Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I give you two reasons why the Obama campaign probably does, and all Obama supporters should , want Hillary Clinton to continue to campaign for the Democratic nomination:

Suffolk U poll of 600 Likely West Virginia voters, May 10-11, MoE +/- 4%

Hillary Clinton 60
Barack Obama 24

Research 2000 poll of 500 Likely Kentucky voters, May 7-9, MoE +/- 4.5%

Hillary Clinton 58
Barack Obama 31

As The LA Times noted yesterday:

Times political writer Mark Z. Barabak had an interesting conversation with Tad Devine, a Democratic strategist not involved with a candidate this time. Counterintuitively, the way he sees the inevitable delegate math in favor of Barack Obama, the worst thing that could happen to the Illinois senator now is what so many party members are clamoring for: Hillary Rodham Clinton to drop out.

Why?

Because with her name still on the ballots, she'd be very likely to win in West Virginia anyway. And maybe Kentucky too, given the demographics in both places. And possibly Puerto Rico as well.

How would that look if at the end of the Democratic race the winning candidate with clearly the most delegates and popular votes went down to defeat against a candidate who isn't in the contest anymore?

Tags: 2008 Presidential election, Barack Obama, Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton (all tags)

Comments

207 Comments

Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Agreed - it's better for him for her to stay.

by Falsehood 2008-05-12 12:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Clarification: So long as Clinton and Obama refrain from willful polarization of the party.

by Falsehood 2008-05-12 12:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I agree with both.  

John Edwards expressed it well on Face the Nation:

by TomP 2008-05-12 12:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Here's why Clinton should stay in:

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Compared to Obama

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 12:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

PREACH IT!

Another agonizing close loss?

I don't think so.

by Zeitgeist9000 2008-05-12 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I refuse to join losing former presidential candidates -- Kerry, Kennedy, Richardson, Dodd and Carter -- in endorsing another loser.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 12:41PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Meh. These polls change.  Hillary isn't free of glaring negatives herself.

by mikeinsf 2008-05-12 01:17PM | 0 recs
facts suck for Obama

so avoid them?

The fact is that these EC maps have had Obama losing consistently for months and Hillary winning.  

by TeresaInPa 2008-05-13 03:27AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

"I refuse to join losing former presidential candidates -- Kerry, Kennedy, Richardson, Dodd and Carter -- in endorsing another loser."

WTF!!??!?!

hey KNOWVox !!!????!?! NEWS FLASH  You backed HRC  Guess what she is another loser so there!!!!

by wellinformed 2008-05-12 01:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Newsflash: Obama doesn't have the votes to put this away, either, and he's going to get his butt kicked tomorrow in KY and W VA.

I support the only candidate who can win in November --Hillary Clinton.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

How can Hillary Clinton win in November when she isn't even going to be on the ballot?

That's like saying that I'd be making $500K next year if I had only gotten that $500K per year job I applied for.

Hillary can't win in November.  She's not going to be on the ballot, so therefore she can't win.

Coulda, woulda, shoulda means zilch right now.  I think Howard Dean coulda won in November 2004.  I don't cry about it because he lost the primaries fair and square, as HRC is about to.

Regarding the original blog post... I agree completely with Todd - PROVIDED that things remain civil and the likely nominee (Obama) isn't trashed by his opponent in the final weeks here.

by Obamaphile 2008-05-12 02:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

How can Hillary Clinton win in November when she isn't even going to be on the ballot?

Where's a copy of the ballot with Obama's name on it?

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Denial, thy name is KnowVox.

by citizensane 2008-05-12 03:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

We are in incredibly new territory here with both our candidates, first AA, first woman.  Bush with lowest ratings in history.  An oldest candidate on the other side.  Tons of new Democratic registrations, and an economy that is getting set to rival the 30s in tank.    

I don't think anything is predictable at this point except that the strongest of the blue states will stay blue and the strongest red, red.  I think the rest of the map can evolve in ways that might surprise us.

by mady 2008-05-12 01:24PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Which is exactly the reason we can't settle for a candidate who refuses to support universal health care and leaves out 15 million, votes "present" on the reproductive rights of women, and will implode once his brief, unproductive political career comes under scrutiny.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Sigh.

by mady 2008-05-12 01:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

That's exactly the response of the 15 million folks Obama neglects in his health care plan -- as well as the women whose reproductive rights he'd compromise in the name of political expediency.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

You DO realize that PP has no problem with his voting record, right?  Do yourself a favor and educate yourself so you stop spreading falsehoods about Obama compromising reproductive rights.

by ChrisKaty 2008-05-12 02:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

You do realize that the Illinois National Organization for Women (NOW) said this about Obama:

During Senator Obama's 2004 senate campaign, the Illinois NOW PAC did not recommend the endorsement of Obama for U.S. Senate because he refused to stand up for a woman's right to choose and repeatedly voted `present' on important legislation.

As a State Senator, Barack Obama voted `present' on seven abortion bills, including a ban on 'partial birth abortion,' two parental notification laws and three 'born alive' bills.  In each case, the right vote was clear, but Senator Obama chose political cover over standing and fighting for his convictions.

"When we needed someone to take a stand, Senator Obama took a pass," said Grabenhofer. "He wasn't there for us then and we don't expect him to be now."

illinoisnow.org

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

And regarding PP:

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: When Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., voted "present," rather than "yes" or "no" on a handful of controversial abortion votes in the Illinois state senate, he did so with the explicit support of the president and CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council.

"We at Planned Parenthood view those as leadership votes," Pam Sutherland, the president and CEO of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, told ABC News. "We worked with him specifically on his strategy.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/ 2007/07/obama-abortion-.html

by ChrisKaty 2008-05-12 03:31PM | 0 recs
Obama on Abortion

N.O.W. in Obama's home state said:

To be clear, voting "present" on those bills was a strategy that IL NOW did not support. At that time, we made it clear to the legislators that we disagreed with the strategy. We wanted legislators to take a stand against the harmful anti-choice bills being brought to the floor of the Illinois State Senate.

Voting "present" does not demonstrate leadership and does not send the clarion signal that one is unwavering in their support of a woman's right to choose. IL NOW knew that those bills were unacceptable to women..... Senator Obama... has not taken leadership on the issue at the same level that Hillary has.

[Obama supporters] assert that the strategy to vote "present" was devised to give political cover to legislators in conservative districts. State Senator Barack Obama did not represent a conservative district and he could have voted "no" with little negative consequence in his district.

www.illinoisnow.org

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 03:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

it's an important point, Americans want change and it would be the best time to go for the best changes we can get.  Barack once wanted single payer and in his heart he may still.  We won't get there until the insurance companies make normal profits, not obscene profits and that's from all of us being insurance, no one being denied, and the insurance all being comprehensive. Barack's plan is cheaper because there can be those high deductibles and co-payments that make insurance affordable only if you never use it.  it is the urgency of now.  Knowvox is right on this.

by anna shane 2008-05-12 03:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

That's one cherry-picked statistical analysis. There are dozens out there, each saying different things.

by KyleJRM 2008-05-12 12:47PM | 0 recs
nope

this is an average of all the polls. Just look at the counters on mydd.  Obama has been losing the EC vote for MONTHS.

by TeresaInPa 2008-05-13 03:31AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't get it. You think that's representative of what it'll be like 6 months from now or something?

by RLMcCauley 2008-05-12 12:54PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

The idea that McCain is going to win Michigan is ridiculous.  Truly.  Not in a million years.

by Lawyerish 2008-05-12 01:00PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

That's not what the evidence suggests:

Michigan: McCain Leads Obama, Tied with Clinton

Michigan has voted Democratic in the last four Presidential elections. The 5 before that they went Republican. Now they are considered a swing state. The results of the latest Rasmussen poll show McCain and Clinton tied at 44% and McCain leading Obama 45 to 44%.

In the McCain/Obama match up, 6% said they would vote for a different candidate and 5% are uncertain. In the McCain/Clinton match up 9% said they would vote for another candidate and 4% are uncertain. McCain does better in Michigan than the current President who gets a 54% disapproval rating and a 32% good or excellent one.

