If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out?

If the Republicans were so smart to center their campaigns on anti-illegal immigration screeds during the 2005 gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia, then why did they lose both contests? If the Republicans were so smart to focus on immigration during the 2006 midterms, how come they lost their majorities in both chambers of Congress and seats in races in which a hard right, anti-immigrant Republican went up against a Democrat moderate on the issue? If the Republicans were so smart to center their campaign to hold the Virginia legislature this past fall on immigration, why did they lose the lower chamber? And if Tom Tancredo was so smart to run a presidential campaign on the immigration issue, why is he dropping out in ignominy? Simon Rosenberg has some related thoughts...

There are all sorts of news reports this morning that Tom Tancredo, who has based his entire campaign on an anti-immigrant platform, is ending his bid for the Presidency. As all of us try to make sense of the current immigration debate and how Tancredo's total rejection by Republican primary voters fit in let's consider these two figures - 1% and 62%. 1% is the share of the Republican vote Tancredo has been receiving. 62% is share of Republicans who support an earned path to citizenship, according to a new LA Times poll taken two weeks ago. There really can be no other conclusion to Tancredo's incredible failure than to conclude the Tancredo approach to immigration, "Deport Those Who Don't Belong. Make Sure They Never Come Back" has been overwhelmingly rejected by even Republican voters, and is just one more example of how the GOP's investment in the immigration issue has failed time and again to produce the results they had hoped for.

Today he will probably try to argue that the reason he never got traction is that the rest of the Republican field has adopted his position. But that really isn't true. Mitt Romney, who has made intense anti-immigration rhetoric a centerpiece of his campaign, is dropping across the board. Mike Huckabee, who seems to rise for every new anti-immigrant ad Romney runs against him in Iowa, has adopted at least rhetorically a much more compassionate path (see here for his new, wacky immigration position). Fred Thompson who has also taken a very hard line on immigration isn't getting any traction, despite his recent endorsement by Iowa Rep. Steve King, a Tancredo ally. John McCain, the Republican most associated with Comprehensive Immigration Reform, is rising in mosts polls and is now very much back in the race. And Rudy, who leads in most national GOP polls has embraced a version of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, and is now running an ad that openly talks about citizenship. Rather than triumphing inside the GOP field, it seems to much more plausible to conclude that the Tancredo vision is in the process of being utterly rejected.

Like Simon, I'm expecting Tancredo to try to spin his utter failure to gain traction in this race as some sort of validation of his extremist position. His statement might sound vaguely like this language attributed to George H.W. Bush as the end of his memoirs in The Simpsons episode "Two Bad Neighbors" from the illustrious seventh season:

And since I'd achieved all my goals as President in one term, there was no need for a second.  The end.

Tancredo may have had some successes in convincing his Republican brethren, both within the Congress and within the presidential field, to follow him off the cliff on this issue. Along these lines, Tancredo has been remarkably able at helping make his party unelectable in a lot of areas of the country (and perhaps across the country as a whole -- we'll have to wait til next fall to see if that is true). But aside from this, he has no success, whatsoever. Hard line immigration legislation isn't likely going to pass any time soon, and the Tancredo brand of anti-immigration rhetoric has only yielded more deadlock on Capitol Hill -- deadlock that has allowed the flow of unlawful entry into the United States. So congrats Mr. Tancredo. Your political career has been really fruitful.



Display:


my theory about Tancredo (none / 0)

is that he entered the race solely to be the bomb-thrower who makes everyone else look moderate.

I can't remember where I read it, but he may have even made some comment suggesting that compared to him, the eventual GOP nominee will look moderate.

If not for Tancredo, everyone else would look more crazy.

Kucinich plays a similar role in our primaries--if he weren't there, our other candidates would be labeled leftist, but he shows what the left really looks like.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 10:21:24 AM EST

also, I think he's dropping out (none / 0)

because he was counting on the endorsement of his buddy, Congressman Steve King. King represents the most Republican area of the state. With him backing Fred Thompson, Tancredo appeared to be headed to an even more humiliating loss.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 10:23:34 AM EST

Re: If He's So Smart.... (none / 0)

Maybe Lou Dobbs will finally shut up. Take a lesson, Lou & CNN. Dobbs' demogoguery over the immigration issue on CNN is way past its shelf life. Business rejects the GOP's demogoguery too, according to Business Week, and voters are switching to the Dems over it:

Public Policy December 17, 2007

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnfl ash/content/dec2007/db20071214_881757.ht m

When Anti-Immigrant Is Anti-Business
Republican Presidential candidates, facing intense pressure to talk tough on immigration, are losing some support from the business community
by Moira Herbst


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 10:24:45 AM EST

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

While a one-trick pony, and an exceptionally nasty one, like Tancredo did not find success, do not mistake his failure for the failure of the immigration wedge issue.  It's an important issue, one that the Democrats had better not ignore or let the pro-open borders wackos take over on.

