She Has His Back

I know many are perplexed and even disappointed that Hillary Clinton didn't make more of a declarative statement about her campaign status last night and get more fully behind Barack Obama (and yes, I'm aware that still others are quite glad she didn't.) But while she may not have made an official endorsement of support for Obama's candidacy, she's been sending some signs of a tacit endorsement in the meantime today, demonstrating that she does have his back as the nominee.

As Josh notes in Breaking Blue, The Hotline's On Call reported that Hillary said the following in her address to AIPAC today:

"It has been an honor to contest these primaries with him. It is an honor to call him my friend. And let me be very clear, I know that Sen. Obama will be a good friend to Israel."

On top of that, The Swamp has reported that Hillary told Rahm Emanuel to do what he can to help Barack Obama.

Hillary Clinton got a call yesterday from Cong. Rahm Emanuel, who told her he'd been invited to appear with Barack Obama at a meeting of a pro-Israel lobbying group on Wednesday. [...]

In that conversation, Emanuel ended his long-held neutrality in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, letting Clinton know that he would endorse his fellow Illinois Democrat now that he is the presumptive presidential nominee.

And, according to Emanuel's account, Clinton seemed to sound a conciliatory note.

"Her other line was (that I) should join him because he will need the help of the Jewish community," said Emanuel, noting that he was paraphrasing all of her comments based on his memory of the conversation. "She said, 'You should do that, we should all do what we can to help him.'"

I'm glad to see her engaging in this sort of advocacy on Barack Obama's behalf as it's arguably more important than an out and out endorsement. Of course, once she does endorse and once she begins to do what she's been insisting for months that she would do, namely help the Democratic nominee defeat John McCain, that will be extremely valuable to the perception of unity, for rallying her supporters around him, and for her own legacy, and it  will provide Obama with further momentum and validity as the presumptive nominee. As I said last night, I hope it comes this week.

Tags: 2008 Presidential election, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (all tags)

Comments

94 Comments

Yes, yes, yes.

It is critical that we Hillary supporters be gracious in defeat.  It is critical that Obama supporters be gracious in victory.

We need to get on with this project.  Barack Obama needs to be president, because enough is enough, and eight years has been too much.

by Beltway Dem 2008-06-04 12:12PM | 0 recs
Indeed

and Hillary Clinton is very important to that and if anyone doubted her intentions this should show them that they were wrong.  Hillary Clinton is not the 'monster' that many make her out to be, kudos to her for this.

by Student Guy 2008-06-04 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Indeed

You are all wrong. You sound like Republicans who still Bush. I've held my thoughts back for 24 hours.

Hillary doesn't care about her supporters
Hillary disrespected Obama last night
Hillary asked her supporters to pay off her debt last night
Hillary said that the magic number was 2210
       Obama reached and exceeded it!
Hillary said that she wanted MI and FL seated because she cared for voters.
        They are seated!
She is tearing this party apart and couldn't care one bit
        It is ALL ABOUT HER
Hillary locked her supporters last night with no TV, cells, or blackberry access to control the message
Hillary is a disgusting pig and she will pay by losing her Senateorial seat since she threw the election for McCain!
Don't call me a troll. Answer my questions and concerns!

by comingawakening 2008-06-04 02:11PM | 0 recs
She should put a Paddle to that backside

for running an ugly, race-driven campaign.

The nomination was handed to him.  For most dems, it's a matter of who is the least repulsive, McCain or Obama.

by layer cake 2008-06-04 02:27PM | 0 recs
maybe 48 would have been better...

but i'll try and answer your "concerns:"

> Hillary doesn't care about her supporters

i can't read hillary's mind.  can you?  if you are concerned about this, you need to get a life.  you will be endlessly chasing your tail if you concern yourself about the intentions and mindset of others.

> Hillary disrespected Obama last night

that may be.  so what?  did you think this was the first time?  hillary was all about hillary last night.  i seriously doubt she gave much thought to barack.

the fact is, she didn't need to.  (last night)

> Hillary asked her supporters to pay off her debt last night

OMG!  ya think?  let's go back to, so what?

> Hillary said that the magic number was 2210  Obama reached and exceeded it!

i thought we'd already established that math wasn't hillary's strong suit.  but leaving that aside, i strongly suspect that hillary speech was written before "Obama reached and exceeded it."  i personally hadn't seen much indication that hillary was quick on her feet, so...