What about the all important cross over vote? In the McCain/Clinton match up, McCain would get 10% of the Democratic voters and Clinton would get 12 % of the Republican.. With the independent voters, McCain would get 58%, Clinton 30%. In the McCain/Obama match up, McCain would get 17% of the Democratic vote and Obama would get 11% of the Republican. With the independents, McCain would get 50% and Obama 37%. Clinton does much better against McCain with Republicans and Independents than Obama and that is what makes the difference in the match ups. They are pretty close with the Democratic voters, but Clinton comes out in the lead here too getting 74% to Obama's 70%.

http://www.politicallore.com/election-20 08/michigan-mccain-leads-obama-tied-with -clinton/285

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

if you think these polls will stick for six months?

by obamaovermccain 2008-05-12 01:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Once the Rehug swiftboat machine gives Obama the once over, it will be much worse.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

so you choose your candidate out of fear of the right wing?

Yikes.  That is how we ended up with Kerry in the first place...

by gil44 2008-05-12 01:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

No, I don't fear the rightwing. I fear Obama's political inexperience and vulnerability in the GE.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

And yet, with all this experience and stuff that you claim Hillary has over Obama, she lost to him. Odd that.

by elvigy 2008-05-12 01:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Um, he hasn't won, and she hasn't lost.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

So if that happens, you'll concede the point?

I doubt that - what argument are you actually making?

by Falsehood 2008-05-12 03:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Worse for McCain, you mean.  Their attack machine isn't going to work on him in the slightest.

I just can't understand why we have such wussies as yourself in the Dem party.  I mean, you sound afraid of the Republicans.  I'm not afraid of them and you shouldn't be either.

by Lawyerish 2008-05-12 01:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I can't understand why many Obama supporters are such wusses that they expect everyone who disagrees with them to fall down and play dead. McCain won't cave and neither will Hillary. Get used to the Majors.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:40PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Check the scoreboard wuss.

by brimur 2008-05-12 01:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I did, and the game ain't over.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

No, but she's down 28 points, Obama's got possession, and there's 6 seconds left on the clock.

by Reaper0Bot0 2008-05-12 02:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Commentators said the same thing about Kansas, and they walked away with the NCAA Championship.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I respect your support for your candidate, but to maintain credibility you should acknowledge the quite unique difficulty of her position. I'm not one of those Obama supporters who thinks she should withdraw. None of my damn business. But it doesn't mean she's any more likely to win.

by brimur 2008-05-12 09:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

This doesn't even make sense.

by Lawyerish 2008-05-12 02:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Lots of things don't make sense to lawyers.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:22PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Hahahahahaha. That's your best evidence? Do you know what statistical signficance is? You're talking about a 1 point difference in a poll with a margin of error of at least 4 times that. Man, do you need to learn something about polling.

by brimur 2008-05-12 01:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

That's the most recent data. But feel free to show me where and how Obama kicks butt in Michigan.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

The same poll. McCain is leading by 1 point with all the shit flying in this primary? He's in trouble.

by brimur 2008-05-12 02:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Are you kidding? McCain hasn't even begun to attack Obama.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

And Obama hasn't begun to attack McCain, wuss.

by brimur 2008-05-12 05:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Really? LOL

by KnowVox 2008-05-13 10:45AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Know Vox,

Get off your f-ing high horse and quite trying to dominate this thread. Here is the latest from pollster.com
Michigan
McCain +0.4% over Obama
McCain +1.5% over Clinton
http://www.pollster.com/

And by the way, Obama is leading McCain again in PA.

http://the-independent13.blogspot.com/

by tomanderson13 2008-05-12 05:08PM | 0 recs
lol

that is one poll in one state.  Nice cherry picking.  Look a the EC results and face it, Obama can't win in november and no amount of dreaming about red states is going to change that.  And Obama hasn't even been attacked by the right wing smear machine yet.

by TeresaInPa 2008-05-13 03:38AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Anybody analyzing general election polls for a candidate with an active primary underway has too much time on his or her hands.  The general election polls at this point are meaningless.  Make as many little maps as you like.  

by Headlight 2008-05-12 07:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Amen to that!  Lighten up everyone.  Support your candidate to the end, but "thou shall not bad-mouth a fellow Dem!"  I like her staying in (I was a supporter, now ready to back Obama).  She helps the numbers coming to vote go way up.  Between both candidates, our registrations have exceeded expectations.  This is doom to the Repubs!  Take heart, Hillary supporters, she will prove to be the good Dem she is and she will be out campaigning for Obama and I believe with both Clintons helping, Obama will win states many of you claim he won't.  

Make no mistake, Hillary is a Dem first.  Of course she wants to win, but she doesn't want to hurt the party.  Can you die-hard supporters say the same?  Time to heal.  Get ready to support Obama and reclaim the W.H.!

by citizensane 2008-05-12 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Take heart, Obama supporters! Hillary is going to win this! Obama will then prove to be the good Dem he is and both he and his wife will be out campaigning for Hillary!

But I'm not holding my breath.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 12:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Especially after watching Michelle's performance here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp_7nnIvW JM

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 12:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

You're funny. The person who's winning will be out there supporting the campaign that's proven itself to be inept and unable to manage it's own cash flow. :)

by Yalin 2008-05-12 12:49PM | 0 recs
OK, let's talk about campaign ineptness

From Jake Tapper today:

Obama's Inability to Hire Good Help Rears Its Head ... Again

We started covering Sen. Barack Obama's inability to hire good staffers in June 2007, when he blamed staffers for some opposition research trying to link Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, to outsourcing in India; for injecting some venom in the David Geffen/Hillary Clinton fight; and for missing an event with firefighters in New Hampshire.

In December, we noted again that Obama was blaming the answers on a 1996 questionnaire on a staffer; and was blaming his touring with "cured" ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin (which antagonized gays and lesbians) on bad vetting by his staff.

Those five buck-passing incidents were apparently not enough.

Yesterday, in an interesting New York Times look at Obama's rise in Chicago politics, we learned that in 2004 some Jewish supporters became alarmed to learn that in a questionnaire Obama refrained from denouncing Yasir Arafat, or from expressing strong support for Israel's security fence....

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: OK, let's talk about campaign ineptness

So one incident from 2004, one from 1996 (12 years ago!) and one from 2007? That's inept?

Hillary is $20,000,000 in the hole, has lost a majority of the delegates, superdelegates, states and popular vote. But Obama is inept?

by elvigy 2008-05-12 01:49PM | 0 recs
Re: OK, let's talk about campaign ineptness

Jack Trapper on that site has been so utterly worthless it is not funny.

He had no staff in 1996, what he had was provided by the group whos questionaire it was, before the questionaire was filled out.

some Jewish supporters...became alarmed...
If I got "some" Americans who thought Hillary Clinton was the Antichrist together, would that make it on his blog?

And wasn't Yasir Arafat's death bad for Israel? I mean HAMAS won the last elections.

And the security fence is not even universally accepted in Israel, I think some courts in that country ruled against sections of it, and I read somehwere it is going to end up keeping farmers from fields and livestock from water.

Do you just randomly post garbage from what ever yellow source you find?  Should I go back into news archives from the Clinton Presidency and post news articles from that time? Since Richard Mellon Schaife endorsed Hillary can I go back and get his old stuff about Hillary out?

I would troll rate you if this site didn't have trolls all over it's recommended list these days.

by Tumult 2008-05-12 01:59PM | 0 recs
Re: OK, let's talk about campaign ineptness

Sounds like you've got a beef with Jake. Get used to it. If your guy's our nominee, things will get A LOT worse.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I am a Hillary supporter, but a DEM FIRST.  I am also a realist.  She is losing the nomination.  He is winning it.  You need to go through the stages of loss before you will find your DEM roots: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance.  Me thinks you are still in denial.  Once you've covered the stages, you'll come around and I believe be ready to support Obama.  No?  Then I hope you like McSame.

By the way, you want to talk about spouse's communication errors? "that depends what the definition of "is" is"  "Jesse Jackson won SC too"  You shouldn't go there unless you want to GO there. Those are the little gaffs that make it easier for me to jump on Obama's band wagon.  I am so tired of the Repubs and the press bringing up all of Clintons' foibles. The few of Michele Obama's are refreshing.

by citizensane 2008-05-12 12:53PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Methinks we haven't counted all the votes. And when we do, Hillary will win.

Consider this letter from members of Congress in Swing States:

Pennsylvania was not just a victory for Hillary Clinton. It was also a wake- up call for superdelegates, forcing us to ask ourselves two essential questions: 1) Which candidate can carry the magic 270 electoral votes to win in the fall? 2) Which candidate is most likely to help our fellow Democrats in down-ballot races? We believe the answer to both of these questions is Hillary Clinton.

