Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

While it will take time and a great amount of energy for Congress to enact sweeping healthcare reform to help cover the millions of Americans without insurance, the Democratic Congress does appear to be gearing up for an important move that could help get the ball rolling.

Congress is poised to give President-elect Barack Obama a quick victory by passing a bill to provide health insurance to millions of low-income children.

The House Democratic leader, Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, said the bill, scheduled for a vote in the House this week, was "very much like" legislation twice vetoed by President Bush in 2007. Legal authority for the program expires on March 31.

[...]

Supporters of the bill said it would cover 10 million children, providing benefits for nearly 4 million who are uninsured, while continuing coverage for 6.6 million youngsters already enrolled. The federal government now spends more than $5 billion a year on the program, and while precise figures are not yet available, the expansion would more than double that cost.

[...]

The new [House and Senate] bills, like those vetoed, would be financed by tobacco taxes, including a 61-cent cigarette tax increase, to $1 a pack.

Covering four million Americans without health insurance when somewhere between 45 million and 50 million are uncovered may seem like a small step -- but it's an important one. The measure of the success of the Obama administration will not be in legislation like the renewal and expansion of SCHIP, in lifting the ban on federal funding for stem cell research, or anything of the like. Yet that does not mean that such bills will not have an important impact on the lives of many Americans. What's more, such legislation has the potential of helping build the momentum towards broader changes with wider impact -- and greater historical importance -- that could improve the lives of countless more Americans. And it doesn't hurt that the Democrats' SCHIP bill is widely popular with voters.

Tags: 111th Congress, Healthcare, Obama Administration, SCHIP (all tags)

Comments

11 Comments

Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

Obama has gone so far right that I wouldn't be surprised if he vetoed SCHIP himself.

by antiHyde 2009-01-13 07:57AM | 0 recs
Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

A bush republican will spend 350 billion dollars bailing out Smith Barney and not spend one dime for Barney Smith then wonder why the economy crashes

by Trey Rentz 2009-01-13 08:02AM | 0 recs
Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

Poppycock..

by lojasmo 2009-01-13 08:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

agree.

by Trey Rentz 2009-01-13 09:30AM | 0 recs
great first step

good publicity -
win win situation for democrats and the Obama Administration.

Tough for Republicans to vote against especially since it passed when Dem majorities were slim.

by sepulvedaj3 2009-01-13 07:59AM | 0 recs
I am building a startup

The children of employees of my company will directly benefit from this. And the savings that we all make from this plan will end up back in my business. How else can it not be? We set aside money for healh insurance, premiums skyrocket - and then all of a sudden - relief is in sight!

Now if only we can get something like this passed that is valid for people over the age of 10 years old.

by Trey Rentz 2009-01-13 08:00AM | 0 recs
We Have To Think Big

History tells us that most big legislative accomplishments of a President occurs in the first six months of the first term in office. Only if a president was highly successful in the first six months and is highly popular does a president get a chance for a second series big legislative wins. Thus, my suggestion would be for Obama to pass univeral health care legislation as part or on the heels of the economic stimulus package. Otherwise, the odds are we won't see any chance for significant health care reform for at least another eight years and probably not for another sixteen years.

by Zzyzzy 2009-01-13 08:34AM | 0 recs
Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

Health insurance for low-income children.

The Republicans must hate that.

by Bush Bites 2009-01-13 08:42AM | 0 recs
Re: Covering the First 4 Million Uninsured

In my state, they've worked hard to underfund it. That whole xenophobia vibe comes into play with this stuff ...  republicans are so broken, divided. the party of so called conservatives leaving a legacy of the biggest spending increase and worst stock market crash ever.

And of course. Border security. "they'll come over here just for the healthcare."

by Trey Rentz 2009-01-13 09:32AM | 0 recs
SCHIP is not just for low-income children

You would be surprised by how many middle-income families rely on SCHIP. Medicaid may cover children from very low-income families, but a lot of people make enough not to qualify for Medicaid, say $20K to $40K a year, but way below what they would need to buy health insurance.

One of my friends got her two kids on SCHIP this fall after her husband got laid off. They were doing pretty well, upper middle class, but he lost his job and she owns a small business that doesn't provide enough income for health insurance.

Anyway, my point is that a lot of uninsured people are not poor, and expanding SCHIP coverage will help their kids.

by desmoinesdem 2009-01-13 10:09AM | 0 recs
Re: SCHIP is not just for low-income children

Try this one on for size. 1700.00 for premiums to cover two small families, head of houshold. Per month.

Small group insurance is a clusterfuck.

by Trey Rentz 2009-01-13 10:21AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------