Andy Stern: The Revolution Will Not Be Televised

This is a guest-post from Andy Stern on net neutrality.

Every day I get out of bed and while I'm shaving, staring in the mirror,  I start thinking about everyone going to work in America.  People go to work at all kinds of jobs every day, and they work hard for their paychecks.  Our union has 1.8 million (and growing) working people who want to build better lives.  And they want their work to be a place where they have the opportunity to realize their dreams.

I've also watched the political dynamic in Washington, D.C. grow increasingly insular among our elected leaders and their consultants - and even some members of the press corps - and so I've  watched with amazement and delight as the internet has started to break-up that insularity, allowing bloggers to compete with major media outlets for scoops and encouraging average people around the country to participate in politics with the same intensity as wealthy donors.

It's important to make sure that workers are free to unite online about issues in the workplace.  It's also important to make sure that everyone in America has equal access to the internet.  The internet's culture of openness is a critical part of its success.  Restricting access or creating a "tiered network" runs the risk of restricting the internet only to  those who can afford it.  A "pay-to-play" internet is dangerous not  only for any group that wants to organize it's members online, but to  anyone who cares about free speech and democracy.

I'm sure there are plenty of people who think there's too much free speech online, that it's too open.  I'm also sure that there are those who look at the central role that the internet has come to play  in our daily lives and their eyes light up with dollar signs, seeing  an opportunity to cash-in on what has become an important part of our  day-to-day infrastructure.  But the truth is that the open nature of  the internet, where any single individual has as much access as a  mammoth corporation, is exciting and important to the future of our  country.  It's important for holding our elected leaders  accountable - and it's also important to hold our business leaders  accountable.

The transparency and the accessibility of the internet is crucial to the long-term success of our democracy - and of our economy. Letting a few large corporations control access using a fee-based system is  unthinkable - and dangerous.



Display:


Andy Stern: The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (none / 0)

This Revolution Will Be "Monitored"


by ROGNM on Wed May 24, 2006 at 07:13:00 PM EST

Blocking access to labor union web site (none / 0)

My understanding is that sometime last year Telus, a Canadian telco, blocked access for its customers to the web site of a labor union with which it was having a dispute.  See: http://www.opennetinitiative.net/bulleti ns/010/
So we're not just dealing with a hypothetical risk here.

Thanks for the post Andy, and for your hard work and courage. You're just the kind of person that some media gatekeepers would love to be able to keep off the video Internet...smart, outspoken and often successful in taking on the powers that be and fighting for change.  Speaking of video, I enjoyed the 60 Minutes piece about you, and look forward to having a lot more options as video migrates to the neutral Internet.


by mitchipd on Wed May 24, 2006 at 07:20:15 PM EST

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (none / 0)

it will be everywhere but TV. Unless you think PumpkinHead looks like Che Guevara....


by Pericles on Wed May 24, 2006 at 07:46:38 PM EST

Welcome Andy Stern (none / 0)

Andy, welcome to the debate. I admire your work in the labor movement, but I have to disagree with your position on net neutrality.   I am with the Hands Off the Internet coalition and in the hopes that you have explored our arguments as much as you have Matt Stoller's, I want to refer you to our Co-Chair Mike McCurry's statement in the Wall Street Journal yesterday.  

"So we say, let the current rules govern. Let's not impose a new and cumbersome set of regulations on the Internet that might thwart the necessary investments. We have no clear evidence that content is being discriminated against and we have no real problem with quality of service that cannot be addressed under current law. We think the advocates of regulated net neutrality have not pointed to a problem that needs a solution."

I also want to directly address this statement of yours, "I'm sure there are plenty of people who think there's too much free speech online, that it's too open."  Hands Off the Internet does not think there is too much free speech on the Internet and our opposition to increased regulation is in the spirit of keeping the Internet open and free from restrictive regulation.  

I would also note that yesterday the Communications Workers of America Union came out in opposition to legislated net neutrality.  


by HandsOff1 on Thu May 25, 2006 at 11:09:29 AM EST

CWA: What Are You Thinking (none / 0)

My union, the Communication Workers of America, has been convinced by the Bells that net neutrality is bad for business, so it opposes net neutrality.

Makes me wish I could quit CWA and join SEIU.

Thanks, Andy.


by Mister Go on Thu May 25, 2006 at 11:11:55 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.