John McCain's Impotence In Washington

What's been most interesting to me today is not that a majority coalition made up of progressives AND conservatives managed to defeat the bailout bill, although that is pretty interesting, but rather how partisan and political Republicans have been on the issue after the bill went down. With all the talk of coming together to solve a crisis (one that Americans are not convinced exists, or at least they're not convinced it affects them) Republicans have gone full bore hurling accusations for the failure of the bill at Democrats, which is clearly just them tprojecting. As Josh Marshall notes, the idea that this is a Democratic failure -- whether you're sad or glad the bill went down -- is patently absurd:

There's a lot of talk out there from commentators who you'd think would know better claiming that this was basically a bipartisan failure -- that both parties, Republicans and Democrats, failed to carry their members for this bill.

But look at the numbers. 60% of Democrats in the House voted for this bill. 33% of Republicans. Face it, that's not even close.

But it's not stopping them from trying to gain some political advantage. Since the failure of the bill, we've seen Republican House leadership accuse the bill's failure on a speech Nancy Pelosi gave, which Barney Frank hilariously mocked as their having "hurt feelings." This accusation was echoed by the John McCain campaign, which released a statement from economic advisor Douglas Holz-Eakin:

"From the minute John McCain suspended his campaign and arrived in Washington to address this crisis, he was attacked by the Democratic leadership: Senators [Barack] Obama and [Harry] Reid, Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi and others. Their partisan attacks were an effort to gain political advantage during a national economic crisis. By doing so, they put at risk the homes, livelihoods and savings of millions of American families," Holtz-Eakin said in his statement. He also blamed Pelosi for delivering a "strongly worded partisan speech" before the vote was called.

Except, remember what John McCain's campaign claimed he was bringing to the table by going to Washington to "solve the crisis"?

On Sunday, one of McCain's top advisers, Steve Schmidt, was giving him credit for making the deal happen. "What Sen. McCain was able to do was to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

And his results speak for themselves.

Over the weekend, McCain spoke with several House Republicans and in the end, four of them voted against the bailout: Reps. Marsha Blackburn, Mario Diaz-Balart and two fellow Arizonans: Reps. John Shadegg and Jeff Flake.

Great work, John!

What else does McCain have but to deflect attention away from what is clearly his own failure to follow through on what he foolishly promised last week? But really, the very idea that John McCain would swoop into Washington and bring House Republicans on board with anything was always an absurd notion. They don't like him and they don't trust him. What this whole episode proves to the nation in clear and stark terms is just how impotent a force in Washington McCain actually is and actually what an impotent president he would be.

Update [2008-9-29 18:7:42 by Todd Beeton]:Hilarious. Now McCain's line is "this is not the time to affix blame" but that's precisely what he's doing.

In Des Moines, Iowa, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the following: "Senator Obama and his allies in Congress infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to affix the blame. It’s time to fix the problem. "

Tags: bailout, John McCain (all tags)

Comments

21 Comments

Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

They don't like him and they don't trust him. What this whole episode proves to the nation in clear and stark terms is just how impotent a force in Washington McCain actually is and actually what an impotent president he would be.

Kinda stings, don't it John?

by WashStateBlue 2008-09-29 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Maybe Bob Dole should share some of his viagra?

by gavoter 2008-09-29 01:59PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Wow, I just saw McCain give a short speech and then leave without answering any questions.  He looked pissed, I would be too if I just learned how uneffective I was within my own party.  McCain reached for the stars on this one, attempting to set the stage as Savior of America, a big gamble that predictably blew up in his face because the fundamentals of his campaign consist of incompetence and mere speculation.

by KLRinLA 2008-09-29 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Yes, he DOES look angry, and it is not playing well in the polls.

I think also he is seeing that, the house Republicans really dispise him.

I always thought he was too good a politician to blow his top in public, but now I am not so sure.

He may literally go off the rails, have a meltdown, and it will make the Macaca moment look good by comparison.

by WashStateBlue 2008-09-29 02:14PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

his anger is rising and it's becoming palpable.  trainwreck is the only word I can think of to accurately describe his campaign. Its like he plants mines and steps on them, everyday.

by KLRinLA 2008-09-29 02:24PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Any day now he's going to start ending his assertions with "don't you see??!!!"

by Jess81 2008-09-29 03:06PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Oooh! you got a stalker, I'm teh gelous

by KLRinLA 2008-09-29 04:12PM | 0 recs
Mean ol' lady Pelosi

I think that was the dumbest idea ever of the GOP leadership to try and blame Pelosi.  I think this childishness is already starting to bite them in the ass big time.  especially, since they are arguing that this changed peoples vote.