On the first question, Hillary has shown she can win the all-important battleground states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida even while being outspent. This speaks to her ability to connect with voters we must deliver in the fall, including blue collar Democrats who can sway this election as they have in the past.

On the second question, Hillary has won rural and suburban districts which we as Democrats must carry to maintain our edge in Congress. Of the fifteen districts rated "toss up" by the Cook Political Report, Hillary has now won ten. Of the 20 districts we picked up in 2006 that had gone for President Bush just two years before, Hillary has now won 16. She is strong in the places we must win to hold and expand our majority.

This is a historically close race. The candidates are separated by a mere percentage point or two and the path to victory for each candidate is the same: win in the upcoming states and secure enough pledged and automatic delegates to get to the number required to win the nomination.

+++

We Democrats are justifiably proud of both of our candidates, and if Senator Obama is our Party's nominee, we will enthusiastically support him. But our responsibility is not to choose simply to support the eventual nominee; it is to help select the nominee who is best for our party and best for our country. Our choice is clear: Hillary Clinton is that candidate. We believe she should be your choice as well.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/relea se/view/?id=7597

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I can't question the facts in that unbiased campaign press release. They are unimpeachable.

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It's a letter from Swing state members of Congress.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

3 of the 17 are from New York -- hardly a swing state.  It's been solid blue for decades.  And 3 more are from Texas. . . when's the last time Texas voted for a democrat?  Again, hardly a swing state.     And the rest are all Clinton superdelegates.  Yes, by god, these are people whose independence cannot be questioned!  

by Headlight 2008-05-12 07:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

So, do you really believe what you type? Do you really read that and think "ah, unbiased swing staters without any agenda other than what's best for the party, and maybe no one will notice they are in the tank for Clinton" or do you simply think the first part and don't actually know the second, somehow? Or do you simply know the second part, don't care about the first, and just want to get the spin out as fast and loud as possible?

Just wondering the motivation, here.

by Lettuce 2008-05-13 05:51AM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't agree with you.

But I admire your perseverance.

Polls today don't mean anything.

Hillary was ahead 30 points as early as January and we all

know how that has played out.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Yeppers, Obama thought he had this wrapped up in New Hampshire. And we all know how that played out...

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Simply not true. From the very beginning he was planning and on the ground everywhere. Show one link where anyone, even Obama himself, said that this would be wrapped up in NH.

by elvigy 2008-05-12 01:52PM | 0 recs
Unbelievable!

Were you alive during the primaries?

Virtually every pundit had Clinton with one foot in the grave. "No doubt," they said. "Hillary will lose New Hampshire by eight" they said. "How can she regroup, how will she survive, she is out of money, she will shakeup her team," they said.

At 7:00 AM yesterday morning the news was about the high turnout and how it helped Obama. At noon the news was about election sites running out of ballots and how Clinton's team was planning a shakeup. At 5:00 PM the news was about Clinton skipping Nevada and South Carolina. At 7:00 PM, as the results started coming in with Hillary up, it was just too early to call the race for Obama. At 8:00 PM it was the exit polls that indicated Obama still won. At 9:00 PM we heard that college towns were still out, and Obama would still win.

Funny thing, just after 10:00 PM it was Hillary Clinton, not Barack Obama, giving a victory speech.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:34PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable!

You said Obama thought he had this wrapped up in NH. You provided only a statement that pundits, a notoriously wrongheaded bunch, thought he'd win.

Try again to show where he or his campaign thought that they would wrap things up in NH.

You lose.

by elvigy 2008-05-12 02:42PM | 0 recs
Re: Unbelievable!

Yeah ... Obama thought he'd wrap it up in NH ... that's why he was so prepared on Super Tuesday!!    ;-)

by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle 2008-05-12 05:10PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

As I recall, it played out that he won many more states, votes and delegates than his opponent, surpassed her in superdelegates just in the last 24 hours, raised tons more money while she borrowed tens of millions, and put himself in position to lock down the nomination in 7 days.  

by Headlight 2008-05-12 07:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

"I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah"

... and it's Hillary?

by mikeinsf 2008-05-12 01:19PM | 0 recs
Obama: No Messiah

No, but supporters depicting Obama this way are downright scary:

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:28PM | 0 recs
Creepy !?!?!?!?!?!

I am not even going to ask why you have that picture saved  

WTF?!?!?!?!!

by wellinformed 2008-05-12 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Creepy !?!?!?!?!?!

I don't have it saved. It's up on the net for everyone to see. And there's even more out there that are much more disturbing.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:44PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama: No Messiah

That is weird.

Still, I'm sure he's not the first national figure to have a few fanatics among his supporters(please see: Hillaryis44).  Still most people behind him are sensible, whether you want to believe that or not.

And, speaking of fanatical, there's going to be a time when you're going to have to accept he's going to be the Democratic nominee this year and that, yes, he has a good shot.

by mikeinsf 2008-05-12 01:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama: No Messiah

That is weird. Is that a unicorn in the background? This is just...weird.

by elvigy 2008-05-12 01:55PM | 0 recs
Not a Unicorn

It's the Unity Pony, of course!

by OtherLisa 2008-05-12 03:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Obama: No Messiah

HEY! I have that same picture!

It's in a corner and I light candles and sing hymns while

praying to the messiah!

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 02:15PM | 0 recs
what is that in his hand?

is it money, a tazer?  

by TeresaInPa 2008-05-13 03:44AM | 0 recs
all work and no play make KnowVOX go........

you really are losing it you really think Hillary really has a snowballs chance in Hell !?!?!!?!!!
Her Campaign is in DEBT

there is NO way for her to catch up !!!!

come back to reality

by wellinformed 2008-05-12 01:37PM | 0 recs
Re: Delusions

You're really losing it if you think Obama's got a snowball's chance in hell of beating McCain.

Come back to reality, indeed.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Delusions

KnowVox,  time to come clean about your Dem leanings...  are you a true Dem and want to win the W.H., or are you just a one-candidate fanatic?  Look, I was a Hillary supporter, too, but I looked at the numbers.  Aside from the formal declaration, it's over.

The question is, do you want a Dem in the W. H. or do you want McSame?  Just answer the question.  This is not multiple choice.  If your answer is the first one, then stop bad-mouthing.  You don't have to proclaim your love for Obama, the Dem nominee-to-be, but stop with the negatives!  I have enough faith in Hillary to know that she will be right there campaigning for Obama and helping him.  You need to prepare yourself to jump on this band wagon or hold your negs.  

by citizensane 2008-05-12 03:26PM | 0 recs
Re: Loyalty Oaths

Interesting that when your views are challenged, you resort to demanding loyality oaths. No dice. The Freepers in my state demanded a loyality test, and it's just as outrageous for them as it is for us. (See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news /1874837/posts)

Hillary has EARNED my vote.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Loyalty Oaths

You dodged the question ... he/she didn't ask if Hillary earned your vote in the primary ... you were asked what you'd do in the general if Hillary is not the nominee.

by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle 2008-05-12 05:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Loyalty Oaths

I didn't dodge it at all. I'll vote for the candidate who earns my vote. If you want to see a "dodge" in action, watch the clip of Michelle Obama on whether she's support Clinton in the GE! LOL

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 07:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Is that a recognized organization (since you capitalized it), or just a group of random Congresspeople?

Also, from what I can tell, at least 5 of the 12 members of Congress aren't from swing states at all (TX+NY, specifically).

by ChrisKaty 2008-05-12 02:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

DENIAL!  You're still in stage 1.  It's hard to put your heart and soul into a campaign and come out losing (no, it's not a loss--YET).  I understand that. But it's time to accept reality and get on the winning team (the Dems)!  Just watch, Hillary who has lots more vested in this will end up being gracious and a great team player.  Why don't you start thinking in that direction.... unless you like McSame?

by citizensane 2008-05-12 02:57PM | 0 recs
Oh no...

"You need to go through the stages of loss before you will find your DEM roots: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

Can we please stop with the ad hoc psychology and sociology lessons from the far-left?  

I realize Obama and his supporters have an "explanation" (to put it lightly) for anyone who won't vote for him, but this phenomenon is getting out of control.  

by BPK80 2008-05-12 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh no...
I think that cuts both ways. There have been plenty of psychological analyses from both sides. My favorite being this.

And then, of course, there's that picture KnowVox just posted above.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow 2008-05-12 02:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh no...

I posted the picture in response to the person who asked me if Hillary was my messiah.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 02:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh no...

