Call For New Netroots Nominations

As you may have already seen over at Swing State Project and Dailykos, DavidNYC has put up a new call for nominations to the Dailykos / MyDD/ Swing State Project combined Act Blue page. I would like to extend that call over to MyDD. This could very well be our last call for nominations, so make your voice heard in this thread.

When making your suggestions, keep in mind that we strongly favor candidates who meet some or all of the following criteria:
  • The candidate is a challenger, not an incumbent.
  • The candidate does not have a massive amount of cash on hand, but also is not looking for an easy way out of traditional fundraising..
  • While not top-tier, the campaign is understood to be winnable.
  • There is a strong local netroots scene either in or very near the candidate's district.
  • The candidate is willing to use the netroots and the progressive movement as an essential component of his or her campaign.
That is what I look for anyway. I don't know if any candidate meets all of those criteria, but the more they meet, the more likely I am to like the candidate. So, with that in mind, nominate away.



Display:


Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (3.00 / 1)

Kweisi Mfume. The rap against him is that he doesn't have as much money as Cardin for the fall election. Let's change it.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 01:27:42 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I thought the rap against Mfume was sexual harrassment.  


by ChgoSteve on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:20:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

link?


by Matt in VA on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:23:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Link


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:50:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

There's np proof in your link. The whole thing has "smear" written all over it. I've been around too long to believe or haul unsubstantiated political trash.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:31:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

See, that's the thing in politics. No proof is needed. If it's said and you can not refute it fully in 24 hours, it sticks and you're done.

Yes, it's unfair but it is the way it is in this cut throat business.

"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."


by Trowaman on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:45:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Pure BS....especially the Rumsfeld quote.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:00:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I'm not staking a position one way or the other, but to the best of my knowledge, that's what's out there.  It's followed him for over a year, so while it's possible that it's BS, it's BS with legs.  Let a lie hang around long enough and it starts functioning as truth in the minds of people who haven't been paying close attention.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:16:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

If the story has legs, it's only because Democrats have contemptibly put them there against one of their own. It's the self-fulfilling prophesy syndrome -- a smear is put out and then people repeat it say it makes a candidate unelectable.

I try not to be profane on this blog, but -- fuck that shit! I'll have no part of it and hope that no more than a handful of foolish Democrats will let what might well be nothing more than a calumny influence them.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 06:22:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Of course there isn't any actual proof. Just allegations, I'd rather we didn't ditch excellent candidates because or rumours. Not to mention if there was actually some bombshell waiting to be dropped I don't think Mfume would still be in the race.


by js noble on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:28:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm not so sure. (3.00 / 1)

"Follow me around. I don't care. I'm serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They'll be very bored."

--Gary Hart, to the New York Times, May 1987.

Politicians (and people generally) can be quite arrogant about what they believe won't sink them.  

Either candidate would be a nice Democratic addition to the Senate.  I prefer Cardin, but not by a ton.


by Adam B on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:44:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Seconded, btw.


by js noble on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:37:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

John Pavich IL-11 (3.00 / 3)

I also would like to nominate John Pavich from IL-11 who is running against incumbent Jerry Weller.

Pavich is a great candidate: young - 30 years old, enthusiastic, charismatic and has never run for office before. He has done important work as a Lawyer for the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia at The Hague in the Netherlands. He was part of a defense team that negotiated the first plea agreement for a national leader in the history of the tribunal. This plea is widely recognized as the first step in a new era of reconciliations in the Balkans.

John also worked for several years as a CIA agent. It was his response to 911, he was personally affected by a college classmates' death at the World Trade Center that day.

After working under the the Bush Administration though, he found he was not being as helpful to the his country in his capacity as a CIA agent. He left and decided to run for office back in his childhood home area of IL-11. You can read his full bio here. John's stand on issues, particularly the Iraq War, Fair Trade rather than Free Trade, properly funding education, and universal health care for everyone, easily fall under the Progressive democrat category. He stands for real change rather than just politics as usual. He has also done an impressive amount of fundraising all on his own, over $350,000. He spends his time and money wisely.

He is married to a wonderful, intelligent and also charismatic young woman, Kelly, his college sweetheart. They now have a young son Andrew who is almost 2 years old. (He has both his parents' good looks, intelligence and charisma already!)

Jerry Weller, the republicans incumbent, is right in line with the Bush, Rove, Frist, DeLay, Abramoff, Cunningham wing of the republican party. Weller has links to all three scandals just named. Weller votes with the conservative christian extremist wing of the republican party 95% of the time. And in his personal life Weller just made a huge mistake right after the 2004 election by marrying into an organized crime family in Guatemala.

Weller married a Guatemalan government official and second in line to be heir of the corrupt FRG party founded by her father, ex-dictator and genocidal murderer General Rios Montt, currently wanted on an International Warrant for genocide, torture and terrorism.

Zury Rios-Montt de Weller, as she now calls herself is an avid and enthusiastic supporter of her father, even calling him "her inspiration" in the Guatemalan press. You can find links to all things Weller/Rios Montt (and Pavich!) on my blog, LiberIL View. Not only did he marry this woman, he married her IN her father's home with him, the murderer, presiding at the ceremony. Meanwhile back here in the IL-11th CD Weller is big on using words like "liberty" and "freedom" in his speeches. He dosen't admit to any irony there.

Weller also does not admit to the conflict of interest his marriage created. He has a seat on the House International Relations Committee - Western Hemisphere. He oversees all things "Guatemala" for our government. He and his wife met while both were working on the legislation (and god knows what other kind of deals to line their pocketbooks) for CAFTA.

Weller had promised constituents here in the 11th CD he would not cast any votes on any legislation that involved CAFTA. He broke that promise and as a result his was one of two votes that passed CAFTA. (Weller expects his constituents to all be lawyers and have to study every word he says, his exact quote that he now uses as his get out of lying free card was, "I promise not vote on any legislation that invovles Guatemala alone.") He was also a whip on that vote, breaking arms for DeLay and making back room deals. Like others have said, Weller is a poster boy for what is wrong with our current government. He needs to be shown the door.

The 11th CD's population in it's upper Northeast corner has been, up until the recent increase in interest rates, growing like wild fire. The voters coming are more democratic leaning. And the current republicans are just as unhappy with their congressman as they are every place else in America, maybe more so here.

Weller isn't around much. He has only ONE office for a very large wide spread district. It's a 2 and 1/2 hour drive from his Joliet, IL. office to the southern most area, (Bloomington, IL.) of the district. And his office is hidden inside a Gold's Gym within another Lawyer's office. No exaggeration there. I was stunned the first time I went there.

Pavich can beat Weller no sweat, if he just gets the money to get his name and message out there. Weller and his wife (and soon to be child, probably being born in Guatemala) is his own walking bad publicity for himself.