The American people are not happy about illegals.  It's one issue, tho.  Democrats allowed Repukeliscum to destroy us in the last two elections.  In 2004, we allowed the Repukeliscum, and the pro-gay marriage wackos, to define us as the pro-gay marriage party.  The American people are not on that page right now.  

We need to ensure that the same does not happen here.  We need to advocate a position of moderate and reasoned amnesty, a position of support for businesses that NEED low-wage workers (ag and meat packing ONLY) and a position of support for programs that allow employers to get legal without a huge investment.


by dataguy on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 10:55:48 AM EST

Re: It's Romney, stupid (none / 0)

The anti-immigration mantle is really being worn by Mitt Romney, not by Tom Tancredo.  His attacks against both Huckabee and Giuliani center on anti-immigrant crap. Tancredo has won, or actually, his position has won.

Mitt has no positions, just what plays.  He's smart and he's very connected to the Republican power brokers.  Immigrant bashing is to 2008 what gay bashing was to 2004.


by David Kowalski on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 11:35:59 AM EST

Re: It's Romney, stupid (none / 0)

Mitt Romney at least says that he wants to increase legal immigration, something Tancredo has been against. Tancredo is a racist as well as a traitor and sometimes borders on Marxism, although he may not recognize it (his support for KGB style wiretapping and building a Berlin Wall South of the border). Why do I say Tancredo is a traitor. Here is the evidence:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/news/item .jsp?aid=79

Now, League of South is an organization some of whose members want armed insurrection against the Yankees and by default the USA.

Then there is his association with the racist Federation of American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelrepo rt/article.jsp?aid=846

http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?a id=295

Tancredo claims he is pro-life..but his actions indicate that he is pro-life as long as the babies are white. That is why he is sympathetic to organizations that want to abort non-white babies such as FAIR. FAIR complains about 20,000 or so-computer programmers allowed in on H1-B visas However, it has nothing to say about 15,000 actors and supporting actors let in on H1-B visas as well. Why? The former are mostly non-white while the latter are 99% white from English speaking countries and som non-English speaking countries such as the Netherlands. FAIR does not care that these actors unemploy aspiring American actors as long as these actors happen to be white. So, there is no hue and cry from FAIR. The goal of Tancredo and FAIR is a white majority America. For all I know, some people in FAIR may be sympathetic to the repatriation of Asian Americans and Hisapnics, even those who are citizens amd banning of mail order brides and international marriages. It is groups such as FAIR we have to be careful about not the neo-Nazis or the KKK whose shennanigans we already know about.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 12:59:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (2.00 / 1)

I always find it ironic that the left has become the business communities' mouth piece on illegal immigration. Probably because La Raza is sponsered by billion dollar corporations and the worst workplace violators (Walmart)and an enormous PR campaign (http://www.nclr.org/section/corporate_pa rtners/). Why won't anyone talk about the downward pressure on wages on the lower income caused by illegal immigration? Why is Ok to break the law? Why are you called a racist if you question the flood of illegal immigration -- even if you're black or Hipanic? This is the number one issue for independent voters, yet Emmanuel is called names for saying it's the third rail. I know Singer thinks he's the smartest guy on the Web, but recent election losses should teach you that this isn't the great issue for Dems which it has been built up to be. If I knew that Dems were protecting the working class first, then I would be less concerned about this issue. But it's all pandering and name-calling. Pathetic.


by JFK464 on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 12:57:10 PM EST

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

"This is the number one issue for independent voters, yet Emmanuel is called names for saying it's the third rail."

Yes indeed! That is why they voted in large numbers for the Democrats and defeated people like JD Hayworth and John Hostettler. Yes indeed! That is why Virginia has a Republican majority in the Senate and a Republican Governor. Yes indeed! That is why Colorado has a GOP governor, state senate and a state legislature..all GOP. Number one issue for the independent voters indeed! Check your facts before writing BS and if you guys think it is a major issue, put your money where your mouth is and vote for Tancredo.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:03:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

http://www.democracycorps.com/

I have done my homework. Read Democracy Corp's October 30 memo. "Check your facts before writing BS." Check your facts, and talk about the plight of Americans without high school diplomas who compete with illegals. Republicans took the most recent special elections, and illegal immigration played a big part.