Vote the way you want, but understand, Obama vs. McSame will be the contest. Do you want another 4 years of crap added to the 8 we just had?  Then adjust your attitude and come to accept the facts.  Obama is winning the nomination.  Continue to bad-mouth him and you sink the Dems chances this election.  There is nothing more that McSame people want than to collect a bunch of quotes from liberal Dems bad-mouthing their own candidate.   How will you all feel if your words against Obama are quoted in an ad for McSame?  That is how every word should be measured before it's put onto a blog for all to see.  We need to think forward and WIN back the W.H., not denigrate ourselves.

by citizensane 2008-05-12 03:02PM | 0 recs
Re: Oh no...

You don't know what my attitude is on the election this fall so I have difficulty accepting your recommendation for an "adjustment."

It's possible my views are, God forbid, nuanced...

by BPK80 2008-05-12 04:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't understand the animosity to Michelle Obama.

The only comparison I can think of is the attacks on Hillary Clinton. Both are smart, savvy, successful women who overcame many obstacles in their lives to get to where they are. Both are indipendent of their husbands, and both were ridiculed for making public speaking gaffes when neither were real public figures prior to the campaign.

As such, when I see Hillary supporters going after Michelle Obama for being outspoken or saying things other than "gosh, I just wuv america and all the kittens in it", joining talk radio, and Malkin-esque bloggers, in ripping her a new one for it, I just scratch my head and cuss quietly to myself.

I mean, how similar was the "proud of America" line to the "baking cookies" line -- both how it played out and how it was used.

Get over it; she's a great person. She's married to the candidate you would rather not have won. You expect her not to defend her husband with the same passion Bill defends his wife? You expect her to shrink and be quiet like Laura Bush or do something really momentous, like hide her campaign-funding finances like Cindy?

I'm not going to say "leave Michelle alone" because I think she can speak well enough for herself, but I hope people realize how petty and ugly it appears.

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 01:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It's only sexist if you speak ill of Hillary.

They can bash Michelle all they want and it's ok.

That's why I read their comments for laughs more than
anything else.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Love you screen name!  Calvin and Hobbes rocks!!

by lockewasright 2008-05-12 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Bill Watterson is a genius.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't understand the animosity to Michelle Obama.

I don't have any "animosity" toward her. I simply supplied the link to a video where she was extremely reluctant to support Hillary Clinton if she were the nominee.

The facts are the facts. It's not an "attack" to tell the truth.

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

You have a point, she's a strong woman, but Hillary never attacks other women and Michelle has had a high level of vitriol for Hillary, she's quite disdainful.  There is a rule with feminists that we often don't like the woman who attacks the other woman. Of course attacking Michelle isn't any better and ought not to be done, except in the context of calling her out on her anti-Hillary rhetoric. Hillary doesn't make personal attacks, she goes after policies and after her famous and feared 'fact checks.'  he's gone after her on her character, and that's what' upset most women, those of us who are upset and don't think she's 'fair game.'  Michelle is even more sarcastic than Barack. She reminds me more of Teresa Kerry than of Hillary. Hillary hasn't time for gossip and personal attacks, she's a busy beaver.  

by anna shane 2008-05-12 03:01PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

You're not holding your breath about Obama campaigning on behalf of Hillary, or, you're not holding your breath about Hillary winning?

Not really clear.

by Reluctantpopstar 2008-05-12 01:27PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

After viewing Michelle Obama's video, does it appear to you she'll be vigorously campaigning for Hillary if she's the nominee?

by KnowVox 2008-05-12 01:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

KnowVox,

Just go ahead and vote for McCain.

BTW, I'm glad to hear you already have a Messiah. So do the Greek Orthodox, Baptists, Lutherans, etc.

What you misunderstand is many Democrats have a different kind of messiah (small m). And he's a political one, not spiritual.

Stop your self-righteousness.

by tomanderson13 2008-05-12 05:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Bingo!

by lockewasright 2008-05-12 01:28PM | 0 recs
stickin' it to the presumptive nominee

Be careful.

A few of the really stubborn Clinton supporters here might actually call for her to drop out now if it actually hurts Obama.

by emptythreatsfarm 2008-05-12 12:22PM | 0 recs
Re: stickin' it to the presumptive nominee

LOL. My cynical political mind was thinking the same few days back. I was wishing Hillary steps down and then we all watch Obama lose with a big margin in WV and Kentucky. No doubt one part of my mind will be happy with that.

But my loyal Dem mind is just wishing that it all ends on a nice note so that we can focus on Nov together. On the night of May 6th, I congratulated everyone I knew for a spirited campaign and said that our common goal is getting the White House back. (though Kennedy did piss me off this week. If he continues, I might just do something to piss him off)

by Sandeep 2008-05-12 12:36PM | 0 recs
Re: stickin' it to the presumptive nominee

For what its worth, I thought Kennedy's remarks were over the line as well.

It's been a strange primary season, hasn't it?

by emptythreatsfarm 2008-05-12 01:59PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It is over after all Americans vote, their votes count and the supers give it to the one term Senator and his kool aid.

The rest is bs.

by gotalife 2008-05-12 12:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I thought the supers were supposed to give it to Hillary? Be consistant in your bitterness!

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 12:15PM | 0 recs
The SuperD's won't need to

..the voters of Oregon will put Obama over the top.

I know, the SuperD's were SUPPOSED to steal it for Clinton. Those Judases!

by rhetoricus 2008-05-12 12:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I guess you're in the Anger phase.

by deminva 2008-05-12 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

They've been in the anger phase since Super Tues. How dare someone try to take the crown from the Queen?!?!?

by danfromny 2008-05-12 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Uh. Hillary wants the supers to give it to her despite her losing...

by RLMcCauley 2008-05-12 12:55PM | 0 recs
actually, at the end of the day

and with michigan and florida, it is likely that Clinton would end up with the lead in the popular vote.

that said, when the supers award it to Obama, as I expect they will, it will be the first time in history the dems nominated someone who didn't also win the popular vote.

Historic election!  You bet, in more ways than one!

by 4justice 2008-05-12 04:52PM | 0 recs
Re: actually, at the end of the day

Are you awarding Obama any votes in MI? Are you counting the caucuses?

Also, show me the part in the DNC rules that talks about the pop vote. I can't find it for the life of me...

by RLMcCauley 2008-05-12 05:51PM | 0 recs
Re: actually, at the end of the day

Hillary only has the popular vote total among the states she won. If you count caucuses and don't count contests that everyone said "won't count" beforehand, you have Obama as the popular vote winner.

by brimur 2008-05-12 06:07PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Well, Huckabee won a few states after McCain was the presumptive nominee...

No one even remembers it now...

It happens all the time... it's not a big deal, really....

She can stay in as long as she wants... She's at least not kneecapping Obama anymore, so it's fine... although the tone of her campaign is still too unseemly for my taste... it's not as bad as it was a few weeks ago...

by LordMike 2008-05-12 12:13PM | 0 recs
He was still in

McCain was assured of victory, but Huckabee was still campaigning.  In other words, the same situation we have now with Obama and Clinton.  So Huckabee winning those states then, would be a parallel to Clinton winning WV and KY now if she is still campaigning.  If she suspends her campaign before WV or KY and then wins them, it would be a different situation than those Huckabee wins.

by cos 2008-05-12 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: He was still in

WV is tomorrow so I doubt her suspending her campaign today would be meaningful.

by RLMcCauley 2008-05-12 12:56PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

How will it look?

Who cares? The beauty of going into "General Election Time" is that the fickle nature of the 24-hour news cycle ceases to matter as much, until, say, September.

It'd be a day of bad press, but so what? Better to avoid it, but if Hillary wins the better half of West Virginia's 28 delegates, and tries painting this as some sort of game changer -- and the press goes along -- that's worse. And significantly more annoying.

But the time is really for getting down to brass tacks, going after McCain and building the infrastructure needed to drown the GOP in some kind of positive, pro-Democratic tidal wave.

And honestly, that's the reason I'd like to see Hillary stay in for a bit. Just so that all the states get the deep loving that comes from these late primaries -- and all the grassroots building that comes from it.

I'd hate to see that aid the delusion though. Politico has the Clinton campaign suggesting some 80-20 or 90-10 win in the offing -- something I think should be taken with a grain of salt. As most of things from the Clinton camp at this point.

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 12:14PM | 0 recs
I don't agree with this point at all

Huckabee won Kansas and the media didn't peep.