John Pavich is the man who can show Weller out of the House door come this November. And he's a man almost all but the most fundamentalists republicans can easily vote for and feel good about casting that vote FOR John Pavich.


by Kankakee Voice on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 01:31:54 PM EST

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (3.00 / 1)

I second the Pavich nod.  


by JJCPA on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:03:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (none / 0)

And I'd like to third it.

This sounds like precisely the guy you want to take you.  This is to say that creeps like this are what give America such an incredibly bad reputation abroad first, by supporting ridiculous nearly imperial policies in countries like Guatemala; and second, by giving Guatamalans the impression (factual as it is) that their local villains have very very close ties to the American government.


by island empire on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:30:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (none / 0)

I also back John Pavich as the netroots endorsed candidates.
First of all, John's work in the CIA and in the Hague give him valuable international relations experience that will help him address the real threats to our national security, not just the endless war in Iraq.
John supports the redeployment amendment that was proposed by Sen. Reed and Sen. Levin regarding Iraq, renewable energy sources, universal health care, and full funding of education.
The incumbent in IL-11, Jerry Weller, is a real monster. Kankakee Voice already highlighted his sketchy marriage, but beyond that, Weller has long since moved out of the district, choosing to live in Chicago instead of with his constituents. Also, he spends a significant amount of time on his palacial Guatamalan estate.
This race is extremely winnable. At R+1 this is a toss-up district, and Pavich's internal poll has Weller's re-elect at just 46%. Pavich has raised about $400,000 on his own, and support from the netroots could really put this race over the top. Please support John!
by AC4508 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:25:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (none / 0)

I fully second these plugs for John Pavich. (Full disclosure - I work for the campaign, but I do it because I believe in him so much!) John has an excellent opportunity to win in November and with some netroots support, we're almost assured of victory.

John is a terrific choice for the 11th. It's a moderate district (48% for Kerry and 51% for Gore/Nader combined) that has an ongoing influx of Dem voters from the Chicago area.  John's background (from the district, all-American guy and family, 5-time commendation winning CIA counter-terrorism officer)plays very well with voting population that overwhelmingly believes that the country is headed in the wrong direction but still believes that use of US power can be a good thing.  Our polling shows that, even in the absence of negative information about our opponent, the voters go for John by 15% once they hear a mere paragraph about his background and views.

Mr. Weller is also a terrific opponent to have.  He's taken over $400,000 from energy companies, has refused to return contributions from the defense contractors who bribed Cunningham and has consistently refused to allow investigations into price gouging.  In one of the largest districts in Illinois, he only has one office and refuses to meet with constituents who were concerned about leaks from the nuclear plants.  Additionally, his voting record is appalling, rating both a 0% from the AFL-CIO and 0% on middle class issues.  He was in favor of the Terry Schiavo amendment and opposed to stem cell research.  He does raise money and raise it well, but our poll indicates that we only need a fraction of what he has to beat him.  Voters know his act and they want something different.

So please help us to send Mr. Weller into retirement and to bring another fighting Dem into Congress.


by DemVictory06 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:04:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (none / 0)

I support John Pavich.
Mr. Pavich's economic positions give a fair shake to all segments of the American public as we strive to make livings and provide for our families. From his empathy for the burden of the out of control fuel costs to his concern over the eventual oppressive financial burden of our National debt, Mr. Pavich understands that someone has to pay.
Mr. Pavich's foreign policies seek rational solutions to National security and international relations, a pullback from acquiescing to minority interests driving us to the brink of global chaos.
Mr. Pavich's emphasis on the long-term future viability of this country will bring us incremental improvements each day.

"Honorable" is the title we give every representative even before they, or if they ever, earn it. Is clear that it was never meant to be descriptive, but directive. Mr. Pavich will fulfill that directive.


by braamer on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:51:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Pavich IL-11 (none / 0)

5th or 6th'ed...

I've been to a couple Pavich events and think he's got a great shot at being the perfect darkhorse suprise in a winnable district.


by zonk on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 07:09:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Vic Wulsin to Take Out Jean Schmidt (3.00 / 3)

Dr. Victoria Wulsin is the perfect candidate for the netroots.
4 Reasons Why:
  1. She's challenging Mean Jean Schmidt.
  2. She's tied in the only poll to date, 44%-44%. The race is on Charlie Cook's chart of competitive races.
  3. As of July 1, she has more Cash on Hand than Jean Schmidt. Vic has $25,000 and Schmidt has $17,000. Netroots dollars go way way way further here than in any other competitive distric.
  4. Vic Wulsin is progressive woman, a public health doctor who has dedicated her career to helping her community.
Go Vic!
by AdyBarkan on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 01:45:13 PM EST

Re: Vic Wulsin to Take Out Jean Schmidt (none / 0)

Yesterday, I suggested on DailyKos that we add no one, and focus instead on bolstering the donor bases for the candidates already selected, because it was too late for our money to make a difference in any race.

You may well have changed my mind.


by Adam B on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:19:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I think putting Mfume on the list is premature; lets see who wins the primary first in MD.

I would like to nominate Jim Webb. As the little "monkey" episode showed yesterday, Allen is exactly the kinda guy who needs to be shown the door. Webb is facing serious cash problems in this race.

Webb, starting before the primary has shown the Netroots love so lets return the favor and help get rid of George Felix Allen.


by bjschmid on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 01:46:36 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

umm, Webb is already netroots endorsed.

If you're angry about the monkey comment, then go on over and give Webb some dough!


by Trowaman on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:48:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Steven Herr, WI-01 (none / 0)

Do you wonder why you never hear about a district where Kerry got 46%, even though less competitive races get more attention?  There are a couple reasons:

- the Democrats had a horrible perennial candidate win the nomination the last three times, and he never got more than 35% of the vote.

  • Wisconsin has a late primary, which means people stand back and wait for the nominee to be chosen, by which time it's too late.
  • the race has a competitive primary which includes the aforementioned perennial candidate running a seventh time, Steven Herr, and three others who are basically in over their heads.

To make this a competitive race in November, we need a good challenger to win the primary.  The perennial candidate has a long track record of losing in the general election, but he has name recognition.  Steven Herr has been working tirelessly with the Democratic Party organization, other groups, county fairs, festivals, and raising as much money as he can.  When the district is written off and people wait for the primary to see who wins, there is little hope for November.  2006 is the year to challenge the seat, and Steven Herr will put up a credible challenge.

