in a fact based manner I will continue to link to RezkoWatch.

When the nomination is settled, in Denver at the latest, and assuming that Hillary will not run independently, I will of course not link to it anymore; what would be the point?


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:57:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (2.00 / 1)

Ah. It's not yours. Ok. As there is no reasonable chance that Clinton will be the nominee why are you trying to harm the party?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:00:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

That's your version of the state of the nominating process, not mine. I fully expect the convention in Denver to vote and decide. Until that moment I will support and donate money to Hillary Clinton.

With your incredibly weak candidate I can appreciate why you want her to roll over and play dead. Won't happen however.


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:04:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And don't worry (none / 0)

my incredibly weak candidate has incredibly strong supporters who are not nearly as nice as him.

Support Hillary Clinton if you must, this Democrat will spend the summer seeing that she is humilated in Denver. If she wants to go nuclear, I won't sit back and let it happen, although I suspect Obama will.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:07:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

No. That's reality. You aren't living in it. That and your pathetic fixation on Rezko and Wright while ignoring the numerous criminal donors to Clinton and Doug Coe shows your hatred.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:07:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

You're no Democrat.  Your top story at Rezkowatch is encouraging Hillary to run as an independent.    


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 04:37:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

yes so the rational thing is to assume ANY HRC supporter who says they are voting McCain is a GOP troll?

riiggghhtttt


Obama said, as Bill beamed. "Thank you, President Clinton."
by TruthMatters on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:39:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

If you weren't so gullible perhaps you wouldn't have to assume so many things.


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:47:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

You've done your share of spreading hatred and invective, but luckily enough, we know that the vast majority of Clinton supporters aren't like you- they have honor and respect.

Good day, sir.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:40:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Really? What "hatred" and "invective" did you have in mind specifically?


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:42:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Please. Plug in "DemAC" to Google, cite it with an election term, and it pulls up a huge amount of useful information; you can forget, for instance, pretending you were never exposed to the racism, hatred, and asinine comments from Hillaryis44, for example.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:51:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

So, your deflecting aside, What "hatred" and "invective" did you have in mind specifically?


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:59:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

How about your reccing a BS diary about Obama "race-baiting"?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:02:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

So, your deflecting too aside, what "hatred" and "invective" did you have in mind specifically?


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:06:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

That shows your hatred as pointing out racial divisiveness isn't "race-baiting".


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:09:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Criticizing Obama's race baiting campaign tactics - that's "hatred"???

Wow... Newspeak and all - all things considered, you probably ARE going to have some real problems bringing this party together.

Good night and good luck!


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:17:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

I want to check something. Pointing out racially divisive things is race-baiting to you?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:22:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Or calling him the Senator from Rezko?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:05:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He isn't??? n/t (none / 0)


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:07:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No nearly as much as (none / 0)

Senator Hillary Clinton (D-Marc Rich)


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:08:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No nearly as much as (none / 0)

If it makes you happy and you're so inclined...

However, while Marc Rich (who's he anyway?) won't be a factor in the fall if Hillary is our nominee you can trust that with Obama his ole' pal Tony Rezko will surface.


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:10:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

oh really? (none / 0)

Marc Rich WON'T be an issue?

wow, you are delusional.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:13:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No nearly as much as (none / 0)

The question is are YOU so inclined? Clinton has numerous criminal donors not one.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:15:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He isn't??? n/t (none / 0)

Only if Clinton is the senator from all of her criminal donors. Is she?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:10:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

See above n/t (none / 0)


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:11:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Or lying about what Obama said about Rev. Wright and what he heard.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:06:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

So there really was no need for Obama to leave that church you mean? You should write him and let him know...


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:08:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

Non-responsive.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:12:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice try (none / 0)

And what comment did you and TheresainPA rec that was so offensive that it had to be removed?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:22:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

This is a free country , anyone would do whatever he or she would regardless .

Don't waste your time.

Some are into the candidate some the party and its ideals


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:35:35 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Indeed. I one of those who proudly voted to Nader in 2000 (in part because I lived in California and knew it was a safe vote.) There are times and people who will draw or push voters one way or another. That's actually one of the virtues of our system, so let's not get too hung up on it.

