When Ignoring The Race Card Is Worse Than Playing It

An alternative title to this entry might be, "Are Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh Racists?"

From Twitter to Fox News, conservatives are mocking those who, like Jimmy Carter and Maureen Dowd, have called Rep. Joe Wilson and the rest of the Glenn Beck fringe "racist." To some extent, they have a point. To suggest that racism is the only or even main reason people criticize the President is absurd. Obama has his honest critics just as Bush, Clinton, and every President all the way back to Adams and Washington had theirs. These critics base their opposition on legitimate policy disagreements - after all, they are conservatives and he is liberal. Republican MSNBC host Joe Scarborough reminded us just how absurd this whole debate can get when he Tweeted, "Great moments in race baiting: Jimmy Carter accused of being racist by Kennedy supporters in 1980 primary."

One of Joe Biden's cardinal rules of politics is to never question another person's motives - eventually you'll make a mistake, tear down a good man, and wind up with egg on your face. Biden's right, so while I will criticize Joe Wilson's actions, I will not second-guess his motives. Maybe he really is just a part of the 55% of America that wrongly believes Obama will cover illegal immigrants, and I'm not about to accuse 55% of Americans of being racist.

But while it is arrogant and dangerous to accuse the entire conservative movement or Republican Party of racism, it is equally dangerous to stick one's head in the sand and claim it isn't a factor. There is racism afoot in the modern conservative movement, we can prove it, and even if it is only relegated to the movement's fringe, it only takes one nut to inspire another to commit what he sees as a necessary murder for the good of his country. It is wrong to accuse 46% of voters or 5 million Fox News viewers of racism, but it is equally wrong to look the other way when even just a few hundred racists speak up. I went to high school in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, where the presence of a few bad apples (the Aryan Nations compound) taught a good community a hard lesson: silence is acceptance.

Frank Rich has by far and away the best column I've yet seen on this subject:

Most important, [Palin] stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind... When Palin referred to Alaska as "a microcosm of America" during the 2008 campaign, it was in defiance of the statistical reality that her state's tiny black and Hispanic populations are unrepresentative of her nation. She stood for the "real America," she insisted, and the identity of the unreal America didn't have to be stated explicitly for audiences to catch her drift.

I won't call Joe Wilson or Glenn Beck's viewers racist, but I will say that we must be vary wary of the Joe McCarthies and the Father Coughlins of this world, and we must name them when we see them. Two of the more obvious names are Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh. On his radio program this week, Limbaugh called for a return to segregation and implied that Obama is the real racist, telling his listeners, "Kid shouldn't have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses... In Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids now cheering [in an impression of what blacks must sound like] `Yay, right on, right on, right on, right on!'"

Yet while Rush goes on to complain that liberals claim all opposition to health care reform is based in racism, Beck takes a different approach and argues that all support for health care reform is based in racism - because black people are incapable of caring about anything other than their own skin color. That quote, more on Beck, and my conclusions below the jump.

The green jobs czar isn't concerned about the planet. He's concerned about reparations. He's concerned about leveling the playing field. Universal healthcare is the next step. It's a much less obvious route to reparations... [Obama] had rejected reparations because reparations didn't go far enough... Barack Obama is setting up universal healthcare, universal college, green jobs as stealth reparations. That way the victim status is maintained. And he also brings back back door reparations.

Translation: "Me? My opinions on health care reform are based on my beliefs about the proper role of government. But not the black guys. Because they're not white, they're not capable of having opinions about the role of government. No, they only want to strike back at me - AND YOU. Be afraid, white people! Be very afraid!"

If you think I'm being melodramatic, take a look at this article from Salon. The one author Beck says you should read before you read even his own book, the man Beck propelled to the top of Amazon's best sellers list all summer long, is Cleon Skousen, a man who "characterized African-American children as `pickaninnies' and described American slave owners as the `worst victims' of the slavery system. Quoting the historian Fred Albert Shannon, `[Skousen] explained that `[slave] gangs in transit were usually a cheerful lot, though the presence of a number of the more vicious type sometimes made it necessary for them all to go in chains.'"

When Beck and Limbaugh scare people into thinking their government is full of evil Hitler-like figures, those people aren't going to sit idly by. And can you blame them? If the government truly were full of little Stalins, it would indeed be irresponsible to look the other way. The longer the race-based fear-mongering of the Becks and Limbaughs goes unchecked, the chances of someone using a gun or bomb rather than a protest sign or leaflet will only increase.