Steve is a small business owner in Kenosha and a strong progressive.  He is a member of the DailyKos community.  This is a case where a little help from the netroots can put one more district in play.


by CA Pol Junkie on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 01:51:11 PM EST

Dr. David Gill (IL-15) (3.00 / 1)

I've met Dr. Gill a few times, and he is a great guy.  His campaign could use some more money to showcase what a corrupt sleazeball Tim Johnson is.  He's already raised a good amount more than when he ran in 2004.  Also, he makes an effort to help out and engage with the local progressive groups.  He even took the time to write an article for my DFA group's new progressive newsletter, The Liberal Media.  He is very passionate about changing our (lack of) health care system, and has been against the Iraq war since before it started.

I won't lie, this is a red district, but with a little fundraising help, Dr. Gill could make this into a real race.


Rudy Giuliani hates firefighters. And puppies.
by Fran for Dean on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:12:42 PM EST

Re: Dr. David Gill (IL-15) (none / 0)

Dr. Gill works too.  I'll second him as well.


by JJCPA on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:03:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Al Weed, VA-05 (3.00 / 1)

Al Weed is a military vet, a farmer, a member of the lay-clergy at his church. Because of these things he can be incredibly authentic while speaking to rural and traditionally conservative voters. He's running on a progressive message of contrast and change.

The Virginia blogosphere is relatively mature because, like New Jersey, we had the first round of state-wide races, after the blogosphere's big explosion, that weren't lost among the noise of the '04 election. Charlottesville is a Democratic stronghold in the north of the district which votes 80% D, reads blogs, and provides us a ton of volunteers -- a ton.

The incumbent, Virgil Goode, is neck-deep in MZM, and the district is in really bad shape -- losing jobs, losing farms, losing schools, losing kids either to far-off colleges and big cities, or to the war in Iraq. The district is ready for change, and only 46% say Goode deserves re-election.

Because of Virgil's corruption, because the district is discontent, and because this district is so rural and so poor, your money will go a lot farther here than most other races. It would take 800K to give Al a 50-50 shot at winning this seat, rather than the 1.2M for some races, and 2.4M for others.

Oh, and we have video of Virgil Goode saying nice things about Mitchell Wade, and then Wade says, "I paid him to say that. hehehe" Don't you want to make sure we can run that ad?


Progress is Personal | Connie Brennan | My opinions are mine alone
by msnook on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:14:46 PM EST

Ashdown (3.00 / 2)

I respectfully request your support.  Having a nominee with deep knowledge of the Internet should be key to the Netroots.

Your financial support goes a long way here in Utah.  I will continue to use it effectively in this race and for long term change.  I will not use it to hire someone to write my blog and diaries for me.

Pete Ashdown

(Crossposted on DailyKos)


by pashdown on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:18:53 PM EST

Dave Mejias NY-3 (3.00 / 1)

  Obviously the winds of change seem to be blowing up east and the incumbent, Pete King (the co-sponsor of the disgusting House immigration bill) has to go.  As an Irish-American and graduate of Notre Dame, King is a complete embarrasment.  He is a right-wing fanatic AND is vulnerable.  The race was recently added to the "leans republican" category.
  As my user name suggests, I have no personal stake in this nomination aside from wanting to end the failed career of a staunch right-wing repug and it seems that the man to do it is Dave Mejias.
When I gave food to the poor they called me a Saint. When I asked why the poor were hungry they called me a communist.- Dom Helder Camera
by kentuckydave on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:22:26 PM EST

John Yarmuth (KY-03) (none / 0)

John is an incredible guy and a great candidate.  He has been a leader in progressive politics in Louisville/Jefferson County for a number of years, and is well known in the area.  He is facing Rep. Anne Northup who has a huge amount of money to run her campaign.  Yarmuth has not been targeted by the DCCC as a candidate they will invest in heavily, so he is facing a huge cash disadvantage.  The race is winnable: Northup is a GOP Rep. in a very BLUE district.  Bluegrassreport.org is a local blog that is very popular and strongly supports Yarmuth (as well as all progressive candidates in KY) and has already advocated for Yarmuth (and I think will only step up those efforts as the election draws closer).  

John will make an excellent public servant and Congressman.  I have volunteered for his campaign and know that will be a true progressive advocate in Congress.  Northup is a viscious politician, and she has already begun using the recent death of her 30-year old son as a political tool this year.  The race is winnable: I think Louisvillians are just convinced that Northup is "unbeatable" and that she "has been their forever" so we should not lose that advatage.  Yarmuth needs all the help he can get to show voters that he is the right person to represent KY-03.


by mtleig01 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:24:39 PM EST

Re: John Yarmuth (KY-03) (none / 0)

  I second this nomination as well!  John Yarmuth's public track record is stellar when it comes to progressive issues.  He courageously condemned the war when many were afraid to take a position what might be labled "against the troops."
  With some netroots support this could jump on the radar screen of the DCCC who have made media purchases in the KY04 (bordering the north) and the Indiana district to the west.  This is the year to get rid of another right-winger closer to home.
When I gave food to the poor they called me a Saint. When I asked why the poor were hungry they called me a communist.- Dom Helder Camera
by kentuckydave on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:13:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jack Carter, NV-Senate (3.00 / 5)

Jack is a great candidate with progressive views. He is instantly recognizable as President Carter's son, a real asset considering the current occupant of the White House. Jack has been campaigning hard in the rural areas that the GOP oftern dominates.

The most recent poll had him down 7 pts, 46-39, to Ensign.  This is a race in a purple state we can win with a little cash and a strong turnout. Nevada media is very cheap.


by Bear83 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:24:50 PM EST

Re: Jack Carter, NV-Senate (none / 0)

It sounded like a hatchet job, but the NPR yesterday had a feature on Carter that highlighted his opposition to Katrina relief spending.

Not really much of a progressive position, you know, opposing rebuilding.


by island empire on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:36:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jack Carter, NV-Senate (none / 0)

I'm pulling for Jack and have touted him a bunch around here, but that's not the most recent poll I don't think.

August 12 had a poll with Ensign up 54%-33%.  I don't know much about the merits of the poll cause I haven't had time to check it yet, but that makes me think the 7% might be an outlier.  I hope I'm wrong, but it seemed relevant to mention it.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:20:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jack Carter meets the criteria (3.00 / 1)

Jack Carter meets your criteria:

The candidate is a challenger, not an incumbent.

Jack Carter is challenging freshman Sen. John Ensign.

The candidate does not have a massive amount of cash on hand, but also is not looking for an easy way out of traditional fundraising.

Jack Carter certainly needs some help. Ensign has a large warchest, mostly made up of contributions from the Casino industry and the telecom companies. He is the Chairman of the Subcommittee of Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness which is the Subcommittee responsible for the whole Net Neutrality issue. If you think Ted Stevens is the problem here you might want to rethink that. What could be better than the Netroots helping do bring down the man responsible for anti Net Neutrality legislation? Carter doesn't need millions to win, however an endorsement from the netroots can help significantly. It puts the race, ignored by the Beltway establishment, on the map. Plus, money in Nevada goes a long way, as its a small state with a relatively cheap all instate media market. He has been fundraising quite a bit, both in and out of state, so an endorsement is not just an easy way for them to get cash.