> Hillary said that she wanted MI and FL seated because she cared for voters. They are seated!

yeah?  she also reserved her sight to challenge that.  most of us heard that...

> She is tearing this party apart and couldn't care one bit.  It is ALL ABOUT HER

yeah, sorry.  not a lot of evidence of altruism in our political system.  when it shows up, we are so shocked that we hardly know how to deal with it.

you seem to be sending mixed messages here.  you are calling hillary a typical politician and then act shocked when she acts like one.  for most politicians, it's all about them.  again: so what?

> Hillary locked her supporters last night with no TV, cells, or blackberry access to control the message

i have no knowledge of this, but i have to question its truth.  you're saying that a college has a facility that prevents digital access???  that's an incredible charge.

> Hillary is a disgusting pig and she will pay by losing her Senateorial seat since she threw the election for McCain!

good luck with that one.  incumbents have considerable advantages, even in the senate.

> Don't call me a troll. Answer my questions and concerns!

done.  what did we learn?  well, you're a little inconsistent.  you're made, but we're not sure why...

by bored now 2008-06-04 03:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Indeed

> She is tearing this party apart and couldn't care one bit

I get why you are angry but, posts like this don't help at all.

I was annoyed that she didn't end it yesterday too but statements like this:

> Hillary is a disgusting pig and she will pay by losing her Senateorial seat since she threw the election for McCain!

are completely uncalled for.

by PSockNerd 2008-06-04 04:07PM | 0 recs
Message control...

...she's got to start reminding her supporters there's a general election going on, we have a nominee, and her ideals are far closer to Obama's than they are to McCain's.

by Firewall 2008-06-04 12:14PM | 0 recs
she has said that

almost word for word for the last two months.

by sepulvedaj3 2008-06-04 12:24PM | 0 recs
No, she hasn't.

She needs to concede. Officially. Then she needs to get behind the nominee of the Democratic party, and urge her supporters to do the same.

by Firewall 2008-06-04 12:27PM | 0 recs
i was talking about

reminding her supporters that she is closer to Obama than mccain.

He has been the nominee for 1 full day.  What is your rush

by sepulvedaj3 2008-06-04 12:32PM | 0 recs
Re: i was talking about

How many days does a Democrat have to be the nominee of the Democratic party before being recognized as the nominee by his closest competitor?

A week? A month? An hour before election day?

by Firewall 2008-06-04 12:34PM | 0 recs
Re: i was talking about

Well, unlike you I do not begrudge Sen. Clinton a day or two to regroup with her supporters. I say let her and her passionate supporters have a moment to mourn their loss in a close and spirited contest.

When she does deliver a heart-felt, eloquent ode to Sen.Obama with a full-fledged endorsement, it will be that much more effective.

by wolff109 2008-06-04 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: i was talking about

I actually don't mind if she doesn't say "I endorse Obama" I just want her to officially "suspend" (not even end) her campaign and order her campaign surrogates to back the fuck off.

by MNPundit 2008-06-04 12:55PM | 0 recs
Re: i was talking about

That's the key.  I'm with you in not begrudging her a couple of days to rally her supporters, soften the blow, work on rehabilitating her reputation (which has been shockingly tarnished by spin despite as impressive a showing a showing as anyone who's ever come up short).

But too many Obama supporters have begrudged her everything all along.  Now is the time for them to chill, to show the Clinton die-hards that they respect her candidacy and that they afford her the same respect and the same opportunity for a graceful exit (rather than humiliating surrounding) that any worthy, important, and needed short-term adversary/long-term ally should be afforded.

So I'm with you -- just chill out and give her a couple of days to sort it all out.  

Because ultimately, it will work out if people just chill.

by dcg2 2008-06-04 01:08PM | 0 recs
exactly

If it looks like she is being forced, it will piss off a lot of her passionate supporters.

by sepulvedaj3 2008-06-04 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: exactly

Good point.  Exactly like how Obama people are trying to say that it if it looks like Obama is being forced into picking him as VP, he can't do it (not that he'll do it anyway, since he's probably convinced himself that the right wing caricature of her was actually correct).  

But it goes both way.  These are two powerful and ambitious and egotistical politicians with a great desire to do right by people and a huge, roughly equal base of support.  Neither will ever do anything if it looks to the world like they are being forced into it.  That's just how politicians are.

by dcg2 2008-06-04 01:59PM | 0 recs
She won the election

Why should she concede officially?  Or unofficially?