I would love to know which congressmen are so delicate that they had to change their votes.  I wonder if Boehner is now going to have to through some congressmen to the wolves.  I would certainly love to know who changed their vote.

by gavoter 2008-09-29 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

The only silver lining in this whole situation is the speech McCain gave this morning, basically crediting himself with the bill's passage. He sure jumped the gun on that one, which both MSNBC and CNN are ridiculing him for. I think the Dems just won this election, but at an awful cost.

by phoenixdreamz 2008-09-29 01:58PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington
I agree, but hopefully we can get another bill put together that has more progressive interests represented.  I am no economic genius, but from what I have been reading all over the place, we do have a big problem with the credit freeze that will impair businesses from big to small that could lead to serious emplyment problems.  It does seem the bill as voted on was not a great or even good one, but it can get it better and now the Dems are in a position to vote in lockstep for a way better bill.  
Not only is McCain's campaign destroyed by this but the Republicans have lost all credibility, not necessarily because they may have voted it down on principle, but because they claim to have voted it down out of spite for Nancy Pelosi.  "Amatuer Hour" was a phrase just used to describe House republicans on CNN.  
by KLRinLA 2008-09-29 02:14PM | 0 recs
On CNN?

That's awesome. On Fox, it would be incredible.

by antiHyde 2008-09-29 02:58PM | 0 recs
With McCain, all that is solid melts into air

instantly.  Whenever I hear McCain or his spokespeople flip-flop-flip-flop-flip-flop-flip in order to defend his outrageous and reckless actions, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

by ProfessorReo 2008-09-29 02:13PM | 0 recs
John McCain is angry and desperate.

My friends, now is not the time to point out the obvious.

by Iago 2008-09-29 02:30PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Barney Frank tore the Republicans a new one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zftp-JMeY kg

by Drummond 2008-09-29 02:30PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Great video- go Barney!

by skohayes 2008-09-29 04:54PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

Yeah John, now is no time to eAT STEAK, CAN YOU PASS THE a-1 PLEASE.

by billreef 2008-09-29 02:46PM | 0 recs
I'm sure John McCain

I'm sure John McCain will do the honorable thing and re-suspend his campaign in order to address this cricical issue. This time around, the timing will be much more convenient for him since he got that pesky debate out of the way.

Three cheers for the honorable John McCain!

by Cleveland John 2008-09-29 02:53PM | 0 recs
I can't believe it

Could anyone really be WORSE than Bush?

I thought for the longest time that it's impossible.

Now we have not one but TWO examples.

John McCain: embodiment of the Bush's "gut" leadership that does not rely on facts and reality.

Sarah Palin: embodiment of Bush's audacious stupidity and aversion to intellectual sophistication.

WOW.

by Sieglinde 2008-09-29 03:00PM | 0 recs
Yep.

The problem with "gut" decisions:  Guts have shit for brains.

by fogiv 2008-09-29 03:04PM | 0 recs
Obama is also at fault

Look at the guy's advisers on this:  Robert Rubin?
Roger Altman?
Not exactly the right people.

When Obama starts listening to the James K. Galbraiths and Nomi Prins of the world then you will know he actually stands for change.

by neaguy 2008-09-29 04:14PM | 0 recs
Re: John McCain's Impotence In Washington

OBAMA COMMITING TREASON
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/
2008/09/19/opinion/main4460105.shtml?
source=RSSattr=Opinion_4460105

Thanks to reporting from Amir Taheri, the gist of which the Obama campaign has confirmed, we now know that while Obama is telling the American people he wants an end to the war, he has secretly negotiated with the government in Iraq to extend the U.S. military mission there. That is a black-and-white violation of federal criminal law.

Yet, during Obama's heralded trip to Baghdad in July, he asked Iraqi leaders to ignore Bush and delay resolving the legal status of our forces until next year - by which time the Senator hopes no longer to need a phony presidential seal.

Under the "Logan Act" (now codified at Section 953 of the federal penal code) it has been against the law since the late 18th century for U.S. citizens to carry on "intercourse with any foreign government" that is aimed either "to defeat the measures of the United States" or to influence the foreign government's dealings with the United States. Being a senator is no immunity from this statute - as any Republican senator would find out in a hurry if he dared to pull a stunt like this during an Obama administration.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW6lW8uD1 ck&feature=related

by WillNotBeFooledByObamaNATION 2008-09-29 11:10PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------