Tracking Poll Update: Obama Matches Largest Rasmussen Lead

Here are today's numbers:

ObamaMcCain
Diageo/Hotline4843
Gallup4944
Rasmussen Reports5044
Research 2000/dKos4943
Average:49.0043.50

We don't yet know how the public will react upon full digestion of last night's debate -- including after Saturday Night Live's send up tonight (boy has it been a long time since the show has been relevant) -- but what we do know is this: On the eve of the first presidential debate, Barack Obama held a noticeable lead over John McCain.

Feel free to consider this an open thread as well... What's on your mind?

Update [2008-9-27 13:43:18 by Jonathan Singer]: And for your viewing pleasure...

Tags: Tracking Poll Update, White House 2008 (all tags)

Comments

27 Comments

What's not on my mind

what's left in this year's baseball season.

by Blazers Edge 2008-09-27 09:22AM | 0 recs
If only

the R2K/Daily Kos poll wasn't such an outlier!

Oh, wait...

Really, what appears to have happened is that R2K was a little on the optimistic edge of the MoE, and Ras was a little on the pessimistic edge. And now that they've both resorted to their means, everything lines surprisingly nicely.

by kos 2008-09-27 09:26AM | 0 recs
Re: If only

Don't worry, I'm sure we're about to hear about how the Battleground tracker is obviously.....something....

by Beomoose 2008-09-27 09:28AM | 0 recs
I think the real thing

that someone is worried about, is that they won't be able to send the "I told you so" message they've had sitting open on their desktop for the last 6 months.

by sneakers563 2008-09-27 10:25AM | 0 recs
Re: If only

heh.  good one.

by fogiv 2008-09-27 10:06AM | 0 recs
ha

good to see you around here again. Reminds me of the (very) old days.

by taylormattd 2008-09-27 10:22AM | 0 recs
Obama Matches Largest Rasmussen Lead

I think the most striking data to come from these tracking polls is the consistency. Obama is at 50-49, McCain is at 44-43, which is basically what the margin was all summer.

I obviously don't have any evidence to back me up, but I think this is what happened last night: The public is a little bit weary about Obama's foreign policy experience, but also far more concerned with the economy; now they are sufficiently satisfied that he can do the job as Commander-in-Chief, and are re-focusing their attentions to the economy. So, in a way, the typical swing voter might be saying... "OK, OK, he's fine with Iraq, let's just get him in there so he can fix the economy".

When voter perceptions harden like that, it's very difficult for any new tactic to work.

Now, that's not to say that something that could change those perceptions can't happen. As we've seen with McCain's already erratic campaign, expect plenty more Hail Marys in the next month or so. This is a tight race and will remain so until the end.

by UMassforObama 2008-09-27 09:39AM | 0 recs
Post-debate polls

Put aside the snap, crackle and pop polls for a minute.  Does anyone think that after last night's debate Obama's poll numbers will go down?  Was there anything that would cause him to lose support?

I think not.

by James Earl 2008-09-27 09:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Post-debate polls

I really and truly cannot think of one reason. It might bring Mccain's number up, but I don't see why it wouldn't even out with equal numbers for Obama. Obama won unequivocally on every measure except for substance, and he split that down party lines. And even then, most Democrats were expecting him to be less knowledgeable than McCain, and he really wasn't.

by vcalzone 2008-09-27 10:23AM | 0 recs
The last time SNL was really relevant

was probably 8 years ago during the Gore/Bush election; I can't think of a skit from 4 years ago that was memorable in they Kerry/Bush election.

And I say this as their target audience; young, urban and male with a disposable income. I just don't find it funny anymore; I went through last week's episode with John Franco without laughing for the first three skits before I switched it off.

by fbihop 2008-09-27 09:51AM | 0 recs
Will Forte's

Take on "politics are hard" of the first debate was pretty right on...but I barely watched.  And that's when I was engaged to a person who put it on the dvr all the time :).

by thurst 2008-09-27 10:43AM | 0 recs
Re: The last time SNL was really relevant

I still remember the "Two Presidents!" sketch, and how it eerily predicted that Bush would cause unprecedented chaos.

by wilder 2008-09-27 11:04AM | 0 recs
Re: The last time SNL was really relevant

that was franco's fault, he's a terrible actor.  the one with shia lebouf was good, the fat kid from superbad was hilarious too

by KLRinLA 2008-09-27 11:07AM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update:

Mostly relief,  Here's what Hillary said:

Hillary Clinton issued the following statement responding to tonight's presidential debate:

"Tonight Barack Obama displayed beyond a doubt that he understands both the gravity of the financial crisis facing America, and the challenges we face in Iraq and around
the world. Senator McCain offered only more of the same failed policies of the Bush Administration. America deserves better.

"I stood next to Barack Obama in 22 debates and tonight epitomized why millions are joining me in standing with him and working hard to ensure he is the next President of the United States."

by anna shane 2008-09-27 10:08AM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update:

I'm more worried about what Bill will have to say with Tom Brokaw tomorrow.

by vcalzone 2008-09-27 11:25AM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update:

he'll probably say Barack showed he's a statesman by holding his temper and not smirking back?