THE VOTERS HAVE DECIDED.

The delegates are under intimidation, and thinking about their professional future.
This is EXACTLY WHY voting is secret.

Two states were hatcheted under the pretense
of "Punishment"  Who was punished?  Not the
republicans responsible for moving the elections.
DNC cannot punish democratic voters for something
they had no control over.

This is a thrown election.

by layer cake 2008-06-04 02:33PM | 0 recs
Re: i was talking about

I think she should be given a little time but I'm not sure why I feel that way.  Maybe because of the length of the campaign or the fact that she lost by so little.  Still, if you look at the way most campaigns end, the loser steps up the night of the election and congratulates the winner.  It does look bad that she couldn't find it in her to do so.

Maybe I'm giving her that grace period in my mind because she's female.  Which is sexist but I'm giving her something rather than taking it away so perhaps that's OK.  

I'm so confused.  I just want her come around so we can all be one big happy family again!

by SpanishFly 2008-06-04 01:23PM | 0 recs
When the entire primary was hijacked

from democratic voters, how can you possibly expect there every to be unity again.

This party is now reduced to the splinter group that threw this for Obama.

They'll blame and point fingers at everyone but themselves.

Obama will lose, and they'll blame Clinton.  Not themselves.

Do you know how long it took the southern states to come back to the party after the states were over-run? The cause was just, but because of the manner things were done, you will never get those states back again.

Now you've just told over half they party their votes don't count.  The claim is these Hillary supporters are slope foreheaded zeros.  Maybe people claiming this don't know where progressive Paul Krugman teaches.  Or the Ivy League college my neighbor graduated from with double honors.

You think you're going to shove a moon in these people's faces and they're going to dog whistle right back to help you out.

by layer cake 2008-06-04 02:38PM | 0 recs
perhaps...

if that was true.  i'd strongly suggest that you had unrealistic expectations and have wrongly interpreted the results before you.  perhaps a little hyperbolic, as well...

by bored now 2008-06-04 03:38PM | 0 recs
Re: No, she hasn't.

Slow down... let her collect some donations to pay down the debt.  Let her supporters heal a little.

Confirmation is not until the convention...

So long as they all stay positive towards each other - there is no need to concede or free her delegates.

by snolan 2008-06-04 12:48PM | 0 recs
here, here...

by bored now 2008-06-04 01:21PM | 0 recs
You don't heal from a thrown election

Ever.

by layer cake 2008-06-04 02:40PM | 0 recs
Re: No, she hasn't.

i concur

by edparrot 2008-06-04 01:34PM | 0 recs
bullshit...

she is behind the nominee.  and it won't matter if she urges her supporters to get behind barack this minute, because they are still mad as hell.  nothing she says will change that -- right now.

we need her to be supportive when everyone has calmed down.  the impatience for hillary to concede or do what you want only confirms the validity of her supporter's suspicion here.  hillary doesn't have to do anything she doesn't want to.  but it's best for obama if she's seen as wanting to do what she ends up doing...

by bored now 2008-06-04 01:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Message control...

I don't give a fuck what Hillary say's, I vote my conscience, always have, always will, and right now my vote will probably be for Edwards/Kucinuch, or maybe Hillary, but I will not vote for Obama.

by muggle 2008-06-04 10:41PM | 0 recs
This in my mind is more important than

a real endorsement right now because it softens the animosity towards Obama that some of her supporters have.  I hope she continues to do this for a week or two before she drops out as it will make her supporters think more kindly of Obama.

by Student Guy 2008-06-04 12:14PM | 0 recs
Re: This in my mind is more important than

She should continue running for weeks after having lost the nomination? How does that make any sense?

She should have been speaking like she did today at least 2 or 3 weeks ago.  When it became clear after Indiana and North Carolina, she should have completely changed the tone and demeanor of her campaign instead of waiting until he technically clinched the nomination.  

Her speech last night did nothing to soften her ardent supporters opinion of Obama. In fact, it further enraged them by continuing the play the disenfranchisement card and only served to make herself seem more important.  Any chance she had at being VP was probably lost during her speech last night, and whatever chance remains diminishes every hour she continues this charade.

by KevinT 2008-06-04 12:44PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

She better help Clyburn... He's getting hate calls from supposed Hillary supporters:

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/04/ clyburn-clinton-supporters-flood-office- with-hate-calls/

Other than a few Taylor Marsh types, I'm convinced that most of these are Republican Operation chaos trolls who have an easy excuse to be racist.  I don't believe that these trolls are true Hillary suppporters.

