What you can do to support the public option

Bumped for healthcare for all, Jerome

If you believe that real health care reform requires a public option for health insurance, you have two new and easy ways to do something about it.

Several major blogs joined with Health Care for America Now and Democracy for America today on a campaign to get U.S. senators on record regarding a public option. From Chris Bowers' post at Open Left:

We made and delivered on a commitment to bring about wide Democratic majorities in Congress. Now, instead of negotiating in secret, this Congress needs to make a public commitment to us on where it stands on health care.

No more dodges. No more vague, open-ended responses. We need every member of the Senate--main obstacle to reform--to answer four questions on the public option:
   

Do you support a public healthcare option as part of healthcare reform?

   If so, do you support a public healthcare option that is available on day one?

   Do you support a public healthcare option that is national, available everywhere, and accountable to Congress?

   Do you support a public healthcare option that can bargain for rates from providers and big drug companies?


[...]Email--don't call, but email--these four questions to your Senators now. Make it clear that you want a written response to all four questions. There needs to be as little room for interpretation as possible. The Senate is going to be the biggest hurdle on health care, as it has proven to the biggest hurdle on all legislation in 2009. That is where we must focus our pressure.

When you receive a response, post it on this webpage. We are going to collect all of the responses to find out where every member of Congress, but especially the Democratic members, stand on the public option. It is only with this information that we can prevent backroom deals that will sell us out to insurance companies.

Join the several thousand people who have already taken part in this campaign. I e-mailed Senator Tom Harkin, because even though he is on record supporting a public option, I do not recall reading whether he would rule out any compromise involving a "trigger" or some other fake public option.

I didn't bother e-mailing my other senator, because Chuck Grassley is the point man for Republican opposition to the public option.

If you live in New Mexico or North Carolina, it's particularly important for you to contact Senator Jeff Bingaman or Senator Kay Hagan, because they are reportedly standing in the way of a strong public option in the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

Speaking of worthwhile blogger activism on health care, Blue America launched a campaign to put television ads on the air. Howie Klein explains at Down With Tyranny:

Digby's been writing TV scripts for a whole week to try to salvage health care reform from the tender mercies of Democrats who have grown worthless to working families after millions and millions of dollars in legalized bribes from the Medical-Industrial Complex and the Insurance Giants. Robert Greenwald is standing by with a camera crew ready to start shooting. The first batch of ads are going up on TV in Arkansas and, man, do we need help. We have a new Blue America Page that I want to urge you to visit today.

Nothing is more important to the American people than passing health care reform that reduces costs and provides security and coverage for everyone. The economy and the nation's competitiveness will not recover if this isn't done and this may be our last chance to get it done for another generation. Since single payer was taken off the table before the debate even started, the only way to reduce costs and increase coverage is to create a quality public plan choice that will keep the insurance companies relatively honest.

There are several Senators who are resisting this necessary reform and either backing toothless substitutes that will do nothing to rein in the medical industry's unnecessary waste and outrageous profits or looking for excuses to do so. Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, who sits on the finance committee and is running for office in 2010 is one. She has so far equivocated, saying that she's concerned that "if all Congress comes up with is a government-backed plan, then there will be very little incentive for the private industry to be able to be competitive perhaps in the plans they will be offering and the individuals they will be offering." That's just nonsense. The only incentive these insurance companies will have to stop gouging their patients and hobbling the entire economy is to be forced to compete with a health plan that puts patients over profits.

I'm in for $50, and if you have any cash to spare, please consider supporting this ad campaign. Last time I checked, they had raised about $5,600 through the new Blue America Page at ActBlue.

See also this post by digby at Hullabaloo and this piece by John Amato at Crooks and Liars.

Tags: health care reform, Public Option, Senate (all tags)

Comments

13 Comments

Re: What you can do to support the public option

NBC/WSJ poll had 75% support for public option.  chuck Todd said that the Senators were reading the poll wrong.. that Americans wouldn't view what they did as real health care reform without a public option!

Make sure you tell the senators that!

by LordMike 2009-06-17 04:52PM | 0 recs
excellent point

Some bills are meant to solve problems, and some bills are meant to create the appearance of solving problems.

Senators need to know that they won't be able to fool the rubes with a fake public option (co-ops, trigger, etc.).

by desmoinesdem 2009-06-17 05:01PM | 0 recs
Re: What you can do to support the public option

Yes, even the scary NBC/WSJ poll which had Obama at a Rasmussen-like 56% approval rating (his lowest MSM poll to date).

If only Obama had stayed away from bailouts.  And I wish there was a way the Dems could reframe the deficit debate.  

by esconded 2009-06-17 05:21PM | 0 recs
Re: What you can do to support the public option

If he stayed away from bailouts, the economy would be far, far worse and he would have a whole other set of problems to deal with.  

by Kent 2009-06-17 06:13PM | 0 recs
about the same poll

the majority was for spending $1T if that guaranteed universal coverage and affordable healthcare. Frankly I am sick of this namby pamby bipartisan above the fray crap and not just for healthcare but on everything: gay rights, torture prosecution, environmental regulation...Its time that the president and his Democratic congress got things done instead of making half-assed placatory measures and more band-aids. As the health reform is shaping out now, it will be a band aid, maybe a very good looking crystal studded band-aid, but still a band-aid.

by tarheel74 2009-06-17 05:00PM | 0 recs
the greatest danger

would be passing a bill that costs $1 trillion but doesn't guarantee universal coverage and affordable healthcare. Then its failure will "prove" the Republican case that Democrats are incompetent and government is the problem, not the solution.

by desmoinesdem 2009-06-17 05:02PM | 0 recs
Re: the greatest danger

You only increase the risk of not guaranteeing affordable, universal coverage by negating a public option. Everything else I am hearing can be lumped into the band-aid category (Schumer, Baucus and even the hilarious co-op option). Also what was universally unpopular was taxing healthcare benefits, something that Max Baucus finds an attractive way of paying for his plan.

Right now as I see it we have two plans: the public option plan or single-payer that can even come close to guaranteeing universal, affordable coverage. But since the latter is not even on the table we have only one plan that makes an honest effort. The rest are all expensive diamond studded band-aids.

by tarheel74 2009-06-17 05:11PM | 0 recs
Great comment

And, that is why those DINOs that are selling out to their corporate masters are 1000 times worse then the Republicans IMHO.

By watering down a bill, essentially creating another situation where the gate keeper is the Health Care Industrial Complex, we will have Bush's drug bill all over again.

In the end, the tremendous opportunity we have can be killed by corrupt bums like Bayh, Baucus, Conrad, who still are following Ronald Reagan and his free-market solves all Bullshit, while the rest of the country has seen that nightmare before.

by WashStateBlue 2009-06-19 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: about the same poll

Jimmy Obama!  Turn the clock back to 1977.

I'm worried we've got another Jimmy Carter on our hands.

by esconded 2009-06-17 05:29PM | 0 recs
Re: about the same poll

Id rather have him be a Carter than a Bill Clinton.  Carter generally kept his approval ratings decent until 1978 and even then the midterm election wasnt that bad.  If Obama can do the same, Im going to call that a win at this point.  

by Kent 2009-06-17 06:11PM | 0 recs
Re: about the same poll

Worry, worry, worry.

by lojasmo 2009-06-17 06:16PM | 0 recs
MORE OF THIS, PLEASE.

I'm going to go follow your advice right now!  Thanks demoinesdem!

by Jess81 2009-06-19 06:25AM | 0 recs
thanks, and don't forget

to sign the petition at StandWithDrDean.com.

by desmoinesdem 2009-06-19 09:02AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------