Onto victory in November!


by PhilFR on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:43:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You have to remember (none / 0)

A certain kind of people get attracted to complaining on the internet...trolls essentially.  They are self-selecting the environment that works for them.  Their volume online shouldn't be given as evidence of their numbers offline.  


by telephasic on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:35:43 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

The right-wing bloggers are definitely trying to stir things up. Real Dems support Dems. It's safe to assume that those who don't are freepers. Pay them no heed.


"No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." -Hillary Clinton
by fugazi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:36:28 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

what about all those Nader votes?  Or those folks that voted for Perot - I know many dems who voted for him.

If someone feels that the democratic nominee doesn't best represent their ideals, I wouldn't say they are not a "real" dem.  However, in the case of Hillary supporters going over to vote for McCain, who has nothing in common with Hillary, whereas Obama & Hillary are basically the same person (when it comes down to policies), I would question their motives.

but please, don't state that only real Dems vote democratic - they don't always do.


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:58:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

That's a fair point. Well said colebiancardi.


"No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." -Hillary Clinton
by fugazi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:01:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Real Democrats (2.00 / 1)

don't vote for Republicans...at least not for President.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:04:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Real Democrats (2.00 / 1)

and that goes for democrats who think putting a republican on the ticket as veep as well.


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:08:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Real Democrats (none / 0)

That's a fair point.  While I personally find the idea of Chuck Hagel on the ticket appealling, I do understand why many people would not.

Can we agree that having Chuck Hagel campaigning for Obama (if Hagel wants to, which I suspect he will) and winding up in the cabinet is acceptable?

I think it is important to include our opponents in actually governing the country.  I dearly intend to kick their asses in November, but there are a lot of them, and I want them not only to feel involved, but to actually be involved.

I don't want them setting policy, but if a handful of them are able to do the job we need them to do, if they can josh that with their own politics, is that acceptable?

I'm not suggesting you will disagree with that notion, but I'm curious to know your thoughts.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:20:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Real Democrats (none / 0)

I have no problem putting a moderate republican in the cabinet.   Hell, I wish we could get Powell - and I think we might, as Powell has made motions in the past about Obama

but not veep.


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:26:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Real Democrats (none / 0)

NO Republican is acceptable.  They created this mess.  They need to be shut out and go sit in a corner for 20 years.  


by wblynch on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:27:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Real Democrats (none / 0)

I would prefer to be more adult about that, frankly, than they have been while in power.

Not all Republicans are evil, and not all of them are stupid.  If the only people we listen to already agree with us, we run the risk of an echo chamber.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 12:39:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Heh (none / 0)

you should take a look over at 777denny's blog, there are a few links in his anyone but Obama blogroll that might be interesting.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:43:35 PM EST

Well I read that Hucksters folks and McCain (none / 0)

folks were going to be there.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:44:12 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)


The democratic party has changed. Everyone doesn't appreciate the change. The party has embraced out with the old, in with the new, changing of the guard, passing the torch, etc.

I'm stunned by the changes and I am sure that many others are too. When so-called progressives blogs embraced the labeling of the Clintons as racists, I knew it was no longer a party I recognized. When sexism became a part of the daily rhetoric of the so-called progressive blogs and the MSM media and my party remained silent I knew the old Democratic party was in its death throes.


"No self-respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her." - Susan B. Anthony
by feelfree on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:47:58 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (2.00 / 1)

"The party has embraced out with the old, in with the new, changing of the guard, passing the torch, etc."

We call that...liberal.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:51:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Indeed. If you're afraid of change, McCain offers four more years of war and no healthcare.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:54:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

I think you missed the posters point of calling the Clintons, who have been loyal democrats for over 30 years and who have worked hard for civil rights, racist from their own party.

that is sad to me.  Also discounting the fact that sexism was ran amuck this primary, but for the most part, was ignored by the MSM, as they were the ones doing it.


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:00:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Please (none / 0)

like a handful of people on blogs labeled them as racists...the Obama campaign didn't label them racists...mean and vindicitive, yes, but not racists.

I'm surrounded by sexists, being a military brat and all, believe me when I say the MSM has NOT been sexist. You want sexist, try growing up with military men.