Hillary needs to step up to the plate and denounce these trolls masquerading as her supporters.

by LordMike 2008-06-04 12:14PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I wish I could agree, but I know of a few (gotta be unfortunately vague here, sorry) but some pretty well-known state party figures in a state  I live in who have been firing off letters to the national GOP on office stationairy that are truly repellant in their anti-Obama nature, and embarrassing in their pro-Hillary delusion. Remember that woman from that Firedoglake clip? Think of it more like a bluetooth virus.

by Lettuce 2008-06-04 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Clyburn was one of Hillary's greatest liabilities in the later stage of her fight for the South.

Despite his vows of allegiance to Hillary's campaign, his faint praise and quick denunciation on the bogus race card played on Bill for the Jesse Jackson comment in South Carolina told Clinton supporters all they needed to know about him, and his quick condemnation of her innocent RFK remarks in May confirmed it.

The Obamas got to him, the Black Caucus probably stormed his office and demanded he back Obama, and his turncoat performance yesterday was a foregone conclusion.

I certainly do not agree with callers who according to him called him racist names on the phone, but in a political sense, to Clinton supporters, this man did us very wrong.

by dembluestates 2008-06-04 01:01PM | 0 recs
Easy does it

Demoninzing the Black Caucus isn't going to win any battles here.

I mean, there's already rumors being circulated that the Black Caucus is going to lean on a future President Obama to start enforcing reparations for slavery.

Toning down rhetoric all around might be a good idea.

by Dracomicron 2008-06-04 01:14PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Well, Stephanie Tubbs Jones did OH-11 very, very wrong... not for endorsing Hillary, or chairing her Ohio campaign.  She was extremely demeaning and belittled Obama mercilessly, even though her district voted 80% for him.

She could have supported her without demeaning him, but she chose the latter.

So, it looks like we've both got some grudges with our African American politicians.

by LordMike 2008-06-04 01:21PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Clyburn NEVER vowed allegiance to the Clinton campaign.

He claimed he was neutral while labeling the Clintons racists.

Screw Clyburn. What goes around comes around.

This is the universe's way of giving back the poison that he put out there.

by feelfree 2008-06-04 03:38PM | 0 recs
Clyburg was PATHETIC for claiming that Clinton

was deliberately trying to cause Obama to lose the general election.

He was way out of line. He also pretended to be offended at the completely inoffensive remark that Bill Clinton made.

He also said "this is how Bill Clinton pays us back". He then went on to say that blacks saved Bill Clinton during the whole Monica thing.

So, I guess the Clinton's should have quit months ago and kissed Obama's hand as he PLAYED THE RACE CARD on them.

What has been said about the former president and first lady by various DEMOCRATIC LEADERS, especially Clyburg is not forgivable.

You can vote for Obama if you want but I sure won't reward someone for race-bating. He is a race-bator and the only two pastors from his church of 20 years are race-bators. So, it makes you go hmmm.

by mmorang 2008-06-04 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Screw the Judas SOB, hope he gets primaried.

by muggle 2008-06-04 10:44PM | 0 recs
Can't wait to hear Hillary say it.

YES WE CAN!

A united Democratic party will steamroll the GOP for years to come.

by spacemanspiff 2008-06-04 12:15PM | 0 recs
I will now be patient

OK I have been impatient, but I have now seen statements from Both Charles Rangel and Gov. Rendell making public statements about the Clintons coming to Obamas side.

These are two of her most vocal and ardent supporters.  They made their statements very publicly.

I am sure that others are making things known privately.  I will now back off for a while and let them treat this as a family issue within the Clinton campaign.  

I have confidence that everything will be worked out by the end of the week.

by monkeyga 2008-06-04 12:18PM | 0 recs
Re: I will now be patient

Patience is good. It makes perfect sense to me that Sen.Clinton would want a day or two -- at least -- to enable her supporters to absorb a very disappointing defeat. It's a lot to ask those who worked so hard and came so close to disregard the fights and ill-will of a spirited contest in which their beloved candidate lost.

Time heals much, and in a day or two, when she finally delivers an eloquent and heart-felt clarion call for Obama, her supporters will be that much more ready to resume the fight against a common foe.

by wolff109 2008-06-04 12:47PM | 0 recs
Re: I will now be patient

I don't get it. How will tomorrow be any different than today? The trajectory of the race has been clear for months.

