Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressives from the Get-Go

Color me still a bit amazed that in thirteen days we're really going to seat a Democratic majority in both houses of Congress. Going on the hope that this really isn't just a dream we're all going to wake up from on Jan. 5, this new congress presents us with both challenge and a ripe opportunity. Here's what I mean by that. One thing very wrong with the Democratic side of Washington DC today is a one of architecture -- Dem office holders and their staff exist in a silo, outside of which exists the network of progressive think tanks, writers, advocacy groups, and the like. There's not much overlap, and the think tanks can't get their wisdom into play on the Hill, staffers don't read progressive writers, advocacy groups orbit in a different universe than Dem members.

But the opportunity before us is that we're getting 41 new reps and 9 new senators, most of them new to the strange ways of the Hill. More importantly, each of those new members will have an office full of new staff. If tradition holds, they'll soon be operating in a vacuum, neglecting to tap into the support and smarts of the progressive infrastructure. But if they don't know that's how it's supposed to be, I propose that we don't tell them. Instead, in the first weeks and months, we convince them that the way we've always done business is that everybody with a progressive interest sits around a table and figures things out.

On the the Republican side, there's a robust relationship between staffers and think tanks and outside groups. It's not unusual to see Heritage Foundation reports end up reworked as talking points on the Senate floor. There's also the American Enterprise Institute, and the Mercatus Institute runs an annual retreat for chiefs of staff (an event billed as bipartisan, even Mercatus gets their funding from, among others, Richard Mellon Scaife, whom you might remember from his decades-long pursuit of Bill Clinton). Beyond just think tanks, they have a stable of writers republished in major newspapers and magazines, even book imprints.

Part of the problem is that the we just don't yet have the diverse and mature intellectual infrastructure that they do on the right, but that's not to say that the left doesn't already have its superstars. One of the best is a small public-policy think tank based in New York City called the Drum Major Institute. They've just recently released a report called Principles for an Immigration Policy to Strengthen and Expand the American Middle Class, the gist of which is that immigration policy should expand and strengthen America's middle class while meeting a two-pronged test: (1) it should bolster contribution that immigrants make to the economy as workers and (2) it must strengthen the workplace rights of workers.

Getting exactly that sort of thing into the hands of new Democratic staffers is important, first because it'll lead to better public policy. Hill staffers are both overworked and isolated. A simple two-pronged test like that is a tool that actually helps them to do their jobs better. But beyond that, cultivating ties between outside groups and insiders builds a stronger progressive movement. Too many Democratic professionals are just that -- professional Democrats. Getting Dem staffers working with think tanks, seeing that there is a infrastructure out there, persuades them to see that there is life as a professional progressive. There are job opportunities out there that don't require hitching your wagon to this candidate or that one, fulfilling things that you can do in progressive politics that are lucrative enough to build a life on.



Display:


Re: Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressive (none / 0)

Great post, though the Third Way is integrated with the Democratic policy world.


by Matt Stoller on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 05:13:20 PM EST

Re: Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressive (none / 0)

Thanks for the praise Nancy.


by DMIer on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 05:22:02 PM EST

Re: Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressive (none / 0)

Great post.


by Chance the gardener on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 05:33:02 PM EST

Re: Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressive (none / 0)

Good stuff and one way to do that is do what you just did an write about good papers on the blogs.  We know that staffers are reading our stuff and can make use of that targeted audience.

Oh yeah and DMI is doing great work and should be able to grow its influence with this new Democratic controlled Congress.


by juls on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 06:04:36 PM EST

Fascinating for us outsiders (none / 0)

If the staffers don't get their info on matters their bosses are voting on from liberal think tanks, where do they get it from?

I assume that a lot of it comes from dueling lobbyists and their clients, essentially leaving the staffers to make sense of a he said, she said.

Presumably, if staffers don't connect without outside groups, that's because they don't think doing so would help them in their jobs.

Working on the freshmen sounds a good way to go; but most of the clout in the place is with the old timers!

Is there no way to break down barriers with their staffs?

And - without waiting (years? decades?) for the full panoply of the lefty infrastructure to arrive, either.

This is clearly a pretty vital area for the development of Dem legislation - and (as will be obvious!) one I'd given no thought to before reading your piece.

(Quick question, while I think of it: why is the official prose of Dem alphasoup so nails-on-chalkboard awful (eg New Direction - all versions) while there are so many good lefty writers around, like you and Chris and the boys?)


by skeptic06 on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 06:11:02 PM EST

Liberal Smarty Anti Message Culture ?? My 60 (none / 0)

pages is smarter than your 50 pages?

Of course, I have neither 50 nor 60 pages to support my gut feeling.

I initially found it beyond ridiculous that these people aren't leveraging each other ... then ...

I think about all the dueling diaries on the web where someone posts a lot of words, sentences, and paragraphs about a topic

and then the games begin as people parse phrases to tear apart the whole topic,

and, oh, by the way,

rarely or never are there soundbites attached to the sentences and paragraphs to make it all easy and effective to explain quickly to people whose lives are busy.  

I hope the new people work on messaging & cooperation, AND

I think I understand a little more why the last 6+ weeks have been so completely utterly fucking dismal wto message from the Dems - well, other than the usual sages scratching their chins professorially and clearing their throats inportantly ... those kind of really effective communication techniques that worked for the crowds around hillarycare in 94 and dukakis in 88 and gore in 00 and and and and

yawn.

rmm.


by seabos84 on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 08:07:26 PM EST

An act of contrition (none / 0)

I continually hear how Democrats need to extend a hand across the aisle and I continually hear how this would result in the hand being bitten off (probably true right now).  So what is the first requirement for establishing better relationships in view of the behavior of Republicans for the last 14 year.  