While not top-tier, the campaign is understood to be winnable.

As of now, there is little polling and the results are conflicting. That said, he is moving up in every poll. The latest Rasmussen has him within the margin of error (39-46). Ensign's approval via SUSA is at 52%, not really safe for an incumbent. Dem and Rep registration in the state is pretty even, it's been a swing state in the last presidential elections. The Senator before Ensign was a Democrat. Democrats have great, promising candidates up and down the ticket. (CD-2, CD-3, many statewide offices)

There is a strong local netroots scene either in or very near the candidate's district.

There are several progressive Nevada blogs supporting Jack Carter's campaign. The blogs and their most recent posts on the campaign:

Battleborn Battleground

   * Myrna Sits Down With Jack Carter

Blue Lyon

   * Ensign...just as radical as the rest of 'em

Desert Beacon

   * "Proven Failures" and Rasmussen Redux

Nye County Blog

   * I Like Jack Carter

Reno and Its Discontents

   * Interview With Jack Carter: Future Senator From Nevada

Say NO to Jim and Dawn Gibbons

   * Jack Carter Rocks Fernley

Plus my own blog:

Turn Tahoe Blue

   * Wes Clark To Endorse Jack Carter?

The candidate is willing to use the netroots and the progressive movement as an essential component of his or her campaign.

Okay, this is easy. His daughter Sarah is fairly well known by now around Daily Kos and MyDD. She also writes the Carter Blog on the campaign website. Jack himself has given several interviews to bloggers, including the one mentioned in the blog links above.

Since Jack Carter, IMHO, meets all the criteria I proudly nominate him for the Netroots endorsement.


Turn Tahoe Blue | Nevada Caucus 2008
by jedinecny on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

My choice for a new netroots candidate is Jim Craig, Democratic candidate for New Hampshire's First Congressional District.  Right now, he's in a primary fight, but his Republican opponent in the general is a slacker.  It's a heavily Republican district, but the Republican (Bradley) has a poor attendance record (71 days). And, Bush is not popular in NH, now.  I say - go for it!!


by Astraea on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:25:25 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I just want to add Jim Craig's website:
craigforcongress.org

check it out!

and, a correction - the number of days Jeb Bradley(R-NH) has worked this year is up to 77 (not 71).

Support Jim Craig for Congress!!!


by Astraea on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:19:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Andy Hurst VA-11 (3.00 / 5)

Running against Tom Davis (R-Abramoff) in a very Democratic area (Northern Virginia). Major issues are Iraq, Honesty in Government, and Transportation. Davis is a long time do-nothing incumbent on the Government Reform Cmte, which is pretty ironic.


by Matt in VA on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:25:53 PM EST

Re: Andy Hurst VA-11 (3.00 / 5)

second the motion!

Andy Hurst is running for Congress from Virginia's 11th Congressional District, he is challenging Tom Davis. He is currently polling even with voters who know who he is, and it is only August. He as solid support in Virginia blogosphere and has been successful in attracting volunteer support.

As an extra special treat, Hurst was one of Julie Hiatt Steel's pro-bono lawyers in her fight against Starr. So, this is a chance for netroots to payback Starr.


by Alice Marshall on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:03:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Andy Hurst = WOOO! (3.00 / 4)

Can I third the Nomination?

Per my comment down thread Andy Hurst meets all of the criteria set forth by Bowers in this post and by DavidNYC of Swing State Project in this post

Andy has even done a few live blogs, not on daily kos tilting at the wind mills of the national netroots, but on local blogs such as Virginia Progressive Here, he has also hosted a Democratic Reunion Event (offline organizing) and won the endorsement of the Progressive Democrats of Virginia in the primary, he is the real deal, I hope that Bowers, Stoller, DavidNYC and Markos take a real look at Andy Hurst


Next Generation Democrats
by Pitin on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:54:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Andrew Hurst more then a candidate (3.00 / 4)

Andrew Hurst is not just a candidate but a man with a vision of how we could do/make things better, mainly starting with ethical and responsible leadership in government.  Also  Hurst grassroots efforts from the primary to date must be doing something right because Tom Davis is having phonebanks 4 nights a week and canvassing Sat. and Sun. plus kissing babies and shaking hands every chance he gets (all things I have heard rumored he hates to do) and it is not even Labor day yet.


by Smith is Blue on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:11:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Paul Aronsohn (none / 0)

NJ-5 is a suburban district running across the northern border of New Jersey and hooking south.  Most of the voters live in northern Bergen County, a classic "moderate" Republican area.  The district was long held by Marge Roukema, a moderate Republican who fit the district like a glove.

After two serious primary battles with a Club for Growth protege, Roukema retired and her opponent, Scott Garrett, took the seat.  Garrett took 60% of the vote in 2002 despite being outspent by Anne Sumers $1.6 million to $1.2 million.  Two years later he outspent Dorothy Wolfe $1.2 million to $475 K and saw his margin drop to 58-41%.  This year he has raised $476 K to 323 K for his opponent, Paul Aronsohn.

NJ has a very strong netroots presence.  Garrett's Progressive Punch score of 4 makes him the most conservative Republican in the tri-state area easily.  Even in the exurban area of the district in Sussex and Warren counties, the GOP has only been taking 60% of the vote.  Oh, yes, Garrett's staff has been known to be hostile on the phone.

This race has flirted along the fringes of the pundit lists.  This is a great year for Democrats, Garrett is a terrible candidate, and Aronsohn has shown some enthusiasm.  In a wave year, we win this seat in an upset.


by David Kowalski on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:27:04 PM EST

Nancy Skinner (3.00 / 2)

Michigan 9th...

Very active in the netroots...and has a shot.


by Nazgul35 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:30:50 PM EST

John Laesch and Jack Carter (3.00 / 1)

Both have movement support, both are excellent Crashing the Gates style candidates who can take out their opponents with the right sources.

Both giant killers.

We have an embarassment of riches on our side of things this cycle, but if we don't include both of these guys, I feel the netroots page will always sort of ring half true.

-C.


by neutron on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:41:48 PM EST

Barry Welsh (none / 0)

I have to throw in a vote for Jack Carter too.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:48:06 PM EST

Francine Busby? (none / 0)

This is more a question than a suggestion...

What do people think of Busby's chances in November?  I was really hoping she'd win in the special election, but I've not heard much discussion of her chances since then.  It was pretty close before and the Repubs were required to spend tons of money to hold the seat.