You should see what they're saying about your candidate now. You think the MSM has been sexist, try having your dad's army buddy talking about how someone should smack Hillary Clinton around a bit...and no, he's not an Obama supporter.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:03:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Please (none / 0)

the MSM is not the military. They are supposed to be more, uhhhmmm, responsible than they have been.

You seem to be de-sensitized about sexist remarks because you are surrounded by it.  Media Matters has written several articles about sexism in the media and as a woman, I agree with them.


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:13:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am NOT desensitized (none / 0)

I have called out everyone around me on their sexist (and racist) remarks, but I never once heard anyone in the MSM make any remarks that were remotely sexist, unless they were also being racists as well.

Call me when someone on MSNBC says someone should slap the bitch or that Hillary Clinton needs to go back into the kitchen.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:24:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I am NOT desensitized (none / 0)

http://mediamatters.org/items/2008052100 02?f=s_search


by colebiancardi on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:30:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A Republican consultant (none / 0)

lol, nice try, but I can let out the roll call of racist remarks on the teevee too...by Republicans.

and Jeffrey Toobin call him out on that and attacked the percevied sexism, so I don't see your complaint. Should we apologize for something stupid a Republican said?


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 12:02:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Republican consultant (none / 0)

I was truly hoping that you would google media matters once you got there and see link after link of sexism in the media, particularly towards Hillary

I guess you didn't care.

and it doesn't matter who in the MSM stated it - are you stating it is okay for the MSM to go on the air and call Obama the N-word, so long they are republican?

come on.


by colebiancardi on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 08:45:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Good (none / 0)

they deserve his leadership. I'll laugh when they try to protest when McCain's judges decide a woman brought on her own rape.

and then in the very next election, I'll vote to get that ruling overturned.

These people may women look REALLY bad.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:48:59 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Well...Nietzsche say that suffering leads to greatness.

So I guess they like war, poverty, corruption, torture, wire-tapping, terrorist threats, high gas prices, the housing crisis, the recession, the tax code, there are more.  I just think we are facing a lot of Nietzschians


Matthew25Network.com
by cardboard 1 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 10:56:27 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

They'll vote Obama in the end.  Those few that do actually vote for McCain aren't real democrats. Either way, it won't matter because we'll win w/o them.


by Democrat in Chicago on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:03:34 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Put it this way, replace Obama with practically any other Democrat and I will vote Democratic in November.

Do you understand that there are people that just can't stand that man?

Just like I can't stand George W. Bush.  I can't stand Obama's arrogance, his voice drives me freakin' nuts, and standing there with his damned nose stuck up so high that if it rains he might drown.  It disgusts me.


by wblynch on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:21:59 PM EST

Yes (none / 0)

do you understand that there are even MORE people who can't stand THAT woman?

I hate hearing HER voice and I only listen to her to hear what position she takes on something today, since it seems to change like the wind depending on what state she's in.

Your intimidation fails again.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:25:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes (none / 0)

I am no intimidator.  There are hundreds that arrived here at MYDD over the past several weeks, I guess they were bored at Daily KOS when non-Obamans were drummed out.

Well you can't drum me out of my party and I suspect when the Obama mania has subsided, many of these drummers will be off on the next great adventure.


by wblynch on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:30:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Weird.  I'm a Democrat b/c of the policies the party supports.  I had no idea that I should be basing my vote on things like what someone's voice sounds like and the angle at which they hold their nose.

I guess I should go and see if I like what Bob Barr's voice sounds like and see if I like his nose angle to determine if I should vote for him.

Hmmm, actually, I think I'll continue to vote based on policy.  But as it is a free country, you are free to vote based on people's noses and voices.  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 04:41:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

Yea I'm sure the McCain website will be brought down by so much "activity". Thank you Truth matters.


by Politicalslave on Sat May 31, 2008 at 11:57:25 PM EST

Re: Were they even Democrats? (none / 0)

It's the "Harriet Christian" wing of the Democratic party.

You know, the ones that crossed-over and voted for Bush last time.

They still have their souvenir axe handles Lester Maddox sold them.


McCainuire, The Wrath Of Not Enough Naps.
by catilinus on Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 08:14:29 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.