House Retirement Woes: 1994 Dems... 2006 GOP?

There is a common misconception among members of the Washington cognoscenti that there will not not be enough Republican retirements in the House to offer the Democrats a real shot at recapturing the chamber next year. While it is certainly true that the Democrats would be greatly aided by a swarm of GOP retirements, it is still early in the cycle and thus would be hasty to rule out the possibility of a Democratic victory next fall simply on the basis of the limited number of Republicans who have announced their plans to retire.

As of November 11, The Cook Political Report listed four Republican Congressmen as retiring. They are:

  • Randy "Duke" Cunningham, CA-50 (PVI R+5)
  • Mike Bilirakis, FL-09 (PVI R+4)
  • Henry Hyde, IL-06 (PVI R+3)
  • Michael Oxley, OH-04 (PVI R+14)
Since that last report from Cook, Jim Kolbe, a moderate Republican who represents AZ-08 (which Bush carried with 49 percent in 2000 and 53 percent in 2004), has added his name to the list. This brings the total number of GOP retirements in the House to five.

Looking at the 1994 midterms, the last sweeping victory for either party in House elections, only seven Democrats had announced their decisions to retire by the corresponding point in the cycle -- despite the fact that 20 House Democrats eventually retired rather than face reelection. There are not, in fact, that many fewer Republicans who have already announced retirement plans this cycle.

The real wave of Democratic retirements during the 1994 cycle did not occur until the months of January and February, when nine more Dems announced their retirements or resignations (another four Dems -- all from the South -- announced their retirements that April). History certainly does not write off the possibility of such a spate of winter and spring retirements happening within the House GOP ranks this cycle. [Source: CQ Weekly, "Congressional Departures" Oct. 22, 1994 Page 2995]

During that same cycle, eight House Democrats chose to forgo reelection bids in favor of attempts at higher office (none of which was eventually successful). This left open 28 Democratically-held seats. [Source: Ibid.] Currently, Cook lists nine Republicans as giving up their House seats to run for higher office, which brings the total number of open seats currently held by Republicans to 14. With even a modest number of additional GOP retirements in early 2006 -- a realistic possibility given President Bush's horrific approval and disapproval ratings (which could scare off "blue" state Republicans, in particular) and the legal woes facing some members -- the Republicans could have to defend close to as many seats as the Democrats did in 1994.

The 2006 midterms are still a long way away, and much can still happen before election day. It's important to note that although a wave of Republican retirements remains a possibility, it is by no means a lock. But Republicans are quickly approaching the point at which they could lose the House just by failing to hold on to their open seats -- a situation even the Democrats did not face in 1994. Just a few more untimely retirements (or timely, given your perspective) could really put the National Republican Congressional Committee on its heels in the next few months, allowing the Democrats to pounce. And the possibility of a Pelosi speakership, which just months ago seemed as unlikely as Newt Gingrich speakership did in 1993, increasingly looks like it could become a reality.

the idea for this post was germinated during a conversation with professor David Menefee-Libey



Display:


Don't forget the empty seat now in CA 48 CD! (none / 0)

Everyone seems to forget that "our" Congressman in the 48th CD in California, Christopher Cox, has been "retired" for several months -- kicked upstairs to the SEC by Bush. If we can fill that empty seat on December 6th with our great Democratic candidate, Steve Young, we'll have a good chance for him to rewin the seat next year. If it goes to a Republican or, gulp, Jim Gilchrist, the Minute Man, it may well be lost to us for year. Everyone can help out (virtual phonebanking or small contributions on Act Blue) by checking Steve out at http://www.steveyoungforcongress.com/
by SharonToji on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 12:29:47 AM EST

Pounce? (1.00 / 1)

Pretty optimistic Jonathan, expecting "pounce" out of the Democratic Party. I've been googling up some information about the DCCC and an across [your interview with Rahm Emmanuel.

He has already put forty-one House seats "in play" -- forcing the Republicans to defend their majority district by district. On the same date in the last election cycle, the number of seats in play was three.

That sounds good, but why is Rahm chop blocking Cegalis?