Clinton wins WV and she will spin it as the voice of the white working class vote, rather than a more complex question of regional and cultural identity in Appalachia- a narrative that the media will likely perpetuate.

The spin of a W.V. loss is more harmful to Obama with Clinton still contesting the nomination than it would be with her having conceded.

When Hillary stops making the media concentrate on each contest, the media will shift to general election mode.

by Casuist 2008-05-12 12:16PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't agree with this point at all

Well John McCain won the Republican Nomination and the media didn't say a peep

by cardboard 1 2008-05-12 12:20PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't agree with this point at all

But I don't know what the media will focus in on, beyond the race message. There's no suspense, so coverage will last, at best, the hour after polls close. And yeah, they'll be rehashing the race comments ad nauseum. Just so long as no one in the Clinton camp goes that way themselves. If they do, I mean if there's a real effort that's taken seriously to put more weight on West Virginia than it deserves as a state offering 28 delegates, then there's a problem, and I'd hope the remaining supers pick up the pace.

So much of "whether this matters" depends on how much grace and class Hillary shows.

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 12:20PM | 0 recs
McCain got 17% in WV

in their first round of balloting on Super Tuesday, and 1% in the second round, behind Romney and the winner, Huckabee.

Yup, as goes WV, so goes the nation.

(PS, if Huck's still on the ballot, who'd like to bet he'll win again on Tues?)

by rhetoricus 2008-05-12 12:19PM | 0 recs
I don't care what Obama wants

As long as no one can produce a list of 2025 or 2209  delegates (if you view this as a 48 vs a 50-state contest), Hillary is still in the contest.  If the superdelegates were as "decisive" as the media elite, they would also have come out of the shadows and publicly declared for Obama, thus ending this race for good.  But as we can see, there are still a significant number of superdelegates who have chosen to remain either "undecided" or worse, "undeclared" (like the spineless Donna Brazile).  They have their reasons, but they also know that by withholding their vote is also "destroying" the unity and the very fabric of the Democratic Party, as Gene Robinson, Frank Rich, and his entitled cohorts claim.

Hillary should remain in the race, because it is simply not over.  If you disagree with this, go write those hundreds of spineless superdelegates who have remained strangely "neutral" at this point in the race.

by Sieglinde 2008-05-12 12:19PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't care what Obama wants

It's not "spinelessness," it's a real belief among many that they shouldn't influence the campaign any more than an average voter.

Others disagree.

Either way, why should a random DNC apparatchik risk getting stepped on while the titans clash? It's not their job.

Gooooooo Big Tent! Wooo!

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 12:22PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't care what Obama wants

But they have, as a group, influenced the campaign irreversibly.  Remember that Clinton, at the beginning, was riding this wave of inevitability, thanks to the support of a great majority of declared superdelegates.  Then, as the contest narrowed, hesitancy set in, and now, extreme cautiousness has led to this mess.

In the end, their votes are needed to determine the nominee.  I think it's not unreasonable to ask them under what criteria they'll be casting their vote with upon the conclusion of this fiasco.  If they say "popular vote" then they should declare so.  If they say "number of elected delegates" then they ought to fall in line with Obama now.  If they have other criteria, they ought to make it all public.

If there's some entity that's diminishing the potency of this Democratic tide, then it's the SPINELESS "undeclared" superdelegates, who seem out to protect their rear ends more than anything.

by Sieglinde 2008-05-12 01:02PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't care what Obama wants

But part of that was Clinton herself asking them to "keep their powder dry."

Let's face it, for most of these supers, Clinton was the safe answer, Obama an unknown with too many question marks. He didn't win everyone over, but it's still a remarkable feat that he won any of them over.

I think both Clinton and Obama are both super powerful in Democratic politics, this year and years to come. Anyone who thinks Obama loses the support he has, win or lose, or Clinton does the same, underestimates the level of support.

I don't think ANYONE was like this for any campaign losers... maybe with the exception of Dean. And it worked out well for Dean.

I think both Obama and Clinton will be playmakers and powerbrokers no matter how 08 pans out. Why get in the way of titans clashing?

by Lettuce 2008-05-12 01:06PM | 0 recs
Re: I don't care what Obama wants

"Why get in the way of titans clashing?"

I agree, but in the end, they'll be casting a vote, under some ad hoc criteria that will square off with their political interests and their continued influence in Democratic politics.

According to all reasonable counts, Obama has locked in the lead for the elected delegates, so if this is their criteria, they ought to declare it, and come out for Obama.  If it's the final popular vote tally, they ought to say so, and wait for that tally.  If it's the strength in battlground states like OH, PA, and FL, then they should back Clinton.

Why is it so hard for them to publicly enunciate their thought process in this nomination that pretends to be democratic?  Why is John Edwards keeping his vote secret?  Didn't he already vote in the NC primary?  He, like many others, are looking out for their own interests, instead of the interests of democracy-- all of us have agreed to vote in caucuses and primaries, with a clear notion of how our delegates will be partitioned.  The superdelegates should do the same, and publicly declare their criteria, so that we know that, while undemocratic, at least the process is fair.

by Sieglinde 2008-05-12 01:14PM | 0 recs
It's not hard to figure out why they're waiting...

they see Clinton with a stronger chance of winning the General than Obama, despite Obama's lead in pledge delegates, and they are scared to death of voting and is being manipulated by media spin. The democrats win or loss in the fall is in their hands. Heck, the faith of the world is in their hands right now and they know who is the stronger candidate, but like most democrats, are too wimpy to step up and say so.

Superdelegates core problem:
Primary Math = Obama Nomination/General Election Loss
Primary Math = Clinton Loss of Nomination/General Election Win

God's laughing his ass off somewhere.

by cosbo 2008-05-12 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: It's not hard to

I'll bet you $50 Obama beats McCain.

by danfromny 2008-05-12 01:37PM | 0 recs
I agree about the SuperD's

..being spineless. They are likely afraid of the "Judas" treatment, or bitter backlash from Clinton supporters until everyone has voted. It won't be long now, though.

by rhetoricus 2008-05-12 12:23PM | 0 recs
Re: I agree about the SuperD's

If I was a super, I would be in the Pelosi club. I may express my favor for Obama, but I would stress that my vote would go to the people's choice. Thus, my day of declaration would either be next week, or possibly June 4th.

That ain't spinelessness; it's respect for democratic principles.

by JoeFelice 2008-05-12 01:08PM | 0 recs
Re: I agree about the SuperD's

Has Pelosi actually explained how "the people's choice" will be determined?

If it's elected delegates, then they ought to just come out for Obama, who, by any measure, has mathematically won this metric.

If it's "popular vote", then they should say so now, and then wait for that final tally.

Much confusion and anxiety are caused by these enigmatic superdelegates who prefer to be courted by the two campaigns, with big promises for sure, rather than to put fairness to the fore.

In my book, they are spineless and slimy.

by Sieglinde 2008-05-12 01:18PM | 0 recs
Unfortunately,

"Popular vote" cannot be determined in caucus states (most of which Obama won), so the "popular vote" is not a true reflection of the whole country's preferences.

by rhetoricus 2008-05-12 01:50PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Besides, it seems like he could use the face time with voters in WV and KY.

I don't think Obama actually has a race problem so much as he has a regional problem. White voters out here in the Midwest really like him. Even Republican friends think he seems like a good guy. Maybe it's because his mother's from Kansas, I don't know, but he just connects very easily with people here. But they do not like him in Appalachia. Maybe it's partly racism, or xenophobia, or the elitist perception, or maybe his communication style just doesn't mesh with theirs so well. It's a big country, no one's style is going to resonate everywhere. But he could clearly use the practice relating to this region, this is a good opportunity to do it and he has the money anyway. He should go out there and talk to them, IMHO.

by tjekanefir 2008-05-12 12:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I agree, Obama should use every opportunity to meet voters.  With enough face-time, he could manage to persuade a few over.  He is a smart man (proven by how well he's done in this primary season), and he shows he is able to adjust his message where necessary.  I look forward to Clinton conceding and getting on the campaign trail to help Obama.  She will help him appeal to these voters (yes, she will because she's a Dem, first and wants us to win), and he'll adjust his message to reach out to them.

It is time for everyone to have faith in the Dem party!  We are going to win in 2008 and win BIG!

by citizensane 2008-05-12 12:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I think it's a synergy of racial tension and class struggles.  It's too bad that Obama got painted with the "elite" brush.

But, meh.