Last night was a missed opportunity. Can you imagine the power of Democratic unity that could have come out of that if she'd acted as Hilary Rosen suggested? It would have been so powerful, not to mention completely covering those of us who've been cynical about her with egg. Now it will be some announcement at press conference or something? Why will it be any easier tomorrow than today?

by RickTaylor 2008-06-04 01:00PM | 0 recs
time is a wonderful healer...

even if the trajectory was obvious to you and me, that doesn't mean that the other side wasn't invested in their own trajectory.  hillary was winning, yada yada -- they had their own rationale.  let's not pretend that our's was the only valid one...

by bored now 2008-06-04 01:22PM | 0 recs
Rosen

I think some things could have been handled differently last night as Rosen suggests, but for now I will be patient and let Rendell and Rangel and a few others have their talks with Clinton.  I am sure they are all talking right now.  I don't want to rehash what happened (or didnt) last night

I do beleive that the situation is being made worse by that national media that wants to see a divided party.  I also beleive that there are people who are part of 'Operation Chaos' trying to make things worse and stir up anger.

Again, I state that I have confidence that we will be a happy family by this weekend.

by monkeyga 2008-06-04 01:26PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Sounds promising.  I would think her doing this a little more publically would go a long way in unifying the party.

by rf7777 2008-06-04 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

she's got about 3 days. then she becomes irrelevant if she doesn't give the speech.

by Metrobot 2008-06-04 12:19PM | 0 recs
and since when

do you hold the clock?

by sepulvedaj3 2008-06-04 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: and since when

since i decided my opinion rocks!

by Metrobot 2008-06-04 12:38PM | 0 recs
There are no more contests

Last night was the perfect time to be gracious.

The media will not be seeking her out daily asking her opinion. If she thinks that, she's in for a rude awakening.

Each day she fails to endorse the nominee, her influence and relevancy wanes.

by BentLiberal 2008-06-04 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: There are no more contests
Considering how hungry the MSM is for controversy and how much they love to bash Clinton (I'm looking at you MSNBC) I would have to say that you are so wrong it isn't even funny.
In what dimension would CNN, FOX, MSNBC, et. al, not be in a feeding frenzy with a constant Hillary watch if it looked like she was going to take this to the convention? It sure as hell wouldn't be the one we all live in.
I know most Obama supporters would like to think that she is going to soon be irrelevant but that is just wishful thinking I;m afraid.
by big poppa smurf 2008-06-04 01:41PM | 0 recs
Yes: they's like to see he destroy Dem Party

Question is: why would you? And why would she?

by BentLiberal 2008-06-04 02:15PM | 0 recs
Re: and since when

seems like Hill agrees with me. My opinion does rock!!

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/6/4/18482 8/9820#commenttop

by Metrobot 2008-06-04 04:03PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Oh, wow, I can't even begin to describe the relief I feel about this statement.

Please, please let it mean that she's begun to slowly walk things back to heal the party.  

by bosdcla14 2008-06-04 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I'd disagree that her "having his back" being "more important" than endorsements.

It's like giving her credit for not being destructive -- which really is what we're doing here. She had an opportunity to ding him -- and she didn't take it, and instead said what we'd expect anyone to say of just about any American leader. What major American leader outside the fringe ISN'T a friend to Isreal? What major American leader who'd want to be president isn't CLEARLY a public friend to Israel?

This isn't a distinction without a difference. I'm not satisfied with congratulating Hillary for not punching Obama in the face each time the opportunity arises. Each day she's out there like this, she takes the spotlight off our chances for November, and hurts her own chances to make a credible case for herself to be Veep.

by Lettuce 2008-06-04 12:20PM | 0 recs
LMFAO @ ^. Sorry, best I could do in response. nt

by PJ Jefferson 2008-06-04 12:22PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Lettuce,

I watched both speeches. From what I saw, she offered up her support of Obama unsolicited. There was no context or need to even mention Obama. Her doing so was a clear signal of her support for the nominee, in an area where he has had trouble and where her own bona fides are impeccable.

I believe action speaks louder than words. Her actions were effective and valuable, and would be better than a hollow homage of lip service. This shows that when she officially endorses Obama it will continue to mean something substantive. She will be an important ally.

by wolff109 2008-06-04 12:40PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

She has more credibility regarding Obama as an opponent than as a surrogate. It makes sense to use this period before she concedes, should she do so, to effectively argue in support of Obama to potentially hostile audiences.

