Grayson on Republicans Healthcare plan
by Jerome Armstrong, Wed Sep 30, 2009 at 05:16:58 AM EDT
Yea, its partisan. And when the only ones you piss off by telling the truth are the likes of bloggers going by the names of WearingFool and AllahPundit, do nothing but offer some cheese to the whiners. Everyone knows that there is not a lick of principle in the Republicans stance against having a public option for the American people. In fact, every single one of the Republican politicians, and their staff, are on a government-run healthcare plan. I've not read anything about any of them not accepting it as a matter of principle either.
To the state of passing healthcare reform-- how to make sense of the conflicting headlines this AM?
We know that Republicans want to kill the public option plan. And there are a number of Democratic Senators who, though they campaigned for concepts like universal healthcare, are now voicing against voting for something similar. Here's what to notice:
Harkin says there are over 50 votes for the public option.
The Democrats have 60 votes to bring about cloture.
Now, I'll take Harkin at his word, and I think its likely so too. The big question then is: would any Democrat not vote to bring about cloture for the up-or-down vote to happen?
I would consider such a thing tantamount to mutiny. Is there a precedent for such a thing happening?
Jonathan Cohn's article on What Rockefeller Understands nails it:
Tags: Alan Grayson (all tags)











10 Comments