Iowa Senate leader dares conservatives to push for Constitutional Convention

Iowa Senate Majority leader Mike Gronstal is on a tear this week. On Monday he rejected Republican efforts to bring a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage to the Senate floor. Read his remarks here (scroll to the bottom) or watch the video:

On Tuesday Gronstal in effect dared conservatives to push for a Constitutional Convention, which might consider adopting an amendment to ban gay marriage. From the Des Moines Register:

"I'm inclined to hope they succeed, if that's their strategy," said Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, who has saluted Friday's Iowa Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage. "There's a lot of good, progressive issues that we could pursue: a woman's right to choose, guaranteed health care for all Iowa citizens, workers' rights -- so if there are people that want to help us get to a constitutional convention, that's kind of my dream world."

If Iowa voters approve a ballot initiative next November on calling a Constitutional Convention, the Iowa legislature will draw up rules for selecting delegates to that body. If the convention approves proposed constitutional amendments, a special election will be scheduled, and voters will consider each amendment separately, not as a bloc.

Some Iowa Republicans don't sound eager to roll the dice on this procedure:

Sen. Ron Wieck, R-Sioux City, said he will likely vote against holding a convention. "We have bumps in the road but we're operating pretty well without going in and messing with the Constitution," Wieck said.

Senate Minority Leader Paul McKinley said he will continue to push for a second route toward a constitutional amendment on gay marriage: votes by the Iowa House and Iowa Senate in two consecutive general assemblies followed by a vote of the people.

But McKinley understands why some might have an interest in a constitutional convention.

"I think the reason there is some appeal at least on the surface is citizens feel very disenfranchised from their government," McKinley said. "Democracies are crazy things. Sometimes the people want to do things that maybe the elites don't agree with."

Although I'm confident that over time a large majority of Iowans will come to support marriage equality, I confess that I am a bit nervous about the issue coming to a statewide vote in 2010 or 2011. At the same time, like Gronstal, I can imagine lots of good amendments that might come out of a Constitutional Convention.

Share any relevant thoughts or speculation in this thread.

Tags: 2010 elections, Gay Marriage, Iowa, Iowa Constitution, Iowa Supreme Court, Marriage Equality, Mike Gronstal, same-sex marriage, State Legislature, Varnum v Brien (all tags)

Comments

5 Comments

VT & DC

I think we're in a different place then we were in 2002 and 2004. The country is seeing this more and more as a civil rights and equal rights issue. There was good news out of Vermont and DC today on this front. By the time Iowa moved this to a Constitutional Convention and state-wide election in 2010 or later, I think we'll see many more states help push this in the right direction.

by CAat14K 2009-04-07 07:01PM | 0 recs
Game of chicken

I know you are nervous, but I logged in to say that Gronstal is playing the situation brilliantly.

There really are only certain strategies as I get old that work. He's playing the one that will work best here. The game of chicken. If the Republicans are serious, he's saying bring it. You think you may cut  off our finger, but we cut your arm or leg. Or, in other words, you have to lose with this than us. That's exactly how to play the situation. It takes nerve, but it's effective.

by bruh3 2009-04-07 07:45PM | 0 recs
agreed that Gronstal is very smart

to go way beyond the half-hearted acceptance of the Supreme Court ruling that many other Democrats would have given.

His statements supporting the ruling have been very strong, and he is signaling to Democrats as well as Republicans that he does not fear the fight ahead over amending the constitution. That's a much better place to be than trying to please all sides.

I just meant that I would feel better knowing that Iowans couldn't vote on this before 2013 or 2014.

by desmoinesdem 2009-04-08 05:34AM | 0 recs
Restatement

That should read "You have more to lose with this than us."

by bruh3 2009-04-07 07:46PM | 0 recs
understood

and it's probably true that Republicans have more to lose from a Constitutional Convention than Democrats do.

by desmoinesdem 2009-04-08 05:35AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------