The focus is always on allegations of racism, but I sense that this is because the left won't discuss class. Too much a threat to their own privilege. But some of the biggest losers in the open border economics are the decedent of slaves and high school dropouts. The downward pressure on wages hurts the most vulnerable. Talk about real racism. But of course we can't talk about this, we need to feed big business with cheap labor that they "NEED."


by JFK464 on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:18:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

"Republicans took the most recent special elections, and illegal immigration played a big part."

What special elections? In heavily GOP districts where RVP is R+5 to 10. Talk to me when they unseat Melissa Giffords. Tancredo is a racist. I have shown evidence above. If the anti-immigration folks want me to hear their point of view they need to have better reps than Tancredo, FAIR and other trash that permeate the movement. And your attempt to bring up the election of GOP in the heavily GOP late Jo Ann Davis's district is a pathetic attempt to argue your viewpoint. As I said, if you can unseat Melissa Giffords I will accept your argument. Not when a GOP candidate wins a heavily GOP district. It is plain BS.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 02:13:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

"a position of support for businesses that NEED low-wage workers (ag and meat packing ONLY"

My point exactly. I thought those of on the left were there to force businesses to pay good wages....by the way, the Swift meat packing plants
were quickly filled with legal workers, many of them Hmong immigrants from Wisconsin who were unemployed. See, it's not about race, it's about following the law and supporting legal workers instead of undermining them.

But that's the point of "What's the matter with Kansas?" Americans perceive, perhaps rightly, that the left speaks for elites and the right speaks for working people, as the above quote proves.


by JFK464 on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:05:52 PM EST

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Tancredo is against legal immigration. Check your facts man. He is a racist!


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:07:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Al Gore has the same position. Anyone who understands sustainability knows that our population will reach a billion by 2090 at the current rate. Maybe we should slow it down.


by JFK464 on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:21:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Al Gore has the same position on immigration. Show me. Please give me links that Al Gore has associated with the Tancredo and Buchanan bunch or for that matter any link that he has sided with Heath Shuler should do.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 02:15:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

"Al Gore has the same position."

Really?

Q: Now that we have a shortage of workers, do you think we should open our doors to more immigrants?
A: Yes, I think that we should allow more immigrants to come in. We are a nation of immigrants and with pride. It is what has made us a great nation. All of us, save the Native Americans, need only count back the generations to find when our families immigrated here or when they were brought here in chains.

http://www.issues2000.org/celeb/Al_Gore_ Immigration.htm

As I said dont write before finding out the facts!


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 02:21:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Well, if the American people believe that, then the American people are suckers, sorry to say.  The Republicans are great at talking a good game on immigration around election time, but we've seen over the last decade what happens when they actually control the government; immigration raids are way down since 2000, except when they do a couple high-profile raids right before every election to show they mean business.

The Democrats are hardly saints on this issue - indeed, they're part of the bipartisan elite consensus that says we need all this immigration to keep the wheels of the economy greased - but at least they're not out there lying to voters about their position.  If voters think Republicans speak for working people on immigration, they're seriously confused.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 02:23:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Most of GOP's anti-immigration stances are based on racism and bigotry rather than on the concerns for the American worker. Tancredo and his ilk have opposed minimum wage, safety regulations, family leave act, and a host of other issues that would help the American worker. Racist anti-immigration groups such as FAIR, CIS and others have said nothing when it comes to jobs going overseas. They are only interested in keeping America white.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 03:20:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

"That is why they voted in large numbers for the Democrats and defeated people like JD Hayworth and John Hostettler."

Should read that is why they voted in large numbers for JD Hayworth and John Hostettler and sustained the GOP majority in the House. Emmanuel is a nutcase, and we are lucky here in NOVA that he did not influence people to stay home on November 6.


by Boilermaker on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 01:06:18 PM EST

Re: If He's So Smart, Why Is He Dropping Out? (none / 0)

Yeah....all aboard the Rahmbo Express to irrelevancy for Dems.

All Aboard the Racist Train!

You don't need no plan you jes get on board!

.


by Pericles on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 02:17:30 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.