With a little netroots support, can she win in November?


by absinthe on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:48:55 PM EST

Re: Francine Busby? (none / 0)

I think the general perception is that not enough people are going to change their minds 6 months later which seems like it'd hold water.  Busby isn't going to get the same kind of money from the party and is gonna struggle to keep up with tv time.  That's the CW for what it's worth.  I was pretty disappointed with her original campaign and even though she's promised to run things differently this time, I think it's probably too late.  Maybe in '08.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:27:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tim Walz, MN-01 (3.00 / 3)

Tim Walz is a Fighting Dem who served 24 years in the National Guard, including going overseas to Europe in support of the recent war in Afghanistan. He is also a high school teacher in the 1st Congressional District's second biggest city (Mankato). Walz is an excellent speaker who actually stole the show in a fundraiser headlined by Al Franken that I was at last month. He is just as good talking to people one-on-one in meet-and-greet situations. Hotline ranks this race as the 46th most competitive this cycle, citing Walz's disadvantage in cash as the only thing holding him back from top-tier status.

Walz is taking the fight to GOP Representative Gil Gutknecht, who was elected in the landslide of 1994 to replace a retiring Democrat. Back then Gutknecht promised to only serve 12 years, but he's now decided to go after term number 7 after being denied a shot at the GOP Senate nod this year by a Republican Party unified around Mark Kennedy. Gutknecht has been dicey on the Iraq issue, saying he would prefer not to talk about a topic most people don't understand and recently changing his position multiple times. Walz has been using his authority and expertise as a Vet to demand a debate against Gutknecht on Iraq. Gutknecht is running scared, telling some lobbyists that he may not be around next year to help them out. It is worth noting that Bush won this district with just 51% of the vote (a 12,000 vote margin) in 2004.

Besides being a great speaker, Walz has a personable quality that is hard to describe. I guess the best thing I could say is that it is hard to walk away from a conversation with him without truly believing that he is a great man.

Nearly everyone who meets him is instantly impressed. The only problem is that, while he has been outraising Gutknecht since the middle of last year, his CoH is still dwarfed by the Incumbent's warchest amassed over years without a credible challenger. However, the good news is that MN-01 is a cheap media market. The largest city in the District is Rochester, Gutknecht's home, which only has about 90,000 people. Rochester is home to the famous Mayo Clinic, whose executives just recently met with Walz after issuing a press release a couple weeks back slamming a GOP plan to give a loan to a hazardous railroad company that is worth 10X the company's present value. Gutknecht has not commented on the plan, while Walz has a position paper out on his website. No one in the local blogoshpere can recall a time when the Mayo execs met with the congressional challenger. In addition, Gutknecht's campaign messed up their signature petition and is currently headed to the MN Supreme Court just to get on the GOP Primary ballot.

Speaking of the local blogoshpere, Tim Walz is the darling of it. There is a great progressive blog that was front-paged by Kos a while back devoted exclusively to the race:
A Bluestem Prarie

Other prominent local Minnesota blogs devoting a lot of attention to this race:
MN Publius
Minnesota Campaign Report
Minvolved

Tim Walz's campaign website is at timwalz.org

This is a perfect race for us to get involved with: we have a great candidate who we can all truly get behind, a district where our money could go a long way in keeping our candidate competitve on the airwaves, a very competitive district in a region in which we presently have no netroots candidates, and a GOP incumbent with both local and national troubles. This is a district where we could truly have an impact.


Never separate the life you live from the words you speak. -Sen. Paul Wellstone (Minnesota)
by Max Fletcher on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 02:59:27 PM EST

Nancy Skinner - Michigan's 9th (none / 0)

Nancy is challenging Joe Knollenberg.

Nancy is as progressive as they come, and a former Air America host. She had a morning show in the district, so her name is familiar.

Nancy attended Yearly Kos and came back fired up, excited about the netroots. She just won the nomination in the primary, and is getting plenty of positive free media. She is holding her own fundraising, but defeating a 14 year incumbent will take help. Her blog, nskinnerforcongress.blogspot.com is active and she often diaries on DailyKos herself.

The race hasn't gotten the national attention it deserves. Knollenberg faced a tough primary challenger, very few races had multiple Democrats on the primary ballot, but Nancy still had a strong primary showing. Given the anti-incumbent sentiment in Michigan right now, this could easily be one of the 15 seats we take the house back with!


by JordanLFW on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:03:06 PM EST

Larry Kissell NC-8 (none / 0)

I nominate Larry Kissell from NC-8 he is in a hard fight with Big Money Robin Hayes and needs our help. Larry with his innovative campaigning with his goat CATFA and his $1.22 a gallon gasoline sale has demonstrated that he knows how to reach and is for the little guy


by cutter28001 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:04:28 PM EST

Re: Larry Kissell NC-8 (none / 0)

Already a netroots candidate.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:23:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)


by cutter28001 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:04:38 PM EST

MN-01 (none / 0)

Tim Walz is running a grass roots campaign in southern Minnesota against Incumbent republican Gil Gutknecht. Tim has experience as a teacher, a Command Sergeant Major in the Minnesota National guard, and took part in Operation Iraqi Freedom in supply lines in Italy. In 2004 he brought students to a Bush rally "only because he teaches social studies" after traveling to the event they were asked not to attend because one of the students had a John Kerry sticker on his wallet. This enraged Tim and got him fired up to get things changed.

Read about that event here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Walz

Gil Gutknecht recently changed his position on Iraq, he now say we need troop withdrawal because "he didn't understand what was happening on the ground". As you know, him not understanding has cost many American and Iraqi lives.

Gutknecht blindly followed Bush now he claims to regret it to in a cheap attempt to cover his butt politically. After loosing 2,600 lives. Tim Walz offers clear plans, brings military experience, and much community experience. He is slowly catching up with fundraising, and this second tier district is on the verge looking like a pick up... with a little help from his friends that it.

http://timwalz.org/


by Demrock6 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:10:25 PM EST

AZ-01: Ellen Simon (3.00 / 1)

Ellen Simon (website, actblue) is running against Rep. Rick Renzi in Arizona's 1st CD. (I posted this on the DailyKos thread as well.)

