Whats it gonna take

I hope to see this coming, but I don't really believe that we are anywhere close to it being a reality:

We can moan all we want about Obama’s shortcomings, the mistakes his Administration has made and his inability to take on Wall Street. But we haven’t exactly applied a lot of heat. A million people on the mall demanding "Jobs Now" along with serious Wall Street reforms might help. A million people showing up repeatedly might actually get the job done. Why have we forgotten how to build a mass movement just as the Tea Party shows that it can be done?

The free market on Wall Street is dead and has been for a long time. It’s been replaced by a billionaire bailout society that will provide decades of chronic unemployment and on-going bailouts for the super-rich.

It’s a damn shame Obama can’t deal with it. It’s a bigger shame that we won’t force him too.

Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street’s Game of Fantasy Finance destroyed our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009.

It's a very fine post by Leopold, over on FDL. But this moment to me, seems quite a bit more like the '93-94 period of 'checking out' of politics by those who supported the Democrats. But back then, I really did check out. I didn't follow politics at all in '93-95, and I wish somedays that I were not following it at all right now either. It feels like a couple of cold winters of wilderness ahead, in spite of the already cold enough one we are in now.

But, I do not believe that there is plenty of time for the political winds to change prior to the 2010 mid-terms. I have long expected for Obama to attempt a shift to recovering some sort of bipartisan mantle, and that's part of his current pitch on HCR and having a meeting with Republicans.

If it is coupled with Democrats actually amending, through reconciliation, a more progressive HCR bill, prior to Obama meeting with Republicans, that could be a good start. That's been my guess as to where things are headed-- but its also in part my wish that Democrats get their act together (if I'm going to have to suffer watching and supporting them through the attempt at governing).

 

Tags: 2010 (all tags)

Comments

15 Comments

FDL

'nuff said.

by QTG 2010-02-11 05:15AM | 0 recs
What a wasted Presidency

We worked so hard to gain our majorities in 2006 and expand them in 2008 and Obama is going to take a sledgehammer and destroy it all.  And for what?  No healthcare reform?  We could have had that under McCain. 

by Kent 2010-02-11 09:09AM | 0 recs
No healthcare reform?

As I recall, a majority of true Progressives advocated hard to 'kill the bill'. Why does it matter if No Health Care Reform was to be the result of a McCain victory or a True Progressive Victory? I think that a dyed-in-the-wool Obama critic would prefer that he was President, because it's a win-win. Bill Killed PLUS Obama bashed.

It's like every day is Festivuchrismahanukkahwanzaadan!

 

by QTG 2010-02-11 10:55AM | 0 recs
RE: No healthcare reform?

What's the point?  I mean, if you want to blame someone, choose somebody that actually was in charge, like Sebelius.

by Jerome Armstrong 2010-02-11 11:03AM | 0 recs
RE: Blame?

Those who fought so hard against the Bills as they wound their way through the normal Legislative process, a process of compromise that any High School Graduate would have been educated in (whether the class was called 'US Government' or 'Civics'), should take credit for their victory. I 'blame' no one, but think it is false modesty on the part of those who participate in politics, whether as a real job or as dedicated non-professionals, to dodge the credit when they get the result they seek.

If the strong and successful push from the Left to kill HCR isn't proof that we aren't just tilting at windmills after all, then what further proof do we need?

I seek only to congratulate, not to blame.

 

by QTG 2010-02-11 11:16AM | 0 recs
They fought hard against the "we need 60 senators" line.

First the president threw away the negotiating point of single payer, then he said that a public option wasn't necessary either.  Then he, and a lot of the democratic party supported the fallacy that "we need 60 to do anything," and compromised further.  He in effect gave a way the half the field, then another 25%, then another 1/8.  Now our STARTING NEGOTIATION POINT on health care reform is without any liberal ideas-- you know, the things that would make the bill good so people would like and support it.

We only need 60 for a permanent law that is harder to overturn. Reconciliation with resolve and a bare majority would give the public a taste of something positive.  Progressives realize that.  DINOs and Obama couldn't care less.   Obama wants a victory without having to fight and without risking anything.  This is the opposite of leadership.  Rather it is selling your side out.

Obama needs someone  to hold his feet to the fire or else we're seeing W's third term.

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Rooktoven 2010-02-11 11:33AM | 1 recs
RE: They fought hard against the "we need 60 senators" line.

You showed him! Congratulations on the victory, and for accepting the credit.

by QTG 2010-02-11 11:38AM | 0 recs
RE: They fought hard against the "we need 60 senators" line.

Put the blame on Harry Reid, Senate Democratic (mis)leadership and jerks like Nelson and Lieberman. 

by Rooktoven 2010-02-11 02:22PM | 0 recs
RE: They fought hard against the "we need 60 senators" line.

Put the blame on Harry Reid, Senate Democratic (mis)leadership and jerks like Nelson and Lieberman. 

by Rooktoven 2010-02-11 02:22PM | 0 recs
RE: They fought hard against the "we need 60 senators" line.

Sure, but the problem is also the branding. You state the HCR bill "is without any liberal ideas" - ignoring the several which are in the bill - like universal coverage, garunteed issue, insurance regulation, and medicaid expansion. The latter in particular is huge and is the core beef the GOP has with the bill.

Then you say stuff like: "Obama wants a victory without having to fight and without risking anything" - WTF is that, a huge fight is going on right now. If Obama didn't want to fight or risk anything he could have simply done nothing until the economy recovered in a few years. HCR is not the top of anyones agenda at the moment, except Obama's.

by vecky 2010-02-11 08:35PM | 0 recs
All Obama is risking

is the seats of Democrats in Congress.  A huge fight is going on WITHOUT Obama.  Obama has yet to publicly back any liberal position.  Name one principle in the HCR bill he championed.  All he's done is roll over and undermine the bargaining power of the party he ostensibly heads.

 

 

 

by Rooktoven 2010-02-15 03:05PM | 0 recs
RE: All Obama is risking

Ummm Obama has championed 3 basic principles:

- Coverage for over 30 million more people.

- Bring costs under control

- Be deficit neutral (i.e: pay for it).

Now I thought these were all fairly liberal positions. Maybe I was wrong. He's championed the PO right from the beginning to his joint address to Congress. Now Congress didn't go along, first gutting the PO (House) to scrapping it completely (Senate). There is still other stuff in the bills that is liberal - like the medicaid expansion, insurance subsidies, out-of-pocket caps, guaranteed issue, insurance exchanges and tighter regulation. All of this stuff can be pulled from the bill to make it more "conservative" (and thus less costly). And Obama could just walk away from HCR and let it be buried. I think his continuing with it is beating a dead horse, providing cpr to a corpse. Congress is scared and running for the hills.  There is no political benefit in pushing for it's passing, and if obama is a politician at all he should just let it go.

by vecky 2010-02-15 04:51PM | 0 recs
Finally

Someone who wants to take credit for the victory!

by QTG 2010-02-11 11:36AM | 0 recs
supporting them?

When the hell have you supported Democrats since June 2008?

by ND22 2010-02-11 04:10PM | 1 recs
RE: supporting them?

LOL I thought the same thing. Maybe it's reverse psychology - bash them non-stop for 18 months and then expect people to vote for them.

by vecky 2010-02-11 08:37PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------