He may be going after votes for people who don't like Barack, by talking about voting for the Democratic candidate?  

by anna shane 2008-09-27 03:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update: Obama Matches Largest Ra

I'm generally pretty cautious on these things, but going into the debate I thought this election just might be on the verge of breaking wide open, and frankly, the debate just may have done it.

Interestingly, the thing that I thought Obama did best is the very item that many on liberal blogs have been criticizing - his open agreement with McCain on certain statements.  There are several reasons.  First, McCain made some good statements - it would have been petty for Obama not to acknowledge them.  Second, he never just said "you're right John", he always added "but" and brought in some related issue on which he strongly degrees with McCain.  Plus, he didn't just criticize, but laid out precisely why he disagrees.  By first agreeing it make his criticisms that much more credible - there weren't just partisan attacks.  Finally, both have presented themselves as post-partisan, but only Obama actually came across that way.  Moderate and independent voters want a government that worked, and last night Obama looked like the kind of man who can do that.

Therefore, for the above reason, and the fact that Obama clearly came across as knowledgeable and prepared, and someone who can be trusted with the Presidency, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the undecideds start migrating strongly to Obama.

by LanceS 2008-09-27 10:14AM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update: Obama Matches Largest Ra

A wise friend of mine thinks this election's model most closely matches that of 1980 when people didn't like Carter but weren't sure Reagan could be trusted.  Once he passed that low bar in the 1st debate, he won 51-41.  I think Obama cleared that hurdle last night, and I'm pleased that we're already starting to see the results in today's tracking polls.  

As another friend is floating, who wants to bet Palin has a family emergency that requires her in Alaska on the 2nd??  We already have a National Review columnist (a woman!) calling for her to bow out so McCain can replace her.

I didn't think Obama's agreeing was much of a problem.  I saw more missed opportunities where he could've gone after McCain harder.  Agreeing too much can be a problem though; remember the 2000 SNL skit of Bush and Gore just repeating, "I agree".

by Sandwich Repairman 2008-09-27 06:52PM | 0 recs
know what's interesting?

the potential 2-2/2 points we'd lose from racism according to the yahoo poll are made up by the fact that young kids use cellphones and aren't being polled proportionately.  kind of odd how these things work themselves out.

by Doug Tuttle 2008-09-27 10:52AM | 0 recs
Re: know what's interesting?

I've always said any so-called "Bradley Effect" (a term usually thrown about by people who don't quite know what it is) will be offset by large youth turnout and large black turnout -- both things that polls are, for the most part, not counting on.

I know a lot of people who are just getting registered to vote now -- and nearly all plan on voting for Obama.

by fbihop 2008-09-27 11:02AM | 0 recs
Re: know what's interesting?

Indeed, that's another real problem with the polling.  Who's a likely voter and how do you tell?  How do you predict turnout among blacks when a major party has nominated a black person for the first time?  And what about all the new voters--more of them and maybe likelier to vote in the past?  Most of those polling biases/flaws would benefit Obama.

by Sandwich Repairman 2008-09-27 06:57PM | 0 recs
Re: know what's interesting?

Those factors and more.  It's frustratingly complicated.  It seems like the Bradley effect has been disproven, or faded away, but I'll believe it when I see the results of this election.  I've gone cell-only since 04, and I think we're more likely to be informed and vote (the data say we're higher income and likelier to have college degrees), and I hope our undercounting in the polls is greater than the Bradley effect.

by Sandwich Repairman 2008-09-27 06:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Tracking Poll Update:

If this debate had been on radio, McCain would have done better. Unfortunately for McCain, people starting buying that darn picture box when he was in his 20's.

by RandyMI 2008-09-27 10:55AM | 0 recs
please help
Could someone please explain how tracking polls are different from normal polls to the statistically inept like myself.  Also, are "today's" numbers from today's phone calls so after last nights debate or from yesterday so the debate hasn't been factored in yet
Thanks for any information you can provide.
by steburke 2008-09-27 11:40AM | 0 recs
Oh brother.

After last night, Obama will continue to lead.  I was talking to my republican friends today and most of them agreed that they felt McCain was an "asshole".  The obnoxious way of not even acknowledging Obama resonated with many Americans.  Makes you think, "do we want THAT again in the White House?"  Finally, Obama made people feel it was ok to vote for him.  

All around, bad for John McCain.

by Raymond Kantorowicz 2008-09-27 11:45AM | 0 recs
Subcommittees

One of a few examples of McCain being the irrelevant congressional insider mired in inside baseball Americans don't know or care about.  Like Gore in 2000 and Dole in 96.  I thought Obama missed an opportunity here.  When McCain criticized him for not holding hearings on Afghanistan, he should've answered, "Tell you what, John.  When I'm president, you can do whatever you want with your subcommittees".

Never mind that Democrats will control them all...

by Sandwich Repairman 2008-09-27 06:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Subcommittees

Obama did dismiss the criticism of his Subcommittee as 'insider baseball.'  I thought that was one of his better moments and it does address your concern.

by Shaun Appleby 2008-09-28 12:32AM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------