Cantwell Out to HUGE Lead (Independent poll)

Check this out. Independent poll (registration required) http://www.king5.com/sharedcontent/regis tration/register.jsp?fw=http://www.king5 .com/localnews/stories/NW_022606WABcantw ellSW.66558ac4.html shows Cantwell with 50 point lead!!! Scratch this one off the vulnerable list, if this poll has any validity!

Go Maria!!!



Display:


Actually, that's 30 points (none / 0)

Here's a registration-free link to the same story, or if that still doesn't work, here's another link (scroll down to the "DUELING POLLS" item). It's actually a 30 point lead (including leaners... 55% say they're voting for her or inclined to do so, while 25% say they're voting for McGavick or inclined to do so). The pollster is Stuart Elway, who's a reputable brand name, although the MoE was a big +/-5% on a sample of 405. Anyway, I agree with your central point... stick a fork in McG; he's done.

In semi-related Northwest news, the latest Rasmussen poll shows Oregon's governor's race looking more comfortable for Ted Kulongoski, or, oddly enough, for Jim Hill, if he somehow beats Kulongoski in the primary. Kulongoski beats the most likely Republican nominee, Kevin Mannix, 51-36%; he also beats the other two Republicans, and Hill beats all the three Republicans too, although not by as wide a margin. (It doesn't poll either side's primary, and it doesn't factor in GOP-turned-Independent candidate Ben Westlund.)


by Crazy Vaclav on Mon Feb 27, 2006 at 06:20:31 PM EST

Re: Actually, that's 30 points (none / 0)

Right. Did I write 50? Sorry, wishful thinking.

Hey, how do you do the embedded link thing?


by ColoDem on Mon Feb 27, 2006 at 06:33:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually, that's 30 points (none / 0)

Type [a href="url goes here"] words you want to hyperlink go here [/a], except use the pointy brackets intead of square brackets. (And don't forget the http: at the start of the url.)


by Crazy Vaclav on Mon Feb 27, 2006 at 07:07:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cantwell Out to HUGE Lead (Independent poll) (none / 0)

You can re-edit your blog post to correct the link, some of the facts and maybe add some more substance to draw people to read the link.

 By the way... this poll makes me HAPPY but it is still to soon.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Mon Feb 27, 2006 at 08:04:26 PM EST

This Is How Realigning Elections Work (none / 0)

This is what the M$M doesn't get, and even our resident honchos here are too twice-bitten/thrice-shy to say (and who can blame them?)  But once the walls begin to crack so wide that nothing can patch them, the cracks all start to run together.  A massive landslide at the top of the ticket, and all sorts of people stay home and don't even vote down ticket.

Yes, I know that there are many more gerrymandered seats than there were in 1994, but this has all the makings of a classic realigning election. The Dems could go up 3-5 seats in the Senate and 20-30 in the House.  The GOP could lose a dozen statehouses, and 300 state legislative seats, or more.

I'm not saying for a moment to be complacent.  I'm saying, "Smell blood, and act like it."

Or, as Eno and Fripp would say, "No Pussyfooting".


by Paul Rosenberg on Mon Feb 27, 2006 at 08:35:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.