Eric Holder: The Anti-Gonzo

Eric Holder's Attorney General Senate confirmation hearing began this morning and the more I read, the more clear it becomes just what a clean break from the Gonzales style DOJ we're in for under Holder.

For example, the most recent post on The NYTimes' liveblog of the hearing features this beauty:

Never one to be less than sarcastic or hard-hitting, Senator Chuck Schumer just conducted a Q&A series with Mr. Holder, checking to see if he would ever be as beholden to Mr. Obama as say, one of this senator's most-criticized former attorneys general, Alberto Gonzales.

Mr. Schumer and Mr. Holder called the civil rights division of the Justice Department a "jewel" of the agency, with Mr. Holder promising to investigate fully what has happened to it in recent years.

Specifically, per TPM, Holder said he would revisit the decision not to charge Bush DOJ hack and criminal Bradley Schlozman.

Holder just told the Senate Judiciary committee that he wants to reconsider the Bush Justice Department's curious decision not to bring criminal charges against Schlozman, a former top department official who was found by a DOJ investigation to have politicized hiring decisions, then lied about it to Congress in an effort to cover it up.

Asked about the issue moments ago by Sen. Dianne Feinstein -- one of the lawmakers to whom Schlozman was found to have given an untruthful answer during testimony -- Holder declared: "I want to know why the determination was made not to pursue charges."

Also during his hearing, Holder exhibited zero nuance on whether waterboarding is torture.

Eric Holder, U.S. President-elect Barack Obama's nominee to be attorney general, said he believed the controversial interrogation tactic of waterboarding, used by the CIA against three terrorism suspects, is a form of torture.

"I agree with you, Mr. Chairman, that waterboarding is torture," Holder said at his Senate confirmation hearing Thursday in response to questioning by Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont. [...]

Holder's declaration on waterboarding signals that Obama's Justice Department would not tolerate it.

Not that it's difficult to be a better AG than Alberto Gonzales and not that there's any political peril in assertively claiming the anti-Gonzo and anti-Bush mantle, but it sure is nice to hear directly from Holder's lips.

The hearing will reconvene at 2:15pm EST.

Tags: attorney general, Barack Obama, Eric Holder (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

Re: Eric Holder: The Anti-Gonzo

I like what I'm hearing from Holder.

Any War on Drugs talk so far?

by Steve M 2009-01-15 08:38AM | 0 recs
Re: Eric Holder: The Anti-Gonzo
I don't want to bash Omigawa Chiaki so hard since I belive she has no exepreince of voice acting before, but honestly, apparently it's really bad.
well, it's simply disturbing and annoying. I almost came to think that "please change it to someone else in the next episode or later"
Man, she made Nasuka Kaori's voice sound a lot better...who i hate so often
---------------
vijendra
---------------
dating - dating
by vk415 2009-01-15 08:46AM | 0 recs
I made the mistake

of watching part of this hearing on MSNBC. After Specter was done, Kohl started asking about Guantanamo, but MSNBC cut away so that Chris Matthews could ask his pundit guests about whether Specter drew blood. It was so stupid. Why not let people watch the actual hearing and do your punditry during the Senate breaks?

By the time they got back to the hearing, Kohl's time was up and it was Kyl asking about immigration enforcement.

by desmoinesdem 2009-01-15 09:20AM | 0 recs
I should add

that it is comical to watch Specter go so deep into the weeds on the Marc Rich pardon, trying to cover some grave error committed by Holder, when it is obvious that Holder was a bit player in that policy.  Meanwhile, Specter always played nice with W's appointees.

I am pissed off that everyone is giving Geithner a pass on his failure to fully pay his taxes, not once but on several years, while Holder is getting raked over the coals at this hearing. It seems to me that if Holder had done what Geithner has admitted to, that would be considered disqualifying.

by desmoinesdem 2009-01-15 09:22AM | 0 recs
Waterboarding is torture? Who Knew!

by molly bloom 2009-01-15 11:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Waterboarding is torture? Who Knew!

Commander Cuckoo Bananas apparently didn't.

by Khun David 2009-01-15 02:10PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------