MO-Sen: Kit Bond to Announce Retirement Today?

This might be gearing up to be another brutal cycle for the Republicans. Here's the latest speculation from The Kansas City Star:

Four-term Missouri Sen. Kit Bond is to address the Missouri General Assembly this morning amid speculation that he may have a surprise announcement.

A surprise most likely would be a statement that Bond, a Republican, won't seek a fifth term in 2010.

Politico is going even further, reporting that Kit Bond "will not run for re-election in 2010, giving Democrats a shot to pick up a seat in a state that has emerged as a major battleground."Update [2009-1-8 10:53:29 by Jonathan Singer]: So does NBC News.

If this story does pan out and Bond does not run for a fifth term next year, it would be particularly bad news for the Republicans. Already one potentially vulnerable Republican Senator from a swing state -- Mel Martinez of Florida -- has announced that he won't run again, and the biggest Republican name in that state, Jeb Bush, won't be running either. If you add to that list the name of Bond, who has been elected four times to the Senate and twice before that to the Governorship, all of the sudden potential Republican candidates all around the country start to wonder, if established names who presumably should be able to win easily don't want to run, can I really win?

Looking more locally into the MO-Sen race itself should Bond indeed retire, The Star says that former House Minority Whip Roy Blunt might be interested in the race. Of course House Republicans lost close to 60 seats under Blunt's watch over the last two cycles, so he isn't exactly the strongest potential pick. On the Democratic side, the name floating around the most seems to be that of Secretary of State Robin Carnanan, whom some (myself included) met at both Netroots Nation and the blogger tent at the Democratic National Convention. Another potential candidate could be state senator Jeff Smith, known to many as the subject of the fine documentary Can Mr. Smith Get To Washington Anymore? about his 2004 congressional bid.

At this point, if indeed Bond is out, it's hard to see how this race wouldn't be rated as a tossup.

As a quick aside... I do have to note how cool it was for Jean Carnahan, Robin's mother and a former Senator in her own right, to have introduced herself to me as "a blogger for Fired Up Missouri" rather than as a former United States Senator.

Tags: Kit Bond, Missouri, MO-Sen, Retirements, Senate 2010 (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

Re: MO-Sen: Kit Bond to Announce Retirement Today?

Sorry to say that it won't be Jeff Smith. Running for Senate is much more difficult than running for an urban district, and he's not exactly popular around the state. For one thing, with him as co-chair of the Missouri SDCC, the Dems actually lost seats in the Missouri Senate in 2008. Lost seats in a wave year!! It's definitely not all his fault, but he doesn't have the profile for a statewide run.

I like Jeff and hope he continues to build toward a more prominent position. But 2010 won't be his year for the US Senate.

by clarkent 2009-01-08 06:04AM | 0 recs
another dynasty pol?

This is getting ridiculous.  Robin Carnahan as a front-runner helps answer the question of whether Mr. Smith can still get to Washington.

I was feeling all warm and fuzzy about Kay Hagen upending Liddy Dole until I learned that Hagen is the niece of former FL governor Lawton Chiles.  I like Hagen and Robin Carnahan but can't we support candidates who aren't born into the oligarchy?

by Thaddeus 2009-01-08 06:20AM | 0 recs
Re: another dynasty pol?

According to Wikipedia, Hagan's dad was a frickin' tire salesman.  But she's born into the oligarchy because her uncle was once the governor of a different state altogether?  Come on.

by Steve M 2009-01-08 06:41AM | 0 recs
Re: another dynasty pol?

Dynasty, maybe. But Carnahan's one of the few who could have easily made it without the name. She's whipsmart, a hard worker, and plainspoken.

by clarkent 2009-01-08 06:50AM | 0 recs
Re: another dynasty pol?

Support the best candidates with the best chances.  To withhold support solely because they're relatives of former/current office holders is as foolish as supporting them solely for that reason.

by TheUnknown285 2009-01-08 06:58AM | 0 recs
I'd rather win seats...

...than worry over dynasties.

If Carnahan gives us the best chance to take this seat, she should be our choice.

by mistersite 2009-01-08 07:02AM | 0 recs
a huge number of women (and men) elected

to high office have family connections. Iowa Governor Chet Culver is the son of a former U.S. senator. Kathleen Sebelius is the daughter of a former Ohio governor, I believe.

Stephanie Herseth would have had no prayer of winning a statewide election in SD without the good family name.

Last year I was researching why Iowa has never elected a woman to Congress, and I learned that more than 15 percent of all women elected to the House of Representatives were widows of incumbents who died in office.

If MO were a deep-blue state, I would take your point. However, in a purple state like MO we need the Democratic candidate to have every possible advantage. If that means a dynasty family, so be it--as long as Carnahan is a good Democrat.

by desmoinesdem 2009-01-08 07:18AM | 0 recs
Re: a huge number of women (and men) elected

She is.

by clarkent 2009-01-08 07:19AM | 0 recs
Yeah--and that's the problem!

WE seem to constantly return to the question of why senators don't trake morte progressive stances, why they were so easy on Bush, why the Dems rolled over.  It's because it's hard to turn on someone in your own club.

Damn right it matters that Kay Hagen is Lawton Chiles niece.  It's about networking and fundrtaising.  We need more Jon Testers and fewer people who are too familiar with the etiquette of the country club.

And don't stop with the Udalls and Begich.  The Democratic caucus in the senate has about fifteen dynasty pols--and about 20-25 in the House.  It is a major problem but reflects a larger problem--the lack of a federally-funded campaign program makes more inbredding inevitable.

by Thaddeus 2009-01-08 09:01PM | 0 recs
Re: It's always been a problem

Yes, and it remains a PROBLEM. Oligarchy is not compatible with democracy.  But with a federally funded campaign we wouldn't hear the argument that Caroline Kennedy should be appointed because she'll be able to raise the funds for an election in 2010.  Much the same applies to the Carnahan boomlet.

by Thaddeus 2009-01-13 02:28PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------