What is needed is an act of contrition by the Republicans.  I would like to see this thought injected into the discussion:

"Given past behavior, we need to see that the Republicans are serious.  They need to start by showing some contrition for their past behavior, otherwise we must remain cautious in our dealings with them.  We will not be unfair, but we will be cautious.  You don't stick your hands into the mouth of a wild animal" (I wrote jackel first, but that it me).

I perceive this is the road Charlie Rangel is going down.  Good for him.


by Eli Rabett on Fri Dec 22, 2006 at 11:08:23 PM EST

Progressives from the Get-Go (none / 0)

The Republicans have a "diverse and mature intellectual infrastructure?"

Could've fooled me....


by global yokel on Sat Dec 23, 2006 at 01:16:15 AM EST

Re: Connecting Dem Offices and Outside Progressive (none / 0)

Ah, the Mercatus institute. I recall that we had this discussion last year, and were, let's say, displeased to find that lots of top staffers for leading Democrats had attended their 2004 retreat:
   

* Lisa Baranello, Dep. Chief of Staff, Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY)
    * Peter Chandler, Chief of Staff, Rep. Michael Michaud (D-ME)
    * Michael Collins, Chief of Staff, Rep. John Lewis (D-GA)
    * Lionel Collins, Jr., Chief of Staff, Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA)
    * Robert Decheine, Chief of Staff, Rep. Steve Rothman (D-NJ)
    * Patricia Delgado, Admin. Asst. (the old name for CoS), Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA)
    * Perry Finney Brody, Chief of Staff, Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX)
    * David Flanders, Legislative Director, Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA)
    * Robert Foust, Senior Policy Advisor, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND)
    * John Haseley, Chief of Staff, Rep. Ted Strickland (D-OH)
    * Cookab Hashemi, Dep. Chief of Staff, Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO)
    * Clyde Henderson, Subcommittee Staff Director, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)
    * Rita Jaramillo, Chief of Staff, Rep. Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX)
    * Melissa Koloszar, Chief of Staff, Rep. James Moran (D-VA)
    * Jason Marino, Sr. Health & Social Policy Advisor, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV)
    * Cynthia Martin, Legislative Director/Counsel, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI)
    * Susan McAvoy, Admin. Asst., Rep. Martin Frost (D-TX)
    * Terri McCullough, Chief of Staff, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
    * Maria Robles Meier, Executive Director, Congressional Hispanic Caucus
    * Jeff Mendelsohn, Chief of Staff, Rep. Ciro Rodriguez (D-TX)
    * Neil Naraine, Legislative Fellow, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
    * Julie Nickson, Admin. Asst., Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA)
    * Gail Ravnitzky, Chief of Staff, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA)
    * Michael Rious, Sr. Legislative Asst., Rep. Al Wynn (D-MD)
    * Drey Samuelson, Chief of Staff, Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD)
    * Scott Schloegel, Chief of Staff, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI)
    * Lisa Sherman, Chief of Staff, Rep. Susan Davis (D-CA)
    * Lisa Venus, Counsel, Democratic Budget Committee
    * Larry Walker, Legislative Director, Rep. Major Owens (D-NY)
    * Jennifer Walsh, Admin. Asst., Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-CA)
    * Monique Clendinen Watson, Chief of Staff, Del. Donna Christensen (D-VI)
    * Rachel Redington Werner, Dep. Chief of Staff, Rep. Jim Turner (D-TX)
    * Stanley White, Chief of Staff, Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA)
    * Patrice Willoughby, Chief of Staff, Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH)

Did we ever follow up and see if anyone was attending the 2005 retreat? 2006? How about this year? Any plans?

We should absolutely be finding ways of offering alternatives. Unfortunately, we may run up against our own "gift ban" this time. A retreat that's attractive enough to lure top staffers away for a weekend just might become out of bounds under our new ethics package. We'll see.

Meanwhile, the right will still be doing it for federal judges, through George Mason University Law School.

What we need is something on the inside, like the revival of the Democratic Study Group and their weekly DSG legislative reports. Killed off by the GOP after the 1994 revolution, it was replaced by the privately produced House Action Reports, and lost its progressive focus almost entirely.

In my opinion, Democratic -- and particularly, progressive -- internal messaging never recovered.


by Kagro X on Sat Dec 23, 2006 at 09:13:03 AM EST

Who's still participating? (none / 0)

Which Democrats are still attending Mercatus Center retreats and seminars?

*Jedd Moskowitz, Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY)
*Priscilla Ross, Rep. (now Sen.) Ben Cardin (D-MD)
*Monique Clendinen Watson, Del. Donna Christensen (D-VI)
*Kimberly Ross, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)
*Jerr Rosenbaum, Rep. Charles Gonzalez (D-TX)
*Jennice Fuentes, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)
*Brenda Otterson, Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA)
*Julie Nickson, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA)
*John Ratliff, Rep. Dan Lipinksi (D-IL)
*Mark B. Harkins, Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC)
*Kerry McKenney, Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ)
*Shelly Stoneman, Rep. Steven Rothman (D-NJ)
*Tara Oursler, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)
*Heather Moeder Molino, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)
*James B. Clarke, Rep. Diane Watson (D-CA)
*Paul Brathwaite, Rep. Mel Watt (D-NC)


by Kagro X on Sat Dec 23, 2006 at 10:04:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Who's still participating? (none / 0)

Source: http://www.crp.org/travel/search_results .asp?sponsor=Mercatus+Center


by Kagro X on Sat Dec 23, 2006 at 10:06:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.