Tags: Cleon Skousen, Frank rich, Glenn Beck, joe biden, Joe Scarborough, Joe Wilson, racism, Rush Limbaugh (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

Brilliant dissection

And looking at this more closely, despite the lens of the Atlantic, this does look like Rush and Beck are playing to those feelings of being 'left behind' - since the Civil War.

Beck's loud dog whistle makes it clear

The green jobs czar isn't concerned about the planet. He's concerned about reparations. He's concerned about leveling the playing field. Universal healthcare is the next step. It's a much less obvious route to reparations... [Obama] had rejected reparations because reparations didn't go far enough... Barack Obama is setting up universal healthcare, universal college, green jobs as stealth reparations. That way the victim status is maintained. And he also brings back back door reparations.

Like child abuse, false accusations of racism are a terrible crime against the alleged perpetrator.

But also like child abuse, fearing to name racism when you see it merely because of social pressure is a more terrible crime against the many alleged victims.

by brit 2009-09-17 10:50AM | 0 recs
Re: Brilliant dissection

But brit, we're not talking about someone who was denied a job because of racism, when I agree it would be a crime not to speak up.  If we stipulate for the sake of argument that there was some element of racism involved in Joe Wilson's heckling of the President, that still doesn't make the President a victim of racism.

Emmett Till was a victim of racism.  Let's not pretend that our obligation to punish his killers has anything in common with our supposed obligation to call out people who make remarks that are arguably tinged with racism.

What you call "social pressure," I call the wholly legitimate concern that being perceived as crying wolf at every opportunity makes it harder to get people to care about stuff like Rush Limbaugh calling for a race war.

If the racism in a comment is subtle enough that only you and your liberal friends are able to perceive it, that doesn't mean you're wrong; but it does mean that you need to figure out how to call it out in a way that will be persuasive to at least one person who doesn't always agree with you.  If you don't care about that, then you're not really helping to combat racism, you're just trying to feel good about yourself.

by Steve M 2009-09-17 11:11AM | 0 recs
Re: Brilliant dissection

I don't disagree with anything you say, Steve. I'm just startled by Beck's talk about "reparations", and that feeds clearly into the perceived reactions to slavery, no? Or am I missing something here.

I don't call anyone a racist. One can make racially charged statements without being a racist (I think Glen Beck's would fit in that catetgory) and let's be clear racism exists in all societies as far as I can see, and can be black on white, light brown on darker brown, or purely tribal.

No doubt you'll think I'm just amping up my liberal credentials and "feeling good about myself" when I mention that my adopted brother is black, and my sister in law Kenyan. The former makes me aware that racism isn't just a 'card to be played', the latter that it's played by everyone (in Kenya's case Kikuyus versus other tribes).

I'd also, like you, make a complete distinction between racist sentiments and racist actions. A minority of Bosnians and Croats hated ethnic Serbs as vigorously as the Serbs hated them. The ability to ethnically cleanse, however, remained mainly the prerogative of the Serbs because they dominated the Jugoslav National Army. They had the power to turn racist sentiment into racist acts.

When it comes to Glen Beck, the 'reparations' sentiment is just that - stoking up imagined grievances and fears among his core audience.

Whether those stirred up sentiments lead to violent actions, we'll have to wait and see. I sincerely hope not. But while not wanting to chill free speech and suggest they constitute incitement, the onus of my free speech is to point out how - in my opinion - they are deeply inflammatory.

by brit 2009-09-18 02:38AM | 0 recs
Re: When Ignoring The Race Card

A good portion of the 55% concerned about covering illegal immigrants ARE racist, on their face.  SOME of them are concerned about costs, but many of them are frankly, xenophobic.

by lojasmo 2009-09-17 12:39PM | 0 recs
Re: When Ignoring The Race Card

I don't know what percentage of conservatives are motivated by racism.

But I will say this much, and I mean this without the least bit of hyperbole...

The only difference between Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and David Duke is that Beck and Limbaugh keep their sheets and robes locked away from public view.

The greatest thing these two vile human beings could contribute to humanity would be to commit suicide.

by Obamaphile 2009-09-17 04:50PM | 0 recs
Re: When Ignoring The Race Card

I was going to mojo this comment until I got to the last line - I don't think that type of rhetoric is ever appropriate; it's the type of comment the right-wing singles out to paint the left as loons. But that aside, I also disagree with it: I think Beck and Rush could do a lot by seeing the light, so to speak, and bringing at least a few of their followers with them rather than just going silent. I'll never complain about a convert, no matter what their past.

Helluva third line though, re: David Duke. Spot on.

by Nathan Empsall 2009-09-17 06:39PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------