Once she concedes, or if she endorses Obama, I will be less interested in what she says about Obama than in how Obama explains himself.

by souvarine 2008-06-04 01:06PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I think she's delaying endorsement to give her supporters a little time to come around to the reality of the situation.  In the meantime, she's actively positive about Barack Obama and her supporters are picking up on that tone and (hopefully) beginning to adopt it.  

I think in a few days or a week the vast majority of us will be able to get behind her coming endorsement, and we'll do it with enthusiasm.  But it's a lot to ask of us today.

by mtnspirit 2008-06-04 12:23PM | 0 recs
I knew she would.

Despite all the things have angered me in this primary campaign, she is a true blue Democrat.  She is going to fight for Obama as the nominee and that is to her credit.

We are lucky to have her as an ally.

by you like it 2008-06-04 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

About a week ago Obama's campaign and many of his supporters were arguing, with a straight face, that Hillary wanted Obama to be assassinated.  I'd say screw 'em all if I were her.  How does she know he will be a friend to Israel?  What has he done (not just said) to prove this?  But, I digress...

I'll vote for the Democratic nominee, but I'm keeping my money to myself.

by BRockNYC 2008-06-04 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

TR'ed for the sig alone.

Please provide a quote from the Obama campaign that said that Hillary wanted Obama to be assassinated.  

by ChrisKaty 2008-06-04 01:32PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Hey BRockNYC, I see you took the time to TR me back (hey mods, TR abuse?), but couldn't answer my question.

Telling.

by ChrisKaty 2008-06-04 02:33PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Ha!  yes, call the admins.  you think your TR was justified?

As I recall Mr. Axelrod himself made a statement saying something like, "these comments have no place in this campaign."  and the MSM troll reporters that prop Obama up confirmed that the Obama campaign was pushing the story to their blackberries.  Just as they did with the Ferraro "story".

by BRockNYC 2008-06-04 06:10PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

This is encouraging.

I will be patient.  I'm not kidding when I say that.  I will calm myself and let it ride.

That will last for a few days.  That should be more than enough time for them to work this out.

by Reaper0Bot0 2008-06-04 12:26PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Or you'll do what?  Not vote for her?

by dembluestates 2008-06-04 01:04PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I watched the AIPAC speeches. Obama was excellent. But Hillary was just outstanding. She was great, and showed the world why she has such passionate support. Her knowledge and command of the issues, her ability to speak to them with force and passion, and her staunch advocacy was something to behold.

Then, when she launched her pro-Obama message, I stood up clapping.

It is truly great to be once again on the same team as Sen. Clinton.

McCain's in deep, deep trouble.

by wolff109 2008-06-04 12:33PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

it is so nice to read such an acknowledgement of clinton's strengths among all these other posts that seem to deny that she has any.

by california voter 2008-06-04 01:04PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

at this point, it doesn't matter how or if she ever concedes to me (although it will matter to Obama how persuasive she is in getting her supporters to support him).

My wish at this point is to move beyond Hillary dominating the headlines and headlong into the GE discourse sooner then later.

Our focus needs to be on beating mcCain.

by alex100 2008-06-04 12:36PM | 0 recs
yes, she's approaching irrelevancy

each day she stubbornly clings to fighting him in Denver makes her more irrelevant.

by BentLiberal 2008-06-04 12:42PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I am not going to follow her if she endorses Obama. She is a politician and she has to do certain things, I am not and I will freely excerise my independence. I'm just glad I have never donated money to the DNC because I would not want it spent on behalf of Obama.

by bsavage 2008-06-04 12:38PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

by NeverNude 2008-06-04 12:47PM | 0 recs
Rezko jury verdict

to be announced at 3:45 Chicago time (4:45 in the east, I guess)

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko /984453,rezkoverdict060408.article

by katmandu1 2008-06-04 12:40PM | 0 recs
Todd, if you're reading,

here's a textbook example of the stuff you'd expect to be cleared out of a site promoting the election of the Democratic nominee to the White House.

by Firewall 2008-06-04 12:43PM | 0 recs
HRC's leverage is waning by the day

She assumes she has a great deal of power and sway.

But what she doesn't realize is that each day that goes by with her stubbornly clinging to fighitng Obama in Denver adds to her irrelevancy.