Let's have the vote, count 'em up, have a (relatively) poor news cycle for a few days and be done with it.  Same thing for Kentucky on the 20th-- but at least KY will be balanced out by Oregon.

And then Appalachia is over and done with, followed shortly by the remaining states.  We'll see what the narrative looks like then.

by bjones 2008-05-12 12:47PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Frankly, the HillBill show isn't relevant anymore so who cares what they do.

Look we all know that WV and Kentucky won't vote for a black guy anyway and since they and a good chunk of the south are destined to vote for McCain in the fall no matter who the DEM candidate is it just does not matter. The only interesting thing about either election tomorrow is the level of racism in those states and how the Clinton's will happily use it.

by mwfolsom 2008-05-12 12:20PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Could you please note down which states in the north will vote for a black guy so that we can focus on the correct states (based on your "all knowing" knowledge).

by Sandeep 2008-05-12 12:48PM | 0 recs
Obama's people already said

they'd be willing to take that chance. With the obviously consistent flow of SDs, it's becoming pretty obvious that he'd rather have this end.

Since the NC/IN primaries on 05/06, Obama has a net gain of 29 SDs, Clinton has a net gain of 2.

From DemConWatch:

5-12-08 - Added Rep. Tom Allen (ME) for Obama
  • Added DNC Dolly Strazar (HI) for Obama
  • Added Sen. Daniel Akaka (HI) for Obama
  • Added Idaho Democratic Party Chair DNC R. Keith Roark (ID) for Obama

5-11-08 - Added DNC Crystal Strait (CA) for Obama

5-10-08 - - Added new Utah addon Kristi Cumming(UT)# for Obama

  • Added DNC Carol Burke (VI) for Obama
  • Switched DNC Kevin Rodriguez (VI) from Clinton to Obama.
  • Added Ohio add-on Dave Regan (OH)# for Obama
  • Added Massachusetts add-on Arthur Powell (MA)# for Clinton
  • Added Rep. Harry Mitchell (AZ) for Obama

5-9-08 - Switched Rep. Donald Payne (NJ) from Clinton to Obama

  • Added Rep. Peter DeFazio (OR) for Obama
  • Added Rep. Chris Carney for Clinton
  • Added DNC John Gage (MD) for Obama
  • Added DNC Edward Espinoza (CA) (aka Mr. Super) for Obama
  • Added DNC Vernon Watkins (CA) for Obama
  • Added DNC Wilbur Lee Jeffcoat (SC) for Obama
  • Added New Mexico add-on Laurie Weahkee (NM)# for Obama
  • Added Rep. Mazie Hirono (HI) for Obama
  • Added DNC Joe Johnson (VA) for Obama. Obama campaign confirmed his endorsement.
  • Added Rep. Ciro Rodriguez (TX) for Clinton.

5-8-08 - Added Rep. Brad Miller (NC) for Obama
- Added Rep. Rick Larsen (WA) for Obama

5-7-08 - Added Rep. Heath Shuler (NC) for Clinton.

  • Added DNC Jerry Meek (NC) and DNC Inola Henry (CA) for Obama
  • Added add-on Dan Gelber (FL)# for Obama
  • Switched DNC Jennifer McClellan (VA) from Clinton to Obama after getting confirmation from the Obama campaign. We are awaiting confirmation from the Clinton campaign on Rep. Brad Ellsworth (IN) who reportedly endorsed her today.

5-6-08 - Added IL add-ons Barbara Flynn Currie (IL)# and Todd Stroger (IL)# for Obama.
- Added DNC Jeanette Council (NC) for Obama


by bookish 2008-05-12 12:21PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I think this is a lot more orchestrated at this point than we would like to recognize.  People keep reporting the Clinton knows it is over.  Several of her backers have said it will be over when the primaries are over (another wording for she cannot win).  Clinton has said her and Obama's campaign are in talks.  I imagine it has already been agreed on that she is ending her bid after a victory in Kentucky.

by cardboard 1 2008-05-12 12:22PM | 0 recs
With that said...

Obama should have been campaigning harder in West Virginia.  Taking a day off on Wednesday to spend with the kids is fine but why spend all of Thursday in D.C.?  Hillary spent some time in D.C. on Wednesday and still managed a trip to West Virginia.  Why take all of Mother's Day off?  Just take the kids with you to Wonderful West Virginia.

The spreadsheet projected a  56-44 loss; that result may have been conceivable had he campaigned there on Wednesday, Sunday, and spent more time there today.

Axelrod dropped the ball on this one in my opinion; I suppose it could be argued that what West Virgnia is for Hillary is what Iowa is to Obama (McCain didn't compete in those two states).

by Blazers Edge 2008-05-12 12:24PM | 0 recs
Obama may surprise you in WV, KY, etc.

People don't like voting for a loser, and whether she'll recognize it or not, Hillary has for all intents and purposes lost this race for the nomination.

I don't expect Obama to win, but I do think that anyone believing Hillary is going to win by 30 or 40 per cent in these last few states is deluding themselves.

by darthstar 2008-05-12 12:28PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Obama should want Clinton to stay because it is the right tihng to do. Let Clinton stay until June 3. There is nothing stopping the other DEmocrats from launching attacks  on McCain right now. Also there is nothing stopping Hillary to start attacking McCain to a greater degree.

by Pravin 2008-05-12 12:28PM | 0 recs
except....


Also there is nothing stopping Hillary to start attacking McCain to a greater degree.

...except, of course, herself.

by Casuist 2008-05-12 12:39PM | 0 recs
I don't think it matters if she stays, but she

should if she wants to and stays positive. Obama losing WV and KY with or without Hillary still in the race doesn't make a difference I think.

As for spending time in WV, I think he's there today, and he has really done a lot since NC/IN. His visit to Washington was very successful, talking to superdelegates and more important making it clear he was the presumptive nominee without saying so. He's also made a successful pivot into general election mode, setting up strategy, proposing the town hall meetings with McCain, and announcing trips to MI and FL.

I do wish he'd spent a little more time in WV, but frankly he's not going to convince many people there that aren't presently going to vote for him in the week that he had. It's going to take a lot more than that to sway some people.

I'm glad to see things settling down. Hillary should be congratulated on her big win tomorrow. I'm going to try to be patient, despite the tendency to want this over, for the next 3 weeks.

by Travis Stark 2008-05-12 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Yep, I would not be surprised if:
There are superdelegates that have told Obama that they support him
Have given him the option to reveal them at the time he thinks best
Obama has decided not to announce a lot of the names until after June 3rd

There will still be dissent when he wins the nomination, but there will be less opportunity to say that Hillary was forced out too early.

by My Ob 2008-05-12 12:31PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It is really stunning to me at this point, whether Hillary is in or out, that Obama the supposed nominee and frontrunner is still getting beat by huge numbers anywhere in the waning days of the primaries.  In what universe does that happen?  What does it say about Obama's candidacy. Not much and a whole lot at the same time.

If Huckabee was winning more states at the end of the republican primaries than McCain, what would we be thinking about the republicans and McCain?  We would be thinking maybe the republicans made a mistake and don't really want their presumptive nominee.

by Scotch 2008-05-12 12:34PM | 0 recs
It says that...

this was a close race all the way but Obama won. There is no rule that all Primaries have to end in a blow out. Get the majority of the delegates and move on....that's what Obama did.

This was a historical race .... Obama gets more credit for having won the most hard fought Primary in a long time...in my book.

Since when is a win downgraded just because it was close?

by JoeCoaster 2008-05-12 12:43PM | 0 recs
Re: It says that...

In an election, perception is what matters.  I am just commenting on how it looks to the innocent GE bystander, and how it actually looks to me.  It looks pretty interestingly odd at this late date.  Like I said.

by Scotch 2008-05-12 12:46PM | 0 recs
innocent GE bystanders..

are NOT paying attention to the WV Democratic primary. They don't start paying attention until after the party conventions.

That's why Obama is smart not to use up resources to close the WF gap. No one will remember what happened there a few months from now.

by JoeCoaster 2008-05-12 01:24PM | 0 recs
Re: innocent GE bystanders..

In this election people are more aware of everything and you can believe that the process that took place in the primary will be talked about and reported on way past the convention in August.

by Scotch 2008-05-12 01:45PM | 0 recs
Re: innocent GE bystanders..

Well, either candidate will lose West Virginia and Kentucky by double-digits. So whatever.

by brimur 2008-05-12 02:06PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

by Zeitgeist9000 2008-05-12 12:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Since I obviously had a lot to say there, I'll finish with this: this election is in the hands of the superdelegates now.

