Despite a nearing end, Ted Kennedy still puts health care and Massachusetts first

Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) has sent a letter to Governor Deval L. Patrick, MA Senate President Therese Murray, and MA House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo asking that state law be amended to keep his seat filled should it - when it - soon becomes vacant. Current law allows for a special election five months after the vacancy; Kennedy would like the law to allow the Governor to appoint someone to hold the seat for those five months on the condition they not run. From the Boston Globe:

Senator Edward M. Kennedy, in a poignant acknowledgment of his mortality at a critical time in the national health care debate, has privately asked the governor and legislative leaders to change the succession law to guarantee that Massachusetts will not lack a Senate vote when his seat becomes vacant.

In a personal, sometimes wistful letter sent Tuesday to Governor Deval L. Patrick, Senate President Therese Murray, and House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo, Kennedy asks that Patrick be given authority to appoint someone to the seat temporarily before voters choose a new senator in a special election.

Although Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer, does not specifically mention his illness or the health care debate raging in Washington, the implication of his letter is clear: He is trying to make sure that the leading cause in his life, better health coverage for all, advances in the event of his death.

This whole story is heartbreaking, absolutely heartbreaking. Edward Kennedy is a modern American hero, a gracious and gregarious man, and one of the most effective legislators in Congressional history. The worst day I had in Washington was the day his illness was announced; there was a black pall over the Hill all day.

This news comes on the heels of yesterday's Politico story about how his absence has impacted the health care debate. Kennedy, of course, has been seen less and less over the past few months, missing Justice Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation vote, his own White House Medal of Freedom ceremony, and his sister's funeral.

Tags: Boston Globe, Health care, MA-Sen, Ted Kennedy (all tags)

Comments

9 Comments

The Old Lion doesn't have much time left

He probably wouldn't be doing this unless it was pretty clear that he wouldn't make the vote.

Not that health care reform needs to be done for Teddy's sake, but his situation does put an edge on the issue, especially since Republicans have lied about his situation as a way of scaring people off the public/Medicare option.

by Dracomicron 2009-08-20 05:37AM | 0 recs
From a purely representative perspective

Senator Kennedy's request is the best way to go about filling a Senate vacancy.  A gubernatorial appointment by itself removes direct election by the people, but a special election months after a vacancy occurs leaves a gap in full representation.

Having a temporary gubernatorial appointment after a vacancy occurs, alongside of a special election a few months down the line both allows for uninterrupted full representation without sacrificing direct election by the people.

Not surprisingly, Senator Kennedy's request makes the most sense when it comes to ensuring that the people are best represented.

by Senate Guru 2009-08-20 07:18AM | 0 recs
Re: Despite a nearing end

I am continually amazed at Senator Kennedy's wisdom and his ability to put his constituents and his country first. Losing him will be heartbreaking, especially now.

by JDF 2009-08-20 07:57AM | 0 recs
I disagree

I have a problem with this. Back in 2004 the law was changed in MA to require a special election. It was done to prevent the sitting Governor from placing political cronies or simply holding the seat for the party who the Governor represent. Now that we hold the Governor;s seat is it terribly hypocritical to change the rule to serve our purpose and to defy the wishes of the public. This isnt about allowing a democrat to vote on healthcare, its about maintaining political control. Democrat or Republican, its wrong to change it in midstream to suit political purposes. For that reason I oppose Senator Kennedy's request.

by BuckeyeBlogger 2009-08-20 09:26AM | 0 recs
Re: I disagree

Appointing a placeholder replacement until the special election would not "hold the seat for the party" if that placeholder did not him/herself run. It would just make sure that the state had its full voice on every vote in those five months and that there was someone there able to handle constituent casework.

by Nathan Empsall 2009-08-20 09:32AM | 0 recs
Re: I disagree

Just read First Read. Listening to them, it sounds like another way to phrase "prevent the sitting Governorfrom ... simply holding the seat for the party who the Governor represent" is that a Democratic supermajority didn't want Romney to give them a Republican Governor. It wasn't that they didn't want a sitting Governor to keep from furthering his party; it's that they didn't want THAT sitting Governor from furthering the party that WASN'T theres. It's politics around no matter how you spin it.

by Nathan Empsall 2009-08-20 09:44AM | 0 recs
Re: I disagree

Kennedy sets forth an elegant solution. Require that the person not run in the special election. Not sure how anyone can reasonably have a problem with that because the way it is right now does not make a lot of sense. And trying to base i on punishing the legislature for poor thinking in the pass is not something one should do if one cares about MA having representation in Congress.

by bruh3 2009-08-20 10:26AM | 0 recs
Re: I disagree

How do we draw the conclusion that the legislature implemented the will of the people when it passed a law in 2004, but now it's "defying the wishes of the public" by passing a law in 2009?  Either way, these are the elected representatives.

by Steve M 2009-08-20 10:39AM | 0 recs
Dang

End of an Era. :(

by agpc 2009-08-20 10:19AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------