That's right: if she doesn't find the light soon, she will be irrelevent.

We'll be forced to do it without her.

by BentLiberal 2008-06-04 12:41PM | 0 recs
Patience, please! She's no longer fighting.

But that's not what she's doing. She has no intention of taking a fight to Denver. Her actions the past 24 hours are clear: she has made strong statements in favor of Sen. Obama.

The only thing she hasn't done is given a concession speech endorsing Obama. But why the rush?

I have no problem with giving her and her supporters some time to gather their thoughts. She'll give a great speech endorsing Obama, then we'll all be happy.

by wolff109 2008-06-04 12:58PM | 0 recs
Re: Patience, please! She's no longer fighting.

Every time she casts the shadow of illigitimacy on Obama's win by invoking her specious "popular vote" meme, she's fighting.  Every time she doesn't discourage chants of "Denver!" she's fighting.  Every day she doesn't endorse our nominee she's fighting.

She and her supporters have had since mid-February to deal with the fact that she probably was going to lose.  Keeping herself in the spotlight on the day that Obama's won our nomination is nothing but self-aggrandizement, and it's harmful the Party coming together.

by ChrisKaty 2008-06-04 01:35PM | 0 recs
bullshit...

(again).  hillary's leverage is not time-sensitive.  she brings considerable assets (and liabilities), but it's downright stupid to think that she is losing her leverage.  i don't want her on the ticket (my own preference), but i won't discount that she's got considerable leverage in the party...

by bored now 2008-06-04 01:27PM | 0 recs
She's not trying to Help Obama

Only herself.

If she were tryihg to help Obama, she would've done so last night, when it really would've meant something.

Not conceding last night, shows that her top priority is herself: faint hopes for her running this election and more hopes of undercutting Obama to position herself for 2012.

by BentLiberal 2008-06-04 02:21PM | 0 recs
yeah, yeah, yeah...

get over it...

by bored now 2008-06-04 03:39PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Hillary must continue on the Denver, because obama is vulnerable.  You folks who choose to ignore that obama is racist (whitey, no make that "why'd he"), that he has too much baggage to ever get elected, and he is involved with people who are in and who will soon be in jail, will get a real eye opener soon from the repuglies.  obama's chances of ever becoming president are in my opinion near zero.  

At the beginning of the primary season I kept an open mind as to whom I wanted as the nominee.  obama has done nothing to convince me he is the better candidate.  Perhaps once he is the nominee he can convince me he is the better candidate, but it better be something better that the tripe he has been spouting, or that he is the Democrat and therefore I must vote for him.  I'll never vote for McInane, but at this point I won't vote for obama, as I don't think he is worth of the presidency.  

Please don't bother laying hate on me for my opinion, I won't be back to this thread.  

by jimbo 2008-06-04 12:41PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

that's courageous.  come on here, spew hatred at the presumptive nominee, and then take your marbles and go home.

by writerswrite 2008-06-04 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

What do you mean perhaps he can convince you he is the better candidate?  You mean better than McCain?    You probably didn't mean that, since you say you won't vote for McCain, so I'm confused.  At this point, it is essentially down to two candidates.

I fully support someone who dislikes both candidates enough to vote for neither, as long as that person honestly believes that the details of what a McCain presidency would be like are not enough worse than those of an Obama presidency to pick the lesser of two evils.  If you can honestly say that overturning Roe Vs. Wade, the continued deterioration of the healthcare system, and no change of approach in Iraq is no worse than what Obama would do, I can only assume you never supported Hillary Clinton, either.

by edparrot 2008-06-04 02:12PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

sweet like candy.

by alyssa chaos 2008-06-04 12:54PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I realize that I'm being really nit-picky here, but would it have killed her to say President Obama will be a friend of Israel?

by Dan Conley 2008-06-04 01:01PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

Yea, you're being nit-picky.

