Love the head-fakes on the media.  Love it.

was self induced.

While he stayed in Washington is the best moment of this entire campaign season!

It all sounds like a David Mamet play.

And the emphasis here is on LITTLE. All this stuff was in all the national media at 7.00am this morning. Schumer with due respect has no more idea of what they talked about than all the media drones. They are both professional democratic politicians and what they both want is something that delivers a stunning victory for the Democrats in November. I suspect they are relatively immune from all the overheated stuff we see on blogs and the last people they'll be taking any notice of will be journalists.  

that he would have her back and support her in the senate, and let his supporters know that he won't tolerate them shutting her out. Without offering her the VP, that will be the one thing he can offer her to gain her support.

I would like to be excited, I want to be excited.  I want to put the nastiness behind us.  I want to see Obama and Clinton sharing the stage together this weekend.  I want to see Clinton help leading the charge in the Senate and Obama leading the charge a few blocks down Pennsylvania avenue next year.

But, I have become more pessimistic now.  I think the nastiness on the blogs has ratcheted up.  I know that there will be flaming comments to your post.  so, my excitment has yet to build

"After a little uncertainty, it looks like we're heading in the right direction."

Just stop.

There was no uncertainty, unless you were a clueless fool who lost all perspective.  

There was never any doubt that Hillary would get behind Obama and do the right thing.

And the suggestion otherwise says more about the person making it and their own biases than it does about current political reality.

Damn! That was Feinstein's mansion they showed on TV last night?? I thought it was the Clintons'.  I knew my Senator had a something on the side to suppliment her salary from Congress, but G Damn!!! And this is her DC home! I have to see what her Cali mansion looks like. I guess hubby's busniess is booming giventhe war and all. Now I definitely will not vote for her again.  

It's good to see them take the time to talk. I think this kind of meeting has more impact for it's quietness than anything else. It lets the healing begin without a single word of spin for the media to blow up and distort.

You should have acknowledged you made an error in judgment in writing that crap about about Hillary Rodham Clinton on the JFK thing.

It was the most offensive piece I had seen on the front page in over year .

That said it seems you have taken over from Singer , I hope you become as credible as he his despite differences.

Again, Josh- you are annoying me.  "I think we're heading  in the right direction".  As if Hillary were going to say, "Screw this- I'm so power hungry- I'll ruin Obama if I have to."  Clinton hatred seems to be your problem, my friend, not 18 million voters.  GET OVER IT, please- otherwise people will NEVER NEVER NEVER come together- and that will ruin Dems in November.  Where will that leave us then?

there was no uncertainty, Josh

only in those minds that believe the absolute worse of the Clintons.  And that is fed by the right wing smear machine in the 1990's

I would have thought better of you.  Oh well.

to be VP.  How many times do Hillary and her campaign have to say it?  Besides, it's just logical:  Why play second banana to a second banana?  

My advice to Hillary:  Get with Bill and apply your considerable intelligence and talents to a difficult world problem (genocide or the Middle East) and leave the children at home to play in the sandbox of dirty U.S. politics for four years.  

I was so happy to hear about this meeting!  I thought uncertainty was the exactly appropriate word to use.  Supporters of both Obama and Clinton have been uncertain what the two candidates want from each other, and so we've been out there fighting for what we THINK they might want.

Soon, I hope, it will be very clear.  

Sen. Clinton always intended Tuesday night for reflection on the results in South Dakota and to celebrate her campaign.  I don't think she expected superdelegates to hand the nomination to Obama prior to the end of the Montana primary.  The uncertainty you felt was caused by the inability of supers to wait until the actual end of the primary season.

The "uncertainty" was of your own choosing.  

Anyone who takes an objective look at Hillary's career could come to no other conclusion than that she would enthusiatically get behind the nominee...it is only the left's irrational paranoia about all things Clinton that informs such "uncertaintly"...

along. She will endorse Obama and work for him.

I'm sure she believes he will lose as I do. Not because she's Kreskin, but because she's been around a while.

She will be blamed for his defeat unlike Ted Kennedy, Gary Hart or Jesse Jackson. All men who were hundreds of delegates behind the eventual nominee and still stayed in the race until the convention.

Rep. Clyburg of SC accused the Clinton's of deliberately trying to lose the election for Obama. Nice man.

People will be furious if Obama loses. They should be furious at the Dem party leadership for prematurely betting on an asset like Obama. He could have been in the whitehouse for 16 years. Now it might be zero....unless Clinton puts him on the ticket in 2012. Stranger things have happened.

Well, I am glad to see that the conversation has gone nowhere and people keep talking over one another.  I stated how I was pessimistic and it is still so.