Sincerely,

Zeitgeist9000

My Representative Democracy

by Zeitgeist9000 2008-05-12 12:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

As it would have been even if a candidate won a 24-point delegate margin in every single state.

Being "in the hands of the superdelegates" basically just means it wasn't an utter blowout.

by ChrisKaty 2008-05-12 12:57PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It is in their hands and they are doing a great job!

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:18PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I could see if WV was a home state for one of the  candidates accounting for why now Hillary is ahead-- but it's very embarrassing for Obama when neither candidate have a real connection to the state and he is still so far behind after the media coverage that has been bestowed upon him since NC.

He has been literally named the nominee by the media and he's still going to get trounced in WV?

It's gonna be a long, rough general and road to the WH is all I have to say.

by GregNYC 2008-05-12 12:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Clinton performed very well in every rural county in other states that border West Virginia (and Kentucky), reaching 90% in a couple of them.  This is not a surprise to anyone.  Believe it or not, people vote for who they want to regardless of what the media says.  Huckabee won two states after McCain cleaned up on Super Tuesday, and came close in two others, despite the media saying McCain was too far ahead to lose.

But if you insist on believing that this means Obama is a weak candidate then there's nothing that I could say to convince you.

by Skaje 2008-05-12 12:43PM | 0 recs
Since NC?

You mean all of 6 days ago? Give me a break! Obama had no time to make up ground in WV and Hillary is still running hard. Obama is wisely focusing on the bigger picture.

All GE's have been long and rough in case you haven't noticed.

by JoeCoaster 2008-05-12 12:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

He has been literally named the nominee by the media and he's still going to get trounced in WV?

The temptation of course is to say that in the 50 state strategy, WV and KY will be among the last 10 to go blue. In 2008, they're not going to beat Obama in the primary or the general, but we still need to take them seriously and make all the inroads we can.  Hillary is no doubt much much stronger in the dominant demographic of these states, but McCain still beats her handily there.

by obsessed 2008-05-12 01:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I personally feel that with so few states left, it is to Obama's advantage to campaign hard in them.  Clinton dropping out now would remove that incentive.  The last two states are just three weeks away.  We can wait a little longer.

by Skaje 2008-05-12 12:47PM | 0 recs
Could Obama be throwing WV?

Just a thought, but I've been wondering why he hasn't been campaigning there at all.  Maybe he decided that the extra delegate or two he could gain wouldn't be as important as letting Clinton have a nice, easy victory in a state in order to start to lower tensions.  It's just a thought.

by thezzyzx 2008-05-12 12:48PM | 0 recs
Re: Could Obama be throwing WV?

I think he's damned if he campaigns there and damned if he doesn't.

With no realistic expectation of winning there, spending a lot of resources only to get stomped makes him look weak.  Not spending resources there makes people say, "what if he spent time/money in WV?"

At least it gives us something to talk about on Wednesday!

by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow 2008-05-12 01:30PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't think it particularly matters to Obama whether Clinton stays or not at this point.

Losing to someone not in the race? It's happened.

Nobody but the most hardcore of political junkies would even notice or care.

by KyleJRM 2008-05-12 12:49PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Is Hillary staying to prepare for a run as an independent?

by CMFost23 2008-05-12 12:55PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

No, she's a DEM first and foremost.  She and her husband have done a lot for the party and the party's done a lot for them.  She being the pro and loyal dem she is, will campaign her heart out for Obama.  That alone will change some votes to Obama in the GE.  I have faith in her abilities.  Why don't more of you die-hard Hillary fans, too?  She is already toning done her rhetoric.  When she concedes, it'll be a very conciliatory session and onward towards getting the Dem (Obama)elected.  I can only hope some of you supporters will take your cue from her and do your best to help the Dems take back the W.H.

by citizensane 2008-05-12 01:03PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It would be great if she did that.  But she hasn't conceded once or even congratulated Obama on any of his wins since mid-February.  I doubt she has the class to do as you say.  Nor do most of her supporters.

by crackerdog 2008-05-12 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I've already said I think she may.  And the impact of that would be a McCain victory.  In her mind, this is the second best outcome.  That's been clear for a VERY long time now.  The Clintons care about one thing and one thing only, the Clintons.  This is about her now, not about her being a Democrat.  She's flipped the party the bird any number of times these last few months.  Black voters aren't important, winning delegates isn't important, playing by the rules isn't important, she should be anointed by party insiders!  And if she isn't...  I wouldn't be surprised if she ran as an indy.  And I wouldn't be surprised if this site supported her to the detriment of the Democratic party.  

by crackerdog 2008-05-12 01:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Is Obama staying to prepare to run for the Republican nomination?

That's about as likely as your argument.

by VAAlex 2008-05-12 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Actually, I think that might be more likely than HRC running as an independent ;-)

by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow 2008-05-12 01:32PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

What do you base that on? Both have said they'll campaign for the eventual winner.

by VAAlex 2008-05-12 02:52PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I agree.  Was just saying (poorly) that HRC will run as an independent about the same time pigs start flying.  

She is a Dem, she says she will campaign for the Dem in November.  We should all take her at her word.

Sorry, did not mean to confuse.

by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow 2008-05-12 06:29PM | 0 recs
It really sank Clinton

in 1992 when Tsongas won New York after dropping out.

Biggest embarrassment ever!  How would the Governor of Arkansas win over coastal Democratic voters in November?

The end is near!

by BWasikIUgrad 2008-05-12 01:04PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

As long as the superdelegates continue to flow to Obama, even after the meaningless contest in West AppalachiaLand, nobody cares.  And they will.

I think it's great that Hillary is staying in the race.  I just hope Bill and her plan on paying off those debts themselves.  It ain't going to be pretty.

by crackerdog 2008-05-12 01:05PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

The Clintons' wealthy "friends" will pay off her campaign debt later this year -- after they know they aren't pouring money into a bottomless pit of self indulgence.

by Kobi 2008-05-12 01:17PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Bill can do a few $1,000,000 speeches and they'll be fine.  I think her friends may just be tapped out.  Really, after this is decided, why would even her "friends" give her more money?

by crackerdog 2008-05-12 01:29PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Because some people have more money than brains?

by Kobi 2008-05-12 02:47PM | 0 recs
keep on stalking me loser

I can play that game too.

by zerosumgame 2008-05-12 04:50PM | 0 recs
Re: keep on stalking me loser

You already have been. I suggest we both ignore each other.

by Kobi 2008-05-12 05:05PM | 0 recs
Applaud Clinton's Win Vociferously...

congratulate her on a well-played primary contest, and then focus on McCain.

This is what I hope Obama will do early Tuesday night.  Let Clinton bask for an evening in a show of her campaign's still considerable support.  It does nothing to hurt his lock on the nomination.  But keep the focus on McCain.  McCain, McCain, McCain... and all the reasons why he's a dangerous demogogue.

I want the Clinton supporters to know that this Obama supporter remains fully cognizant of her strength as a campaigner.  You can be a strong politician and still lose the nomination.

by bjones 2008-05-12 01:12PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

This subject of this diary was pointed out last week by pundits immediately after Obama's big Tuesday.

I and others have said it here as well.

The point has never been Hillary remaining a candidate or not. It's been the scurrilous and divisive tactics she employs -- in a lost cause no less.

by Kobi 2008-05-12 01:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

How would it look?

It would like they were all a bunch of dead-ender hillbillies.

That wouldn't be true, of course, but that's how it would look.

Just like when Puerto Rico votes in favor of Hillary also.  They'll look like a bunch of clueless islanders, isolated from the mainstream of American politics, if she has given up her pointless quest.

That wouldn't be true either, but that's the impression that would be left.

So, I agree, Hillary should stay in.  Even with a $20 million campaign debt.  Rock on, Dona Quixote!  Keep tilting at those windmills!

We don't want to make fellow Democratic voters look like dummies.

by Reluctantpopstar 2008-05-12 01:15PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Puerto Rico is not going to go for Hillary.

Michelle and Chelsea will be on the island tomorrow.