Reasons for my nomination:

  1. Arizona's CD-1, where I live, has gotten no love from anyone for years. The past two election cycles the Democratic challengers got little support from the DNC or the state party and -- even through the district is, under Arizona's nonpartisan districting laws, split evenly between Dems, Reps and Independents.
  2. Rick Renzi (wikipedia, dkospedia)  has been named one of the 13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. While serving as the ersatz representative for rural Arizona, Renzi has continued to live in Virginia, where his primary residence has been since before he was elected to Congress. He is a rubber stamp for Bush, voting with him upwards of 90% of the time (sorry, couldn't find citation -- will look harder, but I know I've read this multiple times).
  3. Congressional Quarterly, impressed with Ellen's fundraising for the July filing deadline, changed their rating for this district from Safe Republican to Leans Republican -- skipping over "Republican Favored" entirely. (See a PDF of the article.)
  4. Ellen is substantially more organized than the other two Democrats running in the primary, Mike Caccioppoli and Vic McKerlie.
  5. Ellen seems to have an instinct for including the netroots, but she clearly isn't there yet. This kind of endorsement would show her how important it is to make the netroots an integral part of her campaign. Bloggers were more active in previous contests and I think with a strong candidate like Ellen, they will be again.
  6. Arizona has a popular Democratic governor coasting to re-election. While the senate race isn't looking so solid right now, there is an increasing trend toward purple in this state.
  7. While I very much want Ellen Simon to win this election -- and I think with sufficient support from the netroots and large donors, it's definitely possible -- even if she doesn't win, a good showing will have a big impact by encouraging the Democratic party and Democratic activists to put it top on their list in 2008.

I grew up in this district, and I pine for better representation. I know she has had some troubles, but compared to what could be used against Renzi, I think she still comes out ahead.


by genocideisnews on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:12:31 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I'm from the Tampa Bay area of Florida - which is the largest swing area in the state (Orlando may surpass us in a few years, but, for now - you can't win Florida without Tampa Bay) with half the swing precincts in the state covered by the Tampa media market.

So - I'd like to propose some candidates for office down here who may not be as sexy as congressional candidates, but are the folks we need in office and on the ground in '08 and beyond!

1) Deb Cope - former chair of the Tampa Group of the Sierra and community activist is running against  Republican incumbent Faye Culp. votecope.com/

2) Rep. Charlie Justice, a progressive Democrat, is running for an open state senate seat. This will be the most heavily fought over seat in the general in the Florida legislature, with two Republican state reps vying for their party's nomination.

Charlie is the real deal. A populist progressive who is genuinely liked by the voters in this 50-50 district, but he's going up against the Republican machine in two counties (Pinellas and Hillsborough) where the local party apparatus is somewhere between disarray and exploding.
www.charliejustice.com


by Tampa Bay campaigner on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:14:44 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Chris Murphy CT-05
Running against Nancy Johnson
by TulaneDem on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:16:07 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Already targetted by the DCCC and not hurting for the kind of money the netroots can provide.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:28:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tim Walz, MN-01 (3.00 / 1)

* Tim Walz fits perfectly with every single one of these criteria. Walz, a fightin' dem and an award-winning public school teacher is challenging 6-term Republican congressman Gil Gutknecht.

* Walz, as of the last filing deadline, had around $250,000 cash on hand. He has done the hardwork of raising money the traditional way: phone-calling and raising money from small donors at events throughout the district. Walz has outraised Gutknecht during the calendar year of 2006. That is right, Walz - a public school teacher - has outraised Gutknecht for 2006. Walz is behind in cash on hand, but the gap is narrowing. With the help of the netroots, Walz will have the resources to take down Gutknecht.

* MN-01 is a 50-50 district. Bush only won the distrct by 4% and 17 of the 22 counties in the district are represented by DFL Legislators. The district is rated an "R+1" by the Cook Political Report. Minnesota is also trending blue once again with Amy Klobuchar running in the double digits ahead in the US Senate Race and Mike Hatch running neck-and-neck with Governor Tim Pawlenty.

* The national establishment has decided to go for the open seat in MN-06, a very Republican district, instead of making Walz one of their targeted races. This is where the netroots come in. MN-01 is currently ranked as the #46 race in the country by the National Journal. This is a more competitive race then some of the other netroots candidates.

* A Blue Stem Prairie is a blog that is covering soley the race in MN-01. Walz has is also "the darling of the Minnesota netroots" recieving the full support of such respected bloggers like:

MN Campaign Report

MN Publius

Minvolved

This is just a taste of the great Minnesota bloggers who have stepped up to the plate to back Tim.

* Walz is a progressive populist, fighthing for progressive causes such as universal health care, strong public schools, open and honest government, and a safe withdrawal of US troops from Iraq. Walz has embraced the help of grassroots and progressive support by meeting with Democratic activists across the district and having interviews a number of Minnesota bloggers.

Tim Walz is an awesome candidate and MN-01 is the perfect district for the Netroots to have a say in. We can not let this opportunity go by us. Together, we can bring independent and authentic leadership back to Southern Minnesota.


by DFLer22 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:20:09 PM EST

MI-07 -- Sharon Renier (3.00 / 1)

(Posted this late on the DKos thread, thought I'd repost here.)

This district was ignored for a long time because it seemed too impossible-- a Republican incumbent, Kerry only got 45%, and there were four underfunded Democrats in a primary race.

Then came the August 8th primary. Far-right former state rep. Tim Walberg defeated Congressman Joe Schwarz in a Club for Growth-sponsored upset that shocked many people. On blogs like DailyKos, there were immediate cries to do something to help the newly-nominated Democrat Sharon Renier. Nationally, most people have forgotten all about that, but locally, we've started working.

Let there be no misunderstanding, Tim Walberg is VERY conservative. He opposes things like the 16th Amendment and income taxes, or the separation of church and state. More than that, in the pre-primary debate, he basically said he'd follow President Bush's lead blindly when it came to Iraq and the military. While Joe Schwarz was far from progressive, at least he had a mind of his own.

The Democrat, Sharon Renier, was the 2004 nominee. She's a little quirky, but right for the district, with a good blend of progressive and conservative positions. With no money, she managed 36 percent against Schwarz, in a district that went 45 percent for Kerry. This time, her fundraising is a little better, and she promises to campaign with a new energy and enthusiasm, especially against Walberg.

As for netroots support and the internet, Sharon Renier has yet to take advantage of that potential. Michigan has a quickly-growing netroots network, centering around Michigan Liberal, and there's a new blog devoted to the district and Tim Walberg-- Walberg Watch. I started it a few days after the primary, and am currently in the process of recruiting a number of other 7th District bloggers to join.

When Walberg won the primary, the district went from a longshot where only people like me were interested to an open seat attracting national attention. This is, after all, Michigan. Tim Walberg is too conservative for Alabama, and it really was a surprise to many that he won the GOP primary. Let's keep this guy out of Congress.


