It's time to repeal the President's Iraq War Powers

Bumped. This is even something Democratic hawks should get behind. Many have repeatedly said how they thought the war in Iraq was a good idea, but have been revolted by Bush's handling of the war. So, I say, revoke his authority to screw it up. Besides, this is also a matter of trust. After three and a half years, can anyone still trust Bush to use our military in a proper fashion? It is time to revoke his authority to conduct this war, and it is time for Congress to take back its constitutional role on matters of war and peace--Chris

On October 11, 2002, the Congress, over the objections of many Members of the House and Senate, passed legislation giving the President the authority to use force in Iraq.  At the time I was a vocal critic of the war, but unfortunately my voice, as well as thousands of others, was drowned out by misinformation from the administration.  

In making its case, the administration threatened us that if we didn't act fast, the proof of Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction would "come in the form of a mushroom cloud."  We were also told that the case against the war, and the evidence of a weapons' program was, "a slam dunk."  Now, three and a half years later, the American public knows what many of us believed all along, that this administration, and our president, misled us about the case to go to war.

Six months after we invaded Iraq, President Bush stood aboard an aircraft carrier before a banner that read "Mission Accomplished," declaring that "major combat operations in Iraq are over."  From that moment on, we were no longer fighting a war, but rather participating in an occupation.

-Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA)

An occupation cannot be won.  The President has put our troops in a position they should not have gotten into in the first place.

Our troops were not prepared to occupy Iraq.  They weren't given the proper equipment, nor were they properly trained.  And most importantly, the US Congress never authorized this President to undertake an occupation.

This occupation of Iraq must end, now, and President Bush must bring our troops home.

That is why I am introducing the Iraq War Powers Repeal Act of 2006.  It is past time for Congress to demand that the Bush Administration come clean on Iraq, and put the safety of our troops, and the security of our nation first.

By repealing the Iraq War Powers, Congress would resume its Constitutional role overseeing the use of military force, and would reassert its authority by bringing our troops home.

Of course, the passage of this bill will be an up-hill struggle, but it is a fight that we can no longer avoid.  Rescinding the President's war powers in Iraq is the least that we can do for our troops, and for their families who anxiously await their return.  With over 2,550 brave men and women having given their lives, and thousands seriously wounded, how many more must die before we put an end to this madness?

This is one more step in putting and end to occupation.  It is time to pass the "Iraq War Powers Repeal Act of 2006."



Display:


Re: It's time to repeal the President! (3.00 / 1)

Word.


Dust in the wind. All we are is dust in the divine, flatulent wind.
by Nezua Limon Xoloquinta Jonez on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 08:44:43 PM EST

Re: It's time to repeal the President's Iraq War P (3.00 / 1)

I like this idea.


by Professor Foland on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 11:09:37 PM EST

Re: It's time to repeal the President's Iraq War (3.00 / 1)

Right on, Congresswoman Woolsey. How many NeoDems who are still clutching onto Bush's Debacle with white knuckles can you convince to go along with this idea?

They don't pay much attention to what we ordinary chumps outside the DC cocktail party circuit think.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 11:46:44 PM EST

Instead of just agreeing here (none / 0)

Alright, we're all in agreement that this is a good idea. The powers granted to Bush were emergency war powers under 911 conditions.

What about the intelligence service that Cheney set up? This administration set up a bigger bureaucracy and paid for it with american tax dollars to fund a concerted effort to lie about the war.

Also, Rumsfeld wanted to help expand the powers of the president. Cheney , in fact, used to work for Rumsfeld. They were both clearly pursuing an agenda of the unitary executive.

The idea was that the American president can be a dictatorship. To make the American presidency so powerful that he can trample on the constitution

If we can connect the dots , we might be able to work towards an important ally : The American Bar Association

This article says the American Bar Association (hardly a bastion of liberalism, that!) is threatening the white house with legal action on their signing statements. These statements are ways that Bush also ignores the will of the people - laws that are passed are specifically ignored , such as for example the McCain Anti-Torture Amendment - that was completely ignored..

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/24/l awyers.bush.ap/index.html

In other words, lets add a "Because"

... Because Bush has trampled on the constitution
... Because he has misused these powers to torture innocent people
... Because he continues to illegally wiretap American Citizens

Finally, I read something in the Wall Street Journal that made alot of sense.

"The war on terror will not end with the signing of a peace treaty. Osama Bin Laden will be there to give President Bush his sword. "

It will NEVER END.  Evangelism is fundamentally opposed to conservatism. Never ending wonderlands are the worst place in the world for more effecient, smaller government.  

War Powers are conferred upon a president to make us safer. So far, all the big breakups of terror plots in the US came from Intel, and from the first responders.

I think what we might hear from the corrupt GOP is their version of how we're fighting these people over there in Iraq instead of here.

The truth is, Iraq has become a breeder, hasn't it?  And now it seems as though we're sliding into world war 3.

When, we could be driving a prius. I got a 50 dollar gift card the other day just to try a test drive on one. I think I am going to do it.


.. and when I win the lottery, gonna donate half my money to the city so they have to name a school or a park after me - camper van beethoven
by heyAnita on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 05:20:11 AM EST

Re: Instead of just agreeing here (none / 0)

Almost forgot -

here's the link on how Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld had planned to make this all happen even before 911  - they were all about using the terrorist attacks to make a big fat bloated.. wait aminute dick cheney and karl rove are big , fat and bloated.. wow this makes perfect sense..

Check out this link..

"After 9/11, Vice President Richard Cheney seized the initiative. He pushed to expand executive power, transform America's intelligence agencies and bring the war on terror to Iraq. But first he had to take on George Tenet's CIA for control over intelligence"

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/ darkside/

You know, I think myDD should be a place where people can do objective due diligence. Why is it that my husband gets banned from this blog, for posting that gay marriage is a dog.  Mydd took away turnerbroadcastings right to post. He had some ideas on this thread but he couldn't post them.


.. and when I win the lottery, gonna donate half my money to the city so they have to name a school or a park after me - camper van beethoven
by heyAnita on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 05:25:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Instead of just agreeing here (none / 0)

You will find on any blog that while open discussion is the unspoken (sometimes spoken) ideal and agenda, you really can only argue within a predetermined frame. I have found that a sure way to get banned from a few sites (I have) is to suggest people not pay taxes if they disagree so passionately with the country's actions. But that is jumping out of the frame, and while Thoreau would approve, the large wheel of Capitalism does not. So while this may not be what happened to your husband, do not entertain the notion that you can say whatever you want.


Dust in the wind. All we are is dust in the divine, flatulent wind.
by Nezua Limon Xoloquinta Jonez on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 10:14:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's time to repeal the President's Iraq War P (none / 0)

The Administration continues to hobble into hell supported by the crutch of the war powers accommodation. Pull the crutch.


by braamer on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 09:40:43 AM EST

Re: It's time to repeal the President's Iraq (none / 0)

I agree 100%.  It's time to use language to our advantage, like the republicans have so effectively done (except, in our case, truthfully).  When we change the dialogue in this country to the point where the majority refer to the "war" in Iraq as an occupation, which is in fact reality, most of our work is done.  An occupation must end, you can't cut and run from an occupation, and an occupation will end when the risks of continuing outweigh the potential benefits (as is the case now).  When we speak truth in one voice, we win.  It's about time.


Joe
by joetalarico on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 10:36:11 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.