For some reason the front page picture shows Barack and

Michelle. Do the math Hillary supporters.

http://www.elnuevodia.com/diario/noticia portada/noticias/duelo__entre_amazonas 403944

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:20PM | 0 recs
A super delegate for Hillary in Puerto Rico

says he doesn't know if Hillary should stay in the race.

http://www.elnuevodia.com/diario/noticia /politica/noticias/debe_seguir_en_la_luc ha/404072

Hoy, Cifuentes, quien es superdelegado por Maryland, y Machado se encontraban en el Capitolio. Según el ex secretario de la Gobernación bajo la gobernación de Pedro Rosselló, su presencia en la Casa de las Leyes se debía a que estaba "ayudando al liderato a insertar a la diáspora en lor proceso políticos".

¿Debe retirarse Hillary Clinton?, se le preguntó.
Sorpresivamente, Cifuentes contestó: "no sé qué decirte".

Translation:

Today, Cifuentes who is a Super Delegate from Maryland and Machado were in the Capitol building. Acording to the ex secretary of past Gobernor Pedro Rossello his presence in the House of Laws (Capitol) was due to the fact that he was helping the local leadership in a political process.

Should Hillary Clinton drop out of the race? he was asked
Surprisingly, Cifuentes answered : "I don't know what to tell you"

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:29PM | 0 recs
Re: A super delegate for Hillary in Puerto Rico

I'm just saying.

Spin does not equal fact.

by spacemanspiff 2008-05-12 01:30PM | 0 recs
And another thing...

Both those polls show convincing wins but do you realize that anything less than a 70-30 now actually makes her winning the nomination MORE DIFFICULT?  With few races remaining, she must take all of them by 70% to gain ground.  And these are the most favorable matchups remaining and she's below the threshold she needs to pick up ground toward the nomination even there.  Sorry but that's how the math works.

As Don Meredith used to sing on Monday Night Football...  "Turn out the lights, the party's oooooooover."

by crackerdog 2008-05-12 01:25PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

That's how he won he's always won - uncontested. Remember Alice Palmer and then Jack Ryan?

by Swing Vote 2008-05-12 01:27PM | 0 recs
re

Alan Keyes might as well have been uncontested too

by rossinatl 2008-05-12 01:35PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Is that why HRC lost all those states, she did not contest them?  If she wanted the nomination, she really should have done more campaigning I guess.

I kid, I kid.

by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow 2008-05-12 01:36PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I guess Hillary should have done a bit more contesting, then. Do we really want a candidate such as Hillary that won't contest her opponent?

by Aris Katsaris 2008-05-12 02:07PM | 0 recs
agree with the diarist

Hillary is indeed doing Obama a very valuable service by staying in through WV, KY and PR. And to her credit, she's taking all sorts of heat for staying in, while Obama benefits. Note that none of that heat is coming from the Obama campaign, which is sitting back and waiting patiently for OR, MT, and SD.

It would have been quite a bit better all the way around if Hillary hadn't thrown in the "hard-working white people" line, but that's now water under the bridge.

In the future, my hope is that Hillary and Bill will play a healing role and help their hard-working rural white constituents understand that Obama, and not McCain, is the best advocate for their interests, and best by a "country mile".

McCain's corporate economic positions are pure poison to the very demographic that will deliver Hillary's upcoming 3 landslide victories.

by obsessed 2008-05-12 01:34PM | 0 recs
Re: agree with the diarist

Amen!  You are helping the healing process with this comment.  I do believe the Clintons will help Obama, and I think Obama will absorb all the advice they can offer him about reaching out to this particular demographic.

Dems in the W.H., majority Senate and majority House in 08!

by citizensane 2008-05-12 03:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Maybe that's one of the reason's Obama has never asked her to drop out

by Djo 2008-05-12 01:39PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

Meh, Huckabee won a state or two after he'd dropped out, didn't he? "Electability" is no longer an issue in the general election. Nobody's going to vote for McCain over Obama because they think that certain regional or socioeconomic groups will refuse to vote for Obama.

I think the important point Todd might be breezing over a bit too quickly is that Hillary staying in is only even marginally theoretically beneficial if she plays nice... which she hasn't been, and which she honestly COULDN'T if she wanted to, because there are plenty of supporters out there who will fight tooth and nail until she finally concedes. (Anyone who glances at the Rec list on this site could quickly come up with a few examples.)

As long as Hillary is in the race even nominally, there are going to be a fair amount of DEMOCRATIC ACTIVISTS spending a lot of energy making Obama look bad. Heck, even if she dropped out today I'm not sure Alegre and some others would have time to come around to Obama's camp before the general.

I think the best solution I've heard so far is for Clinton to take her wins tomorrow and on the 20th and then bow out gracefully on a high note: she can concede in a state she's just won in a landslide, and in so doing make it clear that she's made this decision not out of weakness or inadequacy, but as a strong tactical decision to do what's best for the Democratic party and for the nation.

by ZombieRoboNinja 2008-05-12 01:43PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

People supporting a candidate until s/he conceeds is politics.  It's democracy.  Too bad it takes away from one candidate or another, it's part of the process as it stands.

by Scotch 2008-05-12 01:48PM | 0 recs
Too bad her accountant already conceded.

The accountant has gone from, "Run Away! Run Away!" to "Goodbye cruel world, I'm leaving you today. Goodbye, Goodbye, Goodbye. Goodbye,."

Now if only only Hillary Clinton would get the hint. "Presidential campaigns don't end, they just run out of money."

by Tumult 2008-05-12 02:11PM | 0 recs
Re: Too bad her accountant already conceded.

This is traumatic for you guys, isn't it.

by Scotch 2008-05-12 02:38PM | 0 recs
Re: Too bad her accountant already conceded.

Not really.  Mildly amusing to be honest.  Sad sometimes depedning on how ugly and biased Democrats are being.  A little frustrating when the pundits and talking heads do  a hit piece over factual analasys, on any candidate. Or promote sensationalism.  But why should it be traumatic, I am supporting the guy in the lead, I have no reason to believe it will change, but if it does I will be no worse off then I am now, and will still be able to get out of bed the next morning and go about my life.  And I have no problem with moving to Canada if I need to.

by Tumult 2008-05-12 03:14PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I don't think that Hillary, as of yet, is doing any favors for Obama.

WV and Kentucky (never lived in WV did live in Louisville for a couple of years) wins won't change what is already done.

The game has been played and as long as no one is changing the rules after the fact, something that some would like to see, it has been won.  

Of course that is the crux of it no?  As long as the media and parrots buy the talking points that there is still some plays left to be played there is still a change.  Of course this doesn't change the fact that a touchdown will bring you close to the final score, it still isn't enough to win.

Obama has won the game, and he did so against very very extreme odds.  You can spin it however makes you feel better but a black man running against a Clinton for the democratic nomination...that is some pretty long odds.

I do not belittle what Hillary has done, but the name in and of itself and her entire political machine has been built over a few decades.  She was and is an intrinsic part of the Washington machine.

Which in this election is a liability.

Politics is broken.  Fundamentally so.  Obama is changing the rules from large donors to small.  I wonder if the powers that be would have ever pushed to make public the internet if they had known what kind of effect it would have on the establishment...

Despite having very good Clinton years in this country, I just can not see putting someone else in the WhiteHouse that is a product of such a broken system.

Change has to happen.  And not just more of the same in a new pant suit.

by Phidget 2008-05-12 02:08PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

It's bad enough for Obama that he hasn't been able to completely shut the door on Hillary, though he has been proclaimed the presumptive nominee by most of the left blogosphere and the media for weeks now...if he were still to lose big after she dropped out it would expose his weaknesses even more glaringly...

by SaveElmer 2008-05-12 03:46PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I'm confused....
 Does Obama really want Hillary to stay in the race? I thought he was trying to force Hillary out of the race early! I'm just a high school graduate who gets all tired out from my hard work down at the factory. No wait, that hasn't been true since NAFTA. Let me try that again... I'm just a shiftless welfare cheat selling crack cocaine and waiting for my reparations... No, that's not believable - welfare reform has my baby momma working 3 jobs to support me.

Well, in any case - pick a story and stick to it, the constant changing makes it too complicated! I can't decide which one not to believe the most.

by xdem 2008-05-12 04:13PM | 0 recs
Re: Why Obama Wants Clinton To Stay In

I expect this site, and the crazy Hillary supporters on it, to continue in this vein for the next four years, arguing that Hillary should have been President, would have been President if we used the old Russian system, and finally, that Hillary is actually the President!

You all need meds!

by dhfsfc 2008-05-12 04:40PM | 0 recs
Weak reasoning by a weak candidate....

... the voters and the superdelegates are SO fooled by this strategy!  

by Molee 2008-05-12 06:41PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads


----------- myDD - skin -----------