Not exactly.

Yes, Landrieu is a lousy Democrat and a huge thorn in our side.  That said, she did vote for HCR in the end - something that no true teabagger would ever do.

We can't stand the Landrieus and Lincolns and Bayhs of the Senate, but there is no great love for them coming from the teabagger crowd either.  Which is why their actions literally make no sense whatsoever - not only do they piss off progressives, they aren't winning over anybody from the other side, either.

My guess as to why Landrieu specifically was targetted - she got a sweet $300 Million package for a critical HCR vote in November, and I'm thinking that O'Keefe was fishing to try to prove that something shady was going on.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1124/healthcares-dealbreakers-mary-landrieu-likes-her-300-million

Witness the power of the conservative media in pushing themes. The rest of us can just wash in awe as they push the supposed "journalists" aside. Reminded me of a mini-Iraq Invasion scenario. ya, who cares that the claims were false, the "evidence" fabricated or tampered with, and was obtained illegally. Saddam Huessein was responsbile for 9/11 and had WMDs in his underpants too.

Even the legal defense argument of the break-in is the same:

-snip-

"It was poor judgment,” Robert Flanagan’s lawyer, Garrison Jordan, said in a brief interview outside the courthouse. “I don’t think there was any intent or motive to commit a crime.”

As to your question, we'll see, but so far it's only the G Gordon Liddy  and Cubans portion of it.  Investigate the money trail (who paid for those snazzy telephone repair man outfits!) , look at campaign contributions, etc., any plans to kidnap too?