Walberg Watch - Following Radical Conservative Rep. Tim Walberg in MI-07
by Fitzy on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:21:35 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (3.00 / 4)

Since I was retarded and forgot that Webb was already on the list, I would add my recommendation to Andy Hurst (VA-11). Davis' district has seen significant demographic shift over the past few years, and he is a big supporter of the GOP's pay to play scams; seems ripe for a takeover.  


by bjschmid on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:21:46 PM EST

Peter Goldmark (none / 0)

With Darcy Burner pretty well cemented as netroots fave, the local blogosphere's eye seems to wandering across the mountains to WA-05, where we have a great opportunity to take out first-term right-winger Cathy McMorris before she gets too cemented. Peter Goldmark fits right in with the Schweitzer/Tester mold of all-cattle-plus-hat candidate that we need to win in the mountain west... rancher with mustache and boots (oh, plus a PhD in molecular biology) who knows how to communicate with the district's rural agricultural base and who knows how to put a populist spin on progressivism.


by Crazy Vaclav on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:23:45 PM EST

Re: Peter Goldmark (none / 0)

I second the nomination of Peter Goldmark.  He fits all of the criteria for a netroots endorsement.  

He has reached out to the local blogisphere (he contacted me months ago about setting up a meeting with local bloggers which I happily obliged) and every blogger that has met him has been impressed by his authenticity and his easy manner.  He is a natural candidate.

He is a challenger to a weak incumbent, in fact a recent poll shows Goldmark neck and neck with McMorris and that's without any local coverage of his campaign.  Pretty incredible.

He doesn't have massive amounts of cash on hand, but he's steadily bringing in money and his race has just been upgraded by the DCCC.

This is a winnable seat and he is the perfect candidate for the district.

There is a strong local blogging community in Washington State and we are all trying to help promote the Eastern Washington blogs that are now covering the race, including one in Goldmark's district (www.ewpolitics.com) that is emerging as a serious player.

Peter Goldmark is perfect for a netroots endorsement!


by liberalgirlnextdoor on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 06:24:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Pete Ashdown for US Senate - UT (3.00 / 1)

Pete Ashdown is running for Utah's US Senate seat this year, and he needs the help of the Netroots ActBlue page.  

Ashdown can win in Utah because he is a native Utahn that understands the state.  He is a successful businessman -- XMission, the first Utah based ISP -- who has a record that voters can rely on to see what kind of politician he will be; he'll put his constituents first just as he has done with his clients.  Further, he has garnered some international attention on the BBC World Service because of his novel use of wikis in politics well before Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales launched his Campaigns Wikia.

Please help Pete Ashdown!


by anhhung18901 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:30:55 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I nominate Maxine Moul, running in Nebraska's 1st district against rubberstamper nonpareil Jeff Fortenberry.

Maxine has recently broken fundraising records for Nebraska Democratic Campaigns.

More importantly, Congressional Quarterly Magazine just advanced Maxine's campaign in it's rankings, from "Republican safe" to "Republican favored".

That may not sound like much, but in a red state like Nebraska, it's huge. The Republicans first sent Hastert down here to raise Fortenberry totals, and when that didn't work, they sent Cheney!

Why would the Republicans send the V.P. to Nebraska, supposedly a "safe" red state?

Because, Maxine is considered a real threat.

Mostly what Maxine requires is extra name recognition, and additional funds for GOTV efforts.

Acknowledgement:
I have done phone banking for Maxine, and will do more as November approaches.


by justathought on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:31:30 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Also Angie Paccione in CO-04, running against
Marilyn Musgrave.  Musgrave is one of the prime sponsors of the anti-gay marriage amendment and is a Dobsonite fundie.  Angie has a great story and has been successfully fundraising, but Musgrave has a huge war chest.  Knocking off Musgrave is doable, as she got only 51% of the vote last time, and it woould send a great message.
by Mimikatz on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:25:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Paul Aronsohn (none / 0)

As David Kowalski said earlier, Paul Aronsohn is a great candidate running against extremist Radical Republican Scott Garrett, easily the most right-wing Republican in the Northeast. You can learn more about the race at my blog, Retire Garrett at retiregarrett.blogspot.com.

Paul's a great candidate and this is a winnable district. It is midly Republican with a GOP performance of 55%, but moderate in its roots. The Republicans in this area are just anti-tax, but are moderate to liberal on social issues and are thoroughly disgusted by Evangelical Religious Right Christianist Scott Garrett.

Support Paul Aronsohn.


by ahf8 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:33:08 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

are jim webb and jack carter ever gonna earn their places? they need that money, and have met all those criteria, especially in virginia with its stellar netroots scene.


by b1oody8romance7 on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:38:09 PM EST

Andy Hurst hailing fromf VA-11 (3.00 / 4)

Andy Hurst out of VA-11, www.hurstforcongress.com

Let me go point by point on why I think Andy should be on the netroots page and why he fits ALL of the criteria to be on the page.

1.Andy is running against GOP incumbent and class of '94 Rep Tom Davis.

2. Tom Davis has become a poster boy for corruption, while serving as the Chair of the Government Reform Committee.

3. Andy's district voted for both Kerry in '04 and Kaine in '05.

4. There is a strong Virginia blogosphere already in place, ie. raisingkaine.com, notlarrysabato.typepad.com, and many more

5. The campaign has shown both grassroots and netroots outreach, gaining the endorsement of the Progressive Democrats of Virginia in the Primary, and recently putting up a speach that Andy gave on YouTube and placing it on it's homepage.

6. Larger picture here of both Virginia and Culture of Corruption. Tom Davis has lied about receiving oil money and was caught Tom Davis Lies about OIL MONEY and Gets BUSTED!!!and recently the Washington Post wrote a front page article detailing Tom Davis's influence peddling scandal Also, there is the fact that this is in Virginia, helping Andy could create synergy for Jim Webb, and let us not forget that Bush only won Virginia by 8 points, without any Democratic campaign at all, and Kaine was able to win the Governorship, the Commonwealth really wants to be blue.

7. As far as the partisinship test, Andy Passes with an A+, two days after the Davis scandal broke, Andy held a press conference calling on Tom Davis to resign as Chair of the Government Reform Committee, he proudly prints "Democrat for Congress" on all his signs, bumper stickers, lit, etc...and best of all, he talks like a regular person, because he is. He's a first time candidate who won the primary against the 2004 nominee (sleepwalker) and has already raised FOUR TIMES (75k, vs 300k) the amount that the 2004 nom. raised through Nov.

Additionally, this race has not been targeted by the national party yet, but it deserves to be, and I ask the Netroots to pick up the slack. Not only has Tom Davis become vulnurable, but even the WaPo wrote an article titled "Now, a Word About the Invigorated 11th District Democrats"
when the Davis loving WaPo sends props to our little army of volunteers and supporters down here, you know your making some noise.

