Not So Fast, Rahm

Bumped - Todd

On Sunday, Rahm Emanuel was pretty clear on This Week With George Stephanopoulos on whether there would be legal consequences for the architects of the Bush era torture policy:

President Barack Obama does not intend to prosecute Bush administration officials who devised the policies that led to the harsh interrogation of suspected terrorists, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said Sunday.

Obama last week authorized the release of a series of memos detailing the methods approved under President George W. Bush. In an accompanying statement, he said "it is our intention to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice, that they will not be subject to prosecution." He did not specifically address the policymakers.

Asked Sunday on ABC's "This Week" about the fate of those officials, Emanuel said the president believes they "should not be prosecuted either and that's not the place that we go."

Looks like he may have spoken out of turn.

On Sunday, Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, said on the ABC News program "This Week" that "those who devised policy" also "should not be prosecuted." But administration officials said Monday that Mr. Emanuel had meant the officials who ordered the policies carried out, not the lawyers who provided the legal rationale.

Three Bush administration lawyers who signed memos, John C. Yoo, Jay S. Bybee and Steven G. Bradbury, are the subjects of a coming report by the Justice Department's ethics office that officials say is sharply critical of their work. The ethics office has the power to recommend disbarment or other professional penalties or, less likely, to refer cases for criminal prosecution.

The administration has also not ruled out prosecuting anyone who exceeded the legal guidelines, and officials have discussed appointing a special prosecutor. One option might be giving the job to John H. Durham, a federal prosecutor who has spent 15 months investigating the C.I.A.'s destruction of videotapes of harsh interrogations.

Good.

The fact is, holding the architects of the torture policy accountable is hardly a controversial notion; even Claire McCaskill put the impeachment of Judge Jay Bybee on the table on Fox News Sunday. By releasing these torture memos, the administration is not just passively fulfilling a campaign promise but is setting in motion the sorts of paths to accountability that California activists are pursuing by calling for the California Democratic Party to endorse Bybee's impeachment. Join them HERE.

Update [2009-4-21 16:16:2 by Todd Beeton]:The President himself weighed in on this today:

President Barack Obama left the door open Tuesday to prosecuting Bush administration officials who devised the legal authority for gruesome terror-suspect interrogations, saying the United States lost "our moral bearings" with use of the tactics.

The question of whether to bring charges against those who devised justification for the methods "is going to be more of a decision for the attorney general within the parameters of various laws and I don't want to prejudge that," Obama said. The president discussed the issue of terrorism-era interrogation tactics with reporters as he finished an Oval Office meeting with visiting King Abdullah II of Jordan.

Tags: President Obama, rahm emanuel, torture (all tags)

Comments

8 Comments

Re: Not So Fast, Rahm

This is excellent news. I am proud that my president is prepared to let Congress and his AG do their jobs.

by Lolis 2009-04-21 10:37AM | 0 recs
Slippery slope

This is a complicated situation. Faced with a mix of legitimate needs (to fight terrorism) and extreme political pressures from an out of control administration its often very hard to always say what each individual should have done in retrospect.

Maybe that was the tone Obama was tryng to strike?

by architek 2009-04-21 12:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Slippery slope

 Now Archie, I think that was pretty insensitive, on top of being argumentative and extremely bitter, layered over blind hatred. But one thing it lacked was an element of surprise.

by QTG 2009-04-21 12:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Not So Fast, Rahm
This more than  slippery slope, it a portal to another dimension. How the hell can the Obama adminstration persecute officials working under the previous adminstration when waterboarding, etc, wasn't illegal under that adminstration?
This is a waste of time.
by xodus1914 2009-04-21 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Not So Fast, Rahm

Persecute? I much prefer prosecute.

I'm pretty sure torture has been illegal in this country for a long time. The fact that the Bush Administration called it something different didn't make it legal.

by Fitzy 2009-04-21 01:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Not So Fast, Rahm

But during the Bush administration it was never legally determined if waterboarding was torture.

by xodus1914 2009-04-22 10:56AM | 0 recs
Re: Not So Fast, Rahm

I will lay odds that there will be no prosecutions. It is not a good way to use political capital. Furthermore, it will become a circus and further polarize the nation; it will not, at least for the foreseeable future, happen.

by JDF 2009-04-21 02:13PM | 0 recs
Whatever.

Rahm says "no prosecution," opponents of prosecution say, "I told you so," supporters get outraged.

So Obama says, "well, maybe possibly - but not certainly - prosecution," and supporters take heart . . . without having gotten any kind of promise that there will be prosecution.

Screw that.

This is exactly how the Bush Administration kept both the conservatives and the moderates on the hook - they'd offer TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT STATEMENTS, one of which the conservatives would believe to be the "real" one and one of which the moderates would believe to be the "real" one.

Then they'd do whatever the hell they wanted, confident that neither would care by the time they did it.

I'd hate to see the same dynamic play out among Democrats, but it has been (see also AIG bonuses, punitive taxes on).

As far as I'm concerned, the Obama Administration is offering nothing but doubletalk on this issue.  No praise for them until they decide which story they want to stick with.

by Drew 2009-04-21 04:23PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------