No, those are actual votes.

Remember, this is Wyoming. I spent two decades living in different parts of that state. There are domociles where the closest neighbor is about thirty miles away. There are towns with a population of 2.

There are a total of 319 delegates to the State Convention in Jackson Hole during Memorial Day Weekend.

Looks to me like Clinton did best in the badlands and the red desert.

Thanks, I'll check it out.

Isn't Webb on Hillary's side?

If not he would be the best VP

Or there is no politics of fear, and we have another state being taken by Sen Obamas superior caucusing strategy.

Which of course doesn't mean he didn't win. But no need to try to smear the other side.

It is the number of state convention delegates who will in turn elect the actual convention delegates.

Go check on politico, it has an auto refreshing site. They have 6715 votes so far.

What difference does it make ?

Do you suggest that the Democratic party not hold nominating contests in certain states?

And, besides, there are elections when one candidate wins a huge number of the states, including ones that the other party typically wins: 1964, 1972, 1984.

It is fairly doubtful that WY would go to a Democrat, but then again they have elected Dems statewide recently.  Their Governor is a Democrat.

How long did it take before Wyoming was reduced to insignificance? The latte-sippers in Teton County haven't even caucused yet and you've alright consigned the Equality State to irrelevance. Oh the tragedy!

He can narrow the margin, make the democratic brand non-toxic, and get Trauner elected to congress.

So, yes, Wyoming does matter at the Presidential level.

it's NOT just about the general election!!!

It's unlikely that either Obama or Clinton could actually win a state like Wyoming. But do you even care if it's competitive?

A more competitive race does two things:
1. Forces the GOP to spend money they can't afford to spend on a state that Bush carried without breaking a sweat. Expanding the map is a good thing, especially considering our superior financial position.

2. It betters our chances on down-ticket races. If candidates like Scott Kleeb are going to have any chance, we need as many Democrats as possible to turn out. It appears so far that Obama can accomplish that better than Clinton, ergo, I want Obama to win.

I think South Dakota and/or Montana have caucuses, but I'm not sure. Puerto Rico just moved to a primary.

Yes, it is.

And I don't know if there's anything to this, but I noticed it on CNN, and I've seen it in other states: how many times has Senator Clinton gotten 60% or above against Obama? Counties or Statewide. He's winning 6 (I think, it may be 5 or 7) counties in Wyoming by 60% or better.

Just throwing that out there.

And in the Washington primary she got 46% to his 51%. Forgot that one.

Of all these states the only ones that matter (or may matter in GE) are Washington, Colorado.

In the SUSA general election 50 state poll, Obama wins WA and OR and Clinton loses both.

The blatant misogyny of Maher is disgusting. He played a clip from her book about finding out about Lewinsky as a sign of her leadership.

You know you are an asshat when Joe Scarborough thinks you have crossed a line.

Oh noes!

http://plush-life.blogspot.com/

It kind of doesn't. It's a margin of 3 delegates and like a thousand in the popular vote. Big whoop-de-do.

So now you are pinning your hopes that the MSM become mathletes?

No, the superd's are now waiting for Pennsylvania. If she wins big there and takes over the popular vote lead, it's anyone's game and the superd's want to be in a position to play kingmaker. If I were a superd (and I know many uncommitted ones) I would sit tight and not answer the phone until June.

Tha'ts your problem, not mine. After her endorsement of McCain, she remains Zellary Lieberton to me always.

Scream, cry foul, call names, generalize .... make wild accusations without proof over and over, then say "see it's a pattern", accuse the other party of EXACTLY what you are doing - and in general be very prejudging.

Hmmm, sounds like a Republican to me!

Tim Kaine is the better pick. IT solidifies VA.

Whoever did the electoral math for Obamamakes Chuck Todd look like a rank amateur.

How come?

Most members of the DNC in the states Hillary won were put there by Bill.

I thought everybody understood that.

yeah cause her husband isn't the last elected democratic president.

yeah she didn't have over 150 super delegates lined up before one vote was cast.

the advantages obama has he has built from scratch. like this win. his grassroots ground game is killing her. please the gatecrasher is obama.

       Clinton Obama
Gov.    10    11
Sen.    13    15
Rep.    72    70
DPL    10    4
DNC    138    101
Add-Ons    0    2

Note the nearly 40+ lead in DNC Superdelegates. You want to say again how Clinton isn't the establishment candidate?

Also, Obama is averaging over 40,000 online donaitons per day. If the average donation size of ~$75 from February holds up, that's just above $3,000,000 per day. That would put Obama at over $24,000,000 so far this month.

Can we actually stop counting state delegates as popular vote totals. Yes, if you want to be technical, the state delegate percentage was roughly 18%. But you know the vote differential that separated them, roughly 1400 state delegates.

This is why caucus' suck, no matter who wins them. If you're being intellectually honest, tell me that Obama would win the same percentage in a primary as he would in a caucus. It just wouldn't happen.

Whose predictions would those be? Yours?

Asking a HRC supporter to be fair?  Good luck with that.

I'm about ready to ditch this blog due to the complete bias and incoherence of Hillary supporters.  Most are as irrational as their Republican counterparts.

If this blog is any indication, HRC supporters want her or nothing.

Disgusting.

What? Because she won't surrender? Are you serious? So if Sen Obama won't agree to sit the delegates based on the current votes then he is not uniting the party? Both arguments are bogus, imo.

Both sides have to come up with a compromise they both find acceptable. No need to try to spin either side as evil for trying to get something that makes sense for them.

Sure, sure, its over. She'll drop out any minute.

Pledged Delegates - +1 Obama (After you factor in Texas Caucus and California Recount)

Super Delgates - Depends on whose estimate you trust but my closest estimate is +14 Obama

Total - +15 Obama

I guess some people believe that their state of disillusionment is sacred and that everybody who tries to pull them into reality is a troll.

broken link with no information in the post. x-posted.

Clinton herself has rejected the idea of a re-vote in FL, and rejected caucuses in MI (of course, now her surrogates may have done their typical 180 on that idea).  If you're going to spin, spin honestly.

How did she cut in with his expect momentum in Wyoming?

Railroadign through caucuses eh?

How about railroading through with SD's, you think t hat one is better.

Sorry.  Let me be more specific.  I'm trying to understand if state delegate equivalents = individual votes in Wyoming.