-Pitin
(for the record, don't get paid to work for Andy but have been volunteering 3-4 days a week now, and sit in on strategy sessions and the such).
for more info e-mail the campaign at info[at]hurstforcongress[dot]com


Next Generation Democrats
by Pitin on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:45:37 PM EST

Re: Andy Hurst hailing fromf VA-11 (3.00 / 2)

You can hear Andy talk about this winnable seat himself, this is the link to Andy's Press Confernece about two weeks back,
where he calls for Tom Davis to resign as Chairman of the Government Reform Committee.
by NOVADem on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 06:16:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Double the Bang for the Buck (3.00 / 3)

By supporting Hurst, it provides some up ballot help to Jim Webb.  While the up ballot effect may be arguable or even minute, for Jim Webb it could mean the difference in victory!


by VeniceDave on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 06:42:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Double the Bang for the Buck (3.00 / 1)

That is true in this case cause Jim is expecting to win NOVA, and strong challengers up north this year could make the difference in put Jim's margin of victory up north high enough to overcome gaps in southern parts helping him care the state much like Tim Kaine did last year.


by NOVADem on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 09:36:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (3.00 / 1)

I would like to nominate Kirsten Gillibrand.  She is running against John Sweeney in NY's 20th district.  You may remember John Sweeney for his infamous role banging on doors to stop the recount in Florida in the 2000 election.  It's time we got rid of him! This district has been Republican for a long time but I think the time is right and Gillibrand is running a strong campaign.  She recently received  endorsements from several unions in the state - including the teacher's union.


by Sophia on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 03:55:37 PM EST

NY-19 (none / 0)

While I guess it's unlikely that you'd start advertising for the NY-19 general election fund on ActBlue, I think the district has a good chance of being as competitive as the other NY republican districts this year.  Rubber-stamp congresswoman Sue Kelly definitely is acting as though she were scared as one can tell from ads misleadingly calling her an "Independent Voice" while lacking any mention of the fact that she is a Republican.  School Principal Ben Shuldiner especially could use Netroots help as he already has a visible campaign with large grassroots support (definitely more so than the other Democratic hopefuls) but unfortunately has a smaller war-chest.


by CountMippipopolous on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:13:39 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

JENNIFER LAWLESS IN RHODE ISLAND!  

There is no incumbent in Washington who is more like Lieberman than James Langevin.  The netroots would be appalled to learn that this guy calls himself a Democrat.  Jen is a true progressive voice and will never shy away from the party's values!

www.lawlessforcongress.com

In the smallest state in the nation with a one media market, this seat is very winnable for progressives and a race that I highly nominate for support.


by psubobbyp on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:40:17 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

It's a primary, and calling Langevin "like Lieberman" just because he's pro-life is an insult.


by Adam B on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:28:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

Sorry, Adam B I do not think I mentioned anything about that issue.  I think packgirl makes a fine case below that Langevin's conservative voting goes well beyond choice.  


by psubobbyp on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:56:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I agree Lawless should get support. An outstanding candidate. A true liberal who is an upgrade over the current incumbent Langevin. She needs money and if she gets it Lawless has a huge shot at an upset. Were she to win she could send another message to the Democratic establishment.


by bfred34 on Wed Aug 16, 2006 at 12:12:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Donna Edwards, MD-4!! (none / 0)

Oh yeah - a good-government solid citizen against Al  "Let's Make a Deal" Wynn.


by Crablaw on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:41:58 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

JENNIFER LAWLESS IS RUNNING FOR CONGRESS IN DISTRICT 2 IN RHODE ISLAND.  You may recall a July post by Matt Stoller highlighting this race.  NARAL endorsed Jen days later.

Another Primary in Rhode Island? Add to Hotlist

by Matt Stoller, Fri Jul 21, 2006 at 12:30:09 AM EST

I just noticed that progressive challenger Jennifer Lawless is challenging anti-choice Democratic incumbent Congressman Jim Langevin in Rhode Island's Congressional 2nd district.  Normally this kind of race would be quixotic, and I know little about Rhode Island politics.  The polls don't look good, but her fundraising totals are exceptional for a 'hopeless' race.  She can compete with the amount of money she has, and Rhode Island is a liberal state dominated by a political machine (sound familiar?).

Anyway, would those savvy in Rhode Island politics chime in on this?  I'm not advocating for this one way or another, I'd just like to learn more.

Update: This race looks interesting. Langevin is Schiavo politician, which includes all the standard right-wing cultural touchstones. Patriot Act, flag burning, etc. On a MyDDish note, Langevin voted for the COPE Act, and Lawless is for net neutrality.


by psubobbyp on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 04:57:59 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (none / 0)

I absolutely second the nomination for Jennifer Lawless.  Her opponent James Langevin voted for the PATRIOT Act, against a woman's right to choose over 25 times, against a timetable for getting out of Iraq, and for the COPE Act without net neutrality.  He is out of touch on so many issues, and on others is just simply not the leader Rhode Islanders deserve.

Lawless is a true progressive Democrat and definitely deserves netroots support.

http://lawlessforcongress.com


by packgirl on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:14:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

NY 19 John Hall (none / 0)

John Hall is a great progressive running against Republican Sue Kelly.

He deserves support.


by RadioCity on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:13:05 PM EST

Re: Call For New Netroots Nominations (3.00 / 2)

I'd pick Gary Trauner out in Wyoming.  Barbara Cubin has never been particularly loved out there, and Trauner has her within four points.  It's a cheap state, too -- you can look at the FEC filings here.

I also like the fact that lone representatives are well-positioned to become Senators once seats open up.  


by Neil the Ethical Werewolf on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:14:32 PM EST

Second the Donna Edwards Nomination (MD-04) (none / 0)

The support for Al Wynn, the incumbent, isn't very deep.  In fact, canvassing with Donna, we've found that once Wynn's record of selling out to the telcos, big pharma, oil companies and buddying up to the Bushies is explained, his support evaporates immediately.

Donna is running a good campaign, raising money and going all throughout this huge district.  She's a solid progressive who won't sell us out.  She will be an active and involved member of Congress of whom we can all be proud.


by Art Brodsky on Tue Aug 15, 2006 at 05:54:55 PM EST

Dave Mejias, NY-3 (none / 0)

Dave is a popular county legislator who has won reelection handily in a Republican district, despite the strong opposition of moneyed interests. He has embraced the netroots, posting on Kos, MYDD and TPMCafe, and participated in a live chat on firedoglake this past weekend. The local blog of note is www.kingwatch.blogspot.com, and I wouldn't mind blogging the race myself.

Dave is challenging Peter King, Chair of the Homeland Security Committee and as of late right-wing extremist. King is quoted as saying "I thank God every night George Bush is our President, and you should too". He has become a rubber stamp to Bush to secure the chairmanship, alienating himself from his moderate constituents.

Lately King has gotten much negative press about his temper/angry letters with constituents, and his failure to secure adequate anti-terror funding for NYC. This is a suburban district that is increasingly trending blue. With a strong push from the netroots, and Spitzer/Clinton at the top of the ballot, it's a perfect storm in our favor.


by tpzeiser on