I understand that you are just the messenger Jonathan, but I question whether we can expect anything from the Democratic party even remotely resembling "pounce." Perhaps we can get a rapid waddle if we're lucky.
.

by Gary Boatwright on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:10:55 AM EST

Re: Pounce? (none / 0)

I've never interviewed Emanuel -- never spoken to him in fact -- and am not his mouthpiece. Just trying to give an indication that the Dems aren't as lost as some believe.
My Direct Democracy
by Jonathan Singer on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:32:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

My bad (none / 0)

I mis-read the article I linked to. I didn't intend to suggest you were his mouthpiece. That's why I said you were only the messenger when I realized how my late night comment sounded.  My apologies for a sloppy comment that was still suggestive of something I did not intend to say.
by Gary Boatwright on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 05:35:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My bad (none / 0)

No prob. Just wanted to clear that up.
My Direct Democracy
by Jonathan Singer on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 07:07:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Pounce? (none / 0)

Cegelis, not Cegalis, Gary.

And the link says why. The want a pro-business pro-war candidate like Kerry. Since the professor from religious Wheaton College didn't work, he now wants the war hero who knows nothing about how people in the district think. Heaven forbid that we have a candidate who has actually worked for a living and seen the destruction caused by globalization.

They can take their pro-business candidates and shove them. I won't work for them or contribute. If my neighbors ask me about the campaign, I'll say "Take your pick, a Republican right wing crazy or a Democratic bought and paid for by big business."

by antiHyde on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:02:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Additional resources (3.00 / 1)

Filing deadlines (in case of surprise retirements)

Illinois - December 19th, 2005
Texas - January 2nd, 2006
West Virginia - January 28th, 2006
Kentucky - 4PM on January 31st, 2006
Ohio - February 16th, 2006
Indiana - Noon on February 17th, 2006
North Carolina - Noon on February 28th, 2006
Mississippi - March 1st, 2006
Nebraska - March 1st, 2006
Oregon - March 7th, 2006
Pennsylvania - March 7th, 2006
California - March 10th, 2006
Maine - March 15th, 2006
Idaho - March 17th, 2006
Iowa - March 17th, 2006
Utah - March 17th, 2006
Montana - March 23rd, 2006
Missouri - March 28th, 2006
New Mexico - March 29th, 2006
South Carolina - Noon on March 30th, 2006
South Dakota - April 4th, 2006
Arkansas - Noon on April 4th, 2006
Tennessee - Noon on April 6th, 2006
Alabama - April 7th, 2006
New Jersey - April 10th, 2006
Virginia - 5pm on April 14th, 2006
North Dakota - April 17th, 2006
Georgia - April 28th, 2006
Florida - May 12th, 2006
Nevada - May 12th, 2006
Connecticut - May 16th, 2006
Michigan - 4pm on May 16th, 2006
Colorado - May 25th, 2006
Alaska - June 1st, 2006
Wyoming - June 2nd, 2006
Massachusetts - June 6th, 2006
Oklahoma - June 7th, 2006
Kansas - June 12th, 2006
Arizona - June 14th, 2006
New Hampshire - June 16th, 2006
Rhode Island - June 28th, 2006
Maryland - July 3rd, 2006
Wisconsin - July 11th, 2006
New York - July 13th, 2006
Vermont - July 17th, 2006
Minnesota - July 18th, 2006
Hawaii - July 25th, 2006
Delaware - Noon on July 28th, 2006
Washington - July 28th, 2006
Louisiana - August 11th, 2006

And the 9 oldest Republicans (who aren't retiring yet) [Ages are their age in November 2006]

Ralph Hall (TX-4, 83 years old)
Ralph Regula (OH-16, 81 years old)
Roscoe Bartlett (MD-6, 80 years old)
Sam Johnson (TX-3, 76 years old)
Bill Young (FL-10, 75 years old)
Don Young (AK-AL, 73 years old)
Vernon Ehlers (MI-3, 72 years old)
Joe Knollenberg (MI-9, 72 years old)
Jerry Lewis (CA-41, 72 years old)

I have my suspicions that Hostettler might retire. Right now, he has 61K raised and 27K on hand. I also suspect Bill Young might retire (despite not having real opposition willing to face him).

There's no real lowbar for "If the guy has raised under this number, he might retire". Kolbe raised 287K though September (which was slightly more than Franks, Shadegg, and Flake, all of whom are in redder districts)

Oxley raised 442K. So for all we know, he might be the animal acting weirdly before the earthquake. For all we know, he might be linked to Abramoff.

As for Abramoff..

I was thinking of putting a list here of all the current Republicans who got campaign contributions from him. But I did the list, and 41 Republicans were included, including a ton os $250 donations in 1996. Not bad for just $74593 in "over the table" contributions.

But here's the top five version of that list.

5T. Chip Pickering and John Doolittle - $4K

  1. Dan Burton - $5K
  2. Eric Cantor - $7K
  3. Dana Rohrabacher - $9.5K
  4. Tom DeLay - $10K

So yeah, the earthquake hasn't happened yet.
by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:21:43 AM EST

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Libiondo and Saxton both returned $1000 donations to Abramoff.