Obama has not even been officially confirmed as the Dem nominee yet, and won't be until Denver.

by dembluestates 2008-06-04 01:06PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

So what's your point -- you think SHE'S going to be President?

by Dan Conley 2008-06-04 01:11PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

I was encouraged by Hillary's comments today.  I hope that she'll move her endorsement from tacit to public and enthusiastic, but I understand that she might need a few days to get there.  The main thing for all of us now is to remember that we really do share many of the same ideals.  Ultimately, Obama and Clinton have more in common than these primaries have led us to believe.  

by writerswrite 2008-06-04 01:07PM | 0 recs
She has missed the boat

For months now they have been showing her to be the likely loser.  She has had far too long to adjust and arrive at this moment with grace and historical poise.  She has remained difiant and offered up a luke warm tone.  Obama, in his speech, was infinitely more complimentary and expansive when talking about Hillary.  The world was watching on Tues. night.  Instead she gave the Bronx cheer.  She lingered on her strengths, her perceived victories, and touted how she had more of the popular vote.  NOTHING new.  And frankly distorted.  This moment was not sprung on her.  It was well orchestrated and she chose to fumble.  Watch the two speeches, side by side, and you see why we are looking at this outcome.  As Hillary opined, the important question is "what does Hillary want?  What does Hillary want?"  

by SovSov 2008-06-04 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: She has missed the boat

Just like I never hear Obama say how great it would be to elect a black President and Hillary talks incessantly about how great it would be to elect a woman -- Obama rarely talks about himself, but Hillary can't stop talking about herself.  What does Hillary want?  Who the f- cares?  Might as well as what does Chris Dodd want, he lost the nomination too.

by Dan Conley 2008-06-04 01:13PM | 0 recs
i may not be normal...

but hillary should do what she wants in the time frame she needs.  hell, given the fact that many of her supporters are pushing her hard to abandon the democratic party (i'd bet we even have people who want her to run as mccain's veep), i'm grateful that she's stated a commitment to the democratic party -- even if it won't be her democratic party...

by bored now 2008-06-04 01:14PM | 0 recs
what she could have done!

She could have come out like gang busters.  Talking about how we have heard from all the voters and we have the most historical of moments.  We have had a spirited fight between a woman and a man of color.  Something we only see in movies which take place in 2056.  While she lost she is so proud of her party, her supporters, and most importantly the NEW DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE - OBAMA.  She could have talked about all the fantastic things he will do and detail their collective great moments during the campaign.  She could have talked about how lucky we are to have such a great candidate, and a unified organization against the republican party.  She could have sounded like a fantastic band opening up for the star attraction...Obama's soon to come speech.  She would have shut us all up and made us feel like asses for not trusting her motives.  Instead we got barely a nod.  

by SovSov 2008-06-04 01:19PM | 0 recs
and

in three days when she gets off her duff, no one will notice.  she missed her historic chance to open for a very historic moment.  she could have been a deserving part of history and not someone who wouldn't accept it.

by SovSov 2008-06-04 01:22PM | 0 recs
Re: what she could have done!

After a match, win or lose, you shake the opponent's hand before you head to the locker room.

Hillary didn't do that.  Nothing will ever change the fact that this was bad sportsmanship.  It is already cemented in history and nothing can alter it now.

by nocore 2008-06-04 01:44PM | 0 recs
I just want to say

that I came to this site during the primary from DKos, because it was obvious that it was an echo chamber there (and that is not always a bad thing! support for a candidate kinda depends on groupism, since noone is perfect).

I've supported Obama the whole time, and while a part of me has a soft spot for the dream ticket, I realize that that isn't likely. Not so much because of the attacks from both sides, but because of the campaign messages that differ so starkly: change  vs. experience..

Anyways, what I wanted to mention is that I got tears in my eyes yesterday, not just from seeing Obama win, but also seeing the positivity here from front-pagers and other Clinton supporters. It was really special, and I hope that, if the roles had been reversed, I would have been as honorable and gracious. It is a privilege to have supporters like you on board.

Tears in the eyes are just one tiny thing. I cannot wait for huge Dem gains in November, and a truly new direction for the country..

And it starts here, with the awesome Democrats who have been so passionate for Clinton, but are putting their own interests aside for the benefit of the party and, ultimately, so much more.

by amsterdem 2008-06-04 01:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Has His Back

She's had his back for awhile now, albeit inadvertantly.  The race has been way too close for her to even entertaining quitting, even though the media and others have been encouraging her to do so since Iowa! The Obama camp ought to be glad she's been here, because she has served as a protective shield for Obama.  If she had quit earlier, the Republicans would have already torn Obama too shreds.  He's had a little bumpy road with Hillary still in it, but if she were gone Obama would be toast by now.  

by moevaughn 2008-06-04 02:12PM | 0 recs
Re: She Has His Back

 I beleive that there are people who are part of 'Operation Chaos' trying to make things worse and stir up anger.

by anasky123 2008-06-24 10:31PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------