Hey, It's Just The Rule Of Law

Not great:

The White House is declining to say whether the Obama administration will support legislation introduced by Senate Democrats that would roll back the use of the "state secrets privilege," one of Bush's most controversial legal tools.

The White House's silence on the bill will give more fodder to critics who charge that Obama has broken a campaign promise to dramatically scale back use of the Bush legal maneuver and wants the latitude to use it himself. It also sets up a potential showdown with Senate Dems who continue to view the legislation as crucial to rolling back Bush-era abuses.

The Obama DOJ's own use (expansion?) of the state secrets privilege was probably our first hint that the White House wouldn't support this bill.

But as Sargent points out, the legislation previously had the support of then-Senators Biden and Clinton.

There's an unfortunate pattern developing here: dense, hard-to-communicate constitutional issues like warrantless wiretapping and habeus corpus are treated as politically pliable - i.e. there's an expectation in Washington that a change in position on these things won't result in much political complication. Time will tell, I suppose.

Tags: Barack Obama, State Secrets Privilege (all tags)

Comments

11 Comments

Sigh...

I am on record that this and Larry Summers are my main reason for giving the Obama admins first 100 days a b- grade.

I'm not sure this makes it through Congress, wait till Evan Bayh, our new Majority leader weighs in.

What I think it coming is, the Admin has probably made a tacit agreement with the intelligence community to "leave the bodies buried"  (that SUCKS btw, but I have a feeling this goes so deep and wide that hundreds or more folks fingerprints are all over actionable items, probably felonys)and then clean up the house going forward.

What these folks are claiming is, they were FORCED to do this by higher ups, who clearly are not going to be brought to justice.

It's just a stone-cold fact, you will never see Bush or Cheney stand trial for this.

So, they are worried that, as with all these things, we will hang the footsoldiers and let the generals go free?  

That could be the compromise in this bill the Admin wants.

Since this COULD effect existing court cases right now trying to sue, they might want this to only state "going forward" that the state secrets claim can't be used to shut down prosecutions.

It sucks, but that may be what they are shooting for.

Being President must be a pragamtic Bitch of a job.

by WashStateBlue 2009-04-13 09:01AM | 0 recs
let's see Bayh deliver a vote

We haven't seen him able to convince anyone to vote with him.  (I don't think Nelson counts.)  

by John DE 2009-04-13 10:08AM | 0 recs
but otherwise I think you are right

There has been a bargain made.

by John DE 2009-04-13 10:09AM | 0 recs
this is indeed troubling

but I am not the least bit surprised. Obama's talked a lot about "turning the page," so I didn't expect him to actually punish Bush/Cheney wrongdoing.

by desmoinesdem 2009-04-13 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Hey, It's Just The Rule Of Law

Get behind that legislation.

It is critical to cut back on that perverted doctrine:

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2009/04/common-sense-about-state-secrets.html

by Dredd 2009-04-13 09:17AM | 0 recs
Re: Hey, It's Just The Rule Of Law

Here's my guess...

If Obama couldn't hide behind the "state secrets" nonsense, a lot of the prisoners at Gitmo and elsewhere would have to be released.

Obama figures the political blowback against him for extending "state secrets" is less than the hypothetical firestorm he would have to face if he released "terrorists".

by RickD 2009-04-13 10:24AM | 0 recs
Re: Hey, It's Just The Rule Of Law

Is that a good reason?

by Josh Orton 2009-04-13 10:31AM | 0 recs
Well, I know it's easy to be politically pure

out here on the blogs, but that is a very legit question?

If your long term goal IS to fix Gitmo, can you do it in a political vacuum?

I'm with you Josh, this chaps my hide big time.

But I think there ARE probably good pragamtic arguments to be made that, IF you go back and try to undo all the damage, you handcuff yourself going forward.

Really, it sucks. But, you KNOW that even his own party is going to have to tread lightly when it comes to National Security Issues, the right wing noise machine and the media will NEVER give Obama the silence and accord it gave Bush....

He is operating under a spotlight, and while that is no excuse for not doing the right thing, it is a consideration NONE of us out here in Blog Purity land have to deal with.

by WashStateBlue 2009-04-13 10:55AM | 0 recs
Re: Well, I know it's easy to be politically pure

I agree, and I should have been clearer that I was asking that question earnestly. IS it a good reason? Agree with you that there's a tough balance, but not sure I'm comfortable with the road we're going down by compromising...

by Josh Orton 2009-04-13 10:58AM | 0 recs
Disappointed with this
This should be the highest priority. As someone that was wrongfully accused and questioned by the FBI, I know firsthand of the issues that the warrant-less wiretapping brings up.
Very disappointed in the administration right now. So very disappointed.
My heart sinks when I read stories like this.
by JasonL 2009-04-13 12:27PM | 0 recs
Thanks for this

Thanks Josh. We need to speak out loudly when the Administration disappoints us.

by Charles Lemos 2009-04-13 05:33PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------