But the catch is that Saxton got $2K from Abramoff.

Lobiondo gave back a $1K donation from 2001 in August 2005, and then recieved a $1K donation from Abramoff in August 2005.

Source

Mike Ferguson refused to return the money.

by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:55:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Do these states with extremely early filing deadlines have any escape valve, or are those absolute?  E.g., what happens if we get a mid-January retirement in a place like Illinois or Texas?
by arenwin on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 02:08:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

William Lipinski retired after the primary last year and the local Democratic Party committee just picked Daniel Lipinski to replace him.

I don't recall any random retirements in Texas.

Both Texas and Illinois hold their primaries around March, and I'm thankful California isn't doing that.

by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 09:27:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

In Texas, you can withdraw, but no one new can enter the race after filing.  The only exception is if the person was the nominee and he either dies or is constituionally ineligible to hold the office (and the latter is every limited in what the courts have allowed to be replaced).  For all practical purposes, if the person withdraws after the filing deadline, the party is screwed if he was the only credible candidate that files.
by Corey Olomon on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 10:25:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Thanks, good stuff.  What election cycle does the Abramoff contributions come from?  I have seen much larger figures for many congressman and reports of our Virginian Congressman Cantor taking $31,500.  Here is one report that has much larger numbers and has Hastert on top taking over $100,000.

-Daily Virginia Political News

by Corey D Hernandez on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 10:43:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

I was just mentioning individual contributions from Abramoff to candidates, not PACs or anything else.

The Abramoff contributions to Cantor went as follows

3/19/03 (4K)
7/29/02 (1K)
5/8/01 (1K)
5/7/00 (1K)

by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 11:31:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Abramoff's total contibutions started in 1994, and hit a peak in the late 90s and early 00s
by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 11:32:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Thanks

Daily Virginia Political News

by Corey D Hernandez on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 11:39:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Additional resources (none / 0)

Nice work.

Also check out Barry Welsh's 50 State list, of all known Dem candidates for congressional seats, compiled from DCCC, ActBlue, and Politics1 lists. In Michigan, there's no known opponent yet for Ehlers - didn't realize how old he is, retirement could really be a possibility there.

Michigan Liberal, for MI political news & commentary
by lpackard on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 12:30:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

wow (none / 0)

Great post, Jonathan.
by Matt Stoller on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 04:26:57 AM EST

What about Ohio's Bob Ney? (none / 0)

Republican Rep. Bob Ney (OH-18) has big legal problems because of his associations with Abramoff and DeLay.  Bob Ney would probably not retire unless his legal problems became really, really sticky.

I have a question:  Does a congress member need to actually reside in their district?  I thought they did.  However, Republican Rep. Paul E. Gillmor (OH-5) claims to live in Old Fort, Ohio but actually lives in Dublin, Ohio.  His son Paul M. Gillmor lives in the house in Old Fort which Rep. Gillmor claims as his main residence.  How do we go after this bastard?

by Marie Smith on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 09:55:08 AM EST

Re: What about Ohio's Bob Ney? (none / 0)

You just have to live in the state your district is in to be eligible to be a Representative.

While living outside of the district does not mean that a person cannot represent that district, it usually goes over poorly to live outside of your district.

So yeah, unless Gillmor has a history of living in the district, then not living in the district is a good issue to use to jab him.

by RBH on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 10:24:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

MN-06 is open as well. (none / 0)

Rep. Mark Kennedy (R-MN) is leaving the house for a senate bid.

It is a republican leaning district but is winnable for the Dems.

http://www.tinklenbergforcongress2006.com/bio.html

by Demrock6 on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 10:32:40 AM EST

Some are retiring but don't know it yet (none / 0)

As Josh Marshall has commented about Ney, i.e., he's retiring but he just doesn't know it yet. I think the same may be said of Doolittle. We'll see...

For the good of the Party: So long sucka!

by nite swimming on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 01:18:26 PM EST

What about (none / 0)

Beauprez? Leach? Otter? Gibson? That dude from Nebraska? etc. etc.

there's mroe than just that.

by KainIIIC on Mon Nov 28, 2005 at 04:27:07 PM EST

Re: What about (none / 0)

Gibson Beauprez and that guy from Nebraska are running for governor, but whatever it is you know about Leach, I don't know.  I'm interested though.
by texas dem on Tue Nov 29, 2005 at 02:57:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.