Gay marriage will be issue in Iowa House special election

Iowans in House district 90 will elect a new state representative in a special election on September 1, and the Republican candidate appears to be planning to make same-sex marriage a major campaign issue.

The seat opened up when State Representative John Whitaker, a Democrat, accepted a position with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Republicans didn't even run a candidate against Whitaker in 2008, but Iowa House district 90 has been competitive in the recent past. The southeastern Iowa district contains all of Van Buren County and parts of Wapello and Jefferson counties, including the Fairfield area (home to Maharishi University and the so-called "Silicorn Valley").

The Democratic candidate for the special election is Curt Hanson, a retired driver's education teacher who has won various teaching awards. Hanson plans to campaign on bread-and-butter issues: jobs, health care, education, and balancing the budget.

The Republican candidate is Jefferson County supervisor Steve Burgmeier. His name rang a bell for me because the Jefferson County supervisors made a show of posturing against same-sex marriage on April 27, the day the Iowa Supreme Court's Varnum v Brien ruling went into effect. Burgmeier and his colleagues passed a resolution calling on Iowa legislators to take a stand against same-sex marriage. Since the Iowa Legislature had just adjourned for the year on April 26, the resolution served no purpose other than to put Burgmeier and on record loudly opposing marriage equality. He was probably planning to run for the legislature even before Whitaker's seat opened up; a Republican Bleeding Heartland commenter had been recruiting Burgmeier to run next year in Iowa Senate district 45 (one of the GOP's better pickup opportunities in the upper chamber).

Burgmeier's press release announcing his candidacy for Iowa House district 90 highlighted two issues: cutting government spending and giving Iowans "a right to vote on the definition of marriage." This is the new politically-correct Republican messaging. Instead of acknowledging that they want to write discrimination into the Iowa Constitution, Republicans say, "Iowans deserve the right to vote" on a marriage amendment, as if we were in the habit of subjecting minority rights to a majority vote in this country.

Republicans would like to win this special election for many reasons, not least to fire up their base about the potential to demagogue against committed same-sex Iowa couples next year. Democrats hold a 56-44 majority in the Iowa House. House Speaker Pat Murphy strongly supported the Varnum v Brien ruling and has made clear he will block efforts to bring a marriage amendment to the House floor.

You can donate to Curt Hanson's campaign by clicking here. A strong volunteer effort will be crucial in this low-turnout special election, so if you live within striking distance of southeast Iowa, please consider volunteering for Hanson's campaign before September 1.

Tags: 2009 elections, Gay Marriage, glbt, Iowa, Iowa House, LGBT, Marriage Equality, same-sex marriage (all tags)

Comments

15 Comments

The old playbook?

This is all they have?

Hey, Republicans. Very few things are facts in politics, but here's one.

The Millenials decided. Already. And, they are not changing their minds.  It's over.

Marriage for all, or marriage for none (i.e, change EVERTHING to Civil Unions)

No more biblically defined second class citizens.

You can keep the strategy for your base, as they get older and disappear from this mortal coil.

Because, evidently, you have nothing to offer anyone under 40 that works anymore.

by WashStateBlue 2009-07-24 08:06AM | 0 recs
Re: The old playbook?

They are sowing the seeds of their own irrelevance with the next generation.

Unfortunately, some parts of rural Iowa don't have much in the way of a young population, so there's a chance for the GOP to make some short-term gains in some districts in 2010. I don't think House district 90 is one of their better opportunities, because there is a strong alternative/progressive community in Fairfield, but you never know what's going to happen in a low-turnout special election.

by desmoinesdem 2009-07-24 08:18AM | 0 recs
Im not optimistic here

Democrats just have not been turning out in these special elections and I dont think this one will be any different.  

by Kent 2009-07-24 08:26AM | 0 recs
Kent, are you ever optomistic about anything?

Sorry, but you're sort of the voice of doom on these boards.

You could be right in this case, but talk about crying wolf everytime....

by WashStateBlue 2009-07-24 08:32AM | 0 recs
Re: Kent, are you ever optomistic about anything?

What bothers me is that people are not doing anything to turn this situation around.  We lost so big in 1994 because we were caught flat footed.

by Kent 2009-07-24 09:16AM | 0 recs
Re: Kent, are you ever optomistic about anything?

You want us to turn our overwhelming support numbers around?  The positive generic democratic congressional polling?  What, exactly do you want to turn around?

by lojasmo 2009-07-24 09:55AM | 0 recs
which people?

The Iowa Democratic Party has a much better ground game now than in 1993/1994. They will be fully engaged in this special election. So will the Iowa GOP, so anything could happen, but I don't agree with your suggestions that Democrats are oblivious about doing things differently from 1994.

by desmoinesdem 2009-07-24 09:58AM | 0 recs
Re: which people?

Agreed... in fact, the fear of 1994 may be the only reason we actually get a vote on health care reform...

by LordMike 2009-07-24 10:35AM | 0 recs
You are 10000% wrong

all of us are doing whatever we can to "turn this around"

by DTOzone 2009-07-24 10:01AM | 0 recs
Re: Im not optimistic here

Scary.  We should all probably give up.

by lojasmo 2009-07-24 08:52AM | 0 recs
Re: Im not optimistic here

Democrats have won EVERY special election in the 111th congress.  Is THAT what you think we should "turn around"?

http://tiny.cc/uqeCC

by lojasmo 2009-07-24 10:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Im not optimistic here

Hi, UpstateDem.

by Khun David 2009-07-24 11:00AM | 0 recs
Re: Gay marriage will be issue in Iowa House speci

HELLO FROM FAIRFIELD!

Although we're surrounded by rural voters and those that you would think of as "traditional" Iowans (many of whom are elderly), this is a really (surprisingly) progressive community with a lot of educated folks.  

Denying the equal protection guaranteed (and recently affirmed) under the IA constitution isn't something that will go over too well here, so I think there's a deep well of possible volunteers.

And by the way, silicorn valley was a term coined by Wired magazine in a ~96 cover article and is more true today than ever.  I work as a web developer for a medium sized (~35 employees) company here, prior to that I worked as a web developer for a slightly larger internet company.  I'd wager at least 33% of the jobs in this town are white-collar, and probably another 33% are manufacturing.

by SummertimeDissent 2009-07-24 01:52PM | 0 recs
hello, Fairfield!

Thanks for your comment, and please stop by Bleeding Heartland sometime to share your observations of the special election campaign. I would love to get some on the ground reports.

Is Hanson well known in the community already?

Why does Jefferson Co. have three Republican supervisors?

by desmoinesdem 2009-07-24 05:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Gay marriage will be issue in Iowa House speci
Dear Curt:
You might want to take this one off your resume:
1967 received the Fairfield Jaycee Outstanding Young Educator Award
by SummertimeDissent 2009-07-24 01:57PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------